throbber
PE
`
`CASE REPORTS
`
`
`
`Treatment of Therapy-Resistant
`Perineal Metastatic Crohn's Disease
`After Proctectomy Using Anti-Tumor
`Necrosis Factor Chimeric Monoclonal
`Antibody, cA2
`Report of Two Cases
`Hendrik M. van Dullemen, Ph.D.,* Ella de Jong, M.D.,t Frederik Slors, Ph.a.f
`Guido N. J. Tytgat, Ph.D.,* Sander J. H. van Deventer, Ph.D.*
`From the Departments of *Gastroenterology and Hepatology and I-Surgery, Academic Medical Center.
`Amsterdam, The Netherlands
`
`PURPOSE: Two young females with well-documented
`Crohn's disease and nonhealing perineal wounds following
`proctectomy compatible with "metastatic Crohn's disease"
`are described. We hypothesized that metastatic Crohn's
`disease would be a tumor necrosis factor-dependent inflam-
`matory reaction and have treated these two patients with
`the anti-tumor necrosis factor chimeric monoclonal anti-
`body, cA2. MAIN FINDINGS: Administration of cA2 was
`followed by a rapid reduction of subjective and objective
`parameters of inflammation and caused a substantial reduc-
`tion of the wound size. CONCLUSION: These preliminary
`data are consistent with a tumor necrosis factor-dependent
`inflammatory cause of Crohn's disease and its extraintesti-
`nal manifestations and provide support for targeting tumor
`necrosis factor in this condition. (Key words: Crohn's dis-
`ease, metastatic; Anti-tumor necrosis factor chimeric mono-
`clonal antibody; Proctectomy; Perinea! wound; Tumor ne-
`crosis factor]
`van Dullemen HM, de Jong E, Slors F, Tytgat GNJ, van
`Deventer SJH. Treatment of therapy-resistant perinea! met-
`astatic Crohn's disease after proctectomy using anti-tumor
`necrosis factor chimeric monoclonal antibody, cA2: report
`of two cases. Dis Colon Rectum 1998;41:98-102.
`
`herapy-resistant Crohn's disease of the distal
`large bowel may necessitate proctocolectomy. A
`major complication of this procedure is delayed per-
`Meal wound-healing, which is a particularly notorious
`event after proctectomy in patients with pre-existent
`
`Address reprint requests to Dr. van Dullemen: Department of Gas-
`troenterology and Hepatology, Academic Hospital Groningen, P.O.
`Box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.
`
`perianal Crohn's disease and a major cause of dixi
`ity in these patients. t 2 Keighley and Allan' repo.
`70 percent of 27 proctectomies in patients
`Crohn's disease had persistent sinuses. Scammellk
`Keighley'' report on 112 proctectomies for *-
`with Crohn's disease, of which 21 patients had:
`layed healing that was observed beyond nneyla
`10 patients whose perineal wounds never healed
`notorious cause of delayed healing is "melt
`Crohn's disease," which is thought to be rebind
`remaining foci of granulomatous inflamrnatimit
`agement of patients with metastatic Crohn's dig
`following proctocolectomy is usually difficult- Stm
`cal treatment is associated with a high recurrences
`and no satisfactory medical treatment is know -
`ing of severe perineal and cutaneous Crohn'sthse'
`
`with hyperbaric oxygen has been described.!'
`patient with perineal Crohn's disease that Novo-
`sponsive to surgical and medical therapy for
`years was reported to have a dramatic response
`hyperbaric oxygen therapy.s A group of six Pane'
`with perinea! and perivaginal fistulas, desPiteaPP,
`priate antibiotics and surgery, received hYllefb
`oxygen treatment twice per day, six days Per aT
`for four weeks. All six improved during a folio
`\I'
`period of 18 months, but the fistulas did pot In
`completely.'
`(cid:9) may be useful in the ire'
`
`98
`
`Ex. 1022 - Page 1
`
`

`

`Vol. 41, No. 1
`
`ANTI-TNF FOR METASTATIC CROHN'S DISEASE (cid:9)
`
`99
`
`ment of fistulous Crohn's disease, but its therapeutic
`efficacy in metastatic Crohn's disease is unknown.
`Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) is a proinflammatory
`cvtokine that is necessary for formation of granulo-
`mas, in part through induction of monocyte chemoat-
`tractant protein-1.7-10 We hypothesized that meta-
`static Crohn's disease would be a TNF-dependent
`inflammatory reaction and have treated two patients
`who developed granulomatous inflammation and
`nonhealing perineal wounds following proctectomy
`using a chimeric anti-TNF monoclonal antibody. We,
`here, report the clinical responses of these patients
`following this treatment.
`
`REPORT OF CASES
`Case 1
`A 25-year-old female had well-documented Crohn's
`disease since 1988. In 1989, she underwent a subtotal
`colectomy and ileostomy because of severe colonic
`inflammation and perianal fistulas that were refractory
`to treatment. Initially, the symptoms improved and
`the perianal lesions healed. In 1991, continuity of the
`
`bowel was restored. Unfortunately, the severe ped-
`anal fistulas recurred, for which an ileostomy was
`performed in 1992. Despite this treatment, the peri-
`anal fistulas persisted, and eventually an intersphinc-
`teric proctectomy was performed. Following this pro-
`cedure, a progressive perineal defect developed,
`originating from the vicinity of the incision, compli-
`cated by discharge of pus and intractable pain. In-
`spection under general anesthesia revealed no signs
`of persistent fistulas or abscesses (Fig. 1). Biopsies
`taken from the base of the defect showed inflamma-
`tion and noncaseating granulomas (Fig. 2). The clin-
`ical course and histology was considered to be com-
`patible with extraintestinal Crohn's or "metastatic
`Crohn's" disease. Treatment with hyperbaric oxygen
`failed. Because of the unresponsive disabling disease,
`the possibility of anti-TNF treatment was discussed
`with the patient. After informed consent was ob-
`tained, a single intravenous infusion of the anti-TNF
`chimeric monoclonal antibody (cA2, Centocor Inc.,
`Malvem, PA) at a dose of 10 mg/kg was administered
`as a two-hour infusion. A second dose of cA2 (20
`mg/kg) was infused four months later. The appropri-
`
`Figure 1. Inspection of the perineal wound of patient 1 under general anesthesia before the first infusion with cA2. Note
`the large defect with swollen edges. A small satellite lesion is seen.
`
`Ex. 1022 - Page 2
`
`

`

`Ills Colon Rectum,JanuarylyrA
`
`4
`
`100
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•••d1/
`
`VAN DULLEMEN ET AL
`.
`- rair-a . .4a.; r (cid:9)
`--'...la V: 4 ?s. 4:w. •fi-.;:e...1f,N ,;'Ti.,'' ,'394.:1,-, (cid:9)
`-t v , . (cid:9) ..,.
`.": (cid:9)
`.M.XIIIP",.,
`•;;C-11'_Ol .11 .4.0 Vrk • . A ..I' 4 (cid:9)
`... .... ., (cid:9)
`...,*.111,,,,..1,•. ,e,,
`eyr.s - (cid:9)
`t' , ;..... (cid:9)
`..:4' .`" ' ••••••(,..`• '-'. '4,' • 't
`t (cid:9)
`I olL ., • • 1 h , • (cid:9)
`•
`1.• A. P; (cid:9)
`./ .41. • -.0,',"
`• '- :Al.,'" 4 (cid:9)
`2:-.' 111,11;•.‘VJA61.'1'"% 4-P 3 ..;' * (cid:9)
`r.....,• , • 4
`'D-r-• ''' • f a-
`• • '
`•
`• • 1.1•041.4
`?4ilyidt_zif (cid:9)
`_;,...11:
`. t...1:1;a:
`j!..7 ;•.;;I:::-1.7."*.: ' A '.
`• .1.•
`,•• (cid:9)
`, ..
`, ....
`- 4 *ill, f‘!• t I. ' (cid:9)
`f‘ PI.( (cid:9)
`(cid:9) #
`.. • v. t -,, . 4,. - ,
`".t, {f; is
`'..t4'is,/4 h (cid:9)
`(cid:9) -. (cid:9)
`, u -1--:?-%. ' I tt' •- •1' ' c''" ' - ' • •
`. , .•":. - (cid:9)
`.::'',4 • ••!'-. 't 7
`• • , (cid:9)
`- .-... z
`'-'4"Tw • 4.14 " (cid:9)
`' '' ' (cid:9)
`';'• i
`4.7'n'..„ I - ..; '''.' • -1,,',...'.• 4,
`kal " V" 1 • •• ' ': .. • It • .•/, (cid:9)
`l' •
`-%‘.. •';4-A 1‘;,*.:"..'' A • (cid:9)
`-
`-,,:-..., - 4 •r (cid:9)
`.7z 'T. (cid:9)
`• ,rf- .''
`.„. • -‘,"T. ,-.A-.„.„;PATc " -.., ^ ,, : ,r
`";*..-4,P*'..., ' .0
`'C ;:i1,-'41.1‘1"q".1 I , .1 . 1..ig ' t't .
`i": . (cid:9)
`';" . • ' ;
`-.• (cid:9)
``. 'i ':' k - ' ' - • . (cid:9)
`''''' .."..k • /),.A? .P1 , (cid:9)
`-
`Jo-. 1.• •
`. (cid:9) 44 ' (cid:9)
`"A" (cid:9)
`
`4.7,4'1•
`
`Tr
`.
`• 0.84: Ir!"
`»qr t' •
`•
`
`y' '5
`
`• : . •
`
`_ (cid:9)
`•
`
`. (cid:9)
`
`)- ?..,04i....ki''..,-s (cid:9)
`.. (cid:9)
`/..,... , ...: ....w . (cid:9)
`4,... L .. (cid:9)
`.. (cid:9)
`• -; (cid:9)
`$ •
`r•• (cid:9)
`• (cid:9) "
`• • (cid:9)
`. (cid:9)
`
`.
`
`• (cid:9)
`
`.
`.
`
`,
`
`• • ,
`
`t (cid:9)
`
`X , (cid:9)
`
`•
`
`• (cid:9)
`
`•
`
`• (cid:9)
`
`.•• (cid:9)4
`
`d • (cid:9)
`
`• •
`
`" • " ) (cid:9)
`
`)..f •fi
`
`/11.
`
`•
`
`.. (cid:9)
`Jik ' .e° a . (cid:9)
`
`: (cid:9)
`
`:, ,
`.• , (cid:9)
`.0'• — 'kJ' ies_ ' (cid:9)
`' •
`-
`, (cid:9)
`• (cid:9)
`Figure 2. Biopsy taken from the base of the wound of patient 1 before the first cA2 infusion.
`granulomas (arrow) are seen. (Flematoxylin and eosin; x180.)
`
`Severe inflammation and
`
`CRP mg/t
`70
`
`60
`
`50
`
`20
`
`10
`
`pre (cid:9)
`wk 1
`o (cid:9)
`Figure 3. C-reactive protein (CRP)
`
`wk 2 (cid:9)
`
`wk 3 (cid:9)
`wk 4
`following cA2 infusions of patient 1.
`
`ate amount of cA2 was withdrawn through a 0.2-mM
`low-protein binding sterile filter, diluted with 0.9 M
`saline to a total volume of 300 ml. The concomitant
`medication consisted of diclofenac, morfinhydrochlo-
`ride, and amitriptyline, but no immunosuppressive
`drugs were used.
`
`No adverse events were observed following the
`
`first and second infusions. The perineal pain rapidly
`decreased within days following the infusion, and the
`opiates could be rapidly discontinued. The amount of
`discharge decreased substantially, and one week f°1-
`lowing the infusion, the C-reactive protein completely
`normalized (Fig. 3). Follow-up inspections of the
`wound showed remarkable healing, and the patient
`
`Ex. 1022 - Page 3
`
`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`

`

`Vol. 41, No. 1
`
`ANTI-TNF FOR METASTATIC CROHN'S DISEASE
`
`101
`
`was able to resume daily work. After four months,
`there was only a small defect left (Fig. 4).
`
`Case 2
`
`A 26-year-old female was initially diagnosed as hav-
`ing ulcerative colitis in 1990. In that year, she under-
`went a subtotal colectomy with an ileorectal anasto-
`mosis. However, she developed a rectovaginal fistula
`and an anal ulcer. Biopsies from this ulcer revealed
`noncaseating granulomas, and the diagnosis was
`changed to Crohn's disease. A rectum amputation and
`an ileostomy was performed in 1994, because of the
`persistent nature of the ulcer and the intractable per-
`Meal pain. The postoperative course was complicated
`by a persistent perinea! defect with small satellite
`lesions with a maximum diameter of 1 cm. The patient
`was not treated with any immunosuppressive medi-
`cation. After informed consent, a single infusion of
`cA2 of 20 mg per body weight was given intrave-
`nously. No side effects during and following infusion
`were encountered. A few days after infusion, there
`was a marked subjective improvement, especially im-
`provement of the pain. Inspection of the perineal
`wound was performed under general anesthesia be-
`
`fore the second infusion. The defect was smaller, with
`disappearance of the small skin lesions. The second
`and third infusions of 10 mg per body weight were
`administered at 2.5 and 6 months, respectively, in an
`attempt to completely close the defect. No side effects
`were seen, and both infusions were followed by
`rapid, subjective improvement. Inspection showed
`improvement, but no disappearance of the defect. In
`conclusion, clinical improvement, but not complete
`healing of the wound, was seen after the cA2 infu-
`sions. No side effects were observed.
`
`DISCUSSION
`Both patients had an extraintestinal complication of
`the Crohn's disease with a persistent wound after
`proctectomy, compatible with "metastatic Crohn's dis-
`ease." This complication is characterized by granulo-
`matous inflammation, which is not contiguous with
`the bowel or enterocutaneous fistulous tracts." The
`characteristic early lesions consist of small erythema-
`tous papules that may enlarge, ulcerate, and ulti-
`mately, drain pus. These lesions may occur in the
`vulva, on the face, on extremities, and the abdominal
`wall but seem to preferentially involve intertriginous
`
`Figure 4. Perinea! wound after two infusions of cA2.
`
`Ex. 1022 - Page 4
`
`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`

`

`102
`
`VAN DULLEMEN ET AL
`
`Dis Colon Rectum, Januaiym
`
`areas. Delayed healing of the surgical wound after
`proctectomy in patients with severe anorectal inflam-
`mation is not uncommon and is often therapy-resis-
`tant. It has been hypothesized that "metastatic"
`Crohn's disease results as a consequence of ischemia,
`and treatment with hyperbaric oxygen resulted in
`symptomatic improvement in a few patients. We rea-
`soned that metastatic Crohn's disease is an inflamma-
`tory process that, in view of its granulomatous nature,
`would be dependent on the presence of tumor ne-
`crosis factor.9' 12.13 Indeed, our observations in two
`patients with metastatic Crohn's disease seem to be
`congruent with this notion. Administration of cA2 was
`followed by a rapid reduction of subjective (pain,
`well-being) and objective (discharge, C-reactive pro-
`tein) parameters of inflammation and caused a sub-
`stantial reduction of the wound size, albeit not com-
`plete healing. Repeat cA2 treatment in these patients
`could possibly result in complete wound-healing.
`These results should be interpreted with caution and
`need further confirmation in controlled, clinical stud-
`ies. Nonetheless, our data suggest that anti-TNF treat-
`ment in patients with metastatic Crohn's disease may
`cause rapid improvement, and anti-TNF treatment is
`not associated with a high incidence of side ef-
`fects.10, 14-16
`
`CONCLUSION
`These preliminary data are consistent with a TNF-
`dependent inflammatory origin of metastatic Crohn's
`disease and provide support for targeting TNF in this
`condition.
`
`REFERENCES
`1. Marks CG, Ritchie JK, Todd IP, Wadsworth J. Primary
`suture of the perineal wound following rectal excision
`for inflammatory bowel disease. Br J Surg 1978;65:
`560-4.
`2. Williams N, Scott NA, Watson JS, Irving MH. Surgical
`management of perineal and metastatic cutaneous
`Crohn's disease. Br J Surg 1993;80:1596-8.
`3. Keighley MR, Allan RN. Current status and influence of
`operation on perianal Crohn's disease. Int J Colorectal
`Dis 1986;1:104-7.
`4. Scammell B, Keighley MR. Delayed perineal wound
`
`healing after proctocolectomy for Crohn's disease. Brj
`Surg 1986;73:150-2.
`5. Brady CE, Cooley 13j, Davis JC. Healing of severe pe,
`neal and cutaneous Crohn's disease with hypertk
`oxygen. Gastroenterology 1989;97:756-60.
`6. Potter WA, Bicks RO. The effects of hyperbaric oxir
`therapy on the perineal/perivaginal fistulas of Cr*,
`disease with hyperbaric oxygen labstractl. Gastment
`ology 1991;100:A241.
`7. Kinder V, Sappino AP, Grau G, Piguet PF, VassalliP
`The inducing role of tumor necrosis factor in the dert
`opment of bacterial granulomas during BCG infeaix
`Cell 1989;56:731--40.
`8. Lukacs NW, Chensue SW, Strieter RM, Warmingtont
`Kunkel SL. Inflammatory granuloma formation is mei
`ated by TNF-a-inducible intercellular adhesion mole.
`cule-1. J Immunol 1994;152:5883-9.
`9. Flory CM, Jones ML, Miller BF, Warren JS. Regulator
`roles of tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin-I
`beta in monocyte chemoattractant protein-l-meditec
`pulmonary granulomaforrnation in the rat. Am J Patted
`1995;146:450-62.
`10. van Dullemen HM, Deventer SJ, Hommes DW,
`Tytgat GN, Woody J. Treatment of severe Crohn's dis-
`ease with an anti-tumor necrosis factor chimeric mono-
`clonal antibody. Gastroenterology 1995;109:129-35.
`11. Kafity AA, Pelligrini AE, Fromkes D. Metastatic Crohn's
`disease: a rare cutaneous manifestation. J Clin Gast*
`enterol 1993;17:300-3.
`12. Flynn JL, Goldstein MM, Chan J, el at Tumor necrosis
`factor-alpha is required in the protective immune re
`sponse against Mycobacterium tuberculosis in mice
`Immunity 1995;2:561-72.
`13. Chensue SW, Warmington KS, Ruth JH, Lincoln P.
`Kunkel SL. Cytokine function during mycobacterial and
`schistosomal antigen-induced pulmo-nary granuloma
`formation: local and regional participation of IR:-
`gamma, IL-10, and TNF. J Immunol 1995;54:5969-~6.
`14. Elliot MJ, Maini RN, Feldman M, et al. Randomised
`double-blind comparison of chimeric monoclonal aft-
`body to tumour necrosis factor 181 (cA2) versus
`cebo in rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet 1994;344:1105-10.
`15. Elliott MJ, Maini RN, Feldman M, et al. Repeated ther1l
`with monoclonal antibody to tumour necrosis facmr
`181 (cA2) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis- uncet
`1994;344:1125-7.
`16. Elliott MJ, Maini RN, Feldman M, et al. Treatment of
`rheumatoid arthritis with chimeric monoclonal allub°6
`ies to tumor necrosis factor 181. Arthritis Rheum 1993;
`36:1681-90.
`
`Ex. 1022 - Page 5
`
`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`

`

`Anal Duct/Gland Cyst
`Report of a Case and Review of the Literature
`Mahmoud N. Kulaylat, M.B., B.Ch.,* Ralph J. Doerr, M.D.,*
`Mike Neuwirth, M.D.,* Sateesh K. Satchidanand, M.D.t
`
`From the State University of New York at Buffalo, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Departments
`of *Surgery and (Pathology, Buffalo General Hospital, Buffalo, New York
`
`PURPOSE: The purpose of this communication is to report
`a case of anal duct/gland cyst and review cases of perianal
`and presacrococcygeal mucus-secreting cysts reported in
`the literature with emphasis on their histopathologic fea-
`tures. METHOD: Our patient presented with coccydynia.
`An extraluminal retrorectal tumor was felt on rectal exam-
`ination. A computerized tomographic scan demonstrated a
`presacrococcygeal mass closely related to the anorectal
`junction. The tumor and the coccyx were excised using a
`posterior approach. Cases of perianal and presacrococcy-
`geal mucus-secreting cysts reported in the literature were
`reviewed. RESULTS: In our case, the tumor proved to be an
`anal duct/gland cyst. Some of the reported cases of presa-
`crococcygeal glandular cysts had histopathologic features
`suggestive of anal duct/gland origin. CONCLUSION: Diag-
`nosis of anal duct/gland cyst is based on routine histologic
`features, histochemical characteristics of mucus, and/or the
`presence of a communication with an anal duct or crypt.
`Based on these criteria, some of the reported cases of
`mucus-secreting cysts occurring around the anorectum may
`prove to be anal duct/gland in origin. [Key words: Anal
`duct/gland; Mucus-secreting cyst; Presacrococcygeal cyst;
`Developmental cyst]
`Kulaylat MN, Doerr RJ, Neuwirth M, Satchidanand SK. Anal
`duct/gland cyst: report of a case and review of the litera-
`ture. Dis Colon Rectum 1998;41:103-110.
`
`A (though infection is the most common disease
`A process that occurs around the anorectum, tu-
`mors and cysts are occasionally encountered. t-12
`These tumors and cysts commonly occur in the pre-
`sacrococcygeal space and are classified according to
`their origin and histopathology into congenital, neu-
`rogenic, osseus, and miscellaneous.13 There is con-
`troversy as to classification of the congenital lesions
`and their organ of origin. This is because of the
`complex embryologic changes that occur in the sa-
`crococcygeal area and the varied and often complex
`histopathology of these lesions. Benign developmen-
`tal cysts comprise the great majority of congenital
`]esions.9-11 The nomenclature of such cysts is diverse,
`often descriptive, and their histopathologic features
`overlap. This is particularly true for mucus-secreting
`cysts, Of interest, anal duct/gland cyst, an infre-
`quently reported lesion, is not included in any classi-
`
`Address reprint requests to Dr. Kulaylat: Buffalo General Hospital,
`100 High Street, Buffalo, New York 14203.
`
`fication concerning presacrococcygeal cysts, and the
`anal ducts/glands are not considered as a possible
`source of some of the cysts occurring in that area. This
`is because of the obscure embryologic origin of anal
`ducts/glands and controversy surrounding the exact
`nature and anatomic extent of these structures. We
`report a case of anal duct/gland cyst and review the
`literature for similar lesions and for other mucus-
`secreting cysts occurring in the presacrococcygeal
`area. We further review the anatomy, pathology, and
`histochemistry of the anal glands and the embryologic
`developments that occur in the caudal area of the
`body. Support is given that some of the reported
`mucus-secreting cysts arose from the anal ducts/
`glands.
`
`REPORT OF A CASE
`
`A 71-year-old white male presented to our clinic
`with coccydynia. He gave a history of trauma to the
`coccyx in the past. On examination, no findings were
`noted in the sacrococcygeal or perianal area. Digital
`rectal examination revealed a posterior extraluminal
`mass. A computerized tomographic scan demon-
`strated a mass in the retrorectal space involving the
`coccyx, with an inflammatory reaction surrounding
`the tumor and extending to the right ischioanal space
`(Fig. 1). The tumor mass, coccyx, and portion of the
`gluteus maximus muscle were excised through a dor-
`sal sacrococcygeal incision. The postoperative course
`was complicated by a wound infection. The wound
`was opened and a diverting colostomy was fashioned
`for control of wound sepsis. A communication be-
`tween the abscess cavity and the anal canal was found
`at the level of the dentate line, posteriorly. The patient
`was discharged home on the 30th postoperative day.
`The fistula was closed five months later with an en-
`doanal rectal advancement flap. At this time, the pa-
`tient is awaiting takedown colostomy pending com-
`plete healing of the presacral wound by secondary
`intention.
`The surgical specimen measured 11.5 X 7.8 x 5.8
`
`103
`
`Ex. 1022 - Page 6
`
`

`

`
`
`Ex. 1022 - Page 7
`
`

`

`Diseases of the
`
`Af7;5zP)41...L
`
`OLON
`RECTUM
`
`i.( (cid:9)
`
`*7=
`tmons-*=--
`
`ko*:
`
`H
`/3n)*=
`rint4*..
`1-40*=
`
`I fn *—
`
`• z
`-4 M-
`I 7-
`1.4
`r--
`
`SSA
`
`ANNUAL MEETING OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY
`OF COLON AND RECTAL SURGEONS
`
`San Antonio Convention Center, San Antonio, Texas, May 3-8. 1998
`
`OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF
`THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF
`COLON AND RECTAL SURGEONS
`
`Williams & Wilkins
`
`Ex. 1022 - Page 8
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket