`
`IRELL & MANELLA LLP
`Jonathan S. Kagan (SBN 166039)
`jkagan@irell.com
`Joshua P. Glucoft (SBN 301249)
`jglucoft@irell.com
`Casey Curran (SBN 305210)
`ccurran@irell.com
`Sharon Song (SBN 313535)
`ssong@irell.com
`1800 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 900
`Los Angeles, California 90067-4276
`Telephone: (310) 277-1010
`Facsimile: (310) 203-7199
`
`Rebecca L. Carson (SBN 254105)
`rcarson@irell.com
`Kevin Wang (SBN 318024)
`kwang@irell.com
`840 Newport Center Drive, Suite 400
`Newport Beach, California 92660-6324
`Telephone: (949) 760-0991
`Facsimile: (949) 760-5200
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC.
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
`)
`Case No. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`)
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
`)
`JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC’S MOTION
`)
`FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
`)
`REGARDING CLAIM 1 OF U.S. PATENT
`)
`NO. 6,804,780
`)
`
`)
`
`)
`)
`
`
`FINJAN, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`vs.
`
`
`JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`10125765
`
`
`
`- 1 -
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING JUNIPER’S MOTION FOR
`SUMMARY JUDGMENT REGARDING CLAIM 1 of
`U.S. PATENT NO. 6,804,780
`
`
`
`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 96-1 Filed 06/07/18 Page 2 of 2
`
`The Court, having carefully considered Defendant Juniper Networks, Inc.’s (“Juniper”)
`
`Motion for Summary Judgment Regarding Claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 6,804,780 (“the ’780
`Patent”), the related opposition and reply briefing, and the arguments of counsel, with good cause
`appearing, hereby orders as follows:
`1. Claim 1 of the ’780 Patent is invalid as directed to unpatentable subject matter under
`35 U.S.C. § 101.
`2. Juniper does not infringe claim 1 of the ’780 Patent with respect to the SRX products.
`3. Juniper does not infringe claim 1 of the ’780 Patent with respect to the cloud-based
`Sky ATP service.
`4. Juniper does not infringe claim 1 of the ’780 Patent with respect to the combination of
`the SRX products with the cloud-based Sky ATP service.
`5. The damages for any potential infringement by Juniper of claim 1 of the ’780 Patent
`are limited under 35 U.S.C. § 287 to those accrued based on acts of infringement
`occurring after September 29, 2017 (the filing of the complaint in this matter) and
`before November 6, 2017 (the expiration date of the ’780 Patent).
`Accordingly, Juniper’s Motion for Summary Judgement Regarding Claim 1 of U.S. Patent No.
`6,804,780 is hereby GRANTED.
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`Dated: ______________________
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`____________________________________
`Hon. William Alsup
`United States District Court Judge
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`10125765
`
`
`
`- 2 -
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING JUNIPER’S MOTION FOR
`SUMMARY JUDGMENT REGARDING CLAIM 1 of
`U.S. PATENT NO. 6,804,780
`Case No. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`