throbber
29-40 30/5/07 11:37 Page 29
`
`INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY 31: 29-40, 2007
`
`29
`
`Characterization of novel murine anti-CD20 monoclonal
`antibodies and their comparison to 2B8 and c2B8 (rituximab)
`
`MICHIO NISHIDA1, SADAKAZU USUDA2, MASATO OKABE2,3, HIROKO MIYAKODA3,
`MIDORI KOMATSU4, HIROSHI HANAOKA5, KEISUKE TESHIGAWARA1 and OTSURA NIWA1
`
`1Late Effects Studies, Radiation Biology Center, Kyoto University, Yoshida-Konoe-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8501;
`2BioMedics Japan, Inc, 1-1-10 Koraku, Bunkyo, Tokyo 112-0004; 3Bacteriology Division, Faculty of Medicine,
`Tottori University, 86 Nishi-machi, Yonago 683-8503; 4Digestive Surgery, Osaka City University Graduate
`School of Medicine, 1-4-3 Asahi-cho, Abeno-ku, Osaka 545-8586; 5Bioimaging Information Analysis,
`Gunma University, Graduate School of Medicine, 3-39-22 Showa-cho, Maebashi 371-8511, Japan
`
`Received March 2, 2007; Accepted April 27, 2007
`
`Abstract. Rituximab is the first anti-cancer antibody approved
`by the FDA for the treatment of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma
`(B-NHL), alone or in combination with chemotherapeutic
`drugs. Further, rituximab is now being examined in a variety
`of CD20+ neoplastic diseases as well as B-cell-induced
`autoimmune diseases. The clinical response to rituximab is
`significant, resulting not only in tumor regression but also
`prolongation of survival. However, a subset of patients does
`not initially respond to rituximab or develops resistance to its
`further treatment. Therefore, alternative therapies for these
`patients are strongly desired. Rituximab activity has been
`thought to be by antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity,
`complement-dependent cytotoxicity and apoptosis, and
`studies in model systems established the role of rituximab in
`cell signaling-induced perturbation of anti-apoptotic survival
`pathways, suggesting that the patients unresponsive to
`rituximab may be overcome with other CD20 antibodies
`with different activities. This study investigated eight novel
`murine antibodies directed against CD20 for their physical
`and biological properties in comparison with 2B8 and c2B8
`(rituximab). These antibodies were derived by various antigenic
`and immunization procedures and selected for CD20 activity.
`Analysis of these antibodies revealed that they all bound to
`various B-cell lines and CD20-transfected CHO cells. Six of
`the eight antibodies shared similar variable-region amino acid
`sequences that were also shared by 2B8 while two monoclonal
`antibodies did not. Of them, 1K1791 has a distinct heavy chain
`and both 1K1791 and 1K1782 have distinct light chains. Not
`all of the antibodies inhibited cell growth and only two anti-
`
`_________________________________________
`
`Correspondence to: Michio Nishida, Late Effects Studies,
`Radiation Biology Center, Kyoto University, Yoshida-Konoe-cho,
`Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan
`E-mail: minishida@aol.com
`
`Key words: anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, apoptosis, caspase,
`epitope specificity
`
`bodies reacted with fixed GST-CD20 recombinant fusion
`protein. Noteworthy, 1K1791 was found to inhibit cell pro-
`liferation and also induced caspase-independent apoptosis in
`the absence of cross-linker. These findings identified new
`antibodies with properties and epitope specificities different
`from 2B8. The potential clinical application of such antibodies
`in the treatment of B-NHL and rituximab-resistant B-NHL is
`discussed.
`
`Introduction
`
`Since the introduction of the first monoclonal antibody (mAb),
`rituximab, for the treatment of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma
`(B-NHL), several monoclonal antibodies have been approved
`for many neoplastic and non-neoplastic diseases (1,2). How-
`ever, while such antibodies show therapeutic effectiveness,
`their mechanism of action in vivo remains elusive. Further, it
`is not known what are the best regimens and schedules under
`which such antibodies are best suited for a particular patient.
`In addition, treatment with such antibodies results only in a
`subset of patients responding and some patients who initially
`respond also develop resistance to further treatment. Therefore,
`there is a need to unravel the in vivo mechanisms of action as
`well as develop new classes of antibodies with different
`activities and clinical responses.
`The CD20 molecule is a member of the MS4A family of
`proteins. It spans the plasma membrane four times and both
`C- and N-termini are contained within the cell (3-6). The
`precise function of CD20 is unknown and it has been reported
`to act as an ion channel expressed in the plasma membrane of
`normal and malignant B cells. Liang et al have reported that
`CD20 may operate as a calcium storage channel facilitating
`entry of intracellular calcium following BCR-induced emptying
`of intracellular calcium (4). The importance of CD20 as a
`target for mAb immunotherapy is irrefutable, and anti-CD20
`monoclonal antibodies appear to be ideal for B-cell diseases.
`It is highly expressed on the plasma membrane of almost all
`plasma B cells but not on hematological stem cells; it is not
`shed from the surface after antibody binding and is not shed
`into the circulation (5).
`
`Ex. 2034-0001
`
`

`
`29-40 30/5/07 11:37 Page 30
`
`30
`
`NISHIDA et al: NOVEL MURINE ANTI-CD20 MONOCLONAL ANTIBODIES
`
`It has been reported that rituximab can mediate antibody-
`dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC), complement-
`dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) and apoptosis both in vitro
`and in vivo, and the target epitope is critical in determining
`which of these various mechanisms predominates (7,8). In
`the case of anti-CD20, evidence suggests that Fc/Fc-receptor
`(FcR) interactions are critical, as determined in both animal
`models and humans. However, determining whether such
`interactions are required for classical ADCC-mediated by NK
`or myeloid cells or whether they provide cross-linking which
`promotes apoptosis has been difficult to resolve (9,10). The
`role of complement in the depletion of malignant cells is
`less convincing, and a number of anti-tumor mAbs appear to
`operate in the absence of lytic complement (11-13). A strong
`correlation between the level of CD20 expression and thera-
`peutic outcome for rituximab has been reported, although
`there is also contrary evidence where no correlation was
`found (14,15). Chan et al have reported a CD20 mAb which
`is potent in CDC and less effective in apoptosis, whereas a
`different antibody was ineffective in CDC with potent induction
`of apoptosis (16). Both were equally effective in ADCC.
`Rituximab is currently being used in the management of NHL
`patients as a single agent or in combination with CHOP. It also
`shows clinical response in patients with chronic lymphocytic
`leukemia (17). Rituximab is also used in autoimmune disease
`such as rheumatoid arthritis and has recently been approved for
`treatment of patients with moderate to advanced rheumatoid
`disease (18).
`Following binding of anti-CD20 mAb to cells recruitment
`of effector cells for ADCC (antibody-dependent cellular
`cytotoxicity) and CDC (complement-dependent cytotoxicity)
`occurs. In addition, when CD20 is engaged by mAb, it can
`trigger transmembrane signaling directly and inhibit cell growth
`and trigger cell death in certain tumors. Further, it has also
`been shown to sensitize tumor cells to both chemotherapy
`and immunotherapy (6). Different anti-CD20 mAbs have been
`shown to have different properties and epitope specificities,
`and mediate differential effects on CDC and cell death. All of
`the monoclonal antibodies described to date recognize the
`extracellular loop and partially or completely cross-block
`each other's binding (19-21).
`In the current study, we have developed a number of murine
`anti-CD20 mAbs and compared their activities to the published
`antibodies 1F5, 2B8 and c2B8. We have identified new mAbs
`with different activities and binding specificities.
`
`Materials and methods
`
`mice (purchased from CLEA Japan, Tokyo, Japan) were
`immunized with various combinations of Raji cells, CCRF-SB
`cells, recombinant fusion protein of CD20 extracellular domain
`with glutathione S-transferase (GST) and CD20 DNA trans-
`fected CHO cells (23).
`The murine anti-CD20 mAb 2B8 and the chimeric anti-
`CD20 mAb c2B8 (rituximab) were obtained from Zenyaku
`Kogyo (Tokyo, Japan). The murine anti-CD20 antibody 1F5,
`normal murine IgG1, IgG2a and IgG2b were purchased from
`Dako Japan (Kyoto, Japan), and murine anti-human CD3
`mAb was from BD Biosciences (San Jose, CA).
`
`Flow cytometry. Various mAbs and control immunoglobulin
`(Ig) isotypes were used to determine their binding properties
`on the cell surface of CD20+ cell lines or CD20- cells. The cells
`(2x106 cells) were suspended in RPMI-1640 culture medium
`(Sigma Chemical, St Louis, MO) containing 10% fetal bovine
`serum (FBS) (ICN Biochemicals, Costa Mesa, CA) and were
`centrifuged at 1300 x rpm for 3 min. The supernatants were
`discarded and the pellets resuspended in 550 μl phosphate
`buffered saline (PBS) containing 4% FBS. Aliquots of 50 μl
`PBS containing 4% FBS each were placed in Eppendorf tubes
`and 5 μl (10 μg/ml) of each antibody or control IgG were
`added to the tube and incubated for 30 min at 4˚C. The tubes
`were centrifuged and the pellets washed twice and then
`resuspended into 50 μl PBS containing 4% FBS and 5 μl
`FITC-conjugated F(ab')2 goat anti-mouse Ig (Dako, Japan).
`The tubes were left for 20 min at 4˚C, washed twice and the
`pellets were resuspended in 12x75-mm tubes (BD Falcon,
`BD Biosciences). The flow data were then analyzed by FACS
`Calibur and by the Cell Quest software (BD Biosciences).
`
`Inhibition of cell growth. Raji cells (5x104 cells/ml) in RPMI-
`1640 serum-free medium were assessed for cell growth
`inhibition in the presence of various antibodies or control
`IgGs. The cells (5x103 cells/well) were added into 96-well
`plates and cultured at 37˚C in a 5% CO2 incubator for 24 h.
`Thereafter different concentrations of antibody (0.01-1.0 μg/ml)
`were added and incubated for 24-72 h. At the indicated times of
`incubation, 10 μl/well of luminescent reagent (Cell Count Kit-
`8, Dojundo Laboratories, Kumamoto, Japan) was added into
`each well and incubated for an additional 4 h. The plates were
`then read in a microplate reader (Hitachi High-Technologies,
`Tokyo, Japan) and the absorbance at 492 nm was recorded.
`The percent of cell growth in the presence of each antibody
`(0.01-1.0 μg/ml) compared to control IgGs and % inhibition
`were determined.
`
`Cells and antibodies. The CD20+ cell lines, Raji (Burkitt's
`lymphoma), CCRF-SB (acute lymphoblastic leukemia) and the
`CD20- cell line Jurkat (T cell leukemia), were obtained from
`the Riken Bioresource Center, Japanese Collection of Research
`Bioresources (JCRB; Tsukuba, Japan) and the American Type
`Culture Collection (ATCC; Manassas, VA). CHO DG44 was
`obtained from Invitrogen Japan (Tokyo, Japan) (22). The full
`CD20 DNA-transfected CHO cell line (CD20+ CHO) was
`collaboratively developed by Tottori University (Yonago,
`Japan) and BioMedics Japan, Inc. (Tokyo, Japan).
`The murine 1K mAbs (Table I) specifically binding to
`human CD20 were provided by BioMedics Japan. BALB/c
`
`Affinity measurement by Scatchard analysis. Radiolabeling
`of antibodies by direct radio-iodination was performed after
`the chloramine T method (24). 2 μl of Na 125I (740 kBq) was
`added to 100-μl aliquots of antibody (0.1 mg/ml) in 0.3 M
`phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) and chloramine T (1 μg in 3 μl),
`freshly prepared in the same buffer, was added thereafter.
`After incubation of the mixture for 5 min at room temperature,
`125I labeled antibody was purified by the Bio-Spin 6 column
`(Wako Pure Chemical, Osaka, Japan).
`Binding affinity was determined as follows. Buffer solution
`(100 μl) was added to 1x106 Raji cells and then mixed together.
`Each 100 μl of 125I labeled antibody solution (containing
`
`Ex. 2034-0002
`
`

`
`29-40 30/5/07 11:37 Page 31
`
`INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY 31: 29-40, 2007
`
`31
`
`Table I. Properties of monoclonal antibodies used in this study.
`–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
`mAba
`Isotype
`Immunization
`Source
`Kd
`Bmax
`–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
`IgG2b, κ
`1K0924
`2.23 nM
`0.7x106
`CCRF-SB and GST-CD20
`BioMedics Japan
`IgG1, κ
`1K1228
`1.26 nM
`1.6x106
`CD20+CHO and GST-CD20
`BioMedics Japan
`IgG1, κ
`1K1402
`1.25 nM
`1.7x106
`CCRF-SB and CD20+ CHO
`BioMedics Japan
`IgG1, κ
`1K1422
`2.07 nM
`1.3x106
`CCRF-SB and CD20+ CHO
`BioMedics Japan
`IgG2a, κ
`1.70 nM
`0.7x106
`CD20+ CHO and Raji
`BioMedics Japan
`1K1712
`IgG2b, κ
`1K1736
`1.24 nM
`1.7x106
`CD20+ CHO and Raji
`BioMedics Japan
`IgG1, κ
`1K1782
`NT
`NT
`CD20+ CHO and Raji
`BioMedics Japan
`IgG1, κ
`1K1791
`3.61 nM
`1.5x106
`CD20+ CHO and Raji
`BioMedics Japan
`IgG2a, κ
`1.41 nM
`0.8x106
`NA
`ATCC
`1F5
`IgG1, κ
`2B8
`NT
`NT
`CCRF-SB
`Zenyaku Kogyo
`IgG1, κ
`c2B8 (rituximab)
`1.26 nM
`1.3x106
`Chimerized mAb of 2B8
`Zenyaku Kogyo
`–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
`NT, not tested; NA, information not available. a1K series of monoclonal antibodies were newly developed by BioMedics Japan. 2B8 and
`c2B8 that were developed by IDEC Pharmaceuticals (San Diego, CA) were obtained through Zenyaku Kogyo.
`–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
`
`0.01 μg antibody) and different quantities of non-labeled
`antibody, 0.01, 0.03, 0.1, 0.3, 1.0, 3 or 10 μg, were added to
`100 μl Raji cell suspension and then reacted for 1 h at room
`temperature. The supernatant from the cell suspension was
`removed after centrifugation at 1300 rpm for 3 min, and the
`radioactivity of the cell fraction was measured. The radio-
`activity of 125I-labeled antibody bound to cells was counted
`and compared to the initial radioactivity. The binding constants,
`either Kd (dissociation constant) or Ka (association constant),
`were determined by Scatchard analysis by plotting specific
`bound/free ratio (Y axis) vs. bound antibody concentration
`(X axis). Simultaneously, Bmax (receptor density) was
`determined by fitting to the total binding at the saturated
`concentration of non-labeled antibody.
`
`each well on 96-well PLL plates and immobilized. Blocking
`treatment was performed at 37˚C for 1 h. Rituximab solution
`(40 and 80 ng/ml) and 2.0, 0.4 and 0.08 μg/ml of diluted test
`antibodies as well as 2B8 were prepared. Each combination
`of diluted rituximab and test antibody was added with CD20+
`CHO cells on a cell ELISA plate. The first set of reactions
`used 60 μl/well of antibody at 37˚C for 4 h and the second
`set of reactions used diluted solution (x2000) of HRP-labeled
`anti-human IgG (Jackson Lab) at 37˚C for 1 h, respectively.
`The color reaction was developed for 20 min at 25˚C under
`dark and static conditions. H2O2 + OPD (100 μl/well) was
`used for the luminescent liquid and 50 μl/well of 4N H2SO4
`for the stop solution, and then the absorbance at 492 nm was
`measured.
`
`ELISA with GST-CD20. Glutathione S-transferase (GST)
`fused with the extracellular domain of CD20 was obtained
`from the Biochemistry Division, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori
`University (Yonago, Japan). This fusion protein was solubilized
`using 6 M sodium hydroxide solution and immobilized on a
`96-well PLL plate and washed with a solution containing
`150 mM NaCl, 0.5% Tween-20 and 0.1% NaN3. Blocking
`treatment was applied at 37˚C for 4 h using the dilution buffer
`containing 0.2% gelatin, 0.5% bovine serum albumin (BSA)
`and 0.01% thimerosal. Antibody sample [100 μl (1000, 316,
`100, 32, 10 or 3 ng/ml)] was added to the wells and left to
`react at 37˚C for 4 h (1st reaction). 2B8 was used as a positive
`control and solution without antibody was used as a negative
`control. The plate was washed and then 100 μl solution (diluted
`to 1:4000) of horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-labeled rabbit
`anti-mouse IgG (Jackson Lab, ME) was added to each well,
`and incubated at 37˚C for 1 h (2nd reaction). The plate was
`washed again and 100 μl luminescent liquid was added to
`each well and the reaction stopped after 30 min by adding 50 μl
`of 4N H2SO4. The plates were read for the absorbance at
`492 nm.
`
`Competitive binding assay using the CD20+ CHO ELISA. Of
`CD20+ CHO cells, 100 μl (5x105 cells/ml) were added to
`
`Phylogenetic tree analysis of anti-CD20 mAb variable-region
`amino acid sequences. The relative differences of amino acid
`sequences of variable regions between a number of anti-CD20
`mAbs and 2B8 were mapped and displayed by applying a
`neighboring-joining method on phylogenetic trees (25). Heavy
`and light chain variable-region sequences of anti-CD20 mAbs
`were obtained from several information sources. Those of
`2B8, 2H7 and 1F5 were obtained from GenBank (National
`Center for Biotechnology Information, USA), 9C10, 12E11
`and 1K mAbs were derived from BioMedics Japan. These
`data were analyzed by a computer at the National Institute of
`Genetics (Mishima, Japan).
`
`Cell death and apoptosis. Apoptosis and necrosis induced
`by the various mAbs were measured by flow cytometry with
`Annexin V/FITC, PI (propidium iodine) staining (Annexin V/
`FITC apoptosis detection kit, BD Biosciences). 2B8 was used
`as positive control and murine anti-CD3 mAb (BioLegend,
`San Diego, CA) as the negative control (note: the amount of
`1K1782 was not enough to complete the study).
`
`Analysis of caspase activation. For titrating rituximab, 100 μl
`of RPMI-1640 medium containing 10% heat-inactivated FBS
`and penicillin/streptomycin (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) were
`
`Ex. 2034-0003
`
`

`
`29-40 30/5/07 11:37 Page 32
`
`32
`
`NISHIDA et al: NOVEL MURINE ANTI-CD20 MONOCLONAL ANTIBODIES
`
`Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree analysis of amino acid sequence of anti-CD20 antibody variable regions. The relative differences of amino acid sequences of
`variable regions between a number of anti-CD20 mAbs and 2B8 were phylogenetically mapped employing a neighboring-joining method. Both the heavy and
`light chain sequences of most antibodies were very close to each other. Only the monoclonal antibody 1K1791 had a distinct heavy chain variable region and
`both 1K1791 and 1K1782 had light chains different from most other anti-CD20 mAbs.
`
`added to each well of a 96-well TC plate (E&K Scientific
`Products, Santa Clara, CA). Raji cells [100 μl (2x105 cells/ml)]
`were added to the wells of the first row and then 100 μl
`serially diluted down each column. Rows were divided into
`those with and those without antibody. For the antibody
`containing wells, medium containing 10 μg/ml of both
`rituximab and goat anti-human IgG were added and the plate
`was incubated in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 at
`37˚C for 24 h. Of either caspase-3/7 substrate (Promega, WI)
`or caspase-9 substrate (Promega), 100 μl was then added to
`the appropriate rows and the plates incubated on a shaker
`(based on the Promega technical bulletin of Caspase-Glo™
`3/7 Assay System: TB323, Caspase-Glo™ 9 Assay System).
`The luminescence was read after 1 and 2 h by a Wallac Victor2
`plate reader (Perkin-Elmer, Waltham, MA). Duplicate control
`wells containing 20 μM zVAD-fmk as well as either caspase-
`3/7 or caspase-9 substrate and 5000 or 1250 cells, respectively,
`were included on the plate.
`For 1K mAbs testing, Raji cells (5x103 cells/well) in 85 μl
`of medium were placed in each well of a 96-well TC flat
`bottom plate. Half the rows contained 10 μM zVAD-fmk and
`
`half medium alone. Of test antibody, 5 μg/ml was added to
`each well followed by 5 μg/ml of goat anti-murine IgG.
`Medium was added to all wells to bring the final volume up
`to 100 μl. Appropriate control wells with or without test
`antibody or using human IgG or murine IgG were included.
`Ionomycin (Calbiochem™ EMD Biosciences, San Diego,
`CA) in a concentration of 1 μM was used as a positive control.
`Cells were incubated in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2
`at 37˚C for 12 h and an equal volume (100 μl) of caspase-3/7
`substrate was added. The plate was agitated at room temp-
`erature for 50 min and the luminescence read by a Wallac
`Victor2 plate reader.
`
`Results
`
`Characterization of novel murine anti-CD20 mAbs. Different
`protocols were used to generate murine mAbs directed against
`human CD20. Cell lines expressing CD20 or CD20-transfected
`CHO cells were used for priming and boosting. In addition,
`recombinant GST-CD20 fusion protein was used for boosting.
`Several mAbs were selected for further analysis and were
`
`Ex. 2034-0004
`
`

`
`29-40 30/5/07 11:37 Page 33
`
`INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY 31: 29-40, 2007
`
`33
`
`FL1
`
`Table II. Mean fluorescence intensity of antibody binding to various cells.a
`–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
`Raji
`CCRF-SB
`CD20+ CHO
`CD20- cells
`––––––––––––––––––
`–––––––––––––––––––
`–––––––––––––––––––
`––––––––––––––––
`MFI
`S.D.
`MFI
`S.D.
`MFI
`S.D.
`MFI
`S.D.
`(average)
`(average)
`(average)
`(average)
`–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
`Rituximab
`7.9x102
`1.3x102
`1.0x103
`4.4x102
`3.8x103
`8.8x102
`1.7
`0.2
`1K mAbs
`6.7x102
`2.1x102
`7.8x102
`4.3x102
`3.1x103
`5.8x102
`1.6
`0.2
`–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
`aThe mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of antibody binding to different CD20+ CHO cells was determined through integration of the
`fluorescence histogram of each antibody as in Fig. 2. The FITC intensities detected by FL1 were averaged and compared among those of
`different CD20+ CHO cells. Untransfected CHO DG44 or Jurkat cells were tested as negative controls. The results of the 1K mAbs were
`pooled to show a broad range of antibody response to cells rather than response by individual antibodies, such as rituximab.
`–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
`
`given the nomenclature 1K followed by a number, and were
`then compared to murine mAbs 1F5 and 2B8, as well as the
`chimeric anti-human mAb c2B8 (rituximab). Eight mAbs in
`the 1K series were selected for examination in this study. The
`isotypes of the mAbs consisted of IgG1, IgG2a, and IgG2b
`all with a κ light chain (Table I). Affinity measurements were
`assessed by the use of 125I-radiolabeled antibody binding to
`CD20+ Raji cells and its displacement by different concen-
`trations of non-radiolabeled antibodies, as described in
`methods. The dissociation constant (Kd) was determined for
`each antibody and the values are listed in Table I. There were
`no significant differences in the Kd values among the various
`1K mAbs as well as among the other mAbs 1F5, 2B8 and
`c2B8. Receptor density analysis was also examined to
`determine the Bmax values. As shown in Table I, the Bmax values
`of all the antibodies tested ranged from 0.7-1.7x10-6. These
`findings demonstrate that, following the various protocols
`used for immunization, several novel mAbs (1K series)
`directed against human CD20 were generated with different
`isotypes. These antibodies exhibited similar Kd and Bmax
`values compared to both murine 1F5 and 2B8 as well as the
`chimeric anti-human CD20, c2B8 (rituximab), approved by
`FDA. The findings with the 1K mAbs were further explored
`for other properties that might distinguish them from the known
`mAbs tested.
`
`Analysis of amino acid sequence of both light and heavy
`chains of the anti-CD20 variable regions of the different 1K
`mAbs and the published mAbs: homologies for all except for
`1K1782 and 1K1791. The variable regions of both heavy and
`light chains that are involved in antigen binding determine
`both specificity and affinity. Thus, we established the amino
`acid sequences of the anti-CD20 variable regions of the various
`1K mAbs and determined homology as well as non-homology
`among these and published anti-CD20 mAbs including 2B8,
`1F5 and 2H7. The data were topologically mapped by tree
`analysis as shown in Fig. 1. In this figure, it is noted that all 1K
`mAbs and the published anti-CD20 mAbs have almost identical
`amino acid sequences of the heavy chain-V region except
`1K1791 (Fig. 1, top). Analysis of the light chain sequences
`revealed that all 1K mAbs share similar sequences of the κ
`light chain-V region except 1K1782 and 1K1791. The
`differences of the V regions of both 1K1782 and 1K1791
`
`suggest that these two antibodies may exhibit different
`properties as compared with the remaining 1K mAbs or the
`published anti-CD20 mAbs. Likewise, the homology observed
`between the six mAbs suggests that these antibodies may
`exert similar functions. However, the epitope specificities of
`these various 1K mAbs could not be assigned based on the
`homology and differences in the amino acid sequence of the
`variable region or the heavy and light chains.
`
`Binding of the various 1K mAbs to CD20-expressing cell
`lines as expressed by flow cytometry. The cell surface binding
`properties of the various mAbs to CD20-expressing cells
`were determined by flow cytometry as described in Materials
`and methods. Raji, CCRF-SB, and CD20+ CHO cells were
`used as CD20+ cells and CHO DG44 (CD20-) or Jurkat cells
`were used as a negative control. Control normal murine Ig
`was used with the corresponding isotype to the test mAb. The
`cells were treated with an excess amount of antibody to bind,
`washed and treated with FITC-conjugated F(ab')2 goat anti-
`mouse Ig and processed as described in Materials and methods
`for flow analysis. The data are represented in histograms
`(Fig. 2). For comparison, the 2B8 mAb staining is depicted in
`purple color, the isotype controls are depicted by green dotted
`lines. Clearly, there was no staining of the CHO DG44 and
`Jurkat cells demonstrating the specificity of the 1K mAbs.
`The histogram analyses show that all 1K mAbs stained Raji
`cells with similar intensity. With CCRF-SB, 1K mAbs stained
`the cells with higher intensity than with Raji and there were
`some differences such as that 1K1791 and 1K1782 showed
`less staining compared to 2B8 and other 1K mAbs. Analysis
`of the CD20-transfected CHO cells showed that all 1K mAbs
`stained the cells with significantly higher intensity as compared
`to Raji and CCRF-SB. The high intensity staining of CD20+
`CHO cells reflects the overexpression of cell surface CD20
`compared to non-transfected Raji and CCRF-SB (Table II).
`In addition to flow cytometry, the binding of the various
`mAbs to the CD20+ CHO cells was also analyzed by ELISA,
`as described in Materials and methods. Different concentrations
`of the antibodies were used, their binding to CD20+ CHO cells
`determined and the data were analyzed (Fig. 3). The binding
`was found to be dependent on the concentration of the antibody
`used. At a low concentration of 3 ng/ml, there was little binding
`of 2B8 and 1K mAbs except for 1K1712 that was relatively
`
`Ex. 2034-0005
`
`

`
`29-40 30/5/07 11:37 Page 34
`
`34
`
`NISHIDA et al: NOVEL MURINE ANTI-CD20 MONOCLONAL ANTIBODIES
`
`Figure 2. Flow cytometry analysis of the various monoclonal antibodies. The FITC fluorescence intensity was detected by FL1 in flow cytometry analysis.
`Rows 1-8 are 1K0924, 1K1228, 1K1402, 1K1422, 1K1712, 1K1736, 1K1782 and 1K1791 and columns 1-3 show the reactivity to Raji, CCRF-SB and CD20+
`CHO respectively. The 4th column shows binding to CHO DG44 host (CD20-) (lines 1-4) and Jurkat (lines 5-8). 2B8 staining is depicted in a solid purple
`color as a positive control and its isotype control, IgG1, κ by green dotted line. 1K mAbs are depicted by a pink solid line and isotype control antibodies by an
`aqua dotted line.
`
`higher than others. By increasing the concentration of the
`antibodies, there was increased binding of up to 100-316 ng/ml
`and a plateau was achieved. The binding by the various 1K
`mAbs showed some differences. For example, 1K1712 was
`the most efficient binder followed by 1K1736 and there was
`equal binding by 2B8, 1K0924, 1K1782 and 1K1402. Both
`1K1791 and 1K1422 were the poorest binders. The binding
`
`was specific as control IgGs did not show any activity. These
`findings suggest that the various mAbs may have different
`activity on CD20+ overexpressing cells.
`
`Inhibition of Raji cell growth by 1K mAbs. The previous
`findings demonstrated the ability of various 1K mAbs to
`bind cell surface expression on various CD20+ cell lines. We
`
`Ex. 2034-0006
`
`

`
`29-40 30/5/07 11:37 Page 35
`
`INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY 31: 29-40, 2007
`
`35
`
`Figure 3. Analysis of antibody binding to CD20+ CHO by whole cell
`ELISA. Antibody reactivity to CD20+ CHO fixed on a PLL plate was tested
`as described in Materials and methods.
`
`Figure 5. Competitive inhibition of binding of c2B8 on Raji by the various
`1K and 2B8 monoclonal antibodies. Two concentrations of c2B8, 40 and
`80 ng/ml, were used and different concentrations of 1K mAbs and 2B8 were
`used for competitive binding as described in Materials and methods.
`
`Figure 4. Inhibition of Raji cell growth by the various monoclonal antibodies.
`The inhibitory effects of the 1K series of mAbs and 2B8 at two different
`concentrations (0.1 or 1.0 μg/ml) on Raji cells were examined over 24-72 h.
`The percent inhibition of cell growth was determined as cell growth without
`mAbs (100%) minus cell growth rate (%) in the presence of mAb, where
`cell growth was determined by the luminescence.
`
`examined the effect of these antibodies on cell growth of Raji
`cells in culture (Fig. 4). Raji cells were treated with various
`concentrations of 1K mAbs and cultured for up to 72 h.
`The cells were harvested at different times and cell growth
`was determined by the luminescent method as described in
`Materials and methods. When 0.1 μg/ml mAb was used,
`there was significant inhibition of cell growth by 1K1791,
`1K0924, 1K1422 and 2B8 at both 48 and 72 h of culture. The
`remaining antibodies did not exert any significant inhibitory
`effect on the growth of Raji cells. When a higher concentration
`of antibody was used (1.0 μg/ml), there was a more pronounced
`inhibition. The mAbs 1K1791, 1K1422, 2B8 and 1K0924,
`showed a time-dependent inhibition of cell growth, though
`1K0924 showed less inhibition than the other three mAbs.
`Even at a higher concentration of 1.0 μg/ml, 1K1402, and
`1K1782 did not result in any inhibitory activity of Raji cell
`growth. These findings demonstrate that three of the 1K
`mAbs behave like 2B8 in inhibiting Raji cell growth in a
`time- and concentration-dependent manner. Further, the studies
`demonstrate that, although the non-inhibiting 1K mAbs bind
`to CD20 on Raji cells with the same intensity as the three
`inhibitory 1K mAbs, the mere binding is not sufficient to exert
`
`Figure 6. Binding of the various 1K mAbs and 2B8 to recombinant fixed
`GST-CD20. The binding of the various mAbs to GST-CD20 was performed
`as described in Materials and methods.
`
`an inhibitory effect of cell growth. It is possible, however,
`that the non-inhibitory activity on Raji cells may not be
`generalized to other cell lines. The findings demonstrating
`that three mAbs can inhibit cell growth suggest that these
`antibodies signal the cells through their interaction with their
`CD20 receptor and affect DNA replication. The inhibitory
`effect of cell growth shown above by the 1K mAbs did not
`discriminate between the cytostatic effect and cytotoxic effect
`and further analyses are shown below.
`
`Epitope specificity of the 1K mAbs as assessed by competitive
`inhibition of binding of 2B8 to CD20+ CHO cells. 2B8 mAb
`was used to genetically engineer the chimeric c2B8 (rituxi-
`mab) that was approved by the FDA in 1997 for the treatment
`of B-NHL. Thus, we examined the relationship between
`the epitope binding specificity of the various 1K mAbs in
`comparison to that of c2B8. Competitive binding was assessed
`by using immobilized CD20+ CHO cells on 96-well plates
`and the luminescent ELISA method was used as described in
`Materials and methods. Two concentrations of c2B8 were
`used, 40 and 80 ng/ml. The findings are presented in Fig. 5.
`At a lower concentration of 40 ng/ml of c2B8 mAb, all of the
`1K mAbs and 2B8 mAb significantly competitively inhibited
`the binding of c2B8 on CD20+ CHO cells. The inhibition
`was dependent on the concentration of the antibody used; a
`
`Ex. 2034-0007
`
`

`
`29-40 30/5/07 11:37 Page 36
`
`36
`
`NISHIDA et al: NOVEL MURINE ANTI-CD20 MONOCLONAL ANTIBODIES
`
`Figure 7. Analysis of cell death mediated by various mAbs on Raji cells.
`Raji cells were treated with the mAb for 24 h (A) and 48 h (B). 2B8 was
`used as a positive control and murine anti-CD3 mAb as the negative control.
`
`concentration of 2 μg/ml was more inhibitory than lower
`concentrations. All of the 1K mAbs showed similar competitive
`inhibition at all 3 antibody concentrations used. Interestingly,
`2B8 competed less strongly than the 1K mAbs for c2B8
`binding. Similar findings to those observed with a c2B8
`concentration of 40 ng/ml were also found when a higher
`concentration of 80 ng/ml c2B8 was used.
`These findings suggest that the a

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket