throbber
10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`EP 03 748 438
`M/45063-EP
`
`TEST REPORT
`
`Additional Experimental Results
`for EP 03 748 438
`
`Abbott Biotechnology Ltd
`
`Example A: Potential Of The Formulation To Maintain Adalimumab Stability Over
`Broad Adalimumab Concentration Range
`
`The present formulations of the invention have improved properties as compared
`to other formulations used in the field. Particularly, the formulations of the invention
`were shown to maintain physical and chemical stability of Adalimumab (D2E7) over a
`broad protein concentration range. It is generally accepted by persons skilled in the art
`that with increasing protein concentration stabilization of liquid protein formulation
`presents a challenge, especially over longer periods of time (e. g., more tha n a year).
`Surprisingly, the formulations of the invention guarantee protein stability over at
`least 24 months in a liquid state with a Adalimumab concentration in the range of about
`1mg/ml to 158 mg/ml.
`
`Test Series 1: Adalimumab concentration in the range of 12,5 mg/ml to 158 mg/ml
`
`Table 1 lists formulations containing a broad concentration range of Adalimumab
`that were placed on long term stability for up to 24 months, during which time the
`stabilizing effects of the formulations were monitored
`
`Table l: Adalimumab Formulations Placed On Long-Term Stability Testing At 2-
`8°C
`
`
` Adalimumab
`Concentration
`
`
`
`
`
`
`12.5 1 ml 10mg/0.8ml)
`25
`1 ml 20 ; 0.8m]
`50m ml 40 ,; 0.8ml
`8O
`; ml (160 ; 2ml
`100
`; m1 80
`1 0.8m]
`
`158 mg/ml
`
`
`
`023010vo
`88-003HK _
`080100AW
`980200A0 _
`18228 HK
`
`
`15206HK
`
`
`
`Real Time Stability
`Data Available
`
`(Months)
`
`
`Table. 2 provides a detailed overview over the compositions of the protein
`formulations listed in Table 1.
`
`Table 2: Composition Of Adalimumab Formulations Placed On Long-Term
`Stability Monitoring
`
`AMGEN INC.
`
`Exhibit 1054
`
`Ex. 1054 - Page 1 of 26
`
`Ex. 1054 - Page 1 of 26
`
`AMGEN INC.
`Exhibit 1054
`
`

`

`
`
`[m mL]
`
`
`
`B
`[m_mL] m mL]
`25.00
`50.00
`12-00
`1200
`
`[m mL]
`
`0.71166
`
`1.04
`
`1.31
`
`1.36 1 82
`
`0.24
`0.75
`
`1.53
`
`1.53
`
`EP 03 748 438
`M/45063-EP
`
`Adalimumab
`
`Citricacid
`monoh drate
`
`Sodiumcitrate
`Disodium
`
`phosphate
`dih drate
`
`phosphate
`dih drate
`Sodiumchloride
`P01 sorbate 80
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`E
`[mmL] m_mL]
`100.00
`12-00
`
`1.31
`
`0-31
`1.53
`
`1.53
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5.48-7.31
`
`.
`17
`_
`6.
`3.0
`ON
`H
`-0 “mu-mu
`adlmL
`
`
`
`Formulation A contained 12.50 mg/mL of Adalimumab and various concentration
`ranges of other excipients. Formulations C—F varied only in protein concentration.
`Criteria tested ranged from general quality parameters (e.g., protein content, pH),
`parameters indicating physical stability (e.g., clarity, color, particle contamination
`monitored by visual inspection and light obscuration particle counting, purity including
`fi'agmentation and aggregation monitoring by SEC), and parameters indicating chemical
`Adalimumab stability (e.g., IEC for deamidation, oxidation, general chemical stability;
`SEC).
`
`0 Clarity (analytical measurement)
`
`0 Color (visual inspection)
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`pH
`
`Particulate contamination: visible particles (visual inspection)
`
`Particulate contamination: subvisible particles (light obscuration particle count
`test)
`
`Purity: Size Exclusion I-IPLC (SEC)
`
`Purity: Cation Exchange HPLC (IEC)
`
`0 Protein content (for batch 080100AVV)
`
`The clarity and the color of the solution were determined by analysis of the
`undiluted solution. Clarity was measured by turbidimetry and reported as Nephelometric
`Turbidity Units (NTU). A value of 30 NTU translates to reference suspension IV as
`defined per European Pharmacopeia (E.P.). For determination of color the Adalimurnab
`formulation was visually compared with the reference solutions as described in the ER
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`Ex. 1054 - Page 2 of 26
`
`Ex. 1054 - Page 2 of 26
`
`

`

`EP 03 748 438
`M/45063-EP
`Particulate contamination (e.g., visible particles) was determined by visual
`inspection as described in German Drug Codex (DAC, section Visual Testing for Visible
`Particles).
`
`Subvisible particles were monitored by the light blockage method according to
`United States Pharmacopeia (USP). In addition, the physicochemical stability of the
`formulations was assessed by SEC which allows detection of fragments and aggregates.
`
`To monitor chemical stability, size exclusion high pressure liquid chromatography
`(SE-HPLC) (detection of fragments and hydrolysis specimen) and CEX—HPLC (cation
`exchange I-IPLC) were applied. CEX—HPLC resolves different
`lysine isoforms and
`degradation products (e.g., deamidated and oxidized species) that may have formed
`during storage.
`-
`
`Surprisingly, all of the formulations listed in Table 2 did not show any significant
`instability phenomena when exposed to long—term (at least 24 months) real-time stability
`testing.
`
`The data are analyzed below.
`
`Clarity (reported as NTU values) did not change significantly during the long-
`term stability study, and even afier 24 months storage at a temperature typically
`recommended for storage of biologic products (i.e., 2-8°C), NTU values remained well
`below the quality specification (Table 3). Thus, the formulation of the invention is able
`to provide stability over a broad Adalimumab concentration range with regard to clarity.
`
`Table 3: Clarity 0f Formulations With Adalimumab Concentrations Ranging From
`12.5 mg/mL To 158 mg/mL After 24 Months Storage At 2—8°C
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`12. 5mg/ml
`
`50 mm]
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`25.
`
`
`
`000 000000000000
`
`
`
`5.60
`
`7.6
`
`
`00 0000_—
`00 .0000 __
`25 rug/ml
`00 .0000 _—
`80mg/m21ml
`23.9
`SEW“ _—-0.8ml
`
`
`the Adalimumab
`contamination revealed that
`for particulate
`Testing
`formulations remained practically free from visible particles. Additionally, subvisible
`particle levels (indicating aggregation, precipitation and general physical
`instability
`
`Ex. 1054 - Page 3 of 26
`
`Ex. 1054 - Page 3 of 26
`
`

`

`EP 03 748 438
`M/45063-EP
`phenomena) did not change significantly throughout the 24 months stability testing. The
`drug product batches were virtually equivalent with regards to their physicochemical
`stability at all storage conditions tested. This is surprising, as it is well accepted that
`especially physical stability tends to decrease at higher protein concentrations. Thus, the
`formulation of the invention is able to provide stability over a broad Adalimumab
`concentration range with regard to particulate contamination.
`Tables 4 and 5 provide detailed data of particulate formation (visible and
`subvisible particles) of formulations with various Adalimumab concentrations up to 24
`months:
`
`10
`
`Table 4: Visible Particle Data Of Formulations With Adalimumab Concentrations
`
`Ranging From 12.5 mg/mL To 158 mg/mL After 24 Months Storage At 2-8"C
`
`concentration
`
`
`
`10mg/0m81ml
`25Omg/ml
`'0. 8m]
`50Otng/ml
`
`(4O _.0 8m]
`
`
`
`100 mg/m]
`80m_ 0ml8m]
`Maximum Allowable NMT < 4.5
`
`E
`
`Particulate Contamination (Visual Score)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`15
`
`Table 5: Subvisible Particle Data (Determined Via Light Obscuration) Of
`
`Formulations With Adalimumab Concentrations Ranging From 12.5 mg/mL To
`
`158 mg/mL After 24 Months Storage At 2-8°C
`
` Subvisible Particles
`
`W011)
`
`Z lOum
`
`0
`
`11111111101)10811 _—O
`
`81 118111 01181181)
`
`
`
`0
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Ex. 1054 - Page 4 of 26
`
`Ex. 1054 - Page 4 of 26
`
`

`

`EP 03 748 438
`M/45063-EP
`
`
`
`
`W...
`
`
`Maximum Allowable :
`
`2 10pm NMT < 6000 partJunit
`
`2 25pm NMT < 600 part/unit
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`23
`
`30
`
`0
`
`
`
`
`
`Table 6 provides the results of SE—HPLC testing afier 24 months of storage of
`Adalimumab formulations, showing the levels of monomer over time. Table 6 clearly
`demonstrates that the formulations are able to guarantee virtually identical monomer
`levels with Adalimumab concentrations ranging from 12.5 mg/mL up to 158 mg/mL,
`even after 24 months storage. All formulations reveal monomer levels clearly above the
`95% monomer quality level (indicative for very good stability, even over 24 months real-
`time testing. The formulations actually maintain Adalimumab long—term stability to an
`extent that even an extremely strict quality specification for real-time stability testing of
`98% would be met. Thus, the formulations of the invention are able to provide physical
`stability over a very broad Adalimumab concentration range and over a long time with
`regard to monomer level as well.
`This is very surprising, since it is well accepted in the scientific community that
`aggregation (leading to a decrease of monomer) strongly correlates with increased protein
`concentration.
`
`Table 6: Adalimumab Monomer Levels Of Various Formulations After 24
`
`Months Storage At 2—8°C Difl'ering Significantly In Adalimumab Concentration
`
`(i.e., Ranging From 12.5 mglmL To 158 mg/mL)
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`
`
`Puri HPLC %
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`50 mg/ml (40mg/O.8ml)
`
`Monomer
`
`somg/rnl (160mg/2ml) - Monomer
`
`
`Ex. 1054 - Page 5 of 26
`
`Ex. 1054 - Page 5 of 26
`
`

`

`EP 03 748 438
`M/45063-EP
`
`100 ngml (80mg/O.8ml)
`
`989
`
`Quality Target NLT 95%, with greater than 98 providing excellent stability
`
`CEX-HPLC is a very powerful tool for monitoring the chemical stability of
`antibodies. Table 7 shows that
`the formulation of invention is able to maintain
`Adalimumab chemical stability (expressed as the sum of lysine variants, deamidation,
`and oxidation) for up to 24 months and over a broad Adalimumab concentration range.
`No correlation between protein concentration and decreasing chemical stability was
`observed. The ability to maintain chemical stability over a long period of time and over a
`broad concentration range is an important quality criterium of pharmaceutical
`formulations. Table 7 clearly demonstrates that the formulation is able to guarantee
`virtually identical
`chemical
`stability levels
`in
`formulations with Adalimumab
`concentrations ranging from 12.5 mg/mL up to 158 mg/rnL, even after 24 months
`storage. All formulations revealed a sum of lysine levels clearly above the quality
`specification of 75% sum of lysine determining acceptable Adalimumab stability.
`'
`
`Table 7: Adalimumab Lysine Variant Levels Of Various Formulations After 24
`Months Storage At 2-8°C Differing Significantly In Adalimumab Concentration
`(i.e., Ranging From 12.5 mg/mL To 158 mg/mL)
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`
`
`
`Sum of Lysine Variants
`
`
`
`
`
`"I;-
`
`"E—
`WWW-w
`
`
`
`
`
`Quality target: Not less than 70%, with greater than 75% providing exceptional
`
`
`
`
`
`20
`
`stability
`
`These quprising stability study results continued the findings that the invention
`comprising a protein formulation with protein concentrations ranging fiom 12.5 mg/ml
`
`
`
`Ex. 1054 - Page 6 of 26
`
`Ex. 1054 - Page 6 of 26
`
`

`

`EP 03 748 438
`M/45063—EP
`up to 158 mg/ml maintains Adalimumab stability in liquid solutions for at least 24
`months.
`
`Test Series 2: Adalimumab at protein concentrations from 2 to 150 mg/ml
`
`In order to further verify the surprising stabilization potential of the formulation
`of the invention over a broad protein concentration range, Adalimumab was formulated at
`protein concentrations from 2 up to 150 mg/ml and subjected to repeated freeze thaw
`processing (freezing performed at —80°C, thawing performed at 25°C). It is well known
`that freeze—thaw processing can result in substantial protein denaturation and aggregation,
`resulting in soluble and insoluble aggregate formation. Subvisible particle testing is
`known to be a very sensitive tool for detecting physical instability at very early stages of
`a potential instability pathway.
`.
`
`Adalimumab was formulated in a citrate—phosphate buffer system within a 0.2—
`150 mg/mL Adalimumab concentration range at pH 7 and subjected to repeated
`freeze/thaw processing (-80°C/25°C). Whereas at low protein concentration (0.2 mg/mL)
`the citrate—phosphate buffer system did not maintain stability over repeated freeze/thaw
`cycles, within a 2—150 mg/mL concentration range the citrate—phosphate buffer system
`maintained stability very well, and subvisible particle levels remained well below the
`6,000 particles sized 10 micrometer and above per container set for small volume
`parenteral products by regulatory pharmaceutical compendia (Figure 1). Similarly, the
`citrate-phosphate buffer system maintained Adalimumab stability Within a 2-150 mg/mL
`concentration range to an extent that even after 4 freeze/thaw cycles monomer levels
`exceeded 90% in all formulations tested, and were even well above 95% within a 15-150
`mgmL concentration range (Figure 2).
`
`Similar data have been generated for pH 4 conditions (Figure 3), and the citrate—
`phosphate buffer system was shown to provide Adalimumab stability over a broad
`concentration range (02-150 mg/mL) at pH 4, as demonstrated by virtually identical
`aggregate levels as monitored by SEC. Subvisible particle data was within USP and EU
`specification requirements for low volume parenterals (data not shown; available upon
`request) .
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`Ex. 1054 - Page 7 of 26
`
`Ex. 1054 - Page 7 of 26
`
`

`

`EP 03 748 438
`M/45063-EP
`
`140
`
`Subvisble particle measurement Freezd'lhaw Experinent
`
`Particles>=10um
`
`aCI0O
`
`5D
`
`120
`
`100
`
`NO
`
`0.2
`
`2
`
`50
`15
`Protein Concentration [mglml]
`
`100
`
`150
`
`BTO IT1 IT2 01113 .T4
`
`Figure 1: Subvisible Particle Levels ( 2 10 um/mL) In Adalimumab Solution During
`Up To Four Freeze/Thaw Cycles In Citrate-Phosphate Buffer System At pH 7
`(Quality Target: Not More Than 6000 Particles 210 NIicrometer per mL)
`
`SEC HPLC: Freeze/Thaw wlth protein solufion-monomets
`
`110
`
`100
`
`90
`
`80
`
`70
`
`60
`
`50
`40
`
`30
`
`20
`
`10
`
`
`
`monomer(”/o)
`
`
`
`
`protein concentration [mg/ml]
`
`ElTO IT1 ETZ INTI! IT4
`
`Figure 2: Monomer Levels (SEC Analysis) In Adalimumab Solution During Up To
`Four Freeze/Thaw Cycles In Citrate—Phosphate Buffer System At pH 7
`-
`
`Ex. 1054 - Page 8 of 26
`
`Ex. 1054 - Page 8 of 26
`
`

`

`EP 03 748 438
`M/45063-EP
`
`Mneahrhilfl)
`
`10
`
`Figure 3: SEC Analysis Showing Aggregate Levels Of Adalimumab Formulations
`During Up To Four Freeze/Thaw Cycles In Citrate-Phosphate Buffer System At pH
`
`4 T
`
`est Series 3: Adalimumab at concentrations ranging from 0.2 — 100 mg/mL
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`Based on these surprising results, Adalimumab solutions were prepared with
`various concentrations (ranging fi'om 0.2 — 100 mg/mL at pH 4, and ranging fi'om 2-100
`mg/mL at pH 6) in a citrate-phosphate buffer system. The final formulations were then
`subjected to long—term stability studies (at least 12 months) at 2—8°C. SEC analysis was
`conducted to monitor physical and chemical stability (fragmentation, aggregation), and
`CEX-HPLC was used to monitor chemical stability (reported as sum of lysine variants).
`Quality (stability) targets for these experiments were set to 95% monomer (physical
`stability monitored by SEC) afier 12 months storage at 2-8°C, and about 70% or higher
`for % sum of lysine variants (chemical stability monitored by IEC data).
`
`Data shown by Table 8 clearly indicate that a citrate-phosphate bufi‘er system
`provides stability for Adalimumab for at least 12 months over a broad Adalimumab
`concentration range and over a broad pH range. In all samples tested, monomer levels
`surprisingly exceeded 95%, and lysine variant data in all samples tested exceeded 70%
`(except for 64.8% ofthe pH 4, 100 mymL, 12 month stability data).
`
`30
`
`Table 8: SEC And IEC Data 01' Adalimumab Formulated In Citratel’hosphate
`Buffer System Over A Broader pH Range (pH 4 - pH 6) And Over a Broader
`Concentration Range (12 Months, 2-8°C)
`
`Ex. 1054 - Page 9 of 26
`
`Ex. 1054 - Page 9 of 26
`
`

`

`EP 03 748 438
`M/45063-EP
`
`
`
`SEC
`
`
`
`Aggregate [%]l
`
` Monomer [%]l
`
`Fragment [%l
`
`
`-_——
`
`
`
`
`
`_--——_-—
`
`_——
`u--_
`
`
`
`_-_-
`____
`
`SEC Quality Target: Not less than 95% monomer
`
`
`
`
`
`IEC Quality Target: Not less than about 65% sum of lysine variants)
`
`The data presented in Table 8 are very surprising, since aggregation is
`an acknowledged problem with protein pharmaceuticals (refer to Manning et a1. (1989)
`Pharm Res. 62903-918), and protein aggregation is expected to correlate and to accelerate
`with increased protein concentration (refer to Lumry and Eyering (1954) J. Phys. Chem.
`58:110-120).
`
`the stability study results
`to conclude that
`These surprising data led us
`demonstrate
`that
`the
`invention
`comprising
`a
`formulation with Adalimumab
`concentrations ranging within several orders of magnitude and within a broader pH range
`provide excellent Adalimumab stability in liquid solutions over at least 12 months.
`
`Summary
`
`In summary, these data demonstrate that a citrate-phosphate buffer system is able
`to maintain Adalimumab stability over broad pH and broad concentration range. These
`findings were very surprising, since it is well known for persons skilled in the art that an
`increase in protein concentration almost
`inevitably is associated with increased
`instability, and accelerated aggregation of proteins at high concentrations has been
`reported repeatedly, e.g., for IL—1beta in the range of 0.1-0.5 mg/mL (refer to Gu et a1.
`
`10
`
`Ex. 1054 - Page 10 of 26
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`Ex. 1054 - Page 10 of 26
`
`

`

`EP 03 748 438
`M/45063-EP
`,
`(1991) Pharm. Res. 8:485-490), for low molecular weight urokinase in the range of 0.2—
`0.9 mg/mL (refer
`to Vrkljan et al.
`(1994) Pharm Res. 11:1004-1008), or
`for
`apomyoglobin in the range of 4-12 mg/mL in the presence of urea (De Young et a1.
`(1993) Biochemistry 32:3877-3886).
`
`It is further surprising that the citrate-phosphate buffer system provided stability
`for Adalimumab over a broad pH range spanning several pH units, since it is generally
`accepted that proteins usually are stable only in a narrow pH range, such as pH 6.5—7.0
`for recombinant factor VIII (Fatouros et al., 1997), pH 6-7 for low molecular weight
`urokinase (Vrkljan et al. (1994) Pharrn Res. 11:1004—1008), or pH 4.5-5.0 for relaxin
`(Nguyen and Shire (1996) Stability and characterization of recombinant human relaxin,
`In: Pearlman, R., Wang, Y.J. (eds), Formulation, characterization, and stability of protein
`drugs, Plenum Press, New Zork, pp. 247-271).
`
`10
`
`11
`
`Ex. 1054 - Page 11 of 26
`
`Ex. 1054 - Page 11 of 26
`
`

`

`EP 03 748 438
`M/45063-EP
`Example B: Variation of Buffer System and Antibody
`
`Test Series 1: Different Buffers
`
`Adalimumab formulated in the formulations of invention did not show significant
`changes in conformational stability as assessed by CD spectroscopy in a pH range of 4 to
`7 when formulated in a citrate—phosphate bufi‘er system (refer to Figure 4).
`
`Figure 4: Overlay Of CD Spectra For pH Range 1 To 7 Clearly Shows That
`Adalimumab Stability As Determined By CD Data Is Virtually Identical At pH 4
`And Above When Formulated In The Formulation Of Invention (Formulation
`Composition Of Buffer And Excipients As Listed In Table 2)
`300
`
`200
`
`.29;
`
`_ gm
`
`wave length mm
`
`
`
`Based upon the above CD data, bufi‘er systems that allowed for the control of pH
`between pH 3 and 8 were selected and screened for their potential to maintain the
`stability of Adalimumab in solution. Systems of citrate/phosphate/NaCl buffer (pH 3,4,5),
`acetate/phosphate/NaCl bufi‘er (pH 4,5) and phosphate bufl‘er/NaCl buffer (pH 6,7,8)
`were evaluated. These formulations were subjected to short term stability testing under
`accelerated conditions. Purity (using stability indicating CEX—HPLC and SE—HPLC),
`particulate matter
`(subvisible
`and visible particles),
`biological
`activity (TNF
`neutralization testing) and clarity of the solutions were selected as parameters to monitor
`Adalimumab stability. Table 10 shows the clarity data. Especially for physical stability of
`protein solutions, clarity is a highly differentiating parameter between the formulations
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`3O
`
`35
`
`12
`
`
`
`Ex. 1054 - Page 12 of 26
`
`Ex. 1054 - Page 12 of 26
`
`

`

`EP 03 748 438
`Ml45063—EP
`tested and therefore formulations with the best clarity were selected (see shaded area in
`Table 10). The SE-HPLC and CEX-HPLC data were included for reference of chemical
`stability at the respective pH.
`Based upon the results of these extensive stress studies, citrate/phosphate/NaCl
`buffer at pH 5 and phosphate/NaCI buffer at pH 6 and at pH 7 were conSidered to be the
`most suitable buffer systems for maintaining Adalimumab stability, since in these
`systems clarity levels were lowest (indicating highest physical stability levels) and %
`lysine variants were highest (indicating highest chemical stability levels).
`
`10
`
`13
`
`Ex. 1054 - Page 13 of 26
`
`Ex. 1054 - Page 13 of 26
`
`

`

`
`
`282280Quasi3:29.83..3252:393than33.5»‘53.5£38mx:03;
`
`
`
`
`
`mmvwvnmomm
`
`mmaoomvg
`
`cmI
`
`2m:«.2VSw?m:n:3222S2.m3:325
`
`CHE«“529;558
`
`5.55fl
`
`25.5;«53:8%£50
`
`hots:
`
`
`
`8:39.893.
`
`6222..
`
`
`
`'IEHEIIIEHIIIazéagaafi
`
`5
`
`
`
`3
`
`Ex. 1054 - Page 14 of 26
`
`Ex. 1054 - Page 14 of 26
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`EP 03 748 438
`M/45063—EP
`
`In order to verify the surprising results of a citrate—phosphate buffer system providing
`Adalimumab stability over a broad pH range, accelerated and long—term stability experiments
`were performed. Adalimumab was formulated in citrate-phosphate buffer at 2 mg/mL, and
`physical stability during storage was tested using SEC. Since it is well known fiom the
`literature that even small changes in formulation pH can have a tremendous impact on protein
`stability within a short period of time (see literature referenced in Example A), it was
`surprising to see that a citrate-phosphate buffer system maintained the stability of
`Adalimumab over 12 months at 2—8°C storage within a pH 4-7 range (see Figure 5a). Even at
`very high temperatures (e.g., 50°C), the citrate—phosphate formulated samples revealed more
`than 95% monomer within a pH 5—7 range afier 3 weeks, and more than 95% monomer within
`a pH 4-7 range after 3 weeks.
`At 2-8°C, the citrate-phosphate bufi‘er system provided stability within a pH 4-7 range
`to such a degree that all samples still revealed more than 98% monomer afier 12 months
`storage.
`
`100
`
`99
`
`
`
`98
`
`9, -
`
`92
`
`96
`
`94
`
`93
`
`
`
`monomer[%1
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`3
`
`3.5
`
`4
`
`4.5
`
`5,5
`5
`pH values
`
`6
`
`6.5
`
`7
`
`7.5
`
`Figure 5a: SEC data, amount of monomer [%], Adalimumab (2mg/mL), formulated in
`citrate-phosphate buffer, 2-8°C over 21 days, Smonths, 9 months and 12 months storage.
`Addtionally, data of 40°C, 50°C over 21 days storage, pH 4, 5, 6 and 7 are provided.
`
`Surprisingly, when comparing the monomer loss of the individual formulations over
`12 months at 2-8°C, a citrate-phosphate buffer resulted in a monomer loss of not more than
`0.5% for all samples during 12 months storage when compare to T0 data, i.e., pH 4: 0.5%
`monomer decrease, pH 5: 0.3% monomer decrease, pH 6: 0.4% monomer decrease, and pH 7:
`0.2% monomer decrease.
`
`Given the background that it is well known to persons skilled in the art that even very
`small changes in buffer pH can have huge impact on protein stability (refer to literature
`references listed in Example A), it is very surprising that a citrate-phosphate buffer system
`
`15
`
`Ex. 1054 - Page 15 of 26
`
`Ex. 1054 - Page 15 of 26
`
`

`

`EP 03 748 438
`M/45063-EP
`
`maintains Adalimumab stability for at least 12 months within a pH range spanning at least 3
`pH units (pH 4-7).
`
`Given the exceptional stability a citrate-phosphate bufi‘er system was found to provide
`for Adalimumab, the stabilizing potential of this buffer system was challenged by extending
`the solution pH to a pH 3-8 range (Figure 5b). Since it is well accepted in the scientific
`community and regulatory agencies that accelerated short-term stress testing at elevated
`temperatures (e. g., 40°C storage temperature are typically applied within industry)
`is
`predictive for long—term storage events at the recommended storage temperature (ive., 2-8°C),
`temperatures of up to 50°C were applied in a 21 day accelerated stress test of Adalimumab
`formulated in citrate-phosphate bufi‘er system. Over the complete pH range evaluated at high
`temperatures (40°C) after 21 days more than 95% were monomer. Even when exposing the
`Adalimumab formulations to extreme temperature stress at 50°C, more than 95% monomer
`levels were obtained afier 21 days stress testing within a pH range covering pH 4 to pH 8.
`This is very surprising, since it is well known that high temperatures or changes in pH impair
`protein stability. However, the formulation of invention maintained Adalimumab stability
`even when those two stress parameters were applied simultaneously over time (i.e., extreme
`pH changes, extreme stress temperature).
`
`Manor
`
`[St]
`
`Figure 5b: SEC data, amount of monomer [%], Adalimumab (2mg/mL), formulated in
`citrate-phosphate buffer, 2-8°C over 21 days. Additionally, data of 40°C, 50°C over 21
`days storage, pH 4, 5, 6 and 7 are provided.
`
`16
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`Ex. 1054 - Page 16 of 26
`
`Ex. 1054 - Page 16 of 26
`
`

`

`EP 03 748 438
`M/45063-EP
`
`Test Series 2: Different Monoclonal Antibodies
`
`In order to verify the surprising stabilization potential of the formulation of invention,
`these exceptional stability findings (i.e., stabilizing over broad pH range and ideally over
`longer time) were verified for proteins other than Adalimumab. Figure 5c shows data of an
`experiment where an anti-1L 13 antibody (IgGl, 150 kDa) was formulated at 2 mgmL over a
`broad pH range (pH 3—8)
`in a citrate-phosphate bufi‘er system and subjected to both
`accelerated and long-term storage testing. Surprisingly, not only the buffer system maintained
`stability of the anti—IL 13 antibody at higher storage temperatures over a broad pH 4-8 range
`(more than 90% monomer was observed after 21 days of stress testing), but even afier 1 year
`storage at 25°C within a pH 4 — 8 range the citrate—phosphate buffer system maintained
`stability (all samples revealed at least 90% monomer). When stored at temperatures typically
`recommended for biologics (i.e., 2-8°C), all samples revealed about 95% monomer and above,
`even after at least 18 months of storage. Additional analysis by anionic exchange data verified
`these surprising results.
`
`10
`
`15
`
`100.00
`
`_ 95.00
`é.
`
`
`
`\o
`
`90.00
`
`85.00
`
`80.00
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`+T0
`——s>——3wks/40°C
`—0—12ml25°C
`+18m5,0
`
`L0 g
`
`g
`E
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`solution pH
`
`Figure 5c: SEC data, amount of monomer [%], anti-IL 13 mAb (2mg/mL), formulated
`in citrate-phosphate buffer, stored at various temperatures up to 18 months. Stability
`monitored by SEC and expressed as % monomer remaining
`
`The stabilizing features of the citrate-phosphate buffer system were verified with yet
`another protein. Figure 5d shows data of an experiment where an anti-1L 12 antibody (IgGl,
`150 kDa) was formulated at 2 mg/mL over a broad pH range (pH 3-8) in a citrate-phosphate
`bufl‘er system and subjected to both accelerated and long-term storage testing. Again, not only
`the bufi‘er system maintained stability ofthe anti-IL 12 antibody at higher storage temperature
`over a broad pH 4-8 range (more than 90% monomer was observed afier 21 days of stress
`testing at 40°C), but even after 1 year storage at 25°C within a pH 5 — 8 range the citrate-
`phosphate buffer system maintained stability (all samples revealed at least 90% monomer).
`17
`
`Ex. 1054 - Page 17 of 26
`
`Ex. 1054 - Page 17 of 26
`
`

`

`EP 03 748 438
`W45063—EP
`
`When stored at temperatures typically recommended for biologics (i.e., 2-8°C), all samples
`within a pH 4-8 range were more than 95% monomer. Additional analysis by anionic
`exchange data verified these surprising results.
`
`5
`
`E:
`'5
`E
`2
`g
`g
`g
`
`95.00
`
`90.00
`
`85.00
`
`80.00
`
`75.00
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`—I—-—TO
`+12m, 25'0
`+12m.5"c
`x 3wks,40‘c
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`solution pH
`
`10
`
`Figure 5d: SEC data, amount of monomer [%], anti-IL 12 mAb (2mg/mL), formulated
`in citrate-phosphate buffer, stored at various temperatures up to 18 months. Stability
`monitored by SEC and expressed as % monomer remaining.
`
`18
`
`Ex. 1054 - Page 18 of 26
`
`Ex. 1054 - Page 18 of 26
`
`

`

`EP 03 748 438
`M/45063-EP
`
`Example C: Excinient Potential To Maintain Adalimumab Stability Over A Long Period
`Of Time
`
`The present formulations of the invention have improved properties as compared to
`other formulations used in the field. Particularly, the formulations of the invention were
`shown to maintain physical and chemical stability of Adalimumab over a longer period of
`time, especially in liquid state. It is generally accepted by persons skilled in the art that
`successful development of stable liquid protein formulations provide a challenge, and no
`guarantee can be provided that excipients can be identified that maintain and/ or improve
`protein stability, especially over longer periods of time over a broader protein concentration
`range.
`
`Test Series 1: Mannitol
`
`a
`formulation, mannitol was used in
`isotonic
`an
`produce
`to
`In order
`citrate/phosphate/NaCl/Tween80 buffer system. Based on results of stress stability tests,
`citrate/phosphate/NaCl/mannitol was chosen as the formulation matrix due to its surprisingly
`superior stability profile.
`Mannitol added to the antibody solution (5, 10, 25 and 50 mg/ml) improves the
`solution clarity (see Table 11) and substantially contributed to protein stabilization.
`
`Table 11: Impact Of Mannitol Concentration In Adalimumab Formulations On Clarity
`Upon Stress Experiments
`
`Protein solution
`without
`mannitol
`
`Mannitol
`
`(Note That The Clarity Was Below The Quality Target Value Of 30 NTU For A Broad
`Mannitol Concentration Range.)
`
`Mannitol substantially contributed to protein stabilization, as both protein aggregation
`and fragmentation were impeded by mannitol. Eventually, a mannitol concentration of 12
`mg/mL was chosen for final Adalimumab Drug Product to best accommodate stability
`requirements and to comply with tonicity and local tolerability requirements, respectively.
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`19
`
`Ex. 1054 - Page 19 of 26
`
`Ex. 1054 - Page 19 of 26
`
`

`

`EP 03 748 438
`M145063—EP
`
`Test Series 2: Polysorbate 80
`
`Polysorbate 80 was evaluated for its potential to stabilize Adalimumab in a variety of
`stress experiments.
`
`The formulations listed in Table 12 were subjected to long—term stability testing to
`evaluate the impact of polysorbate 80 on long-term stability (2—8°C).
`v
`
`Table 12: Adalimumab Formulations Put On Long-Term Stability At 2-8°C
`
`
`
`
`__n_
`— With Pol sorbate 80
`Without Pol sorbate so
`
`
`—‘__
`mam—“n
`—-I_——
`_——E_
`—_—E_
`
`
`
`
`
`
`10
`
`15
`
`Stability data provided in Table 13 reveal the stabilizing effect of Polysorbate 80 in
`0.1% concentration. Polysorbate 80 had a stabilizing effect during long-term storage, since
`both visual score data and subvisible particle levels of both 10 and 25 micrometer sized
`particles are lower in the Adalimumab formulation containing 0.1% polysorbate 80.
`This is very surprising, as polysorbate 80 has repeatedly been reported to increase
`protein stability upon air-liquid interface or ice-water interface stress, but not during quiescent
`storage (where polysorbate 80 is known to be very prone to autoxidation, eventually causing
`protein oxidation resulting in aggregation) :
`
`20
`
`Table 13: Impact Of Polysorbate 80 On Long-Term Stability Of Adalimumab (50
`mg/mL Protein, pH 5.2, 24 Month Testing At 2—8°C)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Particles
`
`2 lOum
`
` Subvisible
`
`Visible Particles
`
` (Visual Score)
`
`
`[German Drug
`Codex, DAC] 2 25pm
`
`
`
`
`
`
`50 mg/ml (40mg/0.8ml)
`0.1% Tween 80 added
`
`50 mg/ml (40mg/0.8ml)
`Without Tween 80
`
`
`
`17
`0
`
`105
`11
`
`5.2
`
`Subvisible Particles: Quality Target: Not more than 6000 Particles 210 Micrometer per
`mL, and not more than 600 Particles 2 25 Micrometer per mL
`Visible Particles: Quality Target: NMT 4.5
`
`20
`
`Ex. 1054 - Page 20 of 26
`
`Ex. 1054 - Page 20 of 26
`
`

`

`EP 03 748 438
`M/45063-EP
`
`Additionally, Adalimumab was formulated in the citrate/phosphate/NaCl/ mannitol
`buffer system at 25 mg/mL as listed in detail in Table 14 and was tested for physico-chemical
`stability by using extended magnetic bar stirring and shaking. Table 15 shows that these
`conditions of shear stress can lead to an increase in subvisible and vi51ble particles. The
`inclusion of 0.1% polysorbate 80 eifectively stabilized the formulation,
`inhibiting the
`formation of particulate matter under stirred conditions and substantially reducing particulate
`matter formation during shaking.
`
`Table 14: Composition Of The Solution Subjected To Stir Stress And To Shaking Stress,
`Respectively
`
`Ingredient
`
`
`
`Formulation
`A
`
`m; mL
`
`m_—
`
`—_
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`Table 15: Stabilizing Effect Of Polysorbate 80 Under Stir Stress And Shaking Stress
`Conditions
`
`Formulation A
`
`Condition
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Particles
`[German Drug
`[Counts/mL]
`Codex]
`—_ 2 10 m
`M—9.7
`without polysorbate so
`17 h shaken
`49724
`26191
`with 0.1 % polysorbate 80
`17 h shaken
`151 17
`30
`without polysorbate 80 —— 35073
`with 0.1 % polysorbate 80
`17 h stirred
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`26923
`
`
`The protein concentration in the fonnulation listed in Table 16 was increased from 25
`mg/ml to 50 mg/ml in order to reach an administration dose of 40 mg in 0.8 mL of injection
`volume. Adalimumab was formulated in solutions as listed in Table 16 and the solutions were
`repeatedly subjected to stress via freezing (-80 °C, 12 hours) and thawing (5 °C, 12 hours) as
`well as to accelerated stability testing in liquid state at 40°C, and the effect of various
`polysorbate 80 co

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket