`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`(SAN JOSE DIVISION)
`
`
`
`FINJAN LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability
`Company,
`
`Case No. 5:17-cv-04467-BLF (VKD)
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
`FINJAN LLC’S CORRECTED
`ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE
`UNDER SEAL
`
`SONICWALL INC., a Delaware Corporation,
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`Case No. 5:17-cv-04467 BLF (VKD)
`[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FINJAN’S
`CORRECTED ADMIN. MOTION TO FILE
`UNDER SEAL
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 329-2 Filed 12/22/20 Page 2 of 8
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff Finjan LLC’s Corrected Administrative Motion to File Under Seal portions of
`
`Finjan’s Opposition to SonicWall’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment was brought before
`
`this Court. Upon consideration of this motion and the supporting declaration of K. Nicole
`
`Williams filed in support of the motion, the Court finds that good cause and compelling reasons
`
`exist for sealing certain documents.
`
`Compelling reasons having been shown, the Court finds that there exist overriding
`
`confidentiality interests that overcome the right of public access to the record for the subject
`
`documents as follows:
`
`Document
`
`Portion(s) to Seal
`
`Reason(s) for Sealing
`
`Highlighted portions
`at page 2, lines 15-20;
`page 3, lines 20-22;
`page 6, lines 2 and 16-
`22; page 7, lines 7-12
`and 23-27; page 12,
`lines 21-27; page 13,
`lines 2-8, 11, 13-14,
`and 26-27; page 15,
`lines 20-21; page 16,
`lines 19-22 and 26-27;
`page 17, lines 2-14
`and 25-27; page 18,
`lines 1-6, 9-10, and
`15; page 19, lines 20-
`21.
`
`Entirety
`
`The highlighted portions of
`this document reflect
`information that SonicWall
`has designated as “Highly
`Confidential –Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” or “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only – Source Code”
`pursuant to the Stipulated
`Protective Order, and from
`which confidential
`information regarding
`SonicWall’s accused
`products could potentially
`be discerned. (See
`Declaration of K. Nicole
`Williams In Support of
`Sealing (“Williams Sealing
`Decl.”) ¶ 3.)
`This document reflects
`information SonicWall has
`designated “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” and “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only – Source Code”
`pursuant to the Stipulated
`Protective Order, and from
`which confidential
`
`1
`
`Case No. 5:17-cv-04467 BLF (VKD)
`[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FINJAN’S
`CORRECTED ADMIN. MOTION TO FILE
`UNDER SEAL
`
`
`
`ECF or
`Exh. No.
`ECF 326
`
`Finjan’s Opposition to
`SonicWall’s Motion
`for Partial Summary
`Judgment
`
`Excerpts from the
`Expert Report of Dr.
`Nenad Medvidovic
`Regarding
`Infringement by
`SonicWall, Inc. of
`Patent Nos. 8,225,408;
`7,975,305 and
`8,141,154, dated
`September 3, 2020
`
`Exh. A
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 329-2 Filed 12/22/20 Page 3 of 8
`
`Exh. B
`
`Excerpts from the
`Deposition Transcript
`of Michael King taken
`July 24, 2020
`
`Entirety
`
`Exh. C
`
`Excerpts from the
`Deposition Transcript
`of Shunhui Zhu taken
`July 16, 2020
`
`Entirety
`
`Exh. D
`
`Excerpts from the
`Deposition Transcript
`of Eric Hawkes taken
`July 21, 2020
`
`Entirety
`
`information regarding
`SonicWall’s accused
`products could potentially
`be discerned. (See Williams
`Sealing Decl. ¶ 4.)
`This deposition transcript
`was designated by
`SonicWall as “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” pursuant to the
`Stipulated Protective Order,
`and from which confidential
`information regarding
`SonicWall’s accused
`products could be
`potentially discerned. (See
`Williams Sealing Decl. ¶ 4.)
`
`This deposition transcript
`was designated by
`SonicWall as “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” pursuant to the
`Stipulated Protective Order,
`and from which confidential
`information regarding
`SonicWall’s accused
`products could potentially
`be discerned. (See Williams
`Sealing Decl. ¶ 4.)
`This deposition transcript
`was designated by
`SonicWall as “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” pursuant to the
`Stipulated Protective Order,
`and from which confidential
`information regarding
`SonicWall’s accused
`products could potentially
`be discerned. (See Williams
`Sealing Decl. ¶ 4.)
`This document reflects
`information SonicWall has
`designated “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” pursuant to the
`
`Exh. E
`
`
`
`Entirety
`
`Presentation Produced
`as SonicWall-
`Finjan_00549272-
`SonicWall-
`Finjan_00549291
`
`2
`
`Case No. 5:17-cv-04467 BLF (VKD)
`[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FINJAN’S
`CORRECTED ADMIN. MOTION TO FILE
`UNDER SEAL
`
`
`
`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 329-2 Filed 12/22/20 Page 4 of 8
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`Exh. F
`
`Excerpts from the
`Deposition Transcript
`of Eric B. Cole, Ph.D.
`taken October 22, 2020
`
`Entirety
`
`Exh. G
`
`Entirety
`
`Expert Report of
`Michael
`Mitzenmacher, Ph.D.
`Regarding
`Infringement of
`SonicWall, Inc. of
`Patent Nos. 6,804,780;
`6,965,968; and
`7,613,926, dated
`September 3, 2020
`
`Exh. H
`
`Entirety
`
`Excerpts from the
`Expert Report of Dr.
`Eric Cole Regarding
`Technology Tutorial
`and Infringement by
`SonicWall, Inc. of
`Patent Nos. 6,154,844;
`7,058,822; 7,647,633
`and 8,677,494
`
`Stipulated Protective Order,
`and from which confidential
`information regarding
`SonicWall’s accused
`products could potentially
`be discerned. (See Williams
`Sealing Decl. ¶ 4.)
`This deposition contains
`information designated by
`SonicWall as “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” pursuant to the
`Stipulated Protective Order,
`and from which confidential
`information regarding
`SonicWall’s accused
`products could potentially
`be discerned. (See Williams
`Sealing Decl. ¶ 4.)
`This document reflects
`information SonicWall has
`designated “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” and “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only – Source Code”
`pursuant to the Stipulated
`Protective Order, and from
`which confidential
`information regarding
`SonicWall’s accused
`products could potentially
`be discerned. (See Williams
`Sealing Decl. ¶ 4.)
`This document reflects
`information SonicWall has
`designated “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” and “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only – Source Code”
`pursuant to the Stipulated
`Protective Order, and from
`which confidential
`information regarding
`SonicWall’s accused
`products could potentially
`
`
`
`3
`
`Case No. 5:17-cv-04467 BLF (VKD)
`[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FINJAN’S
`CORRECTED ADMIN. MOTION TO FILE
`UNDER SEAL
`
`
`
`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 329-2 Filed 12/22/20 Page 5 of 8
`
`
`
`
`
`Exh. I
`
`Entirety
`
`Excerpts from the
`Deposition Transcript
`of Kevin Almeroth,
`Ph.D. taken October
`21, 2020
`
`Exh. J
`
`Excerpt from the
`Deposition Transcript
`of John Gmuender
`taken July 9, 2020
`
`Entirety
`
`Exh. K
`
`Excerpt from the
`Deposition Transcript
`of Patrick McDaniel,
`Ph.D. taken October
`23, 2020
`
`Entirety
`
`Entirety
`
`Exh. L
`
`SonicWall Document
`Produced as
`SonicWall-
`Finjan_00002532-
`SonicWall-
`Finjan_00002550
`
`be discerned. (See Williams
`Sealing Decl. ¶ 4.)
`This deposition contains
`information designated by
`SonicWall as “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” pursuant to the
`Stipulated Protective Order,
`and from which confidential
`information regarding
`SonicWall’s accused
`products could potentially
`be discerned. (See Williams
`Sealing Decl. ¶ 4.)
`This deposition contains
`information designated by
`SonicWall as “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” pursuant to the
`Stipulated Protective Order,
`and from which confidential
`information regarding
`SonicWall’s accused
`products could potentially
`be discerned. (See Williams
`Sealing Decl. ¶ 4.)
`This deposition contains
`information designated by
`SonicWall as “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” pursuant to the
`Stipulated Protective Order,
`and from which confidential
`information regarding
`SonicWall’s accused
`products could potentially
`be discerned. (See Williams
`Sealing Decl. ¶ 4.)
`This document reflects
`information SonicWall has
`designated “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” pursuant to the
`Stipulated Protective Order,
`and from which confidential
`information regarding
`SonicWall’s accused
`
`
`
`4
`
`Case No. 5:17-cv-04467 BLF (VKD)
`[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FINJAN’S
`CORRECTED ADMIN. MOTION TO FILE
`UNDER SEAL
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 329-2 Filed 12/22/20 Page 6 of 8
`
`
`
`
`
`Exh. N
`
`Entirety
`
`SonicWall Document
`Produced as
`SonicWall-
`Finjan_00002574-
`SonicWall-
`Finjan_00002592
`
`Entirety
`
`Exh. P
`
`SonicWall Document
`Produced as
`SonicWall-
`Finjan_00599079-
`SonicWall-
`Finjan_00599109
`
`Entirety
`
`Exh. Q
`
`SonicWall Document
`Produced as
`SonicWall-
`Finjan_00373438-
`SonicWall-
`Finjan_00373472
`
`Exh. R
`
`Email Produced as
`SonicWall-
`Finjan_00465540-
`SonicWall-
`Finjan_00465543
`
`Entirety
`
`products could potentially
`be discerned. (See Williams
`Sealing Decl. ¶ 4.)
`This document reflects
`information SonicWall has
`designated “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” pursuant to the
`Stipulated Protective Order,
`and from which confidential
`information regarding
`SonicWall’s accused
`products could potentially
`be discerned. (See Williams
`Sealing Decl. ¶ 4.)
`This document reflects
`information SonicWall has
`designated “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” pursuant to the
`Stipulated Protective Order,
`and from which confidential
`information regarding
`SonicWall’s accused
`products could potentially
`be discerned. (See Williams
`Sealing Decl. ¶ 4.)
`This document reflects
`information SonicWall has
`designated “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” pursuant to the
`Stipulated Protective Order,
`and from which confidential
`information regarding
`SonicWall’s accused
`products could potentially
`be discerned. (See Williams
`Sealing Decl. ¶ 4.)
`This document reflects
`information SonicWall has
`designated “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” pursuant to the
`Stipulated Protective Order,
`and from which confidential
`information regarding
`
`
`
`5
`
`Case No. 5:17-cv-04467 BLF (VKD)
`[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FINJAN’S
`CORRECTED ADMIN. MOTION TO FILE
`UNDER SEAL
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 329-2 Filed 12/22/20 Page 7 of 8
`
`
`
`
`
`Exh. S
`
`Excerpts from the
`Deposition Transcript
`of Ravi Chopra dated
`December 19, 2019
`
`Entirety
`
`Exh. T
`
`Email Produced as
`FINJAN-SW 047873-
`FINJAN-SW 047876
`
`Entirety
`
`SonicWall’s accused
`products could potentially
`be discerned. (See Williams
`Sealing Decl. ¶ 4.)
`This deposition contains
`information designated by
`SonicWall as “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” pursuant to the
`Stipulated Protective Order,
`and from which confidential
`information regarding
`SonicWall’s accused
`products could potentially
`be discerned. (See Williams
`Sealing Decl. ¶ 4.)
`This document reflects
`information SonicWall has
`designated “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” pursuant to the
`Stipulated Protective Order,
`and from which confidential
`information regarding
`SonicWall’s accused
`products could potentially
`be discerned. Additionally,
`this document reflects
`Finjan information that is
`“Highly Confidential –
`Attorneys’ Eyes Only”
`pursuant to the Protective
`Order, including
`information relating to
`Finjan’s licensing
`negotiations and business
`practices. Public disclosure
`of this information would
`cause harm to Finjan. (See
`Williams Sealing Decl. ¶¶ 4-
`5.)
`
`
`
`The Court also finds that a substantial probability exists that the overriding confidentiality
`
`interests will be prejudiced absent sealing, the sealing is narrowly tailored, and no less restrictive
`
`means exist to achieve these overriding interests.
`
`
`6
`
`Case No. 5:17-cv-04467 BLF (VKD)
`[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FINJAN’S
`CORRECTED ADMIN. MOTION TO FILE
`UNDER SEAL
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 329-2 Filed 12/22/20 Page 8 of 8
`
`
`
`
`
`IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Finjan’s Administrative Motion to File Under Seal
`
`be, and hereby is, GRANTED with respect to the documents as set forth above.
`
`
`
`Dated:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Hon. Beth Labson Freeman
`U.S. District Judge
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`7
`
`Case No. 5:17-cv-04467 BLF (VKD)
`[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FINJAN’S
`CORRECTED ADMIN. MOTION TO FILE
`UNDER SEAL
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`