throbber
Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 329-2 Filed 12/22/20 Page 1 of 8
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`(SAN JOSE DIVISION)
`
`
`
`FINJAN LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability
`Company,
`
`Case No. 5:17-cv-04467-BLF (VKD)
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
`FINJAN LLC’S CORRECTED
`ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE
`UNDER SEAL
`
`SONICWALL INC., a Delaware Corporation,
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`Case No. 5:17-cv-04467 BLF (VKD)
`[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FINJAN’S
`CORRECTED ADMIN. MOTION TO FILE
`UNDER SEAL
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 329-2 Filed 12/22/20 Page 2 of 8
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff Finjan LLC’s Corrected Administrative Motion to File Under Seal portions of
`
`Finjan’s Opposition to SonicWall’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment was brought before
`
`this Court. Upon consideration of this motion and the supporting declaration of K. Nicole
`
`Williams filed in support of the motion, the Court finds that good cause and compelling reasons
`
`exist for sealing certain documents.
`
`Compelling reasons having been shown, the Court finds that there exist overriding
`
`confidentiality interests that overcome the right of public access to the record for the subject
`
`documents as follows:
`
`Document
`
`Portion(s) to Seal
`
`Reason(s) for Sealing
`
`Highlighted portions
`at page 2, lines 15-20;
`page 3, lines 20-22;
`page 6, lines 2 and 16-
`22; page 7, lines 7-12
`and 23-27; page 12,
`lines 21-27; page 13,
`lines 2-8, 11, 13-14,
`and 26-27; page 15,
`lines 20-21; page 16,
`lines 19-22 and 26-27;
`page 17, lines 2-14
`and 25-27; page 18,
`lines 1-6, 9-10, and
`15; page 19, lines 20-
`21.
`
`Entirety
`
`The highlighted portions of
`this document reflect
`information that SonicWall
`has designated as “Highly
`Confidential –Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” or “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only – Source Code”
`pursuant to the Stipulated
`Protective Order, and from
`which confidential
`information regarding
`SonicWall’s accused
`products could potentially
`be discerned. (See
`Declaration of K. Nicole
`Williams In Support of
`Sealing (“Williams Sealing
`Decl.”) ¶ 3.)
`This document reflects
`information SonicWall has
`designated “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” and “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only – Source Code”
`pursuant to the Stipulated
`Protective Order, and from
`which confidential
`
`1
`
`Case No. 5:17-cv-04467 BLF (VKD)
`[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FINJAN’S
`CORRECTED ADMIN. MOTION TO FILE
`UNDER SEAL
`
`
`
`ECF or
`Exh. No.
`ECF 326
`
`Finjan’s Opposition to
`SonicWall’s Motion
`for Partial Summary
`Judgment
`
`Excerpts from the
`Expert Report of Dr.
`Nenad Medvidovic
`Regarding
`Infringement by
`SonicWall, Inc. of
`Patent Nos. 8,225,408;
`7,975,305 and
`8,141,154, dated
`September 3, 2020
`
`Exh. A
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 329-2 Filed 12/22/20 Page 3 of 8
`
`Exh. B
`
`Excerpts from the
`Deposition Transcript
`of Michael King taken
`July 24, 2020
`
`Entirety
`
`Exh. C
`
`Excerpts from the
`Deposition Transcript
`of Shunhui Zhu taken
`July 16, 2020
`
`Entirety
`
`Exh. D
`
`Excerpts from the
`Deposition Transcript
`of Eric Hawkes taken
`July 21, 2020
`
`Entirety
`
`information regarding
`SonicWall’s accused
`products could potentially
`be discerned. (See Williams
`Sealing Decl. ¶ 4.)
`This deposition transcript
`was designated by
`SonicWall as “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” pursuant to the
`Stipulated Protective Order,
`and from which confidential
`information regarding
`SonicWall’s accused
`products could be
`potentially discerned. (See
`Williams Sealing Decl. ¶ 4.)
`
`This deposition transcript
`was designated by
`SonicWall as “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” pursuant to the
`Stipulated Protective Order,
`and from which confidential
`information regarding
`SonicWall’s accused
`products could potentially
`be discerned. (See Williams
`Sealing Decl. ¶ 4.)
`This deposition transcript
`was designated by
`SonicWall as “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” pursuant to the
`Stipulated Protective Order,
`and from which confidential
`information regarding
`SonicWall’s accused
`products could potentially
`be discerned. (See Williams
`Sealing Decl. ¶ 4.)
`This document reflects
`information SonicWall has
`designated “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” pursuant to the
`
`Exh. E
`
`
`
`Entirety
`
`Presentation Produced
`as SonicWall-
`Finjan_00549272-
`SonicWall-
`Finjan_00549291
`
`2
`
`Case No. 5:17-cv-04467 BLF (VKD)
`[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FINJAN’S
`CORRECTED ADMIN. MOTION TO FILE
`UNDER SEAL
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 329-2 Filed 12/22/20 Page 4 of 8
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`Exh. F
`
`Excerpts from the
`Deposition Transcript
`of Eric B. Cole, Ph.D.
`taken October 22, 2020
`
`Entirety
`
`Exh. G
`
`Entirety
`
`Expert Report of
`Michael
`Mitzenmacher, Ph.D.
`Regarding
`Infringement of
`SonicWall, Inc. of
`Patent Nos. 6,804,780;
`6,965,968; and
`7,613,926, dated
`September 3, 2020
`
`Exh. H
`
`Entirety
`
`Excerpts from the
`Expert Report of Dr.
`Eric Cole Regarding
`Technology Tutorial
`and Infringement by
`SonicWall, Inc. of
`Patent Nos. 6,154,844;
`7,058,822; 7,647,633
`and 8,677,494
`
`Stipulated Protective Order,
`and from which confidential
`information regarding
`SonicWall’s accused
`products could potentially
`be discerned. (See Williams
`Sealing Decl. ¶ 4.)
`This deposition contains
`information designated by
`SonicWall as “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” pursuant to the
`Stipulated Protective Order,
`and from which confidential
`information regarding
`SonicWall’s accused
`products could potentially
`be discerned. (See Williams
`Sealing Decl. ¶ 4.)
`This document reflects
`information SonicWall has
`designated “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” and “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only – Source Code”
`pursuant to the Stipulated
`Protective Order, and from
`which confidential
`information regarding
`SonicWall’s accused
`products could potentially
`be discerned. (See Williams
`Sealing Decl. ¶ 4.)
`This document reflects
`information SonicWall has
`designated “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” and “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only – Source Code”
`pursuant to the Stipulated
`Protective Order, and from
`which confidential
`information regarding
`SonicWall’s accused
`products could potentially
`
`
`
`3
`
`Case No. 5:17-cv-04467 BLF (VKD)
`[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FINJAN’S
`CORRECTED ADMIN. MOTION TO FILE
`UNDER SEAL
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 329-2 Filed 12/22/20 Page 5 of 8
`
`
`
`
`
`Exh. I
`
`Entirety
`
`Excerpts from the
`Deposition Transcript
`of Kevin Almeroth,
`Ph.D. taken October
`21, 2020
`
`Exh. J
`
`Excerpt from the
`Deposition Transcript
`of John Gmuender
`taken July 9, 2020
`
`Entirety
`
`Exh. K
`
`Excerpt from the
`Deposition Transcript
`of Patrick McDaniel,
`Ph.D. taken October
`23, 2020
`
`Entirety
`
`Entirety
`
`Exh. L
`
`SonicWall Document
`Produced as
`SonicWall-
`Finjan_00002532-
`SonicWall-
`Finjan_00002550
`
`be discerned. (See Williams
`Sealing Decl. ¶ 4.)
`This deposition contains
`information designated by
`SonicWall as “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” pursuant to the
`Stipulated Protective Order,
`and from which confidential
`information regarding
`SonicWall’s accused
`products could potentially
`be discerned. (See Williams
`Sealing Decl. ¶ 4.)
`This deposition contains
`information designated by
`SonicWall as “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” pursuant to the
`Stipulated Protective Order,
`and from which confidential
`information regarding
`SonicWall’s accused
`products could potentially
`be discerned. (See Williams
`Sealing Decl. ¶ 4.)
`This deposition contains
`information designated by
`SonicWall as “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” pursuant to the
`Stipulated Protective Order,
`and from which confidential
`information regarding
`SonicWall’s accused
`products could potentially
`be discerned. (See Williams
`Sealing Decl. ¶ 4.)
`This document reflects
`information SonicWall has
`designated “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” pursuant to the
`Stipulated Protective Order,
`and from which confidential
`information regarding
`SonicWall’s accused
`
`
`
`4
`
`Case No. 5:17-cv-04467 BLF (VKD)
`[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FINJAN’S
`CORRECTED ADMIN. MOTION TO FILE
`UNDER SEAL
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 329-2 Filed 12/22/20 Page 6 of 8
`
`
`
`
`
`Exh. N
`
`Entirety
`
`SonicWall Document
`Produced as
`SonicWall-
`Finjan_00002574-
`SonicWall-
`Finjan_00002592
`
`Entirety
`
`Exh. P
`
`SonicWall Document
`Produced as
`SonicWall-
`Finjan_00599079-
`SonicWall-
`Finjan_00599109
`
`Entirety
`
`Exh. Q
`
`SonicWall Document
`Produced as
`SonicWall-
`Finjan_00373438-
`SonicWall-
`Finjan_00373472
`
`Exh. R
`
`Email Produced as
`SonicWall-
`Finjan_00465540-
`SonicWall-
`Finjan_00465543
`
`Entirety
`
`products could potentially
`be discerned. (See Williams
`Sealing Decl. ¶ 4.)
`This document reflects
`information SonicWall has
`designated “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” pursuant to the
`Stipulated Protective Order,
`and from which confidential
`information regarding
`SonicWall’s accused
`products could potentially
`be discerned. (See Williams
`Sealing Decl. ¶ 4.)
`This document reflects
`information SonicWall has
`designated “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” pursuant to the
`Stipulated Protective Order,
`and from which confidential
`information regarding
`SonicWall’s accused
`products could potentially
`be discerned. (See Williams
`Sealing Decl. ¶ 4.)
`This document reflects
`information SonicWall has
`designated “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” pursuant to the
`Stipulated Protective Order,
`and from which confidential
`information regarding
`SonicWall’s accused
`products could potentially
`be discerned. (See Williams
`Sealing Decl. ¶ 4.)
`This document reflects
`information SonicWall has
`designated “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” pursuant to the
`Stipulated Protective Order,
`and from which confidential
`information regarding
`
`
`
`5
`
`Case No. 5:17-cv-04467 BLF (VKD)
`[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FINJAN’S
`CORRECTED ADMIN. MOTION TO FILE
`UNDER SEAL
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 329-2 Filed 12/22/20 Page 7 of 8
`
`
`
`
`
`Exh. S
`
`Excerpts from the
`Deposition Transcript
`of Ravi Chopra dated
`December 19, 2019
`
`Entirety
`
`Exh. T
`
`Email Produced as
`FINJAN-SW 047873-
`FINJAN-SW 047876
`
`Entirety
`
`SonicWall’s accused
`products could potentially
`be discerned. (See Williams
`Sealing Decl. ¶ 4.)
`This deposition contains
`information designated by
`SonicWall as “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” pursuant to the
`Stipulated Protective Order,
`and from which confidential
`information regarding
`SonicWall’s accused
`products could potentially
`be discerned. (See Williams
`Sealing Decl. ¶ 4.)
`This document reflects
`information SonicWall has
`designated “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” pursuant to the
`Stipulated Protective Order,
`and from which confidential
`information regarding
`SonicWall’s accused
`products could potentially
`be discerned. Additionally,
`this document reflects
`Finjan information that is
`“Highly Confidential –
`Attorneys’ Eyes Only”
`pursuant to the Protective
`Order, including
`information relating to
`Finjan’s licensing
`negotiations and business
`practices. Public disclosure
`of this information would
`cause harm to Finjan. (See
`Williams Sealing Decl. ¶¶ 4-
`5.)
`
`
`
`The Court also finds that a substantial probability exists that the overriding confidentiality
`
`interests will be prejudiced absent sealing, the sealing is narrowly tailored, and no less restrictive
`
`means exist to achieve these overriding interests.
`
`
`6
`
`Case No. 5:17-cv-04467 BLF (VKD)
`[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FINJAN’S
`CORRECTED ADMIN. MOTION TO FILE
`UNDER SEAL
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 329-2 Filed 12/22/20 Page 8 of 8
`
`
`
`
`
`IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Finjan’s Administrative Motion to File Under Seal
`
`be, and hereby is, GRANTED with respect to the documents as set forth above.
`
`
`
`Dated:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Hon. Beth Labson Freeman
`U.S. District Judge
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`7
`
`Case No. 5:17-cv-04467 BLF (VKD)
`[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FINJAN’S
`CORRECTED ADMIN. MOTION TO FILE
`UNDER SEAL
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket