throbber
Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 556-3 Filed 06/25/19 Page 1 of 4
`

`

`

`

`

`

`
`Exhibit 3
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 556-3 Filed 06/25/19 Page 2 of 4
`
`From: Caire, Yuridia
`Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2019 1:24 PM
`To: 'Petersen, Ingrid'
`Cc: Andre, Paul; Hannah, James; Kobialka, Lisa; Manes, Austin; Kastens, Kris; Carson, Rebecca; Glucoft, Josh; Heinrich,
`Alan; Holland, Eileen; Isaac, Shawana; Kagan, Jonathan; Manzano, Jim; Mittleman, Harry; Quarnstrom, Brian; Theilacker,
`Leah; Wang, Kevin
`Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] RE: Finjan v. Juniper

`Ingrid,  

`We met and conferred on this six weeks ago and at that time Juniper stated it would be producing information and 
`supplemental responses within a couple of weeks.  Juniper’s continued delay is unacceptable.  Please identify what 
`specifically you are producing and confirm that you will produce it at the latest with the discovery responses next 
`week.  For Mr. Jas, please provide availability on May 23 or 24th.  For the outstanding 30(b)(6), it will depend on when 
`Juniper provides the updated information but please provide where the witness is located and who it is.  

`Yuri  

`From: Petersen, Ingrid [mailto:ipetersen@irell.com]
`Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2019 12:07 PM
`To: Caire, Yuridia
`Cc: Andre, Paul; Hannah, James; Kobialka, Lisa; Manes, Austin; Kastens, Kris; Carson, Rebecca; Glucoft, Josh; Heinrich,
`Alan; Holland, Eileen; Isaac, Shawana; Kagan, Jonathan; Manzano, Jim; Mittleman, Harry; Quarnstrom, Brian; Theilacker,
`Leah; Wang, Kevin
`Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] RE: Finjan v. Juniper

`Dear Yuri, 

`Juniper intends to serve supplemental discovery responses by the end of next week, with updated financial data 
`produced shortly thereafter.  In view of this, we think it makes sense for the parties to postpone meeting and conferring 
`on these issues until after Juniper serves its supplemental responses, as those responses may resolve many of the 
`outstanding issues.  We also note that many of these issues may be impacted by Finjan’s selection of claims that it 
`intends to pursue at the October trial. 

`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 556-3 Filed 06/25/19 Page 3 of 4
`
`Additionally, we are looking into deposition dates in June for Mr. Jas and the Rule 30(b)(6) deposition that Finjan 
`requested, and should be able to provide those shortly.  If you have a preferred range of dates for these depositions, 
`please let us know and we can do our best to accommodate that request.   

`Best Wishes, 

`Ingrid   


`From: Caire, Yuridia <YCaire@KRAMERLEVIN.com>  
`Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2019 7:37 AM 
`To: Petersen, Ingrid <ipetersen@irell.com> 
`Cc: ~Andre, Paul <pandre@kramerlevin.com>; ~Hannah, James <jhannah@kramerlevin.com>; ~Kobialka, Lisa 
`<lkobialka@kramerlevin.com>; ~Manes, Austin <amanes@kramerlevin.com>; ~Kastens, Kristopher 
`<kkastens@kramerlevin.com>; Carson, Rebecca <RCarson@irell.com>; Glucoft, Josh <JGlucoft@irell.com>; Heinrich, 
`Alan <AHeinrich@irell.com>; Holland, Eileen <EHolland@irell.com>; Isaac, Shawana <SIsaac@irell.com>; Kagan, 
`Jonathan <JKagan@irell.com>; Manzano, Jim <JManzano@irell.com>; Mittleman, Harry <HMittleman@irell.com>; 
`Quarnstrom, Brian <BQuarnstrom@irell.com>; Theilacker, Leah <LTheilacker@irell.com>; Wang, Kevin 
`<kwang@irell.com> 
`Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] RE: Finjan v. Juniper 

`Ingrid,   

`
`Juniper previously agreed to produce updated information and its continued delay to produce such information and 
`provide deposition dates is not warranted. Please provide lead counsel availability for a meet and confer for this week or 
`early next week. 

`

`

`
`Yuridia Caire 
`Associate 
`
`  
`Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP 
`990 Marsh Road, Menlo Park, California 94025 
`T 650.752.1717 F 650.752.1817 
`  
`This communication (including any attachments) is intended solely for the recipient(s) named above and may contain information that is
`confidential, privileged or legally protected. Any unauthorized use or dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received
`this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by return e-mail message and delete all copies of the original communication.
`Thank you for your cooperation. 
`  
`
`  
`On May 10, 2019, at 4:14 PM, Petersen, Ingrid <ipetersen@irell.com> wrote: 
`
`Dear Yuri: 
`
`  
`Because of the Court’s recent summary judgment orders and the resetting of trial, it makes the most 
`sense for the parties to touch base after Finjan informs the Court which patents/claims it intends to 
`pursue at the October trial.  These recent events impact Finjan’s outstanding requests, such as the 
`relevant damages period and which licenses (if any) are relevant.  
`2
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 556-3 Filed 06/25/19 Page 4 of 4
`
`  
`
`Best wishes, 
`  
`Ingrid 
`  
`
`  
`From: Caire, Yuridia <YCaire@KRAMERLEVIN.com>  
`Sent: Wednesday, May 8, 2019 10:56 AM 
`To: Petersen, Ingrid <ipetersen@irell.com>; Glucoft, Josh <JGlucoft@irell.com>; Carson, Rebecca 
`<RCarson@irell.com>; Heinrich, Alan <AHeinrich@irell.com>; Holland, Eileen <EHolland@irell.com>; 
`Isaac, Shawana <SIsaac@irell.com>; Kagan, Jonathan <JKagan@irell.com>; Manzano, Jim 
`<JManzano@irell.com>; Quarnstrom, Brian <BQuarnstrom@irell.com>; Theilacker, Leah 
`<LTheilacker@irell.com>; Wang, Kevin <kwang@irell.com> 
`Cc: ~Andre, Paul <pandre@kramerlevin.com>; ~Hannah, James <jhannah@kramerlevin.com>; 
`~Kobialka, Lisa <lkobialka@kramerlevin.com>; ~Manes, Austin <amanes@kramerlevin.com>; ~Kastens, 
`Kristopher <kkastens@kramerlevin.com> 
`Subject: RE: Finjan v. Juniper 
`  
`Ingrid, 
`
`  
`We are at an impasse on the issues below, as we discussed on the meet and confer, in our follow‐up 
`emails.  Please provide a time for lead counsel to meet and confer on these issues.  In addition, Juniper 
`agreed to produce updated financial information and expected to do so in a couple weeks but nothing 
`has been produced.  Please confirm that you will produce the supplemental information by the end of 
`this week.   
`
`  
`Finally, please provide availability for the depositions of Finjan’s outstanding 30(b)(6) topic and Jas. 
`
`  
`Thanks, 
`
`  
`Yuri  
`  

`
`Yuridia Caire 
`Associate 
`

`Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP 
`990 Marsh Road, Menlo Park, California 94025 
`T 650.752.1717 F 650.752.1817 
`  
`This communication (including any attachments) is intended solely for the recipient(s) named above and may contain
`information that is confidential, privileged or legally protected. Any unauthorized use or dissemination of this communication is
`strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by return e-mail
`message and delete all copies of the original communication. Thank you for your cooperation. 
`  
`

`From: Petersen, Ingrid [mailto:ipetersen@irell.com]
`Sent: Friday, April 05, 2019 5:59 PM
`To: Caire, Yuridia; Glucoft, Josh; Carson, Rebecca; Heinrich, Alan; Holland, Eileen; Isaac, Shawana;
`Kagan, Jonathan; Manzano, Jim; Quarnstrom, Brian; Theilacker, Leah; Wang, Kevin
`Cc: Andre, Paul; Hannah, James; Kobialka, Lisa; Manes, Austin; Kastens, Kris
`Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Finjan v. Juniper 
`  
`
`3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket