The miracles of science‘
`
`Honeywell
`
`Update on a Low GWP Refrigerant:
`Fluid H
`
`Mark W. Spatz
`Global Leader Refrigerant Technology
`Honeywell Fluorine Products
`
`SAE 2007 Alternatives Refrigerant Systems Symposium
`July 17-19, 2007
`
`1 of 51
`
`Arkema Exhibit 1081
`
`
`
`Honeywell
`
`Update on a Low GWP Refrigerant:
`Fluid H
`
`Mark W. Spatz
`Global Leader Refrigerant Technology
`Honeywell Fluorine Products
`
`SAE 2007 Alternatives Refrigerant Systems Symposium
`July 17-19, 2007
`
`1 of 51
`
`Arkema Exhibit 1081
`
`
`
`Honeywell
`
`The miracles a/science‘
`
`Agenda
`
`- Material compatibility
`
`- Stability
`
`- Environmental
`
`- Toxicity
`
`- Performance
`
`- Servicing
`
`2of51
`
`
`
`The miracles afsciencr
`
`Honeywell
`
`Compatible Materials are Available
`-
`-
`Standard Veneer Hose
`m I n I -S h
`Permeation [glmld] on STD Veneer Hose ID13
`-Baseline R134a & Drop-in Fluid H
`
`'Acceptab|e level of leakage and selective
`permeation obtained using same scaling
`
`factor as R-134a.
`
`-The materials and hoses used (type B) was
`shown by an independent lab to have
`
`alternatives with reduced permeation.
`Pemieation [glmly] on Artic3 Veneer Hose ID13
`LeakRate
`
`Artic3 Veneer Hose
`
`3of51
`
`
`
`The miracles a/science"
`
`Honeywell
`
`Improved Stability Results With POE Lubricants
`
`Significant progress made in optimizing POE formulations for
`Fluid H.
`
`- Several lubricant producers have formulated commercial POE
`lubricants
`
`— Pass test at 175 C, 33% saturated water with copper, steel and aluminum
`
`— Some copper discoloration
`
`- Other lubricant companies continue to evaluate PAGs, POEs and
`Alkyl benzene lubricants
`
`- Honeywell compressor testing
`
`— Fixed displacement compressor passes 400 hour test
`
`— Variable displacement compressor test recently completed.
`
`4of5l
`
`
`
`The miracles a/science‘
`
`Honeywell
`
`CPI Demonstrated Good Stability with Fluid H
`
`- Sealed Tube: 190°C for 24 hr
`
`— No visual lubricant change
`
`— No solids or deposits
`
`— TAN <2 mg KOH/g
`
`- Sealed Tube: 175°C for 14 days
`
`— No visual lubricant change
`
`— No solids or deposits
`
`— TAN <2 mg KOH/g
`
`- 190C 24hr TAN significantly lower
`
`5of51
`
`
`
`‘
`
`fire miracles of science‘
`
`Honeywell
`
`CPI Results: Sealed tube results at 190°Cl24hr
`
`190°CI24 hrs
`Sample 1
`
`2.1
`
`Sample 7
`
`Sample 8
`
`6of51
`
`
`
`‘imm’
`
`The mlmdes afsciencr
`
`Honeywell
`
`Sealed tube results at 175°C for 2 weeks
`
`Copper Side
`
`Aluminum/Steel Side
`
`7of51
`
`
`
`The miracles ofscience‘
`
`Honeywell
`
`Additional Stable Oils for Fluid H
`
`rfis
`
`E”
`
`°
`
`ISO VG 80 POE Thermal Stability
`
`- Sealed Tube Test 30%F|uid H, Cu, Al, and Fe
`
`- No Oil Discoloration, No Deposits Observed
`190°C I 24h
`175°C I 2 wks
`
`
`
`Water
`
`~35 ppm
`
`~35 ppm
`
`TAN
`
`1 .3
`
`Copper Matt
`
`8of51
`
`
`
`‘
`
`The miracles of science‘
`
`Honeywell
`
`Encouraging Compressor Test Results with Latest Lubricants
`
`- Honeywell compressor testing
`
`Fixed Displacement Compressor
`
`— Low charge, high pressure,
`heated compressor environment.
`
`— Fixed displacement compressor
`passed 400 hour test
`
`- No unusual wear
`
`- All parts appeared bright
`
`- Very low TAN (below 0.2)
`
`- Visually the oil remained clear
`(like original).
`
`—Variable displacement clutchless
`compressor recently completed
`same test.
`
`- No significant change in
`lubricant chemistry
`
`- Awaiting tear-down analysis.
`
`9of51
`
`
`
`The miracles afscience‘
`
`Honeywell
`
`Favorable Environmental Properties of Fluid H
`
`- 1234yf:
`Atmospheric chemistry determined at University of Copenhagen.
`
`Atmospheric lifetime is 12 days via reaction with *OH radicals in the
`atmosphere.
`Direct GWP1oo = 4.
`ODP = 0
`
`- CF3l:
`Atmospheric chemistry previously determined.
`
`CF3l decomposes photolytically.
`Atmospheric Lifetime is 1-4 days in air, in sunlight.
`Direct GWP1oo ~ 1.
`Study to update 2D ODP values and extend to 3D completed.
`- Results for both 2D & 3D = 0.006
`
`- Applying these values to the blend of 70% 1234yf and 30% CF3l results in
`an ODP of 0.002 for Fluid H.
`
`- The study that developed these values will soon be published.
`
`10
`
`10 of 51
`
`
`
`Honeywell
`
`The miracles afscience‘
`
`Recent Toxicity Update
`
`- 1234yf:
`
`— Completed 90 exposure study
`
`- NOEL = 50,000 (highest value tested)
`
`— Completed genomic carcinogenicity test
`
`- Findings: 1234yf non-carcinogenic
`
`— Honeywell AEL established at 1000 ppm
`
`(same as R-134a).
`
`- CF3|:
`
`— Completed genomic carcinogenicity test
`
`- Findings: CF3l non carcinogenic
`
`11 of 51
`
`
`
`iflllllllli
`
`the miracles of science‘
`
`Honeywell
`
`- Results of numerous tests
`
`conducted by OEMs and Tier 1’s
`show comparable capacity with
`minimal hardware change and
`potential for equivalent COP with
`optimization.
`
`- Example: Valeo results
`presented at recent VTMS
`meeting.
`
`‘I
`
`Ev0'vul.on or the NC loop £00
`
`1! -—---———--—~—-«———-« . fill)‘. gpmgg .q‘,vu ;—-———-
`
`A-
`
`
`
`l'l
`mi
`
`_
`
`.
`
`Evolution of the avapotator blown alt temperature
`
`in-134:
`
`zriuum IR-14.4".
`
`Fcmpnraluve
`
`I'll:
`
`Ccoluown 3'
`
`Cochsowv IO
`
`Caoduvm an‘
`
`M4 :3
`
`bmfuuor at me Ionconunlun inhalant: J! the «mentor math!
`
`'14‘
`
`;,_II.IMa
`
`luau lI'u-
`
`—
`
`—
`
`—pp.au-p-.
`
`12
`
`12 of 51
`
`
`
`The miracles alscience
`
`Honeywell
`
`Use Std. Servicing Procedures & Equipment
`
`.---.-..
`' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
`
`_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ,
`_ _ _- -
`
`Dotted lines indicate default blend tolerance of +I- 2% of
`each component
`
`Original
`(cylinder)
`
`Initial Vehicle
`
`Sample #1
`
`Sam pie #2
`
`Sample #3
`
`50% Leak
`
`Internal
`Cylinder
`
`-Testsperformedon
`standard recycling
`
`80%
`
`70%
`
`60%
`":1ig cycles performed
`E 50%
`followed by a
`simulated 50% leak. §
`— No change in
`g ‘°’
`composition in
`g
`internal tank.
`3 3°"/~
`
`- R-134a leak detectors
`can be uSed_
`
`20%
`
`10%
`
`0%
`
`13
`
`13 of 51
`
`
`
`The miracles of science‘
`
`Conclusions
`
`Honeywell
`
`Significant progress made in the development of this refrigerant.
`Stability continues to improve with latest generation lubricants.
`Compatible materials are available.
`Lower leak rates than 134a production component system
`demonstrated with next generation seal and hose materials.
`Favorable environmental & toxicity results.
`Results of performance evaluations are promising especially in
`optimized systems.
`Aftermarket service procedures unchanged from R-134a.
`This refrigerant continues to show promise as a cost-effective
`LGWP replacement for R-134a.
`
`DISCLAIMER
`
`Although all statements and lnfonnation contained herein are believed to be accurate and reliable. they are presented without guarantee or warranty of any
`kind, expressed or implied. lnfonnation provided herein does not relieve the user from the responsibility of canying out its own tests and experiments, and
`the user assumes all risks and liability for use of the lnfonnation and results obtained. Statements or suggestions concerning the use of materials and
`processes are made without representation or warranty that any such use is free of patent infringement and are not recommendations to infringe on any
`patents. The user should not assume that all toxicity data and safety measures are indicated herein or that other measures may not be required.
`
`14
`
`14 of 51
`
`
`
`The miracles of science‘
`
`Honeywell
`
`DP-1 Update — Low GWP
`MAC Refrigerant
`
`Barbara Minor
`
`Engineering Fellow
`DuPont Fluoroproducts
`
`SAE 2007 Alternatives Refrigerant Systems
`Symposium July 17-19, 2007
`
`
`
`Honeywell
`
`The miracles afscience‘
`
`Topics
`
`—Environmental
`
`—Safety
`
`—Compatibi|ity
`
`—DP-1 Optimization
`
`—|ndustry Performance Testing
`
`—Conclusions
`
`16 of 51
`
`
`
`The miracles afscience‘
`
`Honeywell
`
`DP—1: Excellent Environmental/Safety
`Properties
`
`- Zero-ODP
`
`- Very Low GWP:
`
`— Estimated at 30-35 (well below EU 150 limit)
`
`— Provides margin for uncertainty involving future changes in GWP
`determination (SAR, TAR, SROC)
`
`— 3”‘ party measurements in progress; final paper — July/07
`
`- Non—flammable (by ASHRAE Std 34 and ASTM 681 under
`all required scenarios)
`
`- Improved LCCP versus CO2 and 134a
`
`17 of 51
`
`
`
`tiflfllillli
`
`me miracies of science‘
`
`Honeywell
`
`Determination of DP-1 GWP and Degradation Products
`
`Work on new compound being conducted at
`
`NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Chemical Sciences Division (CSD)
`Dr. A.R. Ravishankara, Acting Director
`
`"C50: Understanding. Our _(_2o*mfp|ex Atmosphere.
`
`The Stratospheric
`Ozone Layer
`
`Being carried out by a team with long
`history of CFC-substitute
`
`The %i;ehmIstiry, Rfaaiatlon, and
`\_
`am as o
`Imahe
`Lf ’\
`.-~~._
`{
`‘rx
`\ r A-
`
`-
`
`"
`
`,
`Reglona
`Tropospheric
`Chemistry
`
`.\__
`K3“
`
`
`
`State—of-Understanding Assessments:
`Relating Science to Information Needs
`
`18
`
`18 of 51
`
`studies
`
`A. R. Ravishankara
`
`R. K . Talukdar
`
`J. B. Burkholder
`
`V. Padadimitriou
`
`R. Portmann
`
`
`
`The miracles afscience‘
`
`Honeywell
`
`Status of NOAA Scientists’ Testing of New Compound
`
`-
`
`Initial GWP determination is complete
`
`— Estimated GWP for DP—1 is about 30-35
`
`— Lifetime of new compound is about 10 days
`
`- Path Forward
`
`— Further investigation of degradation pathways and products to
`ensure no “show stoppers”
`
`— More detailed GWP calculation based on 3-D model results for
`
`atmospheric distribution of short lived compounds
`
`— “Smog chamber” studies to investigate VOC properties
`
`— Preparation and publication of papers with results from above
`studies and presentation to EU
`
`19
`
`19 of 51
`
`
`
`The miracles of science‘
`
`Honeywell
`
`Toxicity Status — New Compound
`
`Test
`
`Status
`
`Acute — short term (e.g. vehicle driver)
`
`4 hour LC50
`
`Ames
`
`In vitro chrom ab
`
`In vivo micronucleus
`
`Cardiac sensitization
`
`Repeated dose — long term (e.g. mfr/service)
`
`28 day inhalation
`
`90 day inhalation
`
`Developmental/reproductive
`
`
`
`20 of 51
`
`
`
`The miracles afscience‘
`
`Honeywell
`
`DP—1: Excellent Plastics Compatibility
`- Compatible with Apollo ND8 at 100°C for two weeks
`
`Refrigerant
`
`Rat
`
`_
`24 h Post
`‘"9 Weight Chg. °/o
`
`Physical
`
`Change
`
`Pol ester
`
`4.8
`
`Polyethylene Terephthalate
`
`Pol
`
`imide
`
`Refrigerant
`
`Pol ester
`
`24 h Post
`Rating weight Chg. %
`
`Physical
`
`Change
`
`Polyethylene Terephthalate
`
`Pol
`
`imide
`
`Rating 0 = weight gain < 1 and physical change = 0
`1 = weight gain > 1 and < 10 and/or physical change = 2
`2 = weight gain > 10 and/or physical change = 2
`
`21
`
`21 of 51
`
`
`
`The miracles afscience‘
`
`Honeywell
`
`DP-1: Excellent Elastomers Compatibility
`— Compatible with Apollo ND8 at 100°C for two weeks
`
`Refrigerant
`
`Elastomers
`
`Rating
`
`24 h Post
`
`24 h Post
`
`Linear Swell Weight
`O/o
`Gain °/o
`
`24 h Post
`Delta
`Hardness
`
`‘ eoprene
`
`
`.“U1
`
`But
`
`I rubber
`
`Refrigerant
`
`Elastomers
`
`Rating
`
`24 h Post
`
`24 h Post
`
`Linear Swell Weight
`0/0
`Gain °/o
`
`24 h Post
`Delta
`
`Hardness
`
`Neoprene
`WRT
`
`Bu I rubber
`
`Rating:
`
`0 < 10% weight gain and < 10% Linear swell and < 10 hardness change
`1 > 10% weight gain or > 10% Linear swell or > 10 hardness change
`2 > 10% weight gain and > 10% Linear swell and > 10 hardness change
`
`22 of 51
`
`
`
`The miracles afscience‘
`
`Honeywell
`
`No Significant Issues with Temperature Glide
`
`kIR h
`
`F
`
`ec arge roma ys em
`
`S t
`
`DP-1V
`
`L
`
`apor ea
`
`105%
`
`.
`
`. DP_1capacItydrops
`only about 5% after
`multiple leaks and
`recharges of the
`
`system,
`
`- COP increases slightly
`
`- No performance or
`design issues dueto
`glide identified during
`partner testing
`
`23 of 51
`
`
`
`RelativeCapacityorCOP
`
`95%
`
`90%
`
`85%
`
`8°%
`
`+ Delta cop
`
`+ Delta Cap
`
`°
`
`'
`'
`*
`'
`*
`5
`4
`3
`2
`‘
`Number of LeaksIRecharges
`
`5
`
`
`
`The miracles a)'science'
`
`Honeywell
`
`Third Party DP-1 Soft Optimization Recommendations
`
`- Adjust evaporator pressure for DP-1 to about 10%
`less than R134a (e.g. 270 kPa DP-1 vs 300 kPa R134a).
`
`- For orifice tube, go to next lower diameter size versus
`R134a, also to achieve lower evaporating pressure
`
`- Target subcooling similar to R134a
`
`— Increase charge size of DP-1 about 5—10%
`
`— Because DP-1 discharge pressure is lower than
`R134a, there is room to increase charge size
`
`- Target superheat similar or slightly less (e.g. 1-2°C)
`than R134a due to temperature glide
`
`24 of 51
`
`
`
`The miracles of science‘
`
`DP-1 Equipment Optimization Options
`
`Honeywell
`
`- Modify evaporator to achieve counter-current flow which can
`provide an advantage for a glide refrigerant such as DP-1
`
` Fiure 1S Simle tank evaorator 4 asses
`
`Fiure 28 Multi tank evaorator 4 asses
`
`- Optional internal heat exchanger also increased capacity
`4-7% and COP 2.5-4% (not used in following tests)
`
`25 of 51
`
`
`
`The miracles of science‘
`
`Honeywell
`
`Cooling Capacity and COP in an Optimized System —
`30°C Ambient Temperature
`
`Cooling capacity for 30 °C
`
`COP for 30 °C
`
`2900
`
`2700
`
`2500
`
`2300
`
`2100
`
`1900
`
`1700
`
`1500
`
`1300
`
`1100
`
`900
`
`700
`
`
`
`
`
`Coolingcapacity[W]
`
`
`
`1 60/450
`
`260/ 1 1 50
`
`360/1750
`
`360/ 1 750
`
`160/450
`
`260/1 150
`
`Air flow couples Ev I Cond [m3Ih]
`
`
`Air flow couples Ev I Cond [m3Ih]
`
`
`
`26 of 51
`
`
`
`The miracles of science-
`
`Honeywell
`
`Cooling Capacity and COP in an Optimized System —
`40°C Ambient Temperature
`
`Cooling capacity for 40 °C
`
`COP for 40 °C
`
`3500
`
`3300
`
`3100
`
`2900
`
`2700
`
`2500
`
`2300
`
`2100
`
`1900
`
`1700
`
`1500
`
`1300
`
`1100
`
`
`
`
`
`Coolingcapacity[W]
`
`Air flow couples Evl Cond [m3Ih]
`
`Air flow couples Ev I Cond [m3Ih]
`
`
`
`27
`
`27 of 51
`
`160/450 260/1150
`
`1 60/450
`
`260/ 1 150
`
`360/1750
`
`360/1 750
`
`
`
`Honeywell
`
`The miracles of science‘
`
`DP-1: Industry Performance Testing
`
`-
`
`Industry-wide testing in progress across all regions and levels
`
`- OEM and Tier 1 direct substitution (TXV adj. only) evaluations — very
`encouraging results
`
`— Energy efficiency (COP) equivalent or better than R134a
`
`— Modest capacity deficit of approximately 5-10%
`
`- Significant improvements demonstrated via minor component
`
`optimization
`_
`_
`_
`_
`DP-1 direct substitution (TXV ad]. Only)
`‘O
`-
`'
`.
`.--‘.
`l 5
`
`DP-1 average COP 5-10% better than R134a at
`e uivalent ca ac“
`
`
`
`3.5
`
`‘I
`
`3
`
`25
`
`
`
`I143 ten‘-po'aluiu
`
`R
`
`E
`
`S
`
`8Roomiomporaturwc) S
`
`1;§;i[ii-q-u.:.L.iiii /,4 ’.',*,.
`.
`‘
`I .'
`‘.
`‘° '.~.>~;t.\»L~.',«’2rl.ii»l«%i..-'.
`'.‘»»'w.*.~’~*
`'1 v,J‘\’J._J 1 ,_
`V I4
`_‘.
`‘V
`4
`RV
`\
`‘
`°o
`5
`:0
`is
`20 DP 1
`;2J;m‘$m3,o '
`Tlme (mlnj
`
`28 of 51
`
`
`
`The miracles a)'science'
`
`DP—1 Conclusions
`
`Honeywell
`
`— Excellent environmental properties (zero—ODP, very
`low GWP, low LCCP)
`
`— Low acute toxicity, some repeated dose effects
`
`—Compatible with current R-134a materials
`
`—Cooling capacity similar to R—134a can be achieved
`with minor component optimization
`
`— Potential for improved energy efficiency versus R-
`134a
`
`—Significant progress by OEMs and Tier 1s in test
`evaluations
`
`29 of 51
`
`
`
`The miracles of science‘
`
`Honeywell
`
`Refrigerant JDH — Joint
`Collaboration Between DuPont
`
`and Honeywell
`
`Mark Spatz
`
`Honeywell
`
`Barbara Minor
`
`DuPont
`
`SAE 2007 Alternatives Refrigerant Systems Symposium
`
`July 17-19, 2007
`
`
`
`The miracles of science‘
`
`Introduction
`
`Honeywell
`
`- Refrigerant JDH - product ofjoint Honeywell and
`DuPont effort.
`
`- Formulated utilizing technology strengths of both
`companies
`
`- Formulated with existing molecules of Fluid H
`and DP-1
`
`— Previous property and performance information can
`be leveraged
`
`31 of 51
`
`
`
`The miracles afscience‘
`
`Refrigerant JDH
`
`Honeywell
`
`— Two component blend
`— Excellent environmental properties (zero-ODP, very
`low GWP, good LCCP)
`— Low acute toxicity
`— Non—f|ammab|e
`
`— Low fractionation (temperature glide = O.5°C)
`— Low hose permeation
`— Compatible with current R-134a MAC technology
`—Targeted for all climates and all vehicles
`
`32 of 51
`
`
`
`The miracles olsciena-'
`
`Honeywell
`
`Refrigerant JDH Properties Provide Better
`Match for R-134a than CO2
`
`
` I
`
`PT Chart
`
`I
`
`I
`
`I
`
`I
`
`-40
`
`-20
`
`0
`
`20
`
`40
`
`60
`
`80
`
`100
`
`Temperature (C)
`
`33 of 51
`
`
`
`The miracles afscience‘
`
`Honeywell
`
`Refrigerant JDH - Excellent Environmental
`Properties
`
`- Zero—ODP
`
`- Very Low GWP:
`
`— 100 yr experimentally determined to be 4 (well below EU 150
`limit)
`
`— Provides margin for uncertainty involving future changes in
`GWP determination (SAR, TAR, SROC)
`
`- Improved LCCP versus enhanced CO2 and enhanced
`R—134a
`
`— Planning to perform detailed LCCP calculations based system
`performance results
`
`34 of 51
`
`
`
`The miracles olscience‘
`
`Honeywell
`
`Refrigerant JDH is Non—F|ammab|e
`
`- Multiple conditions are modeled to insure non—flammabi|ity in worst
`case scenarios:
`
`— Worst case formulation (WCF) at 100°C, 50% RH
`— Worst case fractionated formulation (WCFF) at 60°C, 50% RH
`90% full at 54.4°C
`
`90% full at bubble point plus 10°C
`90% full at 23°C
`
`15% full at 60°C
`
`15% full at bubble point plus 10°C
`
`I
`}
`
`Simulatingleaksfromstoragecontainers
`Simulating leaksfromequipment
`
`- Worst case formulations were confirmed experimentally
`
`- Refrigerant JDH is non-flammable per ASTM-681 and ASHRAE
`Standard 34
`
`35 of 51
`
`
`
`The miracles a)'science'
`
`Honeywell
`
`Refrigerant JDH Toxicity Status
`
`- Acute toxicity testing for the components of
`Refrigerant JDH are complete with excellent
`results — JDH has low acute toxicity
`
`- Sub—acute/chronic toxicity tests are in
`progress for Refrigerant JDH — Initial results
`expected 3-4Q’O7
`
`36 of 51
`
`
`
`<fllIElIflI2
`
`memlrudesafsdencr
`
`Honeywell
`
`Refrigerant JDH has Excellent Thermal Stability
`Refrigerant JDH and Nippon GS10 PAG 175°C, 2 weeks
`
`37
`
`37 of 51
`
`
`
`The miracle: afsciencr
`
`Honeywell
`
`Thermal Stability - Continued
`Refrigerant JDH with ND8 175°C for 2 weeks
`
`300 ppm Watfil‘
`
`4000 ppm water
`
`
`
`33%
`
`38 of 51
`
`
`
`‘imllli
`
`The miracle afsciencr
`
`Honeywell
`
`Thermal Stability — Continued
`Refrigerant JDH and Nippon POE 13 190°C 14 days
`
`
`
`Time M TAN
`Temp °c
`33
`
`Good Stability even at 190°C for two weeks.
`
`This is an extremely severe test.
`
`39 of 51
`
`
`
`The mimcles afsciencr
`
`Honeywell
`
`Refrigerant JDH: Excellent Plastics Compatibility
`Apollo ND8 PAG at 100°C for two weeks
`
`Pol ester
`
`Polyethylene Terephthalate
`
`Pol
`
`imide
`
`Pol ester
`
`Polyethylene Terephthalate
`
`Pol
`
`imide
`
`Rating 0 = weight gain < 1 and physical change = 0
`
`1 = weight gain > 1 and < 10 and/or physical change = 2
`
`2 = weight gain > 10 and/or physical change = 2
`
`40 of 51
`
`
`
`The mimdes afsciencr
`
`Refrigerant JDH: Excellent Elastomers Compatibility-
`Apollo ND8 PAG at 100°C for two weeks
`
`Honeywell
`
`T EEE
`
`AI
`
`i23iE1I:I_‘E:‘1I-
`jEEE§'4'1Z:Zfi_d
`t Bu lrubber 21111121
`
`WRT Z
`
`jjllfi-IEIZIKJ
`jjlléjzijfiljfl-Z1
`kZ3.'iIE]IZ2iZ1ZEXj
`jE@1nZ!:-is
`jj211:—1xr11
`
`Rating:
`
`41 of 51
`
`0 < 10% weight gain and < 10% Linear swell and < 10 hardness change
`
`1 > 10% weight gain or > 10% Linear swell or > 10 hardness change
`
`2 > 10% weight gain and > 10% Linear swell and > 10 hardness change
`
`
`
`The miracles olsciena-'
`
`Honeywell
`
`Refrigerant JDH: Excellent Miscibility with PAG
`Lubflcant
`
`R134a and JDH Miscibility with Apollo PAG
`
`A JDH High
`
`I
`
`\l$010101
`Temperature(C)8an
`duo:men
`
`
`
`Lon
`
`>0
`
`>0
`
`9
`
`9
`
`5
`-65
`
`0
`
`10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90100
`
`Wt% Oil in Refrigerant
`
`42
`
`42 of 51
`
`- R134a Low
`
`- R134a High
`
`o JDH Low
`
`
`
`The miracles of science
`
`Honeywell
`
`Refrigerant JDH — Low Hose Permeation
`
`-Test conducted with low permeation hose for R-134a and near JDH
`
`formulation at 80C for 28 days (SAE Std J2064):
`
`Leak Rate:
`
`R134a
`
`0.45 kg/m2/yr
`
`JDH
`
`0.07 kg/m2/yr
`
`Hose Permeation Test - Refrigerant Loss Rate
`
`Pas
`
`0.5
`
`0.4
`
`0'3
`
`-o—134a
`
`E 0.2
`0
`_G
`-§
`M
`
`0.1
`
`o
`
`-0.1
`
`43 of 51
`
`o
`
`1oo
`
`zoo
`
`3oo
`
`4oo
`
`soo
`
`soo
`
`7oo
`
`300
`
`Time (Hours)
`
`EE
`
`9 3
`
`3‘E
`
`
`
`The miracles of science‘
`
`Honeywell
`
`Comparable Thermodynamic Cycle Performance
`
`- The performance of JDH was calculated using thermodynamic properties
`
`- The following typical alc conditions were utilized:
`
`— 5°C Evaporator Temperature.
`
`— 50°C Condenser Temperature.
`
`— 5°K Superheat & Subcooling.
`
`— 70% Compressor lsentropic Efficiency.
`
`
`Temp.
` Evaporator Condenser Discharge
`
`.
`Ca
`'
`Relative Relative
`Relative
`Pressure
`Pressure
`TemP-
`Glide
`pacigty
`n°
`
`Capacity
`
`COP
`
`Mass Flow
`
`kJIm
`
`70
`
`2373
`
`100% 100°o
`
`100%
`
`iifl
`55?I5!
`
`
`Hid,
`
`
`
`Refrigerant JDH
`
`44 of 51
`
`
`
`
`
`97%
`
`112%
`
`83%
`
`
`
`The miracles olsciena-'
`
`Honeywell
`
`System Performance Bench Test Facility
`
`Wind tunnels constructed to test automotive alc system similar to SAE testing.
`
`System tested: Opel Astra alc system manufactured by Delphi.
`Measurements made:
`
`— Refrigerant circuit:
`- Temp. and pressure at inlet & outlet of all major components.
`- Mass flow.
`
`— Compressor torque and rpm
`— Air side:
`
`- DB temperature distribution inlout of evaporator and condenser.
`- Dew point inlout of evaporator.
`
`OUTDOOR
`ROOM <3
`
`Blower
`(coupled to a VFD)
`
`Air-Flow
`
`Measuring Nozzles
`
`INDOOR
`
`Temperature
`Grids
`
`Evaporator
`
`r Sampling
`(inlet)
`
`45
`
`45 of 51
`
`
`
`The mirades alscience‘
`
`Honeywell
`
`Industry Common Test Points Selected
`
`Ambient
`tem .
`p
`
`Test
`Name
`
`Compressor
`
`Speed
`
`Condenser
`F
`ace
`Velocity
`[m/s]
`
`Temp.
`
`I Evhépfrator
`T _
`ypma V9 we
`Humidity Mass f.|°w
`[kg/mm]
`
`Temp.
`
`53
`
`35
`35
`
`01
`25
`25
`25
`25
`
`25
`
`35
`35
`
`NMN030303U1U101U1U10‘!
`
`o
`3:0
`
`0D
`
`Targeted air
`temp.
`downstream of
`e a orator
`V P
`
`I t d
`S_
`'"“’a e
`air
`.
`selection
`
`RECIRC
`RECIRC
`RECIRC
`RECIRC
`RECIRC
`OSA
`OSA
`OSA
`OSA
`
`Oi(DU)
`
`8>
`
`8888>>>>
`88888>>>>>>>
`
`35
`35
`35
`
`NU1
`
`0U1
`
`25
`
`25
`25
`
`1 800
`2500
`4000
`
`1 800
`2500
`4000
`
`1 800
`
`2500
`4000
`
`Z2
`Z1
`11
`
`---
`
`—'Z
`
`1
`If
`
`Ifr1
`
`E1EEE-
`
`2000 XE-I-ZIKjI1—':
`
`46 of 51
`
`
`
`Honeywell
`
`WCaD.ac
`
`HDJI
`
`m_H_
`
`fire mlmdes of science‘
`
`Pm./.mmwfH58e..lbD9s0JsowmmgS..m..w..M%Tea
` .mmmmwm.mmaomm%.mamammr.m%.;WmDesomde
`tZmm.m.muu.m:;$mm.S..._u..__odn...namyRN.mMc
`
`_m.m
`
`ET..lon
`
`S2:
`
`line).
`
`COP
`
`t
`
`S87654321
`
`0
`
`IJDH El R134a
`
`3.
`
`m3
`
`3.:
`
`3:
`
`8.
`
`3.
`
`3..
`
`3:
`
`mm:
`
`_
`
`on3..
`
`03.mu...
`
`8.mm...
`
`on..=s_
`
`«Ease
`
`111
`
`5‘:
`
`nunSI1654321044446444
`
`
`
`6.o2!&..I._.81.33
`
`3.
`
`3..
`
`mes.
`
`3...
`
`S.
`
`3.
`
`3..
`
`mas.
`
`3...
`
`on3..
`
`02.3..
`
`02.max
`
`onm:2
`
`mmfico
`
`47
`
`47 of 51
`
`Evan. Outlet
`
`Comp. Inlet
`
`
`
`
`
`¢flflII]]I)
`
`fire miracles of science-
`
`Honeywell
`
`Uniform Evaporator Outlet Air Temperature Profile
`at Low & High Flow Conditions
`
`Inlet4.
`
`R134a
`
`
`
`Inlet
`
`JDH
`
`
`
`JDH
`
`
`
`I 8.5-9.0
`I 8.0-8.5
`I 7.5-8.0
`I 7.0-7.5
`CI 6.5-7.0
`CI 6.0-6.5
`El 5.5-6.0
`I 5.0-5.5
`I 4.5-5.0
`I 4.04.5
`I 3.5-4.0
`I 3.0-3.5
`
`I 15.5-16.0
`I 15.0-15.5
`I 14.5-15.0
`I 14.0-14.5
`I 13.5-14.0
`I 13.0-13.5
`El 12.5-13.0
`El 12.0-12.5
`El 11.5-12.0
`I 1 1.0-11.5
`I 10.5-11.0
`I 10.0-10.5
`I 9.5—10.0
`I 9.0-9.5
`
`
`-—:.—u—.::
`
`R134a
`
`H45
`
`Inlet4.
`
`I45
`
`48 of 51
`
`
`
`The miracles of science‘
`
`Honeywell
`
`Refrigerant JDH Can Utilize Standard Recycling
`Procedures & Equipment
`
`- Tests were performed using a production Robinair 34788
`recoverylrecycling unit intended for R-134a.
`
`- Testing Sequence:
`
`— Internal cylinder charged with 7 kg. of Refrigerant JDH.
`
`— Standard charging procedure utilized.
`
`— Vehicle run for one hour then shut-down for 24 or more hours.
`
`— Slow vapor leak (50% by mass) simulated.
`
`— The above three steps were repeated five times.
`
`— Samples collected from internal cylinder and vehicle after each
`
`recharge.
`
`- The refrigerant collected in the cylinder after each vapor leak was also
`analyzed.
`
`- Results: No significant change in the composition. Only a
`1% change in composition within the recycling unit’s
`cyflnden
`
`
`
`49
`
`49 of 51
`
`
`
`Honeywell
`
`The miracles of science‘
`
`Refrigerant JDH
`
`—Exce||ent environmental properties (zero-
`ODP, very low GWP, good LCCP
`
`—Low acute toxicity, repeated dose tests in
`progress
`
`—Non-flammable
`
`—Low fractionation (temperature glide = O.5°C)
`—Low hose permeation
`—Compatible with current R-134a MAC
`technology
`—Targeted for all climates and all vehicles
`
`50 of 51
`
`
`
`The miracles olsciena-'
`
`Path Forward
`
`Honeywell
`
`- Provide data to OEMs for DP-1, Fluid H and Refrigerant JDH
`for use in their risk assessments
`
`- Identify mitigation options to address any potential issues, as
`have been developed for CO2
`
`- Support system, component, and vehicle testing per OEM
`guidance
`
`- Secure OEM forecasted demand for future EU conversion
`
`- Converge to best candidate based on industry feedback
`
`- Support global convergence to one solution
`
`DISCLAINIER
`
`Although all statements and information contained herein are believed to be accurate and reliable, they are presented without
`guarantee or warranty of any kind, expressed or implied. Information provided herein does not relieve the user from the responsibility
`of carrying out its own tests and experiments, and the user assumes all risks and liability for use of the information and results
`obtained. Statements or suggestions concerning the use of materials and processes are made without representation or warranty that
`any such use is free of patent infringement and are not recommendations to infringe on any patents. The user should not assume that
`all toxicity data and safety measures are indicated herein or that other measures may not be required.
`
`51
`
`51 of 51
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
