throbber
Ulllted States Patent [19]
`Sarno et al.
`
`[54] STABLE INTRAVENOUSLY-
`ADMINISTRABLE IMMUNE GLOBULIN
`PREPARATION
`
`_
`Inventors: Maria Erlinda CI Sarno, Cerritos;
`Rodolfo Anthony Vasquez, NorWalk,
`_
`_
`_
`sau'Gee Yullg’ R1211“), Ch?ord R-_
`Graf, Lakeview Terrace, all of Calif.
`
`[4] Notice:
`
`.
`
`[73] Ass1gnee: ?laxter International Inc., Deer?eld,
`'
`This' patent issued on a continued pros-
`ecution application ?led under 37 CFR
`1.53(d), and is subject to the tWenty year
`patent term provisions of 35 U.S.C.
`154(a)(2)_
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`US005945098A
`[11] Patent Number:
`[45] Date of Patent:
`
`5,945,098
`*Aug. 31, 1999
`
`4,692,331
`4,719,290
`4,721,777
`4,764,369
`
`9/1987 Uemura et al. ......................... .. 424/85
`1/1988 Curry etal.
`530/357
`1/1988 Uemura et al. .
`530/388.15
`8/1988 Neurath et al. ......................... .. 424/89
`
`Woods et al. ......................... .. 4,876,088 10/1989 Hirao et al. ..
`
`4 877 608 10
`,
`,
`/1989 Lee et al.
`424/858
`5,177,194
`1/1993 Saras et al. ........................... .. 530/412
`
`424/85.8
`
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`0187712 7/1986 European Pat‘ Off‘ '
`0196761 10/1986 European Pat. Off. .
`5347515 42978 Ia???”
`55464630 12/1980 Japan_
`59.97057 6/1984 Japan _
`
`2500076 7 1976 G
`
`.
`
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`Tomono et al., Vox Sang vol. 51 (2) pp. 81—86 (1986).
`Stephan, W., “Undegraded Gamma—Globulin for Intrave
`nous Therapy: ANeW Preparation of Immune Serum Globu
`lin for Intravenous Administration,” XXIVth Scienti?c Meet
`ing of the Blood Research Institute, pp. 469—478, 1971.
`Fernandes et al., “Preparation of a Stable Intravenous Gam
`ma_G1Obuhn: Process Deslgn and SCa1e_Up’” VOX Sang‘ 39:
`101—12(1980)~
`Gerber, “Stabilization of Gamma Globulin With Copper
`Complexes. possible Relevance to the Etiology of Rheuma_
`t .d Arth .t'.
`,, I
`.
`D.
`a, C
`1982
`
`n 1S’_ fit/‘lamination ‘$64868 an 01 Gerber, “Inhibition of Denaturation of Human Gamma Opper (
`
`
`Globulin by a Mixture of L—Histidine L—Cystine and
`Copper, and Its Clinical Implication in Rheumatoid Arthri_
`tiS,”Ar[hri[iS and Rheumatism) V01' 19, 3.593_601 (1976)'
`Florence et al., “Emulsion Stabilization by Non—Ionic Sur
`factants: Experiment and Theory,” J. Pharm. Pharmac.
`23;153_169 (1971)_
`Miller, G., et al., “Stabilization of Cytotoxic Antibody and
`Complement With Cysteine,” J. 0fImmun., vol. 101, No. 5,
`
`a
`
`a
`
`[21] Appl- NO-I 08/935,294
`.
`_
`[22] Flled'
`
`Sep' 22’ 1997
`t- D t
`R l t d Us A l-
`e a e
`pp lea Ion a a
`[63] Continuation of application No. 08/504,854, Jul. 20, 1995,
`abandoned, which is a continuation of application No.
`08/317,214, Oct. 3, 1994, abandoned, which is a continua-
`tion of application No. 08/178,432, Jan. 6, 1994, abandoned,
`which is a continuation of application No. 07/866,089, Apr.
`
`6, 1992, abandoned, which is a continuation of application NQ ()7/473j5547 Feb 1, 1990, abandoned
`
`6
`
`Int. Cl. ................................................... .. A61K 38/21
`[51]
`[52] US. Cl. .............................. .. 424/855; 514/2; 514/12;
`514/21; 530/387'1; 530/389'1; 530/380;
`530/390'5
`[58] Field of Search .............................. .. 424/85.5; 514/2,
`514/12> 21; 530/387-1> 389~1> 380> 3905
`_
`
`
`
`References Clted U'S' PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`Primary Examiner—Chhaya D. Sayala
`
`3,903,262
`4,165,370
`4,168,303
`4,186,192
`
`9/1975 Pappenhagen et al. ................ .. 424/85
`8/1979 Coval .......... ..
`424/858
`9/1979 Nishida et al.
`530/387
`1/1980 Lundblad et al.
`.. 424/858
`
`Attorney) Agent) or Firm—R0IhW@11, Figg, Ernst & KHIZ,
`P-C
`
`[57]
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`128225 9128 $22,311.11; .................. .1252/221 4374 763 2/1983 Takagi .................................. .. 424/858
`
`4:384j993
`5/1983 Sam et a1_
`__ 424/85_1
`4,396,608
`8/1983 Tenold ________ __
`424/85_8
`4,439,421
`3/1984 Hooper et al.
`424/85
`4,477,432 10/1984 Hardie .................................. .. 424/85.1
`Curry et al. .......................... ..
`giurath 6t ‘111'
`7/1986 Zolton et al. .
`4,597,966
`4,613,501
`9/1986 Horowitz . . . . . .
`4 623 717 11/1986 Fernandes et a1_
`
`,
`
`,
`
`mura e a.
`
`..... ..
`
`.. 424/858
`. . . . .. 424/89
`530681
`
`muons are Stablhzed agamst aggreganon and Polymenza'
`tion and rendered isotonic With amino acid(s) and non-ionic
`detergents, polysorbate and polyethylene glycol. The immu
`noglobulins are derived from human or animal sources, or
`from hybridornag, Optional, additional stabilizers include
`Various physiologically_acceptable Carbohydrates and Salts_
`Polyvinylpyrrolidone can be used in addition to the amino
`:‘.C1d(S)'AIz;rt ?om the Tr?umglfl’ulfm Half’ the melt)?“
`1on5 are 0 . “.Wlse essen la y pro em .ree'
`é’prepara Ions
`are useful in immunotherapy and as diagnostic reagents.
`
`-
`
`-
`
`-
`
`_
`
`-
`
`4,637,834
`
`1/1987 Thurow . . . . . . . . . . . . .
`
`. . . . . . .. 514/3
`
`4,639,513
`
`1/1987 Hou et al. ............................. .. 530/387
`
`15 Claims, No Drawings
`
`Ex. 1023 - Page 1 of 5
`
`AMGEN INC.
`Exhibit 1023
`
`

`
`1
`STABLE INTRAVENOUSLY
`ADMINISTRABLE IMMUNE GLOBULIN
`PREPARATION
`
`This is a continuation of Ser. No. 08/504,854 ?led on Jul.
`20, 1995 noW abandoned, Which is a continuation of Ser. No.
`08/317,214 ?led Oct. 3, 1994, noW abandoned, Which is a
`continuation of Ser. No. 08/178,432, ?led Jan. 6, 1994, noW
`abandoned, Which is a continuation of Ser. No. 07/866,089,
`?led Apr. 6, 1992, noW abandoned, Which is a continuation
`of Ser. No. 07/473,554, ?led Feb. 1, 1990, noW abandoned.
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`1. Technical Field
`The present invention relates to intravenously
`administrable immune globulin preparations. More
`speci?cally, the invention relates to immune serum globulin
`preparations that, aside from the immune globulin itself, are
`otherWise essentially protein free. The preparations are
`administrable by other routes as Well. The preparations also
`are useful reagents for diagnostic testing and can be supplied
`in their solution form in diagnostic test kits.
`The term immune globulin, also knoWn as Immunoglo
`bulin G, IgG and gamma globulin, encompasses both
`immune serum globulin and monoclonal immune globulins.
`Immune serum globulin is obtained from pooled plasma
`samples from either normal or hyperimmune donors and
`contains IgG antibodies to many common bacterial and viral
`infectious agents. Monoclonal immune globulins
`(monoclonal antibodies) are obtained from hybridomas.
`Immune globulin long has been used in connection With
`the prophylaxis and treatment of a variety of diseases and
`disorders. Certain patients With immunode?ciencies are
`rendered susceptible to acute and chronic infections, With
`life-threatening consequences, Which the immune system of
`the normal patient can easily combat. These patients With
`compromised immune systems are not able to produce
`normal levels of antibodies and can greatly bene?t from the
`administration of exogenous immune globulin.
`Patients With normal immune systems and antibody levels
`may require additional defense in overcoming certain
`antibiotic-resistant bacterial infections, such as those caused
`by Pseudomonas aeruainosa. Immunotherapy via the
`administration of immune globulin has become a standard
`treatment in these circumstances.
`The administration of immune globulin is perhaps most
`Widespread in the prophylaxis of What Were once highly
`common diseases. Many viral infections, such as German
`measles, measles, mumps and smallpox, for example, can be
`controlled via the Widespread administration of the appro
`priate immune globulins to children. The occurrence of
`many bacterial infections also have been controlled or
`virtually eliminated due to the Widespread administration of
`immune globulins.
`Immune serum globulins for human administration Were
`?rst produced via an alcohol fractionation method developed
`by E. Cohn et al., J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 68: 459 (1946). These
`preparations contained approximately ten to eighteen (Wt.)
`percent protein and Were relatively stable during storage at
`2 to 8° C. Although originally intended for intravenous
`administration, it Was found that untoWard reactions, includ
`ing anaphylactic shock, rendered unsafe such administration
`of the alcohol fractionated immune serum globulins. These
`products are acceptable for intra-muscular injection, hoW
`ever.
`Aparticularly preferred method for producing an immune
`globulin fraction from Cohn Fractions I+II+III, for use in the
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`5,945,098
`
`2
`present invention, is disclosed in US. Pat. No. 5,177,194
`?led concurrently hereWith and incorporated by reference
`herein.
`Although intramuscular injection of immune globulin can
`effectively raise circulating antibody levels in most patients,
`this mode of administration suffers from several disadvan
`tages. The antibodies administered in this manner diffuse
`rather sloWly into the circulation. The ultimate blood levels
`attained from a given dose varies from patient to patient, and
`local tissue injury at the injection site is a possibility.
`Moreover, only a fraction of the total immune globulin
`administered to the patient reaches the bloodstream.
`The intravenous administration of immune globulin over
`comes these disadvantages. The desired level of circulating
`antibody is reached almost instantaneously and can be
`relatively accurately controlled by control of the dosage.
`Effectively larger doses can be more quickly administered
`Without the discomfort associated With intramuscular injec
`tion.
`As mentioned earlier, the intravenous injection of certain
`immune globulin preparations has lead to severe reactions.
`These reactions are generally believed to be caused by the
`activation of complement by aggregates and/or fragments of
`immunoglobulin Which form during the preparation and/or
`storage of the immune globulin product. Thus, the safe
`administration of immune globulin requires steps to be taken
`to avoid the formation of immunoglobulin fragments and
`agglomerates and their resulting anticomplement activity.
`Immune globulins (antibodies) also ?nd Wide use in the
`diagnostics ?eld. Diagnostic test kits, intended for a single
`use, often contain a monoclonal antibody preparation as one
`of the test reagents. These antibody preparations are com
`monly provided in lyophiliZed form in order to increase their
`shelf life, and must be reconstituted just prior to use. The
`immune globulin preparations of the present invention,
`hoWever, are quite stable and are Well suited to being
`included in diagnostic test kits in their solution form.
`2. Description of the Prior Art
`The processing of immune globulin preparations in order
`to reduce anticomplement activity is documented in the
`literature. In “Preparation of a Stable Intravenous Gamma
`Globulin: Process Design and Scale Up”, Fernandes, P. M.
`and Lundblad, J. L., Vox Sang. 39: 101—112 (1980), the
`authors note that a variety of such processing methods have
`been investigated. The various techniques are (a) removal of
`high-molecular-Weight aggregates by centrifugation, (b) pH
`adjustment to 4.0, (c) ‘gentle’ fractionation techniques, (d)
`af?nity methods, (e) use of protein stabiliZers and
`enZy
`matic treatment and other chemical modi?cations. None of
`these methods has been entirely successful from either the
`purely medical or commercial vieWpoints, hoWever. For
`example, the various chemical treatments can alter the
`immunoglobulin’s physical structure and hence its activity.
`Some treatments for disassociating immunoglobulin
`agglomerates are not permanent; the agglomerates reappear
`during storage or during pH shifts to physiological condi
`tions.
`Japanese Kokai No. 60-146832 (1985) discloses that IgG
`preparations prepared via the cold ethanol fractionation and
`ammonium sulfate fractionation methods contain from 10 to
`40 percent aggregated IgG in addition to 75 IgG. These
`preparations are unsuitable for intravenous administration
`because of their anticomplement activating effects. It is
`reported that these same preparations, after treatment by
`maintenance at pH 3.7 to 4.3 at 1 to 10° C. over the course
`of 0.5 to 20 hours, no longer exhibit anticomplement activ
`
`Ex. 1023 - Page 2 of 5
`
`

`
`5,945,098
`
`3
`ity. A stabilizing compound selected from among various
`inorganic salts, sugars, proteins and organic acid salts is
`added to prevent denaturation of the immunoglobulin chain
`during the acid treatment.
`US. Pat. No. 4,719,290 (Curry et al.; Jan. 12, 1988)
`provides a reportedly intravenously-administrable gamma
`globulin preparation by stabilizing a puri?ed Cohn Fraction
`II With relatively large amounts of human serum albumin.
`The ?nal solution is formulated With the addition of sodium
`chloride and/or a carbohydrate.
`US. Pat. No. 4,396,608 (Tenold et al.; Aug. 2, 1983)
`relates to a process for stabiliZing immune serum globulin
`preparations so as to avoid aggregation. The pH of a Fraction
`II (or other Cohn fraction) ?ltrate is adjusted to 3.5—5.0 and
`the ionic strength is then adjusted (loWered) via ?ltration,
`dialysis, etc. or combinations thereof. The solution is then
`made isotonic via the addition of an amino acid, a carbo
`hydrate or a sugar.
`US. Pat. No. 4,093,606 (Coval; Jun. 6, 1978) relates to
`fractionation techniques Whereby a suspension of Cohn
`Fraction II or II+III plasma protein is reportedly rendered
`stable for intravenous injection. Preparations are formulated
`With glycine, albumin and a non-ionic surfactant such as one
`of the polysorbates.
`Although albumin is knoWn for its ability to stabiliZe
`proteins in solution, its stabiliZing properties diminish With
`time. Other factors also detract from the use of albumin. The
`presence of serum-derived albumin in a preparation may
`detract from its overall purity, as it is noW Well knoWn that
`many contaminants, including proteins and infectious
`agents, can be neither easily detected nor removed With
`certainty in a cost effective manner. The presence of albumin
`also can mask the presence of immunoglobulin fragments in
`the immune serum. If such fragments are present, yet
`undetected, the presence of undesirable enZymes Which
`produce such fragments also may go undetected. Thus, a
`need exists for improved stabiliZed immune globulin prepa
`rations Which are albumin-free.
`
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`
`In one of its aspects the present invention relates to a
`stable, intravenously-administrable immune globulin prepa
`ration comprising an aqueous solution of immune globulin,
`an amount of an amino acid effective to impart a
`physiologically-acceptable tonicity to the preparation and to
`maintain the immune globulin in monomeric form, and a
`physiologically-acceptable amount of a non-ionic detergent
`Wherein, apart from the immune globulin itself, the prepa
`ration is essentially protein-free.
`In another aspect, the present invention relates to a stable,
`intravenously-administrable immune globulin preparation
`comprising an aqueous solution of immune globulin, a
`physiologically acceptable amount of polyvinylpyrrolidone
`effective to maintain said immune globulin in monomeric
`form, an amount of a carbohydrate or a physiologically
`acceptable salt or an amino acid effective to impart a
`physiologically-acceptable tonicity to the preparation, and a
`physiologically-acceptable amount of a non-ionic detergent
`Wherein again the preparation is essentially protein-free
`apart from the immune serum globulin.
`The present invention advantageously provides a storage
`stable liquid product, thus eliminating the inconvenience
`and expense of lyophiliZation and reconstitution. The ionic
`strength, pH and protein concentration can be optimiZed
`during processing, and the ?nal product can be stored at
`ambient temperatures or under refrigeration. The stabiliZers
`
`4
`are non-toxic and present in minimal amounts, and they do
`not alter the native biological form or function of the
`immunoglobulin. PolymeriZed immunoglobulin does not
`form during storage; thus, the preparations are Well suited
`for intravenous administration. The preparations also are
`useful as stable immune globulin reagents for use in diag
`nostic applications.
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE
`INVENTION
`
`The immune globulin preparations according to the
`present invention are prepared from any starting materials
`based on native or monoclonal immunoglobulin G. The
`teachings herein are applicable to immunoglobulins derived
`from both native and monoclonal sources. Most frequently
`the preparations Will be prepared from gamma globulin
`containing products produced by the alcohol fractionation
`and/or ion exchange and af?nity chromatography methods
`Well knoWn to those skilled in the art. Puri?ed Cohn Fraction
`II is commonly used and is the starting point for the
`preparations disclosed herein unless otherWise noted.
`As accepted in the art, the starting Cohn Fraction II paste
`is about 95 percent pure IgG and is comprised of each of the
`four subclasses of IgG, namely, IgG1, IgG2, IgG3 and IgG4.
`The different subclasses are present in Fraction II in approxi
`mately the same ratio as they are found in the pooled human
`plasma from Which they are obtained. The Fraction II must
`be further puri?ed before formulation into an administrable
`product, and this can be accomplished via any of a number
`of knoWn procedures so that the ?nal immune serum globu
`lin product does not contain impurities, such as IgG poly
`mers and/or fragments, that possess anticomplement activi
`ties.
`For example, the Fraction II paste can be dissolved in a
`cold puri?ed aqueous alcohol solution and impurities
`removed via precipitation and ?ltration. FolloWing the ?nal
`?ltration the immunoglobulin suspension is dia?ltered using
`ultra?ltration membranes having a nominal molecular
`Weight limit of 2 100,000 daltons to remove the alcohol. The
`solution is either concentrated or diluted to obtain the
`desired protein concentration and can be further puri?ed by
`techniques Well knoWn to those skilled in the art.
`Aphysiologically acceptable amount of a non-ionic deter
`gent is added to the immunoglobulin solution in accordance
`With the present invention. By ‘physiologically acceptable’
`it is meant that the amount added is a stabiliZing, non-toxic
`amount loW enough to avoid any adverse toxic reactions as
`derived from knoWn LD50 values and/or published literature
`pertinent to the potential toxicity of the particular additive.
`It is advantageous to use the least amount necessary to
`produce the desired stabiliZation. The detergent reduces the
`tendency of the immunoglobulin molecules to come out of
`solution. Suitable detergents (surfactants) include the partial
`esters of sorbitol and polyoxyethylene oxides of long chain
`fatty acids knoWn as the polysorbates, alkylpolyethoxyetha
`nols and alkarylpolyethoxyethanols. Polysorbate 80, com
`mercially available as TWeenTM 80 from Atlas Chemical
`Industries, is most preferred. The non-ionic detergents are
`advantageously used in minimal amounts and preferably
`beloW about 0.01 percent (W/v). It has been found that from
`0.0005 to 0.01 percent is useful, and ?nal products contain
`ing about 0.002 percent (W/v) of non-ionic detergent are
`preferred When the immune serum globulin content is 5
`percent (W/v). At higher immune serum globulin
`concentrations, for example 10 percent, the detergent level
`(i.e. detergent concentration to protein ratio) can be reduced
`
`Ex. 1023 - Page 3 of 5
`
`

`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`5
`even further. At these higher protein concentrations the
`immunoglobulin molecules appear to stabilize themselves.
`The optimal detergent content is obtained by formulation
`experiments Well knoWn to those skilled in the art. In any
`case, it appears that a desirable detergent concentration
`provides a balance of hydrophilic and hydrophobic proper
`ties to the protein solution so that the immunoglobulin is less
`prone to denature. The optimal detergent concentration Will
`be the minimal amount that Will prevent particles from
`coming out of solution, Will not cause toxic effect and Will
`not adversely alter the efficacy of the ?nal product under the
`selected storage conditions.
`An amount of one or more amino acids effective to impart
`a physiologically-acceptable tonicity (i.e. about 300 mOsm/
`l) to the preparation and to maintain said immune serum
`globulin in monomeric form also is added to the solution.
`Preferred amino acids include glycine, lysine, arginine and
`phenylalanine, With glycine being particularly preferred. A
`glycine concentration of about 0.2 M generally is preferred.
`The IgG solution can further comprise polyvinylpyrroli
`done (“PVP”) at certain pH ranges, typically pH 4 to pH 7,
`in addition to or in place of the amino acid(s) as an agent for
`preventing polymeriZation and/or particulation of the
`gamma globulin. PVP alone typically does not provide long
`term stabiliZation of immunoglobulins, but PVP does con
`tribute to effective long term stabiliZation in the preparations
`of this invention. The amount of PVP useful in the prepa
`rations is limited by its toxicity and insolubility at high
`concentrations. From 0.1 to 1 percent (W/v) of PVP K-15 (or
`other Water soluble grade) is useful to prevent particulation.
`Amounts Within this range are soluble and Well beloW toxic
`levels.
`The addition of PVP does not provide an isotonic solution
`(except When the PVP is added at unacceptably high levels).
`Therefore, PVP generally is added to the IgG solutions in
`combination With other additives such as amino acids,
`physiologically-acceptable salts or carbohydrates Which can
`be used to adjust for isotonicity. Useful carbohydrates
`include sugars such as dextrose, mannose, trehalose,
`galactose, dextran, fructose, lactose, sucrose, maltose, man
`nitol and sorbitol. Non-reducing carbohydrates are pre
`ferred. Almost any physiologically acceptable salt, such as
`sodium chloride, sodium acetate, sodium citrate, etc., can be
`used to adjust the tonicity of the preparations. Examples
`include the alkali metal, alkaline earth metal, ammonium
`and phosphate salts as Well as various organic salts
`(including but not limited to oxalate, valerate, oleate,
`laurate, borate, benZoate, lactate, tosylate, citrate, maleate,
`fumarate, succinate and tartrate). Sodium chloride and
`sodium citrate are preferred salts. The speci?c amount of
`any particular tonicity-adjusting agent(s) needed to provide
`an isotonic solution Will vary from preparation to prepara
`tion. The artisan Will readily determine appropriate amounts,
`hoWever.
`It has been found that the pH of the immune globulin
`preparation is an important factor relative to the IgG mono
`mer content of the ?nal product. In the preparations of the
`present invention the pH can range from 4.0 to 7.4. Within
`this range, a loWer pH is desired, hoWever, to ensure
`maximum monomer content. A pH of 4.2105 is preferred
`for a 5 percent immune serum globulin preparation. Ten
`percent preparations, hoWever, are most stable at a pH of
`5 .2102. Optimal pH is obtained by formulation techniques
`Well knoWn to those skilled in the art. For example, optimal
`pH can be determined from siZe exclusion chromatography
`determinations as Well as heat stability data and anticomple
`ment titers of the various preparations under differing pH
`conditions.
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`5,945,098
`
`6
`Immune globulin solutions, including immune globulin
`solutions useful as starting materials for the present
`preparations, often include minor amounts of poly(ethylene
`glycol) (“PEG”) as a stabiliZer. While PEG alone cannot
`provide a preparation as stable as those described herein, its
`presence is believed to be important to the overall stability
`of any immune globulin solution, including those of the
`present invention. Thus, if PEG is not already present in the
`starting source of immune globulin, a small amount
`(typically less than 0.2 gram %) should be included in the
`preparations of the invention.
`It Will be apparent that the appropriate concentrations of
`the various stabiliZers in the present immune globulin com
`positions Will vary With protein concentration. Normal
`variations among pooled sera also Will cause adjustments in
`stabiliZer requirements. Those skilled in the art Will readily
`determine acceptable stabiliZer levels based on the teachings
`herein.
`The invention is illustrated by the folloWing Examples.
`All percentages are by Weight unless otherWise noted.
`
`EXAMPLE I
`
`Glycine at concentrations of 0.210.1M is added to aque
`ous IgG solutions puri?ed according to the method taught in
`US. Pat. No. 5,177,194 from Cohn Fr. I+II+III, or other
`more crude IgG sources Which contain residual amounts of
`polyethylene glycol, usually less than 0.2 g %. The protein
`concentration is then adjusted to approximately 5% either by
`dissolution and dilution of a puri?ed IgG precipitate or
`concentration through the use of tangential ?oW ultra?ltra
`tion and other suitable means of concentrating proteins. The
`pH is adjusted to 5 .0110 and Polysorbate 80 (TWeenTM 80)
`is then added to a 0.003:0.001% level. The IgG solution is
`sterile ?ltered and ?lled into ?nal containers for use.
`
`EXAMPLE II
`
`Glycine at concentrations of 0.210.1M is added to aque
`ous IgG solutions puri?ed from Cohn Fr. II, Cohn Fr. III
`?ltrate, or other more crude IgG sources. The protein con
`centration is then adjusted to approximately 10% and the pH
`is adjusted to 6011.0. Polysorbate 80 (TWeenTM 80) is then
`added to a 0.007:0.003% level. The IgG solution is sterile
`?ltered and ?lled into ?nal containers for use.
`
`EXAMPLE III
`
`Glycine at concentrations of 0.210.1M, PEG at concen
`trations of 0.01% and polysorbate at concentrations of
`approximately 0.001% are added to an aqueous solution of
`puri?ed monoclonal antibody derived from hybridomas. The
`concentration of the antibody is approximately 2 mg/ml and
`the solution is kept at pH 5.2 using 10 mM sodium citrate or
`sodium phosphate as buffer. This preparation can be used as
`a diagnostic reagent or can be sterile ?ltered and ?lled into
`?nal containers for intravenous or intramuscular adminis
`tration.
`
`EXAMPLE IV
`
`Glycine at concentrations of 0.210.1M, and polyvinylpyr
`rolidone at concentrations ranging from 0.1 to 1% is added
`to aqueous IgG solutions puri?ed from Cohn Fr. II, Cohn Fr.
`III ?ltrate, or other more crude IgG sources Which contain
`residual amount of PEG (typically less than 0.2%). The
`protein concentration is then adjusted to the desired value,
`usually 5 or 10%, by knoWn dilution or concentration
`techniques such as ultra?ltration. The pH is adjusted to
`
`Ex. 1023 - Page 4 of 5
`
`

`
`5,945,098
`
`7
`5011.0. Polysorbate 80 (TWeenTM 80) is then added to a
`concentration that Will not cause particulation in the
`solution, typically, 000310.001 for 5% protein solution or
`0.007%:0.003% for a 10% protein solution. The IgG solu
`tion is sterile ?ltered and ?lled into ?nal containers for use.
`
`EXAMPLE V
`
`Glycine at concentrations of 0.210.1M and carbohydrates
`such as trehalose, glucose, mannitol, hydroXyethyl starch,
`carboXy methyl cellulose, hydroXymethyl starch, maltose,
`glycerol, lactose etc. at concentrations of 0.1 to 3% is added
`to aqueous IgG solutions puri?ed from Cohn Fr. II, Cohn Fr.
`III ?ltrate, or other more crude IgG sources Which contain
`residual amount of PEG, typically less than 0.2 g %. The
`protein concentration is then adjusted to the desired
`concentration, usually 5 or 10%, by knoWn dilution or
`concentration techniques such as ultra?ltration. The pH is
`adjusted to 5.0110. Polysorbate 80 (TWeenTM 80) is then
`added to a concentration that Will not cause particulation in
`the solution, typically 0.003:0.001% for a 5% protein
`solution or 0.007:0.003% for a 10% protein solution. The
`IgG solution is sterile ?ltered and ?lled into ?nal containers
`for use.
`Although the invention has been described in connection
`With certain preferred embodiments, it is not so limited.
`Variations Within the scope of the claims Will be apparent to
`those skilled in the art.
`We claim:
`1. A storage stable, intravenously-administrable immune
`globulin preparation comprising an aqueous solution of
`immune globulin, from about 0.1 M to about 0.3 M glycine,
`from about 0.0005% (W/v) to about 0.01% (W/v)
`polysorbate, and less than about 0.2 gram % PEG, Wherein
`the preparation is essentially protein-free apart from said
`immune globulin.
`2. An immune globulin preparation according to claim 1
`Wherein said polysorbate detergent is polysorbate 80.
`3. An immune globulin preparation according to claim 2
`Wherein the immune globulin concentration is about 5
`percent (W/v) and the concentration of polysorbate 80 is
`about 0.002 percent (W/v).
`4. An immune globulin preparation according to claim 1
`Wherein the immune globulin concentration is about 5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`8
`percent (W/v) and the concentration of polysorbate is about
`0.002 percent (W/v).
`5. An immune globulin preparation according to claim 1
`having a glycine concentration of about 0.2 M.
`6. An immune globulin preparation according to claim 1
`having an immune globulin concentration of about 5% (W/v)
`and a pH of about 4 to 7.4.
`7. An immune globulin preparation according to claim 1
`having an immune globulin concentration of about 10%
`(W/v) and a pH of about 5 to 7.4.
`8. An immune globulin preparation according to claim 1
`further comprising a carbohydrate or a physiologically
`acceptable salt.
`9. An immune globulin preparation according to claim 8
`Wherein said carbohydrate is selected from the group con
`sisting of dextrose, mannose, trehalose, galactose, deXtran,
`fructose, sucrose, maltose, mannitol and sorbitol.
`10. An immune globulin preparation according to claim 1
`Wherein the immune globulin is derived from a monoclonal
`source.
`11. An immune globulin preparation according to claim 1
`Wherein the immune globulin concentration is about 10
`percent (W/v) and the polysorbate detergent concentration is
`from about 0.0005 to less than about 0.002 percent (W/v).
`12. A storage stable, intravenously-administrable immune
`globulin preparation according to claim 1 Wherein the
`polysorbate is present from about 0.002% (W/v) to about
`0.01% (W/v).
`13. Amethod for preparing a storage stable intravenously
`administrable immune globulin preparation comprising
`imparting a physiological tonicity to an aqueous immuno
`globulin solution by adding from about 0.1 M to about 0.3
`M glycine, from about 0.0005% (W/v) to about 0.01% (W/v)
`polysorbate, and less than about 0.2 gram % PEG, thereto,
`said preparation being essentially protein-free apart from
`said immune globulin.
`14. A method according to claim 13 Wherein the polysor
`bate is added in an amount from about 0.002% (W/v) to
`about 0.01% (W/v).
`15. A method according to claim 13 further comprising
`the addition of a physiologically acceptable amount of
`polyvinylpyrrolidone effective to maintain said immune
`globulin in monomeric form.
`
`*
`
`*
`
`*
`
`*
`
`*
`
`Ex. 1023 - Page 5 of 5

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket