throbber
Thomas Declaration - Exhibit A
`
`Part 1 of 2
`
`Page 1 of 260
`Copied from 95002180 on 07/01 /2014
`
`A''‘‘’'“‘' E""“’“ “Z1
`
`

`
`DOE/CE/23810-l8
`
`MISCIBILITY OF LUBRICANTS WITH REFRIGERANTS
`
`Final Report
`
`July 1993
`
`Michael B. Pate
`
`Steven C. Zoz
`
`Lyle J. Berkenbosch
`
`Iowa State University of Science and Technology
`Department of Mechanical Engineering
`2028 Black Engineering Bldg.
`Ames, Iowa 50011
`
`Prepared for
`The Air-Conditioning and Refrigeration Technology Institute
`under
`
`ARTI MCLR Project Number 650-50300
`
`in whole or in pact, by U.S. Department of Energy grant number DE—FG02—9lCE238l0: Materials
`This research project is supported,
`Compatibility and Lubricants Research (MCLR) on CFC—Refrigerant Substitutes. Federal funding supporting this project constitutes 93.67% of
`allowable costs. Funding from non—goVernment sources supporting this project consists of direct cost sharing of 6.33 % of allowable costs, and
`in—kind contributions fiom the air—conditioning and refrigeration industry.
`
`F3§85 SF 328
`Copied from 95002180 on 07/01/2014
`
`Page 2 of 260
`
`Page 2 of 260
`
`

`
`DISCLAIMER
`
`The U.S. Department of Energy's and the air-conditioning industry's support for the Materials
`Compatibility and Lubricants Research (MCLR) program does not constitute an endorsement by
`the U.S. Department of Energy, nor by the air-conditioning and refrigeration industry, of the
`views expressed herein.
`
`NOTICE
`
`This report was prepared on account of work sponsored by the United States Government.
`Neither the United States Government, nor the Department of Energy, nor the Air-Conditioning
`and Refrigeration Technology Institute, nor any of their employees, nor of any of their
`contractors, subcontractors, or their employees, makes any warranty, expressed or implied, or
`assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any
`information, apparatus, product or process disclosed or represents that its use would not infringe
`privately-owned rights.
`
`COPYRIGHT NOTICE
`
`(for journal publication submissions)
`
`By acceptance of this article, the publisher and/or recipient acknowledges the right of the U.S.
`Government and the Air-Conditioning and Refrigeration Technology Institutes, Inc. (ARTI) to
`retain a non-exclusive, royalty-free license in and to any copyrights covering this paper.
`
`F3§8§ SF 328
`Copied from 95002180 on 07/01/2014
`
`Page 3 of 260
`
`Page 3 of 260
`
`

`
`TABLE OF CONTENTS
`
`E}i5Q ia.§0m0s:%r ........................................................................................ .. i
`
`Nmice ............................................................................................... .. i
`
`C§.:Tpy1‘igE1t N0=li.§:s ............................................................................. .. $0
`
`Table of Contents ............................................................................ .. ii
`
`A§;>s=:::'a::ii ........................................................................................... ..
`
`3
`
`§§c:'3pe .............................................................................................. ..
`
`Test FaT::i§ii‘y
`
`pe1‘im~:=.11tai ?::‘z3ce.du::"::s .................................... 0. 3
`
`E~§ig::ifE:.:zmi: §f{es::iis .......................................................................... .. 6
`
`R_efrige:7:~11’1: iiiiid, F;.u3;::7;i<;.a_m‘ Pu.ri=;y ................................................. . E ‘E
`
`§::i.§Y4§‘&‘:E:\'§’W§’fii.§¥4§‘$ ................................................................................ .. H2
`
`V3
`
`TE
`
`E.
`
`Cmnpiiance with
`
`...................................................... ..
`
`.A}:%}:3<%:'a<.ii.x A » T;,=.§;>uE.és,i'{am {sf §§ixp£:rin'1en$.2s,E E}3.‘{i.i
`
`1- ppendix E3 ~ Aci":.1a§ Test §_..::‘-‘firicamis ........................................ »h 255
`
`FSEE 2‘: 8328
`Copied from 95002180 on 07/01/2014
`
`Page 4 of 260
`
`Page 4 of 260
`
`

`
`MISCIBILITY OF LUBRICANTS
`
`WITH REFRIGERANTS
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`Miscibility data have been obtained for a Variety of non-CFC refrigerants and their potential
`lubricants. Ten (10) different
`refrigerants
`and fourteen (14) different
`lubricants were
`investigated. Experiments were performed in two phases: Phase I focused on performing
`screening tests for miscibility using refrigerant concentrations of 10, 50 and 95 % and Phase II
`consisted of obtaining further refrigerant concentrations of 20, 35, 65, 80, and 90%. The
`complete data set is presented herein. The miscibility tests were performed in a test facility
`consisting of a series of miniature test cells submerged in a constant temperature bath. The bath
`temperature can be precisely controlled over a temperature range of -50°C to 90°C(-58°F to
`l94°F). The test cells are constructed to allow for complete Visibility of lubricant refrigerant
`mixtures under all test conditions. Each of the refrigerants tested are miscible with at least one of
`the lubricants, with the exception of R-l43a, which exhibits partial miscibility with each of the
`lubricants.
`
`FSEE § 8328
`Copied from 95002180 on 07/01/2014
`
`Page 5 of 260
`
`Page 5 of 260
`
`

`
`Phase I - Preliminary Screening
`
`SCOPE
`
`Miscibility tests were performed on refrigerant-lubricant mixtures for refrigerant concentrations
`of 10%, 50% and 95% by weight. These tests were performed by keeping the liquid phase visible
`at all times, by controlling temperatures to ::1°C, and by providing agitation of the test cells.
`
`The following refrigerants were tested for miscibility in 10°C (18°F) increments over the
`temperature ranges indicated below:
`
`- R-22:
`
`-50---60°C(-58---140°F)
`
`- R-134:
`
`-50---60°C(-58---140°F)
`
`- R-32:
`
`-50---60°C(-58---140°F)
`
`- R-134a:-50---90°C(-58---194°F)
`
`- R-123:
`
`-50---60°C(—58---140°F)
`
`- R-142b:-50---90°C(-58---194°F)
`
`- R-124:
`
`-50---90°C(-58---194°F)
`
`- R-143a:-50---60°C(-58---140°F)
`
`- R-125:
`
`-50---60°C(—58---140°F)
`
`- R-152a:-50---90°C(-58---194°F)
`
`Each of the above refrigerants was tested for miscibility with the lubricants listed below. The
`viscosity for the penta erythritol ester mixed acid was ISO 22, while all other lubricants had a
`viscosity of ISO 32.
`
`- mineral oils (<30 ppm moisture, acid number <0.01)
`naphthenic mineral oil
`
`- alkylbenzenes (<30 ppm moisture, acid number <0.01)
`
`- polyglycols(<50 ppm moisture, acid number <0.05)
`polypropylene glycol butyl monoether
`polypropylene glycol diol
`modified polyglycol
`
`- polyolesters(<50 ppm moisture, acid number <0.05)
`penta erythritol ester mixed-acid (ISO 22)
`penta erythritol ester mixed-acid (ISO 32)
`
`During the above miscibility tests, the contents of each test cell were observed for signs of
`cloudiness, floc or precipitate formation, and liquid layer formation. These observations were
`made at each required temperature after equilibrium (i.e., steady state) conditions had been
`reached. Applicable miscibility data consists of the refrigerant/lubricant concentration,
`the
`temperature at equilibrium, and the observations of the test cell contents for evidence of
`immiscibility.
`
`FSEE 2 81528
`Copied from 95002180 on 07/01/2014
`
`Page 6 of 260
`
`Page 6 of 260
`
`

`
`Phase II - Derivation Of Complete Miscibility Characteristics
`
`Phase II consisted of additional tests made up of an expanded concentration range. In addition to
`Phase I refrigerant concentrations (i.e., 10%, 50%, 95%), refrigerant concentrations of 20, 35,
`65, 80 and 90% were tested for miscibility.
`
`The basis for selecting the lubricant-refrigerant combinations that were tested in Phase II is that
`the combination must have demonstrated single-phase miscibility in at least one of the three test
`points obtained in Phase I. This criteria was met by all of the refrigerant/lubricant combinations
`of Phase I. Therefore, each of the lubricants from Phase I was tested for miscibility in Phase II.
`Also, higher Viscosity Versions of each Phase I lubricant except the modified polyglycol and the
`penta erythritol ester mixed-acid were included in the Phase II test matrix. Additionally, a penta
`erythritol ester branched-acid (two ISO grades) was added to the test matrix. The lubricants are
`listed below along with their associated Viscosities.
`
`o mineral oils (30 ppm moisture, acid number <0.01)
`naphthenic mineral oil, ISO 32 and 68
`
`o alkylbenzenes (<30 ppm moisture, acid number <0.01), ISO 32 and 68
`
`o polyglycols (<50 ppm moisture, acid number <0.05)
`polypropylene glycol butyl monoether, ISO 32 and 68
`polypropylene glycol diol, ISO 32 and 100
`modified polyglycol, ISO 32
`
`o polyolesters (<50 ppm moisture, acid number <0.05)
`penta erythritol ester mixed-acid, ISO 22, 32, and 100
`penta erythritol ester branched-acid, ISO 32 and 100
`
`TEST FACILITY AND EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
`
`The test facility used in this project was designed for the purpose of measuring the miscibility of
`refrigerant-lubricant mixtures. Test cells with glass Viewports are submerged in one of two
`constant temperature baths, and then the miscibility characteristics of the mixture is observed
`and recorded.
`
`Test Cells
`
`The test cells are constructed to allow for complete Visibility of the lubricant/refrigerant mixture
`at all test conditions. Each test cell consists of a double-port seal-cap type liquid indicator, which
`is essentially a 1.25 inch pipe cross with sight windows screwed into opposing ports. Valves for
`charging the refrigerant into the cell are screwed into the other two ports. A temperature sensor
`can be inserted in each cell or in an adjoining reference cell exposed to the same heating or
`cooling conditions.
`
`FSEE 3 81528
`Copied from 95002180 on 07/01/2014
`
`Page 7 of 260
`
`Page 7 of 260
`
`

`
`The overall volume of each test cell varies slightly; however, all were measured to have volumes
`around 65 ml. During charging, each cell can be filled so that the vapor space is less than l5% of
`the total volume. In addition, if temperature and pressure data are available, changes in the liquid
`concentration due to vapor space refrigerant can be calculated.
`
`Four charged cells can be placed in a Plexiglas holder, and three such holders can be placed in a
`constant temperature bath to permit the testing of l2 test cells at one time.
`
`Constant Temperature Baths
`
`The temperature of the cells is fixed by placing them in one of two constant temperature baths.
`The hot bath is used to maintain temperatures from l0°C to 90°C(50°F to l94°F), while the cold
`bath is used for temperatures in the range of l0°C to -50°C(50°F to -58°F).
`
`The baths are constructed of glass which allows complete visibility of the test cells and,
`therefore,
`the lubricant/refrigerant mixtures throughout
`the test. Figure I.
`is a photograph
`showing an array of twelve test cells in the bath. Movable fluorescent lights are mounted behind
`a bath to help increase visibility.
`
`Figure l Photograph of test facility.
`
`FSEE § 8328
`Copied from 95002180 on 07/01/2014
`
`Page 8 of 260
`
`Page 8 of 260
`
`

`
`Cold Bath
`
`The cold bath fluid is composed of 65% pure ethylene glycol and 35% water. Pure ethylene
`glycol is used so that the bath fluid will be transparent. The bath is cooled with the use of an
`R-502 refrigeration system. A temperature controller and a heater are installed to regulate the
`bath temperature.
`
`The bath is insulated on all sides to ensure a uniform temperature. The insulation on the front
`and back of the bath consists of a double-paned Plexiglass window mounted on the glass bath.
`Condensation is prevented by using a nitrogen purge of the dead air spaces. Insulation on the
`other sides is provided by 2 inches of styrofoam.
`
`Hot Bath
`
`The hot bath fluid is water with rust inhibitor added. Two inch styrofoam provides the insulation
`on the ends of the bath, while the insulation on the front and back of the bath is provided by a
`single Plexiglass window mounted on the glass leaving a half-inch air space.
`
`Instrumentation
`
`The precise temperature of the bath fluid is measured by two internal resistance temperature
`detectors (RTD). These primary temperature probes consist of a platinum RTD connected to a
`signal conditioner/current transmitter that provide a linear response over the temperature range
`-51°C (-60°F) to 149°C (300°F). The RTD's have an accuracy of ::0.l°C. A microcomputer and
`data acquisition hardware under the direction of a data acquisition program monitors and records
`signals from all instruments.
`
`One cell in each bath is assembled with an internal RTD to determine equilibrium (i.e., steady
`state) conditions. The cell is charged with pure lubricant to provide a "worst case" heat transfer
`situation. The temperature difference between the internal RTD and the bath temperature
`indicates when thermal equilibrium between the cell and the bath has been achieved. Steady state
`conditions are typically achieved about thirty minutes after a change (e.g., 5°-10°C) in the
`circulating bath temperature.
`
`Experimental Procedure
`
`Experimental procedures have been developed for measuring refrigerant-lubricant miscibility by
`using the test facility described previously. The cells start out with the front and back windows
`removed for cleaning. After cleaning, the back window is installed and tightened. The prescribed
`amount of lubricant is injected with a syringe through the front window space. The front window
`is then replaced and tightened. A vacuum pump is hooked up to one of the valves and a vacuum
`is pulled to remove any dissolved moisture or air. Fittings are retightened if a failure to hold
`either a vacuum or a set pressure indicates that this is necessary.
`
`FSEE 3 8328
`Copied from 95002180 on 07/01/2014
`
`Page 9 of 260
`
`Page 9 of 260
`
`

`
`Refrigerant is then injected into the cell from the refrigerant canister by using a manifold that
`allows for the evacuation of the connecting lines. The cells are weighed on a scale before and
`after the injection of the lubricant and the refrigerant. The scale has an uncertainty of ::0.01 gran1.
`The concentration of the liquid in each cell is calculated from the masses of refrigerant and
`lubricant injected. The uncertainty in the concentration measurements is ::0.5% . It is important to
`note that since the refrigerant vapor density changes as the temperature and pressure change, then
`the refrigerant vapor mass also varies. As a result, the liquid concentration varies slightly as the
`temperature and pressure change. For the experimental approach presented here,
`the vapor
`volumes are kept small; less than 15% of the total space is vapor. Therefore, the overall variation
`in refrigerant concentration as temperature and pressure are changed during any particular test are
`small. Once the desired amounts of lubricant and refrigerant have been injected into the cell, it is
`ready for testing.
`
`The cells are then placed in the bath and heated or cooled to the desired temperature. The desired
`temperatures are 10°C increments from either 90°C to -50°C or 60°C to -50°C, depending on the
`refrigerant being tested. Steady state conditions are assumed when two conditions are met: first,
`the bath temperature is within ::0.5°C of the setpoint temperature and second, the difference
`between the instrumented cell and the bath temperature is within 0.5°C. At this point the
`characteristics of the fluid in each cell are noted.
`
`After testing the cells through the temperature range, the cells are removed from the bath. The
`refrigerant/lubricant mixture is drained through one of the valves, and the cell is rinsed three
`times with R-113. The final cleaning of the cell is accomplished by removing the front and back
`window and rinsing with R-113 to remove traces of lubricant. The windows and seals are then
`cleaned and visually examined for defects.
`
`SIGNIFICANT RESULTS
`
`Test Results
`
`Miscibility data have been obtained for R-22, R-32, R-123, R-124, R-125, R-134, R-134a, R-
`142b, R-143a, and R-152a, and the following lubricants:
`
`- naphthenic mineral oil (ISO 32)
`
`- alkylbenzene (ISO 32)
`
`- polypropylene glycol butyl monoether (ISO 32)
`
`- polypropylene glycol diol (ISO 32)
`
`- modified polyglycol (ISO 32)
`
`- penta erythritol ester mixed-acid (ISO 22)
`
`- penta erythritol ester mixed-acid (ISO 32)
`
`- penta erythritol ester branched-acid (ISO 32)
`
`- naphthenic mineral oil (ISO 68)
`
`BE: 18 81528
`Copied from 95002180 on 07/01/2014
`
`Page 10 of 260
`
`Page 10 of 260
`
`

`
`- alkylbenzene (ISO 68)
`
`° polypropylene glycol butyl monoether (ISO 58)
`
`° polypropylene glycol diol (ISO 100)
`
`° penta erythritol ester mixed-acid (ISO 100)
`
`° penta erythritol ester branched-acid (ISO 100)
`
`These tests were performed at refrigerant concentrations of approximately 10%, 20%, 35%, 50%,
`65%, 80%, 90%, and 95% over a temperature range of -50°C to 90°C (tests are concluded at
`60°C for the higher pressure refrigerants as specified in the Work Statement). According to the
`Work Statement, when cloudiness, precipitate formation, or formation of a second liquid phase is
`noticed,
`the mixture is considered immiscible. However,
`in the following discussion, when
`cloudiness or precipitate formation was observed, it will be noted as such, but when the mixture
`separated into two liquid phases,
`it will be noted as immiscible. The observations for each
`refrigerant/lubricant pair are provided below. These data are summarized and also presented in
`IE through 10, with each table containing the data for a specific refrigerant with all of the
`lubricants. :'~\p;?s£3m'i§ A contains tables of data for each refrigerant and lubricant pair.
`
`Refrigerant Concentration
`
`are nominal values for each
`through
`The refrigerant concentrations given in "mbles 1
`lubricant-refrigerant test condition. The measured (actual) concentration may vary from the
`nominal concentration by ::4% (0.04). Measured concentrations are calculated as previously
`described and are included in the tables in A;:>pe;nd.ix
`The measured concentration represents
`the concentration that exists in the cell when the cell
`is at its lowest temperature. At this
`temperature, essentially all of the refrigerant in the cell is in the liquid phase. As the temperature
`is raised in each cell, the density of the vapor phase increases which results in the transport of
`refrigerant from the liquid phase to the vapor phase and, hence, an increase in lubricant
`concentration. However, the volume of the vapor phase decreases due to thermal expansion
`which diminishes some of the impact of this lubricant concentration increase.
`
`These changes in the liquid composition with temperature are small since the vapor volume in
`each cell is minimized during charging. However, in order to cover the entire temperature range,
`a 10 to 20% vapor space is required due to thermal expansion and contraction. For this required
`vapor space, changes in liquid composition are noticeable for refrigerant concentrations lower
`than 30% . For example, for a 10% R-134a mixture with a 15% vapor volume, the liquid
`concentration could decrease up to 2.5% from its initial value.
`
`Naphthenic Mineral Oil (ISO 321 The 12%, 20%, and 95% refrigerant mixtures were miscible
`throughout the test temperature range. The 36%, 47%, 68%, 81%, and 90%
`
`BE: 11 81528
`Copied from 95002180 on 07/01/2014
`
`Page 11 of 260
`
`Page 11 of 260
`
`

`
`refrigerant mixtures were immiscible at temperatures below -40.3°C, -30.1°C, -20.5°C, -9.7°C,
`and -19.6°C, respectively.
`
`Alkylbenzene gISO 321 All eight concentrations were miscible throughout the test temperature
`range.
`
`lene Gl col But 1 Monoether
`throughout the test temperature range.
`
`ISO 32
`
`All eight concentrations were miscible
`
`lene Gl col Diol
`
`ISO 32 All eight concentrations were miscible throughout the test
`
`temperature range.
`
`Modified Polyglycol gISO 321 The 9%, 68%, 81% , 91%, and 95% refrigerant mixtures were
`miscible throughout the test temperature range. The 23% , 39% , and 49% refrigerant mixtures
`became hazy at temperatures below -19.6°C, -19.6°C, and -29.8°C, respectively.
`
`Penta Emhritol Ester Mixed-Acid gISO 221 All eight concentrations were miscible throughout
`the test temperature range.
`
`Penta Emhritol Ester Mixed-Acid gISO 321 All eight concentrations were miscible throughout
`the test temperature range.
`
`Penta Erflhritol Ester Branched-Acid gISO 321
`throughout the test temperature range.
`
`All eight concentrations were miscible
`
`The 12% and 22% refrigerant mixtures were miscible
`Naphthenic Mineral Oil gISO 681
`throughout the test temperature range. The 36%, 51%, 64%, 80%, 90%, and 95% refrigerant
`mixtures were immiscible at temperatures below -29.9°C, -10.5°C, 0.0°C, 10.9°C, -10.5°C, and
`-10.5°C, respectively.
`
`Alkylbenzene gISO 681 All eight concentrations were miscible throughout the test temperature
`range.
`
`Polypropylene Glycol Butyl Monoether gISO 581
`throughout the test temperature range.
`
`All eight concentrations were miscible
`
`Polypropylene Glycol Diol gISO 1001 All eight concentrations were miscible throughout the
`
`test temperature range.
`
`Penta Erfihritol Ester Mixed-Acid gISO 1001 All eight concentrations were miscible throughout
`the test temperature range.
`
`Penta Emhritol Ester Branched-Acid gISO 1001
`throughout the test temperature range.
`
`All eight concentrations were miscible
`
`BE: 15 81528
`Copied from 95002180 on 07/01/2014
`
`Page 12 of 260
`
`Page 12 of 260
`
`

`
`Table 1 provides a summary of the test data for each lubricant and R-22 pair. All of the lubricants are
`
`completely miscible with R-22 except for the naphthenic mineral oils (ISO 32 and 68) and the modified
`
`polyglycol, which are all partially miscible with R-22.
`
`Table 1 Summary of miscibility data for R-22 and 14 lubricants.
`
`
`
`.
`2
`"
`\
`x‘
`-
`1'
`'
`‘
`v.
`.



`-
`\
`:
`:
`-
`\
`.
`2
`~
`.
`z
`..
`.
`=
`..
`.2
`.
`.
`:
`:
`:1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`.
`.
`.
`K
`s
`_\\
`3 "\
`,
`\ Q }»~:«
`=
`\
`.. }\\
`.
`y M
`o 2
`,~\
`4
`
`{W _ an
`E
`H5
`i
`""§l:}\
`i
`"Q:
`\ Q.»
`: “£§..}\
`E
`‘
`.-
`9.2

`" 1:):
`<)‘.,..«
`1
`{$93
`l
`§:}§€.3
`.5.-.23
`=
`2
`2
`2
`s
`s
`s
`2
`s
`3.2
`'
`22.
`'
`'
`‘
`....2‘m.....2.»gpa...».~....u2.2.+.2.,mm».M2..,+.22.2...,.,.,»..22.x...2m.....i..
`+.2...........-.29......§,...r..........m.....,........
`1
`...w........;
`it

`‘
`:
`i
`3
`K
`1
`at
`¥.~
`X3
`-2‘
`E
`I
`‘
`1
`:
`1
`=
`‘
`‘:
`§\=§
`M
`.%°‘¢'~
`:
`y
`,
`.
`:\-§
`2»-"§
`=‘:
`.2
`ll
`w‘.‘.~
`3
`E
`3
`:
`3
`5
`3
`
`...p.,,),\\22\\22\\“w§“wwMM “W.-.w.,...»...w.\nu‘“w.~.»§-.»......2““\““““.Y.»..,..».».,- ; \ 1 \ .
`
`
`
`
`
`. ,§...........‘.uu«««-_lii
`
`
`
`
`.
`
`
`
`. 9"
`‘
`g~3§i¢~...\.:s(‘»-
`
`5\\\\s\~.~\\~.-kssxi .
`
`
`.3
`
`.
`
`.,
`
`
`
`9
`v
`t
`v
`E
`.3
`‘
`i
`5
`t
`E
`.-
`.
`.
`.
`-
`:
`2
`3
`‘
`-'1
`:
`\
`‘
`.
`txasm meneetmsi
`;
`M
`133%
`2
`M
`s
`N!
`{:2
`22.~-Ԥ
`;
`M
`M
`,
`.

`»»».»“«‘««.«,....manna.~..«A.......«.‘u.-~w~a-ms.“«xxx««~«w-.-§.-w««‘«»““““«-.»;--.~«“‘m«~«««~ xxssxxwwwwxxxwsx\\\V§-a-As‘V\\\\\»\»\\»\\\Vv~‘vvvv-~v~~~\\\\v~~s~§
`4
`l
`2
`2
`~
`-.
`;
`V
`V
`I
`3
`M
`I
`3
`:
`Q
`
`
`
`
`2K??i
`
`M
`
`
`
`53
`
`?\~‘‘
`
`M
`
`N
`
`:1
`
`‘
`
`i
`
`L
`
`h
`
`‘
`l
`:

`1
`.........4:
`_
`‘
`~
`K;
`2w
`:i
`:
`,‘~e'2x>“‘
`2
`=
`K.-
`
`
`a
`;
`1
`‘
`2
`2

`2+3
`we
`3:
`1’
`4.
`‘
`2
`3
`Fe:
`
`....w.w;.,.....MM~.Mw..q:
`I
`p
`_
`: ..r..~...............2§........‘...22.‘.‘....;......mm.w......§.w.........2.
`‘i
`w
`x
`E
`~.»-. -,; xv-:
`~
`-
`.-.1-h -.;.vs-¢a_\
`«E «.3-.;v¢
`\
`-
`\
`3 fi
`‘ 3
`i
`E
`141
`:
`§,.\$2»§\»\3 ‘$3 $2 an .-3'; 1-\.l
`§.4;§| I«\. .~

`“$3
`5
`R1
`3
`as
`g
`1%‘
`
`3
`we‘
`h¢\
`S
`we
`§x
`IX
`iy“ { ‘
`A; ‘i
`5
`x-.‘:.-..-}
`.~:_ A“;
`:
`E
`E
`:
`Q
`3
`;
`;
`K
`sh-003%.?-EC: ‘$3.25 \
`\\-
`o‘.w:..»
`\
`I
`:
`t
`\
`\
`x
`\~ -.
`~e
`_
`\~,}~\_.~
`‘% '
`--%,r.s
`\
`:
`;
`\
`\
`
`E.‘
`R ‘
`:
` 2.\.»»2M?,,...._,,2.m....._ \._..._...»\,.c._?,_,,....,.......,.
`,..........m.~.w.~{...~......m.~.mw;
`,\_3§:.fix3 \.3 _s\ It -{$1.5}; Q-,2:ml,’
`3
`9‘,4:‘

`32
`E

`E
`9‘)5
`3
`&
`g
`R
`3
`
`
`>.~=.~,=X2.~\.~‘.s.\z.~==:..x
`:
`.-; ‘us -
`.\~>'
`:
`:;
`E
`:
`E
`:
`2
`2
`2
`l
`R‘
`.-..~:
`922% ..-1»-.1»-g’ 3; ‘''‘.:'‘‘‘c
`‘
`.
`3
`‘i
`5
`“N
`\
`‘KS
`E
`i
`=
`“W
`3
`”‘
`t
`3°‘
`“V
`i
`2
`.

`V.
`~
`VVV\»»»s\\\\vvvvvvvv~\§\~\ 2222........3.........~.xu...m+...........m..N. \.......mm..‘..wq..w...\.222~...2ww..f.vw..w..22..~.
`22.2.“ ‘
`,.
`E
`22.\.\\\\\\2,
`S
`E
`i
`i
`5
`5
`.
`,
`.
`2
`.
`2
`E
`t
`:
`3
`, 1
`2
`2
`:
`=
`W.“
`‘ Q‘)

`W!“
`xv‘?
`30’?
`9+;
`3
`ff?)
`E

`E
`E
`:
`W i
`E
`2 .
`E
`E
`3
`5
`'
`'
`~i\.v-...-
`.
`E
`2
`:

`.
`2
`:
`-
`-
`
`‘E-evvs-
`
`~~~2~~~~«s“s-«sf-«"“‘s«xx~u«‘.—¢«~«-«xxs‘s«w.-vwQ~ww.2\22»~~www.-¢-..~...~.W.~wwwwqwwv.~.~~~~we.we-.¢~.~wu~2-...w.,.-...~u...Q.-ae».-.~.z.».“a.~~»\\\\»\“<..»e.».“\\\.\““\“\“~\ ‘ 2 - \ ‘
`
`
`
`
`
`*2!“ *~ ax
`~“
`=
`‘
`2
`:

`,i 9} {.2
`‘,3
`“.8
`em
`. .53 ;.... xi: :2‘.
`E
`3
`.
`2
`:
`"5 {2} ix.
`“ . X.
`-..
`+2
`N:
`‘.
`:
`t
`E
`i
`5
`- 1,.
`V..
`.
`2?
`5
`2
`l
`.

`.
`\
`-
`2
`r
`_~mm.m............ .
`v\b---~»-xm---~----we-~-~mm»-»-»»»p---»-m --
`x~.~.~.~.~.-.-.~.\~.-w~.¢«.~.«s-.-.-A««\xx\x\\\\«<
`1
`t
`‘
`2
`1;
`2
`_
`_
`.¥€
`.
`.~Ȥ
`.92-2
`M
`“Vi ms‘.
`i=
`2
`its?
`3»
`“““w..2 ‘
`_
`W.-V.-we-.-ajeweeeem-mw.wwwg-aw...-.».\ww.2we-.§wm“2 ~“\\....Qmwm2“\2\~.\\.“\
`....m,,
`
`2
`
`1 :....},:5 $2.,
`~..-
`\.
`
`‘
`
`.
`
`
`
`
`
`V
`
`.
`
`;
`x.- «.2
`‘
`
`,
`
`V.
`
`"‘
`
`.
`
`$2‘?
`M
`2
`x«~.«~.~.~.~.~.~\\~.~.x~.~.ss§<~\ww~sQ««~.~.~.~.\ss-.~«{us««--~.\‘~.~.\\\\~s~.\5«««««~.~.~.x««~"~\\~.~.x~.~.€«-\\~\~.~.x~x~.x\xx--
`
`‘\\\\s~\<<<\\\\\\\\\\\
`
`ta:
`ta
`:2:
`xi
`x-2
`««««~.~.~.~.~.'w'w\\\~.~.~.xs.’««ssA~<.x‘\\\\\\\~.~.«s~.{L«q«sas~«~.~.\vw\\*.\~.\\~.§«s--.~.~.\~.v»~.-V»-.-V-.-.~.-. ~x~.-.~.~.~.~.~.««xx«\\\\x~.¢~««s««~.«~.«~.«\\~.\\~.\\~<
`
`.~"w.,.;».w
`
`
`
`
`ly,.,............,.... llllllll
`
`§§'§3$~3.i~.:l"\§3d"‘§Cl{.§
`
`
`
`....,...»...,..,,.,m,m,m.
`
`
`
`Notes:
`
`M —— miscible over the complete test temperature range
`I
`——
`immiscible over the complete test temperature range
`——°C
`—— the mixture was immiscible at and below this temperature
`
`BE: 13 8328
`Copied from 95002180 on 07/01/2014
`
`Page 13 of 260
`
`Page 13 of 260
`
`

`
`Naphthenic Mineral Oil gISO 321 The 9% refrigerant mixture was immiscible below -0.2°C.
`The seven other concentrations were immiscible throughout the test temperature range.
`
`Alkylbenzene gISO 321 The 13% refrigerant mixture was immiscible below 205°C. The seven
`other concentrations were immiscible throughout the test temperature range.
`
`Polypropylene Glycol Butyl Monoether §ISO 321 The 14%, 20%, and 34% refrigerant mixtures
`were miscible throughout the test temperature range. The 53%, 63%, and 94% refrigerant
`mixtures became immiscible at temperatures below -30.4°C, -0.1°C, and -19.6°C, respectively.
`Also, the 53%, 63%, and 94% refrigerant mixtures became immiscible at temperatures above
`55.4°C, 300°C, and 387°C,
`respectively. The 80% and 89% refrigerant mixtures were
`immiscible throughout the test temperature range.
`
`lene Gl col Diol
`
`ISO 32 All eight concentrations were miscible throughout the test
`
`temperature range.
`
`Modified Polyglycol gISO 321 The 12% and 94% rcfrigcrant mixtures were misciblc throughout
`the test temperature range. The 21%, 34%, 48%, and 65% refrigerant mixtures became hazy at
`temperatures below -40.1°C, -0.1°C, 104°C, and -0.1°C, respectively. Also, the 65% refrigerant
`mixture became immiscible at
`temperatures above 604°C. The 80% and 90% refrigerant
`mixtures became immiscible at temperatures above 604°C.
`
`The 14% and 20% refrigerant mixtures were
`Penta Erflhritol Ester Mixed-Acid §ISO 221
`miscible throughout the test temperature range. The 35%, 49%, 65%, 79%, 90%, and 95%
`refrigerant mixtures became immiscible at temperatures below -49.3°C, -19.6°C, -0.3°C, -0.3 °C,
`-10.5°C and -30.4°C,
`respectively. Also,
`the 65% and 79% refrigerant mixtures became
`immiscible at temperatures above 499°C.
`
`Penta Erfihritol Ester Mixed-Acid gISO 321 The 11%, 21%, and 34% refrigerant mixtures were
`miscible throughout the test temperature range. The 48%, 61%, 79%, 90%, and 95% refrigerant
`mixtures became hazy at temperatures below -40.1°C, -29.7°C, -19.6°C, -19.9°C, and -19.6°C,
`respectively.
`
`Penta Emhritol Ester Branched-Acid gISO 321 The 12%, 20%, and 36% refrigerant mixtures
`were miscible throughout the test temperature range. The 51%, 65%, 79%, 90%, and 94%
`refrigerant mixtures became immiscible at
`temperatures below -30.0°C,
`-19.9°C,
`-19.9°C,
`-30.0°C, and -40.5°C, respectively.
`
`Naphthenic Mineral Oil gISO 681 The 10% refrigerant mixture was immiscible below 300°C.
`The seven other concentrations were immiscible throughout the test temperature range.
`
`BE: 11 81528
`Copied from 95002180 on 07/01/2014
`
`10
`
`Page 14 of 260
`
`Page 14 of 260
`
`

`
`Alkylbenzene gISO 681 The 12% refrigerant mixture was immiscible below 97°C. The seven
`other concentrations were immiscible throughout the test temperature range.
`
`Polypropylene Glycol Butyl Monoether §ISO 581 The 12%, 21%, and 32% refrigerant mixtures
`were miscible throughout the test temperature range. The 47% refrigerant mixture became
`immiscible at temperatures below -19.8°C. The four other concentrations were immiscible
`throughout the test temperature range.
`
`The 12%, 21%, and 36% refrigerant mixtures were
`Polypropylene Glycol Diol gISO 1001
`miscible throughout the test temperature range. The 49% refrigerant mixture became immiscible
`at temperatures below -40.3 °C. Also,
`the 49% refrigerant mixture became immiscible at
`temperatures above 498°C. The four other concentrations were immiscible throughout the test
`
`temperature range.
`
`The 12% and 21% refrigerant mixtures were
`Penta Erflhritol Ester Mixed-Acid gISO 1001
`miscible throughout the test temperature range. The 35%, 51%, and 94% refrigerant mixtures
`became immiscible at temperatures below -30.1°C, 9.9°C, and -0.3°C, respectively. The 65%,
`78%, and 89% refrigerant mixtures were immiscible throughout the test temperature range.
`
`Penta Emhritol Ester Branched-Acid gISO 1001 The 12%, 21% , and 35% refrigerant mixtures
`were miscible throughout the test temperature range. The 51% and 65% refrigerant mixtures
`became immiscible at temperatures below -40.3°C, and -20.1°C, respectively. Also, the 65%
`refrigerant mixture became immiscible at
`temperatures above 498°C. The three other
`concentrations were immiscible throughout the test temperature range.
`
`provides a summary of the test data for each lubricant and R-32 pair. The polypropylene
`"fa.‘:_>le
`glycol diol (ISO 32) lubricant is completely miscible with R-32. The rest of the lubricants are
`partially miscible with R-32.
`
`BE: l§ 81528
`Copied from 95002180 on 07/01/2014
`
`11
`
`Page 15 of 260
`
`Page 15 of 260
`
`

`
`Table 2 Summary of miscibility data for R-32 and 14 lubricants.
`
`nabhthsaixizciisrslinsra
`ms use 3
`
`
`.
`\

`_
`;;
`_
`
`*
`t
`‘
`*
`3
`g
`
`
`
`g
`g
`l

`:
`‘
`{ESQ 322%
`=
`=
`&i‘x‘€be—rs2§:~..s
`v»»»»~ --«~«««-- ...u....p...... ,“___‘~
`E
`“‘—‘—*—“‘*«~*-~
`iwoi
`mm’ artist: “lam.
`t
`am»
`. W3 kl‘
`>§fi¢{:
`:>_3fi.\,5,:
`huts’? monoether
`M
`i
`‘
`_
`‘
`~;3£§“€Z
`we
`
`use 32.;
`l
`,,»,»‘.
`Iygropyiene git.-zeal
`{film €ii~3t3 323
`
`t22
`
`M
`
`in
`
`
`
`Z?’‘r*
`
`M
`M
`
`M
`V‘
`
`l E
`
`g
`l
`I
`
`
`...........www....-.~q...............,..,____r
`
`
`._..._‘¢.,“»»»,\«uuu«. /1.1.........4%,.......A..A«......A
`
`
`
`
`
` . 5
`
`.,
`W.
`.
`<
`\
`~¢iaJ°*;-
`L-""C.~
`_:
`Fa:
`
`Qt:
`
`
`
`—3e<>«;:
`M
`«:‘..a::<~‘-*2":
`
`--»»-,-L‘......«...
`
`
` 2 gtzzanta arythritoi as-zctsr
`iil'FaV€}Ch£:€3'E3(té:i§
`M
`‘.343
`__,;;§ 1: {E
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`nlapiithenic niésrxerai
`_
` +h
`E
`oi:
`as:
`
`
`afiwitaenziene
` {"30
`~
`_
`use
`A
`**‘‘‘‘‘“‘‘W‘“‘‘ “*»-—-»--~wwww-----+-vv-----_,-»»,»,~«
`3 seiypropvisne géycmi
`‘
`5
`5
`1:m:x="§ :m::m:2e':é:er
`M
`l
`M
`M
`a2{}°{,‘
`5
`‘
`I
`i¥S£3E.‘>§£.‘:i
`3"
`L
`1:
`E ,>“3‘535‘§,3C3‘W“g'I3's*‘§E.3‘i"-8 §3‘,*¢;‘i,'§$
`N
`g
`i
`:>s3t:2>=*{:
`=
`:
`vi
`1
`l
`4.
`,
`....,
`.
`2:
`vs‘:
`;
`ix»?
`'
`_
`s
`. »»..,..a..«.«... n‘.»u..,.
`
`wet it
`2.3 ?Ut3§
`3
`,~
`\
`g
`5 items ewtrirétol ester‘
`3
`m's;:<>::t:i~8c':d
`i
`iiso was
`l.
`I
`:
`;:::enta erytriritoi ester
`i....V
`;
`brsr:<:§"eee‘~a::id
`M
`M
`M
`:
`
`HEB {ESE
`
`Notes:
`M —— miscible over the complete test temperature range
`I
`——
`immiscible over the complete test temperature range
`——°C
`——
`the mixture was immiscible at and below this temperature
`>——°C
`——
`the mixture was immiscible at and above this temperature
`
`..........
`
`....,..
`

`
`:
`‘
`
`2
`5
`
`s
`‘
`
`_
`::
`
`. :
`
`M
`
`M
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`?
`
`?
`
`3
`
`1
`__,__,__,___N;_w
`*
`t
`
`3
`
`Naphthenic Mineral Oil gISO 321 All eight concentrations were miscible throughout the test
`
`temperature range.
`
`BE: 12 8328
`Copied from 95002180 on 07/01/2014
`
`12
`
`Page 16 of 260
`
`Page 16 of 260
`
`

`
`Alkylbenzene gISO 321 All eight concentrations were miscible throughout the test temperature
`
`range.
`
`Polypropylene Glycol Butyl Monoether gISO 321
`
`All eight concentrations Were miscible
`
`throughout the test temperature range.
`
`Polypropylene Glycol Diol gISO 321 All eight concentrations were miscible throughout the test
`
`temperature range.
`
`Modified Polyglycol gISO 321 All eight concentrations were miscible throughout the test
`
`temperature range.
`
`Penta Emhritol Ester Mixed-Acid §ISO 221 All eight concentrations were miscible throughout
`
`the test temperature range.
`
`Penta Emhritol Ester Mixed-Acid gISO 321 All eight concentrations were miscible throughout
`
`the test temperature range.
`
`Penta Erflhritol Ester Branched-Acid gISO 321
`
`All eight concentrations were miscible
`
`throughout the test temperature range.
`
`Naphthenic Mineral Oil gISO 681 The 11%, 21%, 38%, and 95% concentrations were miscible
`
`throughout the test temperature range. The 47%, 63%, 80%, and 89% concentrations became
`
`hazy at temperatures below -47.7°C, -47.7°C, -40.3°C, and -47.7°C, respectively.
`
`Alkylbenzene

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket