throbber
6
`Polyalkylene Glycols
`
`Paul L. Matlock, William L. Brown, and Nye A. Clinton
`Union Carbide Corporation
`Tarrytown, New York
`
`INTRODUCTION
`I.
`Polyalkylene glycols are unique among synthetic lubricants because of their high oxygen content.
`As lubricants, they are exceptionally clean, allowing use where petroleum products would build
`tars and sludges. By varying their structure, one can vary their solubilities from water soluble
`to water insoluble. They are the only lubricants available with water solubility. A product of
`World War II, they quickly found uses where petroleum-based lubricants fail. This chapter cov-
`ers lubrication uses only; however, polyalkylene glycols have many applications in addition to
`lubrication.
`
`II. HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT
`Polyalkylene glycols are one of many important industrial chemicals developed during World
`War II. This work was performed by H. R. Fife, and to a lesser extent by R. F. Holden, as a joint
`development project between Union Carbide Chemicals and Plastics Company Inc. (then known
`as the Union Carbide and Carbon Corporation) and the Mellon Institute of Industrial Research in
`Pittsburgh. Union Carbide Chemicals and Plastics Company Inc. held the original patents for the
`common lubricants [1–3].
`The first use of polyalkylene glycols was in water-based hydraulic fluids [4]. First devel-
`oped for the navy [5] for use in military aircraft, these compounds were being investigated as
`early as 1943. They were formulated from water, ethylene glycol, a polyalkylene glycol that
`acted as a thickener, and an additive package. In military aircraft, it is important that fires not
`break out when bullets or shrapnel sever hydraulic lines. The final test the Navy conducted was
`to fire a 50-caliber incendiary bullet, shredded by first passing through a steel baffle, through 1-
`gallon cans of test fluid. This test was passed by UCON Hydrolube U [6] using a polyalkylene
`glycol thickener.
`
`159
`
`Copyright © 1999 Marcel Dekker, Inc.
`
`Page 1 of 35
`
`Arkema Exhibit 1118
`
`

`
`160
`
`Matlock et al.
`
`More severe flammability requirements were established after the war. Hydraulic fluids to
`be used for missile ground handling equipment were developed that would not burn in a 100%
`gaseous oxygen atmosphere when the fluid was ejected at a pressure of 3000 psi in the presence
`of a continuous electric discharge ignition source [7]. Aqueous solutions of polyalkylene glycols
`could be formulated to pass this test.
`When polyalkylene glycols were first developed, the high viscosity indices and low pour
`points were quickly identified [8], leading to the use of these compounds in all-weather, heavy-
`duty brake fluids. Besides being fluid at temperatures that would cause petroleum products to
`freeze, they were also water tolerant. Small amounts of water contaminants would dissolve, not
`significantly changing the physical properties of the fluid nor crystallizing at low temperatures.
`This is still a major use of polyalkylene glycols today.
`Polyalkylene glycols were extensively used as aircraft engine lubricants in cold climates [9].
`Over 150,000 flying hours were accumulated, mostly in Alaska, using an inhibited polypropylene
`glycol monobutyl ether. The low pour point allowed aircraft engines to start at temperatures as
`low as ⫺30⬚F without diluting the lubricant with fuel, a step that can be used to reduce lubricant
`viscosity. It was possible to hydraulically feather the propellers using the polyalkylene glycol
`based lubricant down to ⫺60⬚F. Clean burn-off, an intrinsic property of polyalkylene glycols,
`resulted in low levels of carbon deposits and sludge, making engine cleanup easier during main-
`tenance. Polyalkylene glycols were finally judged unsuitable for aircraft engine oils because of
`factors: corrosion and deposits. Corrosion, due to the tendency of polyalkylene glycols to absorb
`water, was principally a problem for engine parts exposed to moist air. Corrosion protection
`additives were not available at that time for polyalkylene glycols. The hard deposits consist
`primarily of lead from the fuel. The clean burn-off tendency of the fluid apparently was respon-
`sible for this. The lead deposits formed with petroleum as an engine lubricant are soft and have
`a lower lead content. It is believed that these unusual lead deposits resulted in valve sticking after
`about 300–400 hours of operation [10] although no valve sticking was observed if valve clear-
`ances were adequate.
`Lubrication engineers quickly developed new uses of polyalkylene glycols. The uses devel-
`oped were for petroleum oil replacement in operations where petroleum oil was not entirely sat-
`isfactory and the higher cost of the polyalkylene glycol could be justified. The desirable proper-
`ties of the polyalkylene glycols include a low tendency to form carbon and sludge, clean burn-
`off, solvency, high viscosity indices, tolerance for rubber and other elastomers, low pour points,
`and low flammability.
`Polypropylene glycol monobutyl ethers were tested extensively as lubricants for automobile
`engines [11]. The fluids showed the expected low carbon and low sludge, as well as clean engine
`parts and satisfactory cranking at low temperature. Over 2 million miles of operation using these
`oil were experienced. This market was never developed.
`Because polyalkylene glycols burn off cleanly, they are desirable to use in high temperature
`applications where petroleum lubricants would form sludge. They have been used in glass facto-
`ries to lubricate the turrets of hot cut flare machines or to lubricate the bearings of rollers that
`smooth glass sheets. When mixed with graphite, polyalkylene glycols are very effective at lubri-
`cating bearings of carts being rolled into kilns. After the polyalkylene glycol has burned off, a
`soft, lubricating layer of graphite is left behind.
`Polyalkylene glycols were found to have little or no solvent or swelling effects on most
`synthetic or natural rubbers. This gave rise to many uses calling for the lubrication of rubber
`parts, such as rubber shackles, joints, or O-rings, or in the manufacture of rubber parts, where
`demolding lubricants were needed.
`
`Copyright © 1999 Marcel Dekker, Inc.
`
`Downloaded by [Charles Mitchell] at 20:21 16 January 2016
`
`Page 2 of 35
`
`

`
`Polyalkylene Glycols
`
`161
`
`III. CHEMISTRY
`A. Nomenclature
`Polyalkylene glycol is the common name for the homopolymers of ethylene oxide, propylene
`oxide, or butylene oxide; or the copolymers of ethylene oxide, propylene oxide, and/or butylene
`oxide. Although polyalkylene glycol is the common usage, Chemical Abstracts refers to these
`materials as polyoxyalkylene glycols. The ethylene oxide polymers are generally called poly
`(ethylene glycols) or poly (ethylene oxides). The Chemical Abstracts nomenclature is oxirane
`polymer. The propylene oxide polymers are known as poly (propylene glycols) or poly (propy-
`lene oxides) with a Chemical Abstracts name of oxirane, methyl polymer. The butylene oxide
`polymers are known as poly (butylene oxides) with a Chemical Abstracts name of oxirane, ethyl
`polymer. The copolymers are known as “oxirane, polymer with methyloxirane” or “oxirane,
`methyl polymer with oxirane,” depending on which oxide was used in the greater amount.
`Butylene oxide polymers are treated similarly. The Chemical Abstracts nomenclature does not
`distinguish between random and blocked copolymers (see below). The individual polymers and
`the copolymers all fall into the class of polyalkylene glycols. This latter name leads to the
`acronym PAGs. The acronym PAO has occasionally been used to indicate poly (alkylene oxide),
`but PAO is commonly used to designate poly (␣-olefin).
`
`B. Mechanism of Polymerization
`Polyalkylene glycols are prepared by polymerizing epoxides with a starter that consists of an
`alcohol and a smaller amount of its metal alkoxide, usually the potassium or sodium salt. The
`epoxide reacts with the metal alkoxide form of one of the starter alcohol molecules to give an
`alkoxide derivative of a new alcohol. This new metal alkoxide is in equilibrium with all the alco-
`hols present, so that the next reaction of an epoxide can occur either with the molecule that has
`already reacted or with a different alcohol:
`
`Copyright © 1999 Marcel Dekker, Inc.
`
`Downloaded by [Charles Mitchell] at 20:21 16 January 2016
`
`Page 3 of 35
`
`

`
`162
`
`Matlock et al.
`
`If the epoxide is propylene oxide, a propyloxy group results:
`
`If the epoxide is butylene oxide, a butyloxy group results:
`
`The equilibrium between alcohol and alkoxide determines the molecular weight distribution
`of the product. The epoxide monomers react with the metal salts of the alcohol at much faster
`rates than are observed with the alcohols. Whichever alcohol is most acidic will tend to form the
`alkoxide salts and will be the most reactive toward the epoxide. Once each starter alcohol has
`reacted with at least one epoxide, all molecules in the system will have approximately the same
`reactivity. Unless the parent alcohol is extremely unreactive, the fast exchange of metal salt
`between the growing polymer chains then results in what is nearly a Poisson distribution for
`molecular weight. The starter alcohols in commercial polymers use relatively reactive alcohols.
`The Poisson distribution is a much narrower distribution than the most probable or Gaussian dis-
`tribution. In many applications the narrow distribution is critical, since it means that there is no
`significant fraction of low molecular weight, volatile, or low-boiling components. In addition, a
`narrow molecular weight distribution leads to a high viscosity index. Polymerization of ethylene
`oxide produces a structure like the following:
`
`Ethylene oxide has two reactive sites, and the product is the same no matter which one reacts.
`The situation is different with propylene oxide and butylene oxide. In this case the ring opening
`occurs predominantly to produce a secondary hydroxyl group. This result is due to steric factors;
`the methylene ring position is less hindered than the methylene. For propylene oxide, 96% of the
`end groups are secondary hydroxyls and 4% are primary hydroxyls:
`
`This leads to a polymer structure approximated as follows:
`
`Copyright © 1999 Marcel Dekker, Inc.
`
`Downloaded by [Charles Mitchell] at 20:21 16 January 2016
`
`Page 4 of 35
`
`

`
`Polyalkylene Glycols
`
`163
`
`Copolymers of ethylene oxide and propylene oxide have two types of structure, random and
`blocked. In the random polymer, the two epoxides are co-fed to the starter and will both be incor-
`porated throughout the polymer. They react to give a product that is itself reactive and is in the
`acid–base equilibrium with all the other alcohols and metal alkoxylates present. To a first approx-
`imation, the epoxides are incorporated in a random manner dependent on the relative amounts of
`each epoxide present and the molecular weight distribution is still approximated by the Poisson
`model. Polymers with this structure are identified as random copolymers. A portion of the struc-
`ture of a random ethylene oxide–propylene oxide copolymer is shown schematically:
`
`In the block copolymer, an alternative structure is produced by reacting the starter first with one
`of the epoxides to produce a homopolymer. This can then be reacted with a different epoxide to
`produce a block copolymer. This name arises from the presence of a chain of one structure con-
`nected to a chain with a different structure. A block copolymer produced by feeding propylene
`oxide to propylene glycol followed by feeding ethylene oxide is shown schematically as follows:
`
`The polyalkylene glycols that are used commercially as lubricants are of five main types.
`
`1. Homopolymers of propylene oxide (polypropylene glycols), which are the water-insolu-
`ble type. These show limited solubility in oil. These are typically monobutyl ethers:
`
`2. Copolymers of ethylene oxide and propylene oxide, which are the water-soluble type.
`These are typically diols or monobutyl ethers:
`
`Copyright © 1999 Marcel Dekker, Inc.
`
`Downloaded by [Charles Mitchell] at 20:21 16 January 2016
`
`Page 5 of 35
`
`

`
`164
`
`Matlock et al.
`
`3. Polymers of butylene oxide. These show greater oil solubility than the homopolymers of
`propylene oxide. They have the following structure:
`
`4. Polymers of propylene oxide and higher epoxides designed to give greater oil solubility.
`These have the following structure:
`
`5. Polymers of propylene oxide that are dimethyl ethers:
`
`Polymers consisting of all ethyloxy groups, the polyethylene glycols, are not often used as lubri-
`cants, since they tend to crystallize at room temperature when their molecular weight exceeds
`600. Nevertheless, solid polyethylene glycols are used in specialty lubrication applications where
`the solid formulation is advantageous.
`The tendency of polyethylene glycol chains to crystallize affects the block polyalkylene gly-
`cols. If the blocks of ethyloxy groups are long enough in a block copolymer, pastes or waxes result.
`Block structures also tend to give the polymers surfactant properties in water. As a result, block
`polyalkylene glycols are often used as surfactants. However, surfactant-like properties are of little
`use for most lubrication applications.
`The epoxide polymers formed by base-catalyzed reactions typically have molecular weights
`of less than 20,000. Traces of water in the monomer feed and minor side reactions limit the aver-
`age molecular weight that can be achieved. The major side reaction for the base-catalyzed poly-
`merization of propylene oxide is the rearrangement of propylene oxide to allyl alcohol. This was
`recognized as early as 1956 [12]. The rearrangement involves deprotonation of the methyl group
`on the propylene oxide, followed by intramolecular ring opening:
`
`Copyright © 1999 Marcel Dekker, Inc.
`
`Downloaded by [Charles Mitchell] at 20:21 16 January 2016
`
`Page 6 of 35
`
`

`
`Polyalkylene Glycols
`
`165
`
`This mechanism is supported by kinetic studies with 1, 2-epoxypropane-3,3,3-D, which show a
`large positive isotope effect [13]. The allyl alcohol formed reacts with ethylene oxide and propy-
`lene oxide to yield new polyalkylene glycol molecules, which are monoallyl ethers. This chain
`transfer reaction limits the ultimate molecular weight that can be achieved with base catalysis.
`Although rearrangement of butylene oxide is not reported, this compound undoubtedly undergoes
`a similar base-catalyzed rearrangement. Strong base catalysts that give reduced amounts of unsat-
`uration are reported to be barium and strontium hydroxides [14].
`An alternative technology for polymerization can produce much higher molecular weight
`ethylene oxide polymers. Using coordinate-initiated polymerization, it is possible to produce eth-
`ylene oxide polymers with molecular weights in excess of a million. These compounds are pro-
`duced commercially by Union Carbide Chemicals and Plastics Corporation under the trade name
`of Polyox. A calcium amide alkoxide suspended in a solvent that does not dissolve the polymer
`product is used. Ethylene oxide is added and the polymer, not being soluble in the medium, is
`produced as a granular solid. Polymerization is thought to take place by coordination of the epox-
`ide to an electrophilic site on the catalysts. This coordination activates the epoxide for reaction
`with the growing chain.
`
`C. Synthesis of Polyalkylene Glycols
`Ethylene oxide is a toxic material with a time-weighted average for 8 hours of exposure of 1 ppm
`and a short-term permissible limit of 5 ppm in a 15-minute period, as determined by the federal
`Office of Occupational Safety and Health (OSHA). It is highly flammable and has a wide flam-
`mable range in air of 3.0–100%. It can explosively decompose if exposed to an ignition source.
`The flammability is only heightened by a boiling point of 10.4⬚C, making it a gas at ordinary tem-
`peratures. It can be polymerized with acidic, basic, and coordination catalysts, a polymerization
`that is very exothermic. A very careful study of tile hazards and procedures for safely handling
`ethylene oxide must be undertaken before the use of this substance is attempted. Similar hazards
`exists with propylene oxide and butylene oxide.
`In the laboratory, it is possible to use glass equipment at atmospheric pressure to prepare
`ethylene oxide, propylene oxide, and mixed ethylene oxide–propylene oxide polymers. A
`nitrogen-flushed flask is charged with the starter solution and fitted with a dry-ice condenser.
`A small amount of the epoxide is fed to the heated flask (typically 100⬚C or more) and
`allowed to reflux from the dry-ice condenser. The epoxide charge will be slowly consumed by
`the polymerization reaction, and the reflux rate will decrease. More epoxide is added at a rate
`sufficient to keep the system at reflux [15]. The rate can be increased by keeping the appara-
`tus under a slight pressure from a dip tube immersed in an inert liquid. The higher pressure
`increases the concentration of monomer in the reaction solution. To make a random copoly-
`mer, the two oxides are co-fed; a block copolymer requires sequential feeds of the two differ-
`ent epoxides. A similar system can be designed for coordinate-initiated polymerization.
`The use of an autoclave for the polymerization will result in much faster rates, since opera-
`tion at higher pressures is possible, resulting in much higher liquid phase concentrations of
`the monomers. The epoxide can be fed either by forcing it into the autoclave from a pressurized
`feed vessel with nitrogen pressure or by pumping it into the reactor. The reactor needs to be
`equipped with a cooling system and a control scheme to follow and regulate both pressure and
`temperature. The reactor is heated to the desired operating temperature and the epoxide fed until
`the pressure has reached the desired level. As the reaction progresses, the pressure will fall and
`more epoxide can be fed. Pure ethylene oxide vapor can explosively decompose upon exposure
`to an ignition source. A sufficient amount of nitrogen present before the initiation of the epoxide
`feed will ensure that the vapor phase does not reach the flammable limit at any time during the
`
`Copyright © 1999 Marcel Dekker, Inc.
`
`Downloaded by [Charles Mitchell] at 20:21 16 January 2016
`
`Page 7 of 35
`
`

`
`166
`
`Matlock et al.
`
`run. It is critical to keep the inventory of unreacted oxide in the reactor at a level such that the
`heat of polymerization (20 kcal/mol) can be removed by the cooling system. A critical factor in
`keeping the oxide concentration low is the reactor temperature. If pressure is the control mecha-
`nism, a low temperature in the reactor will allow the oxide to build to a potentially unsafe con-
`centration. Concentration of unreacted epoxides is the cause of the greatest number of reactor
`failures. The problem becomes larger with propylene oxide and especially butylene oxide, where
`the vapor pressure of the oxide may not be a reliable indication of liquid phase concentration. The
`reactor should have a safety relief device sized to handle a runaway reaction due to loss of cool-
`ing. One of the authors has seen an autoclave and its high pressure cell catastrophically destroyed,
`with the autoclave top thrown many hundreds of feet. The cause was the inadvertent feeding of
`ethylene oxide at a low temperature, an error that allowed the accumulation of a large inventory
`of ethylene oxide. The uncontrolled polymerization that followed proved to be uncontainable.
`To avoid exposure of personnel to unreacted ethylene oxide or propylene oxide, it is neces-
`sary to hold the reactor contents at temperature after the end of the feed until the concentration
`of unreacted epoxides has dropped to an acceptable level. This procedure is called a cook-out or
`digestion. A cook-out may be necessary during synthesis because the vessel will fill with liquid
`as the reaction proceeds and the polymer is produced. This will compress the nitrogen in the ves-
`sel, and the partial pressure of the monomer will therefore decrease (the system is run by keep-
`ing pressure constant). The reaction rates will fall to unacceptably low levels. Venting of the
`excess nitrogen after a cook-out will allow feed to be resumed at faster rates. It may even be
`necessary to remove some of the reactor’s liquid contents to allow room for further reaction.
`This is most likely to occur during the synthesis of higher molecular weight products.
`The commercial preparation of poly(alkylene oxides) is carried out in a manner analo-
`gous to that described for the laboratory autoclave. A semibatch stainless steel system with
`a recirculation loop and an agitator has been described. The reactions are carried out at
`100–120⬚C at pressures of 60 psig. The oxide feed rate is controlled by pressure, and feed
`times are on the order of 15 hours or more [16].
`Pressindustria Company has reported a novel method for synthesizing polyalkylene gly-
`cols [17]. The solution of growing polymer is sprayed through the headspace of a horizontal
`reactor. The reaction with oxide monomer is reported to take place at the gas–liquid interface.
`Rapid reactions without large increases in pressure or temperature are reported. Cooling takes
`place with an external heat exchanger.
`The first commercial-scale syntheses were performed at the Union Carbide production facil-
`ity in Charleston, West Virginia. The first preparations were similar to that used today. Sodium
`salts of alcohols were used as starters at reaction temperatures slightly above those used currently.
`Butanol was the starter alcohol of choice for monoethers. The products developed at this time
`form the backbone of the UCON® Fluids product line of Union Carbide and has been widely
`duplicated by other manufacturers. The method first used at Union Carbide to neutralize these
`fluids was unusual. The crude fluids were diluted with water, acidified with carbon dioxide,
`extracted with hot water, and then stripped of water at high temperature. Decolorizing with acti-
`vated charcoal was the last step.
`
`D. Preparation of Capped Polyalkylene Glycol
`Polypropylene glycol dimethyl ether has become available as a commercial lubricant. This
`requires that the hydroxyl end groups be converted to the methyl ether:
`
`Copyright © 1999 Marcel Dekker, Inc.
`
`Downloaded by [Charles Mitchell] at 20:21 16 January 2016
`
`Page 8 of 35
`
`

`
`Polyalkylene Glycols
`
`167
`
`Although the conditions used commercially to effect this transformation are not reported, it is
`almost certainly done by a Williamson ether synthesis. This involves converting the alcohol to its
`alkoxide form, followed by reaction with methyl chloride:
`
`The art of this transformation is the conversion of the alcohol into its alkoxide. Sodium hydrox-
`ide is the most convenient base, and it works well for low molecular weight ethoxylates [18,19].
`Higher molecular weight ethoxylates can be capped by means of sodium hydroxide and a phase
`transfer catalyst [20]. Propoxylates, which are secondary alcohols, hence more difficult to con-
`vert to their alkoxide form, are normally capped by adding sodium or potassium methoxide and
`driving the equilibrium reaction between the different alkoxide forms to the polyether alkoxide
`by removing the methanol [21]. Capping efficiency is limited by the difficulty of converting all
`the end groups to the higher energy alkoxide species. Improved yields can be obtained by using
`sodium hydride after the methoxide reaction has been driven as far as is practical [21] or by using
`sodium hydride alone [22].
`
`E. Oxidative and Thermal Stability
`The bond strength of the carbon–carbon bond is 84 kcal/mol (ethane), which is slightly stronger
`than the 76 kcal/mol carbon–oxygen bond of an ether (dimethyl ether) [22]. Other authors have
`reported that carbon–oxygen ether bonds are comparable to, or slightly stronger than, the usual
`carbon–carbon bonds [23]. However, from a thermochemical standpoint, polyalkylene glycols
`are usually considered less stable than typical hydrocarbons. In the absence of air, they can be
`used up to about 250⬚C.
`The poly(alkylene oxides) are all polyethers with an oxygen atom in every third position of the
`polymer backbone. As with all ethers, a secondary or tertiary carbon adjacent to the ether oxygen
`is susceptible to oxidative attack. The mechanism involves a free radical abstraction of the hydro-
`gen on the ␣ carbon, resulting in a carbon-based radical stabilized by the adjacent oxygen atom.
`This can then react with oxygen to produce a peroxy radical. The chain process is continued, with
`the peroxy radical abstracting a hydrogen atom to give another oxygen stabilized radical:
`
`Copyright © 1999 Marcel Dekker, Inc.
`
`Downloaded by [Charles Mitchell] at 20:21 16 January 2016
`
`Page 9 of 35
`
`

`
`168
`
`Matlock et al.
`
`The process does not continue to build peroxide levels, since a number of mechanisms lead to
`peroxide destruction. In the early stages of oxidation the peroxide will increase, but as the reac-
`tion proceeds and carbonyl levels build, the peroxide level reaches a steady state. Further reac-
`tion will lead to the formation of acidic material. As the acidic oxidation products build, the vis-
`cosity begins to drop. Studies of the oxidation of polypropylene glycols [25] and polyethylene
`glycols [26] show that the polymers degrade into lower molecular weight products as they oxi-
`dize. This is in contrast to the behavior of petroleum products, which build higher molecular
`weight products as they oxidize [27]. It is these higher molecular weight materials that precipi-
`tate from the oil and produce sludge.
`It is the fate of the hydroperoxides that determines the tendency of a lubricant to form sludge.
`In the case of petroleum, the hydroperoxides form hydrocarbon-based aldehydes, which can
`undergo aldol condensations to form high molecular weight ␣,␤-unsaturated species that them-
`selves are reactive [28]. This leads to the formation of high molecular weight polar species that
`are not soluble in the parent nonpolar base oil and therefore precipitate out of solution to form
`sludge.
`
`The fate of hydroperoxides is different in polyalkylene glycols and in petroleum. Because
`every third atom is an oxygen, a high proportion of the chain cleavage products in the former case
`are esters. While esters can condense, the reaction is difficult and is unlikely to occur. The type
`of end groups can be determined by proton magnetic resonance. For polyethylene glycols, a
`prominent formate peak is formed at 8.1 ppm, indicating the following reaction:
`
`Copyright © 1999 Marcel Dekker, Inc.
`
`Downloaded by [Charles Mitchell] at 20:21 16 January 2016
`
`Page 10 of 35
`
`

`
`Polyalkylene Glycols
`
`169
`
`In the case of polypropylene glycols, the reaction products are more complex owing to the greater
`complexity of the molecules. The end groups produced are shown in Table 1 [25]. These end
`groups are not simple aldehydes and will undergo condensation with difficulty.
`When sufficient degradation has taken place, volatile products will be produced. These have
`been quantified in the case of polypropylene glycol degradation [25], as shown in Table 2.
`The oxidation of polyalkylene glycols yields polar, oxygenated products. Polyalkylene gly-
`cols themselves are polar and will dissolve these oxidation products. In contrast, oils are nonpo-
`lar and their oxidation products are polar, consisting of peroxides and carbonyl species as well.
`Oils will not dissolve these polar species, and this property contributes directly to their tendency
`to form sludge and varnish.
`The tendency of polyalkylene glycols to solubilize their own degradation products, and their
`cleavage to form volatile species, can be cited to explain their low Conradson carbon and
`Ramsbotton carbon (ASTM D189 and D 524), typically less that 0.01%. When sludges do form
`from polyalkylene glycols, it is usually in oxygen-starved systems as a result of aldehyde conden-
`sation. Under conditions of exhaustive oxidation, the chain cleavage will have occurred to such an
`extent that the oxidation products evaporate. The volatilization of the fluid, together with the ten-
`dency not to form carbon or sludge, means that the polyalkylene glycol will be removed under
`high temperature applications in a property known as clean burn-off. Clean burn-off is important
`in a number of the applications for these products—for example, as a carrier for graphite on chains
`being used in ovens or kilns. As with the pyrolysis products of any organic material, good venti-
`lation, should be installed to ensure the removal of the vapors from the workplace.
`The oxidation of polyalkylene glycols could result in shorter than desired service life for
`some applications. Oxidation can effectively be controlled through the addition of antioxidants
`to interrupt the chain transfer oxidation mechanism [29]. Typical antioxidants that have been
`used include butylated hydroxyanisole, phenothiazine, hydroquinone monomethyl ether, butyl-
`
`Copyright © 1999 Marcel Dekker, Inc.
`
`Downloaded by [Charles Mitchell] at 20:21 16 January 2016
`
`Page 11 of 35
`
`

`
`170
`
`Matlock et al.
`
`ated hydroxytoluene [30], and phenyl-␣-naphthylamine [31, p. 109]. The poly(alkylene oxides)
`are dramatically stabilized toward oxidation by the addition of antioxidants. In many cases antiox-
`idants at levels of a few hundred parts per million are sufficient to stabilize against oxidative degra-
`dation under mild conditions and higher levels will stabilize these systems under much more
`severe conditions. The uses of inhibited polyalkylene glycols as heat transfer fluids and as gear and
`calender lubricants are all examples of successful high temperature applications. These applica-
`tions show that if the system is protected against oxidative attack, either by the addition of an
`antioxidant or by removal of oxygen, polyalkylene glycols will have very good high temperature
`stability.
`
`F. End Group Chemistry
`The polyalkylene glycols all have at least one hydroxyl group on the end of the molecule. If they
`have been produced from water or a multifunctional starter, they will have more than one hydroxyl
`group. The polyols used for urethane applications perform by virtue of the reaction of the
`hydroxyl groups reacting with isocyanate groups to give the urethane linkage. In this application,
`stearic factors cause the primary hydroxyl group to be more reactive than a secondary hydroxyl.
`The urethane polyols are formed from propylene oxide. Since this results in a less reactive
`secondary hydroxyl end group, it is necessary to end-cap the polyol with a small amount of
`ethylene oxide to increase the number of primary alcohol terminated molecules.
`Other end group reactions are used to functionalize polyalkylene glycols. These reactions use
`the known alcohol derivatization reactions. Esters are formed by reaction with either organic or
`inorganic acids. In addition to the etherification reactions already discussed, it is possible to react
`the alcohol with a strong acid and an olefin to give an alkyl ether cap.
`Other derivatization reactions of the alcohol end group are possible. It has been reported that
`poly (dichlorophosphazene) can be reacted with polyalkylene glycols to give poly(phosphazene)
`derivatized with grafted polyalkylene glycol chains [32]. These materials are reported to have
`utility as metalworking lubricants.
`
`G. Coordination Chemistry
`The presence of an ether oxygen atom at every third position of the polymer backbone leads
`to the rich coordination chemistry of these compounds. The use of these polymers as phase
`transfer agents has been reviewed [33]. Complexation with phenols, phenolic resins, bromine,
`
`Copyright © 1999 Marcel Dekker, Inc.
`
`Downloaded by [Charles Mitchell] at 20:21 16 January 2016
`
`Page 12 of 35
`
`

`
`Polyalkylene Glycols
`
`171
`
`iodine, gelatin, sulfonic acids, mercuric slats, tannic acid, poly(acrylic acid), and urea all have been
`reported [34]. The use of poly(ethylene oxide) polymers as flocculation agents is related to their absorp-
`tion on colloidal silica, clay, and minerals.
`The facile wetting of metal parts in lubrication applications is related to the ability of the
`polymer to associate with me metal surface. Like the complexation of other chemical species, the
`ability of the polyalkylene glycol to wet a metal surface is due to the presence of an ether oxy-
`gen atom at every third position of the polymer chain. This results in good extreme pressure and
`metalworking performance. The solution properties of these polymers in water are also directly
`related to the association of the water with the ether oxygen atoms.
`
`IV. PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
`A. Base Fluids
`The physical properties of poly(alkylene oxides) are best understood by considering them as a
`series of homologous derivatives. Thus the polymers derived exclusively f

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket