throbber
Peroxide Formation in Polysorbate 80 and Protein Stability
`
`EMILY HA, WEI WANG, Y. JOHN WANG
`
`Analytics & Formulation Department, Process Sciences, Bayer Biotechnology, 800 Dwight Way, Berkeley, California 94701
`
`Received 30 January 2002; revised 11 April 2002; accepted 1 May 2002
`
`ABSTRACT: Nonionic surfactants are widely used in the development of protein
`pharmaceuticals. However, the low level of residual peroxides in surfactants can
`potentially affect the stability of oxidation-sensitive proteins. In this report, we exa-
`mined the peroxide formation in polysorbate 80 under a variety of storage conditions
`and tested the potential of peroxides in polysorbate 80 to oxidize a model protein, IL-2
`mutein. For the first time, we demonstrated that peroxides can be easily generated in
`neat polysorbate 80 in the presence of air during incubation at elevated temperatures.
`Polysorbate 80 in aqueous solution exhibited a faster rate of peroxide formation and a
`greater amount of peroxides during incubation, which is further promoted/catalyzed by
`light. Peroxide formation can be greatly inhibited by preventing any contact with air/
`oxygen during storage. IL-2 mutein can be easily oxidized both in liquid and solid states.
`A lower level of peroxides in polysorbate 80 did not change the rate of IL-2 mutein
`oxidation in liquid state but significantly accelerated its oxidation in solid state under
`air. A higher level of peroxides in polysorbate 80 caused a significant increase in IL-2
`mutein oxidation both in liquid and solid states, and glutathione can significantly
`inhibit the peroxide-induced oxidation of IL-2 mutein in a lyophilized formulation.
`In addition, a higher level of peroxides in polysorbate 80 caused immediate IL-2 mutein
`oxidation during annealing in lyophilization, suggesting that implementation of an
`annealing step needs to be carefully evaluated in the development of a lyophilization
`process for oxidation-sensitive proteins in the presence of polysorbate. ß 2002 Wiley-Liss,
`Inc. and the American Pharmaceutical Association J Pharm Sci 91:2252–2264, 2002
`Keywords: polysorbate; peroxide; protein stability; IL-2; oxidation; lyophilization
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`Polysorbates are an important class of nonionic
`surfactants used in the pharmaceutical industry
`because of their effectiveness at low concentra-
`tions and relative low toxicities. They have long
`been applied to pharmaceutical preparations to
`facilitate solubilization of poorly soluble drugs1
`and to enhance the stability of emulsions2 or
`
`Emily Ha’s present address is Thomas J. Long School of
`Pharmacy & Health Sciences, University of the Pacific, 3601
`Pacific Avenue, Stockton, CA 95211.
`Correspondence to: Wei Wang (Telephone: 510-705-4755;
`Fax: 510-705-5629; E-mail: wei.wang.b@bayer.com)
`
`Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Vol. 91, 2252–2264 (2002)
`ß 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc. and the American Pharmaceutical Association
`
`microemulsions.3 In the past 2 decades, they were
`widely used in the biotechnology industry because
`of their relatively inert nature when mixed with
`proteins and their strong effect in preventing/
`inhibiting protein surface adsorption4 and aggre-
`gation under various processing conditions, such
`as refolding,5 mixing,6 freeze thawing,7 freeze
`drying,8 and reconstitution.9,10 Even chemical de-
`gradation could be inhibited to a certain degree
`in the presence of polysorbates.11 As a result,
`several protein pharmaceutical products, both in
`liquid and solid dosage forms, contain polysor-
`bates as inactive pharmaceutical
`ingredients,
`including Actimmune, Activase, Intron A, and
`Recombinate.12
`However, there have been concerns about use
`of polysorbates in pharmaceutical preparations
`
`2252
`
`JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, VOL. 91, NO. 10, OCTOBER 2002
`
`Ex. 2020-0001
`
`

`
`because polysorbates contain low levels of resi-
`dual peroxides,13,14 which may accumulate during
`storage and cause immediate and/or long-term
`damage to the active pharmaceutical ingredients.
`Structurally, polysorbates contain fatty acid esters
`of polyoxyethylene sorbitan and polysorbate 80 is
`an ester of a single oleic acid. It has been well
`documented that surfactants with alkyl polyox-
`yethylene chains such as polysorbates undergo
`autoxidation with subsequent chain-shortening
`degradation.13,15 The autoxidation starts with
`metal- and/or light-induced decomposition of alkyl
`polyoxyethylene chain and peroxides (initiation
`step), propagated with oxygen consumption and
`formation of hydroperoxidized derivatives, and
`terminated with collision among radicals. Results
`of the autoxidation include not only formation
`of peroxides on the polyoxyethylene chain of the
`molecule but also changes in physico-chemical
`properties of the surfactant such as a reduction in
`the cloud point, pH, and surface tension due to
`the formation of breakdown products.13 Although
`peroxide formation in diluted polysorbate 20 or
`other nonionic surfactants have been carefully
`examined,13,14,16 peroxidation of polysorbate 80
`either in diluted solution or neat form has not
`been found in the literature.
`The oxidative damaging effect of peroxides
`in surfactants on drug molecules has been ex-
`tensively reported. These include oxidation of
`benzocaine hydrochloride,17 penicillins,18 and
`aminophylline19 by peroxides generated from
`polyoxyethylenic nonionic surfactants. Although
`the effect of residual peroxides in polysorbates has
`not been widely reported on protein stability, it is
`anticipated that even trace amount of peroxides in
`polysorbates could cause significant damage to
`proteins because proteins are often formulated at
`relatively low concentrations. Indeed, a few such
`cases have been reported. Knepp et al.20 demon-
`strated that alkyl hydroperoxides in polysorbate
`80 induced oxidation, dimerization, and subse-
`quent aggregation of recombinant human ciliary
`neurotrophic factor (rhCNTF) in solution and the
`rate of reaction was similar to that induced by
`hydrogen peroxide at the same concentration.
`Herman et al.21 were able to correlate the level of
`peroxides in polysorbate 80 and the degree of
`oxidation of recombinant human granulocyte
`colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) during sto-
`rage. Another paper by Miki et al.22 reported a
`linkage between the oxidation of hydroperoxidase
`and peroxides generated in Triton X-100, a sur-
`factant structurally similar to polysorbates. No
`
`PEROXIDE FORMATION IN POLYSORBATE 80
`
`2253
`
`reports, however, have been found on the poten-
`tial effect of peroxides in surfactants on protein
`stability in solid state.
`Because surfactants often have to be used in
`protein pharmaceutical preparations to prevent
`protein surface adsorption and/or aggregation,
`proper control of the level of residual peroxides
`in surfactants is a key in protecting oxidation-
`sensitive proteins. To control the level of residual
`peroxides in polysorbates, two methods may be
`applied independently or in combination—control
`of the source of oxygen, and/or use of antioxidants.
`Removal of oxygen from the system would prevent
`peroxidation by blocking the propagation step.
`Some manufacturers, such as Mazer Chemicals
`and Pierce, have used this strategy to limit the
`peroxide formation during storage and shipment
`by packaging surfactants under nitrogen. John-
`son et al.23 showed that removal of oxygen in the
`headspace of ampoules prevented oxidation of
`Fenprostalene by peroxides generated in PEG 400
`during storage. Several antioxidants, including
`cysteine, glutathione, and methionine, have been
`shown to prevent oxidation of recombinant
`human ciliary neurotrophic factor (rhCNTF) and
`recombinant human nerve growth factor (rhNGF)
`caused both by alkyl peroxides in polysorbate 80
`and hydrogen peroxide in solution.20 It should be
`noted that antioxidants may potentially interact
`with protein molecules, and result in protein
`degradation or precipitation.20
`In this article, we report for the first time how
`peroxides are generated in polysorbate 80 under a
`variety of storage conditions, and that peroxida-
`tion in polysorbate 80 can be effectively inhibited
`by reducing its contact with molecular oxygen. A
`model protein, IL-2 mutein, was used to demon-
`strate that peroxides generated in polysorbate 80
`could accelerate protein oxidation both in liquid
`and solid states. Finally, we show that peroxide-
`induced IL-2 mutein oxidation can be effectively
`prevented/inhibited either by reducing the con-
`tact of the protein formulation with molecular
`oxygen or through addition of an antioxidant.
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`
`Materials
`
`NF-grade polysorbate 80 (lot N11662, peroxide
`level < 100 ppm) and sulfuric acid were purchased
`from J.T. Baker (Phillipsburg, NJ). Low-peroxide
`polysorbate 80 (lot 120K7276), Xylenol orange,
`ferrous chloride, and hydrogen peroxide (30%
`
`JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, VOL. 91, NO. 10, OCTOBER 2002
`
`Ex. 2020-0002
`
`

`
`2254
`
`HA, WANG, AND WANG
`
`solution) were purchased from Sigma Chemicals
`(St. Louis, MO). HPLC-grade water and acetoni-
`trile were obtained from Fisher Scientific (Pitts-
`burgh, PA). High-purity nitrogen (99.99%) was
`obtained from Air Products (Galt, CA). Recombi-
`nant human IL-2 mutein at 3.5 mg/mL in a frozen
`buffered solution was prepared by Bayer Corpo-
`ration. This protein was derived from Chinese
`hamster ovary cells with a purity of greater than
`99% by SDS-PAGE. All materials were used as
`received.
`
`Determination of Peroxide Concentration
`in Polysorbate 80
`
`The FOX (ferrous oxidation with Xylenol orange)
`assay was used to determine the peroxide con-
`tent in polysorbate 80 solutions.14 Briefly, 50 mL of
`sample was mixed with 5 mL of 10% (w/v)
`butylated-hydroxy toluene (BHT) in ethanol and
`950 mL FOX reagent containing 250 mM ferrous
`chloride, 100 mM Xylenol orange, and 100 mM
`sorbitol in 25 mM sulfuric acid. BHT was added to
`prevent further peroxide generation during the
`assay process. The mixture was then incubated at
`room temperature for 20 min prior to reading at
`530 nm on a Wallac Victor 2 automated microtiter
`plate reader (Gaithersburg, MD). Hydrogen per-
`oxide was used to prepare standard curves and
`therefore, peroxide level in polysorbate 80 was
`obtained as peroxide equivalent to H2O2 stan-
`dards. All neat polysorbate 80 samples were di-
`luted to 20% solution with water before analysis.
`The peroxide level in neat polysorbate 80 samples
`was calculated as milliequivalents (mEq) or micro-
`equivalents (mEq) per kg of neat polysorbate 80
`(equivalent to the H2O2 concentration in mM
`or mM). To make comparison easier, the peroxide
`level in 20% polysorbate 80 samples was also
`expressed per kg of neat polysorbate 80 (calcu-
`lated by multiplying by 5).
`
`Stability Studies on Polysorbate 80
`
`Stability studies were conducted on both neat and
`20% (w/w) polysorbate 80. The 20% solution was
`prepared by diluting the neat polysorbate 80 with
`water for injection at a weight ratio of 1:4. Sta-
`bility samples were prepared by dispensing 1 mL
`of neat or 20% polysorbate 80 into 10-mL flint
`tubing glass vials. These vials were placed in a
`freeze dryer (Virtis Genesis 35 EL) and cooled
`down to 0–28C. After the samples were cooled,
`vacuum was applied gradually to 10 mTorr and
`
`JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, VOL. 91, NO. 10, OCTOBER 2002
`
`maintained for 10 min before the vials were either
`backfilled with air or nitrogen to 1 atmosphe-
`ric pressure or directly sealed with bromobutyl
`rubber stoppers inside the freeze dryer. The stop-
`pered vials were then capped manually. These
`stability samples were incubated at 40, 50, or
`608C with or without light for 8 weeks. The light-
`ing condition (460 foot candle) was provided with
`a fluorescent light box (Model BL1012) purchased
`from The Back Light Hall Productions (San Luis
`Obispo, CA). All the samples were stored at 808C
`until analysis.
`
`Preparation of Liquid IL-2 Mutein Stability Samples
`
`Recombinant human IL-2 mutein at 3.5 mg/mL
`was dialyzed extensively overnight into a buffered
`solution containing 5% mannitol and 20 mM citric
`acid at pH 5.5. The dialyzed protein was diluted to
`a final concentration of 1 mg/mL with the dialysis
`buffer containing no polysorbate 80, 0.1% low-
`peroxide polysorbate 80, or 0.1% high-peroxide
`polysorbate 80. The peroxide level in the protein
`solution containing low- and high-peroxide poly-
`sorbate 80 was, respectively, 0.33 mEq and 25 mEq
`per liter of protein solution. High-peroxide neat
`polysorbate 80 was obtained by incubating low
`peroxide polysorbate 80 at 408C under light for
`4 days. The diluted IL-2 mutein solution was dis-
`pensed at 1 mL into 6-mL flint tubing glass vials.
`The head space of these sample vials was filled
`with air or nitrogen in the same way as described
`for the polysorbate 80 stability samples.
`
`Preparation of Lyophilized IL-2 Mutein
`Stability Samples
`
`The initial preparation of lyophilized IL-2 mutein
`stability samples was similar to that for the liquid
`stability samples. Reduced glutathione (GSH), an
`antioxidant, was included at 0.5% in some stabi-
`lity samples containing high-peroxide polysorbate
`80. Lyophilization included the following steps:
`freezing to 458C at 0.48C/min, holding the tem-
`perature at 458C for 1 h, increasing the tem-
`perature to 208C at 0.48C/min, holding the
`temperature at 208C for 1 h (annealing), de-
`creasing the temperature to 458C at 0.48C/min,
`increasing the vacuum to 100 mTorr, increasing
`the temperature to 258C at 0.48C/min, holding
`the temperature for 16 h (primary drying), and
`increasing the temperature to 208C at 0.48C/min
`and holding the temperature for 24 h (secondary
`drying). At the end of the drying process, the vials
`
`Ex. 2020-0003
`
`

`
`were either stoppered immediately under vacuum
`or backfilled with air or nitrogen. Both liquid and
`lyophilized IL-2 mutein stability samples were
`incubated at 408C. Stability samples were stored
`at 808C until analysis.
`
`Reverse-Phase High-Performance Liquid
`Chromatography (RP-HPLC)
`
`RP-HPLC analysis of IL-2 mutein and its oxidiz-
`ed product was done on HP 1100 (Hewlett
`Packard, Pleasanton, CA). A Vydac C-18 column
`(250 4.6mm, 5 m, 300 Angstrom) was used (Vydac,
`Hesperia, CA). The mobile phase contained sol-
`vent A (0.1% TFA in water) and B (0.1% TFA in
`acetonitrile). A gradient elution at a flow rate of
`1.0 mL/min was used according to the following
`program: 45% B to 70% B in 16 min, 75% to 100%
`B over 10 s and hold for 7 min, 100% to 45% B
`in 10 s and hold for 7 min. The IL-2 mutein and
`its oxidized product, respectively, with a reten-
`tion time of 13.8 and 13.0 min, were monitored
`at 280 nm.
`
`RESULTS
`
`Peroxide Formation and Decomposition in
`Polysorbate 80
`
`To our knowledge, peroxide formation in neat
`polysorbate 80 during storage has not been re-
`ported in the literature. Therefore, we examined
`peroxide formation in neat polysorbate 80 under
`air or nitrogen. To accelerate formation of pero-
`xides, stability samples were incubated at elevat-
`ed temperatures of 40, 50, or 608C, all in dark. The
`starting peroxide level in the neat polysorbate 80
`was 0.16 mEq. In the presence of air the formation
`of peroxides was accelerated upon incubation
`(Fig. 1). The peroxide in the samples under air
`reached a peak level of 15, 25, and 36 mEq,
`respectively, at 60, 50, and 408C. Although the
`peak level of peroxides was reached at week 2 at
`60 and 508C, it was reached at week 4 at 408C.
`Further incubation caused a gradual drop in
`peroxide level at all temperatures, forming bell-
`shaped curves with time. In contrast, peroxide
`formation in samples under nitrogen was negli-
`gible (Fig. 1). In fact, the peroxide level declin-
`ed slightly in the first few weeks, especially at
`608C and after week 4, the peroxide level started
`to increase. The slight increase could be due to
`trace amount of oxygen, which was present in
`
`PEROXIDE FORMATION IN POLYSORBATE 80
`
`2255
`
`Figure 1. Effect of temperature and air on the
`formation of peroxides in neat polysorbate 80 during
`incubation. Key: }—under nitrogen at 408C; *—under
`nitrogen at 508C; &—under nitrogen at 608C; ^—
`under air at 408C; *—under air at 508C; and &—under
`air at 608C. The error bars represent the standard
`deviation of values determined from three separate
`vials and, if not shown, are smaller than the symbols.
`
`nitrogen and/or permeated through the rubber
`stoppers with time. The nitrogen had a purity of
`99.99% and the residual oxygen amount would be
`approximately 5 nmol, assuming the impurity gas
`had 20% oxygen. The above results suggest that
`oxygen in air is the major cause of peroxide for-
`mation in neat polysorbate 80 and by remov-
`ing oxygen, peroxide formation in polysorbate 80
`may be inhibited completely during long-term
`storage.
`As polysorbate 80 is generally used from a
`concentrated stock solution, we prepared a 20%
`aqueous solution and examined the peroxide
`formation of this solution under similar incuba-
`tion conditions as for neat polysorbate 80 (Fig. 2).
`Several differences were observed. First, the
`initial formation of peroxides in 20% polysorbate
`80 solution under air was faster, and the per-
`oxides reached a much higher peak level (approxi-
`mately 10 times) than that in neat polysorbate 80.
`Second, there was a clear trend of increasing lag
`time with decreasing temperature, which resulted
`in delayed peaking time. Third, the peroxide level
`did not reach a plateau at 408C even after 8 weeks.
`Fourth, there was a second increase in peroxide
`level after week 6 at 508C. Last, the 20% solu-
`tion (with a starting peroxide concentration of
`0.044 mEq) under nitrogen showed a weak gra-
`dual upward trend in peroxide concentration but
`
`JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, VOL. 91, NO. 10, OCTOBER 2002
`
`Ex. 2020-0004
`
`

`
`2256
`
`HA, WANG, AND WANG
`
`Figure 2. Effect of temperature and air on the for-
`mation of peroxides in 20% polysorbate 80 solution
`during incubation. Key: }—under nitrogen at 408C;
`*—under nitrogen at 508C; &—under nitrogen at
`608C; ^—under air at 408C; *—under air at 508C; and
`&—under air at 608C. The error bars represent
`the standard deviation of values determined from three
`separate vials and, if not shown, are smaller than the
`symbols.
`
`remained below 0.4 mEq during the course of the
`study. The slight increase in peroxide under
`nitrogen may have to do with the residual oxygen
`dissolved in the polysorbate 80 solution. Again,
`these results show that peroxide formation in
`polysorbate 80 solutions can be effectively inhib-
`ited by removing oxygen.
`The above results indicate that peroxides in
`polysorbate 80 decompose with time. Because for-
`mation and decomposition of peroxides occurred
`simultaneously under air, the above results could
`not tell us the true decomposition rate of peroxides.
`Therefore, we examined the decomposition rate of
`peroxides in 20% polysorbate 80 solutions under
`vacuum in dark at 40 or 608C. We chose vacuum
`condition instead of nitrogen fill because we want-
`ed to reduce the residual oxygen in the sample
`vials to a minimum to prevent any formation of
`peroxides. The 20% polysorbate 80 solution had
`been aged and contained a starting peroxide level
`of 1 mEq. Upon incubation, the peroxide level
`dropped at both temperatures (Fig. 3). However,
`the decline was much faster at 608C than at 408C,
`and a significant lag time was observed at 408C. In
`addition, no significant drop was observed at 408C
`after week 4, suggesting that peroxides below a
`certain level could be stable at a lower tempera-
`
`Figure 3. Effect of temperature on the decomposi-
`tion of peroxides in 20% polysorbate 80 solution under
`vacuum during incubation. Key: *—408C; and &—
`608C. The error bars represent the standard deviation
`of values determined from three separate vials and, if
`not shown, are smaller than the symbols.
`
`ture. The higher decomposition rate of peroxides
`at a higher temperature may explain why a lower
`level of peroxides accumulated during incubation
`at a higher incubation temperature both for neat
`and aqueous solution of polysorbate 80 (Figs. 1
`and 2).
`
`Factors Affecting Peroxide Formation
`in Polysorbate 80
`
`Light is a very common factor in controlling sta-
`bility of chemicals, and has been shown to affect
`the peroxide formation in polysorbate 20.13 There-
`fore, we examined the effect of light on the per-
`oxide formation in polysorbate 80. Instead of using
`neat polysorbate 80, we prepared 20% polysor-
`bate 80 solutions for stability studies because the
`peroxide formation is faster and any effect can be
`observed in a shorter period of time. As expect-
`ed, light dramatically accelerated the formation
`of peroxides during incubation at 408C (Fig. 4).
`By the end of a 5-week incubation period, the
`peroxide level reached 1300 mEq under air, which
`was eight times higher than that under air but
`without light exposure. In the absence of air, how-
`ever, light exposure did not cause any increase in
`peroxide level (Fig. 4). These results indicate that
`exposure of polysorbate 80 to light may not cause
`formation of peroxides in the absence of air.
`
`JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, VOL. 91, NO. 10, OCTOBER 2002
`
`Ex. 2020-0005
`
`

`
`PEROXIDE FORMATION IN POLYSORBATE 80
`
`2257
`
`the residual level of peroxides in polysorbate 80
`may or may not have a significant effect on protein
`oxidation. To answer this question, we prepared
`liquid IL-2 mutein formulation containing both
`fresh (low-peroxide) and stressed (high-peroxide)
`polysorbate 80 at 0.1%. The peroxide level in
`the protein formulations was determined to be,
`respectively, 0.33 and 25 mEq. Incubation was
`conducted at 408C under air or nitrogen. The
`starting material of IL-2 mutein contained 2.8% of
`oxidized IL-2 mutein, which was formed presum-
`ably during the fermentation and/or purification
`process. Under nitrogen, oxidized IL-2 mutein
`increased to 5.4% by the end of a 30-day incuba-
`tion period (Fig. 6). In contrast, air caused an
`increase in the amount of oxidized IL-2 mutein to
`10.9% in the same period, suggesting that oxygen
`in air catalyzed IL-2 mutein oxidation. The slight
`increase in oxidized IL-2 mutein under nitrogen
`may reflect a combined effect of dissolved oxygen
`and the residual oxygen present in nitrogen. As
`calculated before, the nitrogen may contain appro-
`ximately 5 nmol of oxygen. Because the amount
`of IL-2SA in the sample vials was approxima-
`tely 66 nmol, up to 7.6% of IL-2 mutein could be
`potentially oxidized by the residual oxygen if their
`reaction molar ratio was 1:1. In the presence of
`low-peroxide polysorbate 80, the base-line oxida-
`tion of IL-2 mutein did not change under air or
`under nitrogen to a significant degree, suggesting
`that the amount of peroxides in polysorbate 80 did
`not induce any significant oxidative effect. How-
`ever, the amount of oxidized IL-2 mutein in the
`presence of low-peroxide polysorbate 80 at the end
`of the 30-day incubation period was slightly
`higher than the control, suggesting possible effect
`of peroxides generated during storage. In con-
`trast, high-peroxide polysorbate 80 caused a rapid
`increase in IL-2 mutein oxidation during the ini-
`tial incubation period. The rate of oxidation was the
`same either under air or nitrogen within 4 days,
`suggesting the peroxides in polysorbate 80 were
`responsible for the IL-2 mutein oxidation. After
`day 4, oxidation of IL-2 mutein in these samples
`became slower under nitrogen, which may reflect
`a gradual depletion of peroxides in the formula-
`tion. After 1 week, oxidation of IL-2 mutein under
`air also started to slow down, indicating a dimi-
`nishing contribution of peroxide-induced IL-2
`mutein oxidation relative to that due to molecular
`oxygen. These results indicate that the oxidative
`effect of peroxides in polysorbate 80 may or may
`not be an issue, depending on its relative quantity
`in a protein formulation.
`
`JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, VOL. 91, NO. 10, OCTOBER 2002
`
`Figure 4. Effect of light on the formation of per-
`oxides in 20% polysorbate 80 solution during incubation
`at 408C. Key: }—light under vacuum; *—light under
`air at 408C; and *—dark under air. The error bars
`represent the standard deviation of values determined
`from three separate vials and, if not shown, are smaller
`than the symbols.
`
`Effect of Peroxides in Polysorbate 80 on IL-2
`Mutein Stability in Liquid State
`
`The above data demonstrate that peroxides can
`be easily generated in neat or diluted polysorbate
`80 during storage under air. As mentioned earlier,
`polysorbate 80 has been frequently used in process-
`ing or formulating proteins. An obvious question
`is whether the peroxide level in polysorbate 80
`can cause any significant damage during proces-
`sing or storage of a formulated protein. Therefore,
`we chose a model protein, IL-2 mutein, and exa-
`mined the potential oxidative effect of peroxides
`in polysorbate 80 on formulated IL-2 mutein dur-
`ing storage. This protein has been reported to have
`potent antitumor activity and better tolerabi-
`lity in vivo than Proleukin, a commercial IL-2
`product.24 Additional reasons for choosing this
`protein include (1) oxidation at Met104 could easily
`occur in recombinant IL-225 and desAla1Ser125
`IL-226 during storage at room temperature; (2)
`peroxides specifically catalyze methionine oxida-
`tion,27 and any oxidative effect of peroxide-con-
`taining polysorbate 80 can be easily assessed; and
`(3) the oxidized IL-2 can be easily separated and
`quantitated by RP-HPLC (Fig. 5). Oxidation of the
`IL-2 mutein was confirmed by MS analysis of the
`RP-HPLC eluate and both MWþ 18 (major) and
`MW þ 32 were detected, although the site of
`oxidation was not verified.
`Because the level of polysorbate 80 in protein
`formulations is usually low (typically below 1%),
`
`Ex. 2020-0006
`
`

`
`2258
`
`HA, WANG, AND WANG
`
`Figure 5. Separation and quantitation of IL-2 mutein and its oxidized product by
`reverse-phase HPLC (see details under Materials and Methods). The retention time for
`IL-2 mutein and its oxidized product was, respectively, 13.8 and 13.0 min.
`
`Effect of Peroxides in Polysorbate 80 on IL-2 Mutein
`Stability during Lyophilization and in Solid State
`
`Lyophilization has been used frequently to extend
`the shelf-life of a protein formulation. Therefore,
`we also examined the potential oxidative damage
`caused by peroxides in polysorbate 80 on lyophi-
`lized IL-2 mutein with the same composition as
`the liquid formulation. Although not as signifi-
`cant as in liquid state, air-induced oxidation of IL-
`2 mutein also occurred in the solid state and 5.5%
`of IL-2 mutein was oxidized by the end of 9-week
`incubation period (Fig. 7). In contrast to the liquid
`state, IL-2 mutein oxidation in solid state was
`significantly increased in the presence of low-
`peroxide polysorbate 80 and the oxidation rate
`gradually decreased to that of the air-induced
`oxidation by week 7. A surprising finding was that
`high-peroxide polysorbate 80 caused a significant
`formation of oxidized IL-2 mutein during prepara-
`tion (lyophilization) as well as increased oxidation
`during incubation. After lyophilization, the oxi-
`dized IL-2 mutein jumped from 3 to 5%. Addition
`of glutathione did not change the amount of
`oxidized IL-2 mutein formed during lyophili-
`zation, although this antioxidant significantly re-
`duced the rate of IL-2 mutein oxidation during
`incubation. Under vacuum, high-peroxide poly-
`sorbate 80 also accelerated IL-2 mutein oxidation
`as expected. However, the amount of oxidized IL-2
`mutein reached a maximum at week 4, suggesting
`
`Figure 6. Formation of oxidized IL-2 mutein in
`solution during incubation at 408C. The protein solu-
`tion contained 1.0 mg/mL IL-2 mutein, 5% mannitol,
`and 20 mM citrate at pH 5.5 with and without 0.1%
`polysorbate 80. Key: *—no polysorbate 80 under
`nitrogen; *—no polysorbate 80 under air; }—low-
`peroxide polysorbate 80 under nitrogen; ^—low-per-
`oxide polysorbate 80 under air; &—high-peroxide
`polysorbate 80 under nitrogen; and &—high-peroxide
`polysorbate 80 under air. The error bars represent
`the standard deviation of values determined from three
`separate vials and, if not shown, are smaller than the
`symbols.
`
`JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, VOL. 91, NO. 10, OCTOBER 2002
`
`Ex. 2020-0007
`
`

`
`PEROXIDE FORMATION IN POLYSORBATE 80
`
`2259
`
`because the peroxide assay recommended in the
`European Pharmacopoeia (EP) requires a larger
`amount of sample (5 g) and offers less sensiti-
`vity. Fresh polysorbates usually contain a variable
`level of residual peroxides depending on the
`source. We found the peroxide level in polysorbate
`80 from J.T. Baker (lot N11662) and Sigma
`Chemicals (lot 120K7276) was, respectively, 0.16
`and 0.33 mEq. Knepp et al.20 reported peroxide
`levels between 0.76 to 27.8 mEq in polysorbate 80
`from several suppliers, including Mazer Chemi-
`cal, ICI Specialties, Spectrum, Croda, and Emery.
`The difference in peroxide level in polysorbate 80
`may reflect possible differences in the manu-
`facturing and purification (bleaching) processes,
`packaging, and storage conditions.
`During incubation at elevated temperatures,
`both neat and 20% polysorbate 80 experienced
`a rise and fall in peroxide content with time.
`Similar observations were also made with other
`types of nonionic surfactants including 3% poly-
`sorbate 20 solutions13 and 3% Cetomacrogol solu-
`tions.16 The rise and fall in peroxide content was
`considered typical of radical chain autoxidation
`followed by degradation.13 Autoxidation is a term
`for the uncatalyzed oxidation of a substrate by
`molecular oxygen,27 and our data clearly indicate
`the participation of air (oxygen) in the peroxide
`formation. A chain autoxidation process consists
`of three phases: initiation, propagation, and ter-
`mination. The increased formation of peroxides in
`polysorbate 80 under light suggests photocata-
`lyzed initiation of peroxide formation process,
`probably through the conversion of triplet to
`singlet oxygen27,28 and/or light-induced decom-
`position of trace amounts of peroxides, triggering
`the chain oxidation. The changing time course
`of peroxide formation in polysorbate 80 reflects a
`relative balance between simultaneous forma-
`tion and decomposition of peroxides. The initial
`increase was due to a faster rate of peroxide for-
`mation than that of decomposition. At the peak
`level, the rate of formation and decomposition
`reached a steady state. The decline in peroxide
`level indicates a faster decomposition of peroxides
`than peroxide formation. These results suggest
`that the level of peroxides in polysorbate 80 can
`change dramatically under different storage con-
`ditions and the level of residual peroxides in poly-
`sorbate 80 is not a reliable indicator of the age or
`past storage condition of polysorbate 80. Although
`peroxide formation in surfactants can be inhibited
`to a great degree by including an antioxidant
`such as butylated hydroxytoluene,14,29 our data
`
`JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, VOL. 91, NO. 10, OCTOBER 2002
`
`Figure 7. Formation of oxidized IL-2 mutein in a
`lyophilized formulation during incubation at 408C. The
`formulation before lyophilization contained 1.0 mg/mL
`IL-2 mutein, 5% mannitol, and 20 mM citrate at pH 5.5
`with and without 0.1% polysorbate 80. Key: *—no
`polysorbate 80 under air; ^—low-peroxide polysorbate
`80 under air; &—high-peroxide polysorbate 80 under
`air; &—high-peroxide polysorbate 80 under vacuum;
`and ~—high-peroxide polysorbate 80 under air plus
`0.5% GSH. The error bars represent the standard de-
`viation of values determined from three separate vials
`and, if not shown, are smaller than the symbols.
`
`that the peroxide-induced IL-2 mutein oxidation,
`if any, reached a nondetectable level after week 4.
`The rapid formation of oxidized IL-2 mutein
`during lyophilization prompted us to investigate
`each lyophilization step where IL-2 mutein can
`possibly be oxidized. To magnify the oxidizing
`effect, we prepared IL-2 mutein formulation con-
`taining hydrogen peroxide at 50 mM instead of
`high-peroxide polysorbate 80. We sampled each
`step during lyophilization and found that the total
`amount of oxidized IL-2 mutein after freezing,
`annealing, and drying was, respectively, 4.8, 17.4,
`and 17.4%. It is clear that oxidation of IL-2 mu-
`tein during lyophilization occurred in both freez-
`ing and annealing steps and mostly during
`annealing.
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`Peroxides in Polysorbate 80
`
`In this study, we examined the peroxide forma-
`tion in neat and 20% polysorbate 80. We chose the
`FOX assay in the determination of peroxides
`
`Ex. 2020-0008
`
`

`
`2260
`
`HA, WANG, AND WANG
`
`indicate that removal of oxygen is simple and ef-
`fective in preventing peroxide formation in poly-
`sorbate 80 during long-term storage.
`Peroxide formation in polysorbate 80 experi-
`enced a temperature-dependent lag time during
`incubation. This lag time was also termed as the
`induction period and considered to be the time
`period when the peroxide level is below 5 mEq.13
`Assuming this level demarcates the end of a lag
`time, we found a linear Arrhenius-type relation-
`ship

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket