throbber
Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 71-1 Filed 04/23/18 Page 1 of 3
`
`IRELL & MANELLA LLP
`Jonathan S. Kagan (SBN 166039)
`jkagan@irell.com
`Joshua Glucoft (SBN 301249)
`jglucoft@irell.com
`Casey Curran (SBN 305210)
`ccurran@irell.com
`1800 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 900
`Los Angeles, California 90067-4276
`Telephone: (310) 277-1010
`Facsimile: (310) 203-7199
`
`Rebecca Carson (SBN 254105)
`rcarson@irell.com
`Kevin Wang (SBN 318024)
`kwang@irell.com
`840 Newport Center Drive, Suite 400
`Newport Beach, California 92660-6324
`Telephone: (949) 760-0991
`Facsimile: (949) 760-5200
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC.
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`IRELL & MANELLA LLP
`A Registered Limited Liability
`Law Partnership Including
`Professional Corporations
`
`10492877
`
`
`FINJAN, INC., a Delaware Corporation,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC., a Delaware
`Corporation,
`
`
`vs.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`Case No. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`DECLARATION OF JOSHUA GLUCOFT
`IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT JUNIPER
`NETWORKS, INC.’S OPPOSITION TO
`MOTION FOR AN ORDER
`SHORTENING TIME
`
`
`DECL. OF JOSHUA GLUCOFT ISO JUNIPER’S
`OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME
`Case No. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`IRELL & MANELLA LLP
`A Registered Limited Liability
`Law Partnership Including
`Professional Corporations
`
`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 71-1 Filed 04/23/18 Page 2 of 3
`
`DECLARATION OF JOSHUA GLUCOFT
`
`I, Joshua Glucoft, declare as follows:
`1.
`
`I am an attorney at the law firm of Irell & Manella LLP, counsel of record for
`
`Juniper Networks, Inc. in the above-captioned action. I am a member in good standing of the
`
`State Bar of California and have been admitted to practice before this Court. I have personal
`
`knowledge of the facts set forth in this Declaration and, if called as a witness, could and would
`
`testify competently to such facts under oath.
`2.
`
`I submit this declaration in support of Juniper Networks, Inc.’s (“Juniper”)
`
`opposition to Finjan, Inc.’s (“Finjan”) Motion for an Order Shortening Time (“motion to shorten
`
`time”) (Dkt. No. 68).
`3.
`
`Attached as Exhibit A to Juniper’s Opposition to Finjan’s motion to shorten time is
`
`a true and correct copy of email exchanges between Julie Mar-Spinola, Finjan’s Chief Intellectual
`
`Property Officer, and Meredith McKenzie, Juniper’s Deputy General Counsel, from October 2017.
`4.
`
`Attached as Exhibit B to Juniper’s Opposition to Finjan’s motion to shorten time is
`
`a true and correct copy of a March 15, 2018 email that I sent to Kris Kastens of Kramer Levin
`
`Naftalis & Frankel LLP, counsel for Finjan.
`5.
`
`On March 19, 2018, Juniper produced its source code for the SRX, Sky ATP, and
`
`Space Security Director products. On March 7, 2018, Juniper produced more than 160,000 pages
`
`of technical documents related to these products. On April 13, 2018, Juniper produced
`
`approximately 7,000 additional pages of highly confidential technical documents related to these
`
`products, including design and development documents for Sky ATP, and substantial portions of
`
`Juniper’s production of design and development documents for SRX and Space Security Director.
`6.
`
`Juniper expects to produce thousands of additional pages of highly confidential
`
`technical documents related to the SRX, Sky ATP, and Space Security Director products by the
`
`end of April 2018.
`7.
`
`Juniper’s Sky ATP is a distinct product from the ATP Appliance. The source code
`
`that Juniper collected and produced for Sky ATP is different from the source code used in the ATP
`
`Appliance.
`
`10492877
`
`
`- 1 -
`
`DECL. OF JOSHUA GLUCOFT ISO JUNIPER’S
`OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME
`Case No. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 71-1 Filed 04/23/18 Page 3 of 3
`
`8.
`
`On April 18, 2018, I met and conferred with Finjan’s counsel by telephone
`
`regarding Juniper’s opposition to Finjan’s Motion to Amend and its accompanying motion to
`
`shorten time. During this conversation, Finjan’s counsel did not mention that Finjan was going to
`
`request a discovery deadline for discovery related to the ATP Appliance in its motion to shorten
`
`time.
`
`Executed this 23rd day of April, 2018, at Los Angeles, California.
`I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the
`
`foregoing is true and correct.
`
` /s/ Joshua Glucoft
`
` Joshua Glucoft
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`IRELL & MANELLA LLP
`A Registered Limited Liability
`Law Partnership Including
`Professional Corporations
`
`10492877
`
`
`- 2 -
`
`DECL. OF JOSHUA GLUCOFT ISO JUNIPER’S
`OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME
`Case No. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket