throbber
Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 484-7 Filed 05/22/19 Page 1 of 9
`
`AO 88B (Rev. 02/14) Subpoena to Produce Documents, Information, or Objects or to Permit Inspection of Premises in a Civil Action
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`for the
` Northern District of California
`__________ District of __________
`
`Civil Action No.
`
`3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`))))))
`
`FINJAN, INC., a Delaware Corporation,
`Plaintiff
`v.
`JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC., a Delaware
`Corporation
`Defendant
`
`SUBPOENA TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS, INFORMATION, OR OBJECTS
`OR TO PERMIT INSPECTION OF PREMISES IN A CIVIL ACTION
`Dawn-Marie Bey c/o, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, 990 Marsh Road, Menlo Park, CA 94025
`
`To:
`
`(Name of person to whom this subpoena is directed)
`✔
`(cid:117) Production: YOU ARE COMMANDED to produce at the time, date, and place set forth below the following
`documents, electronically stored information, or objects, and to permit inspection, copying, testing, or sampling of the
`material:
`See Exhibit A.
`
`Place:
`
`Joshua Glucoft, Irell & Manella LLP, 1800 Avenue of
`the Stars, Suite 900, Los Angeles, CA 90067
`
`Date and Time:
`
`05/10/2019 by 9:00 am
`
`(cid:117) Inspection of Premises: YOU ARE COMMANDED to permit entry onto the designated premises, land, or
`other property possessed or controlled by you at the time, date, and location set forth below, so that the requesting party
`may inspect, measure, survey, photograph, test, or sample the property or any designated object or operation on it.
`
`Place:
`
`Date and Time:
`
`The following provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 45 are attached – Rule 45(c), relating to the place of compliance;
`Rule 45(d), relating to your protection as a person subject to a subpoena; and Rule 45(e) and (g), relating to your duty to
`respond to this subpoena and the potential consequences of not doing so.
`04/25/2019
`Date:
`
`CLERK OF COURT
`
`Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk
`
`OR
`
`/s/ Joshua Glucoft
`Attorney’s signature
`
`Defendant Juniper
`The name, address, e-mail address, and telephone number of the attorney representing (name of party)
`, who issues or requests this subpoena, are:
`Networks, Inc.
`Joshua Glucoft, Irell & Manella LLP, 1800 Avenue of the Stars, Ste 900, Los Angeles, CA 90067, jglucoft@irell.com, (310) 277-1010
`Notice to the person who issues or requests this subpoena
`If this subpoena commands the production of documents, electronically stored information, or tangible things or the
`inspection of premises before trial, a notice and a copy of the subpoena must be served on each party in this case before
`it is served on the person to whom it is directed. Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(a)(4).
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 484-7 Filed 05/22/19 Page 2 of 9
`
`AO 88B (Rev. 02/14) Subpoena to Produce Documents, Information, or Objects or to Permit Inspection of Premises in a Civil Action (Page 2)
`
`Civil Action No.
`
`3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`PROOF OF SERVICE
`(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 45.)
`
`I received this subpoena for (name of individual and title, if any)
`.
`
`on (date)
`
`(cid:117) I served the subpoena by delivering a copy to the named person as follows:
`
`(cid:117) I returned the subpoena unexecuted because:
`
`on (date)
`
`; or
`
`Unless the subpoena was issued on behalf of the United States, or one of its officers or agents, I have also
`tendered to the witness the fees for one day’s attendance, and the mileage allowed by law, in the amount of
`$
`.
`
`My fees are $
`
`for travel and $
`
`for services, for a total of $
`
`0.00
`
`.
`
`.
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.
`
`Date:
`
`Additional information regarding attempted service, etc.:
`
`Server’s signature
`
`Printed name and title
`
`Server’s address
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 484-7 Filed 05/22/19 Page 3 of 9
`
`AO 88B (Rev. 02/14) Subpoena to Produce Documents, Information, or Objects or to Permit Inspection of Premises in a Civil Action(Page 3)
`
`(c) Place of Compliance.
`
`Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45 (c), (d), (e), and (g) (Effective 12/1/13)
`(ii) disclosing an unretained expert’s opinion or information that does
`not describe specific occurrences in dispute and results from the expert’s
`study that was not requested by a party.
`(C) Specifying Conditions as an Alternative. In the circumstances
`described in Rule 45(d)(3)(B), the court may, instead of quashing or
`modifying a subpoena, order appearance or production under specified
`conditions if the serving party:
`(i) shows a substantial need for the testimony or material that cannot be
`otherwise met without undue hardship; and
`(ii) ensures that the subpoenaed person will be reasonably compensated.
`
`(1) For a Trial, Hearing, or Deposition. A subpoena may command a
`person to attend a trial, hearing, or deposition only as follows:
`(A) within 100 miles of where the person resides, is employed, or
`regularly transacts business in person; or
`(B) within the state where the person resides, is employed, or regularly
`transacts business in person, if the person
`(i) is a party or a party’s officer; or
`(ii) is commanded to attend a trial and would not incur substantial
`expense.
`
`(2) For Other Discovery. A subpoena may command:
`(A) production of documents, electronically stored information, or
`tangible things at a place within 100 miles of where the person resides, is
`employed, or regularly transacts business in person; and
`(B) inspection of premises at the premises to be inspected.
`
`(d) Protecting a Person Subject to a Subpoena; Enforcement.
`
`(1) Avoiding Undue Burden or Expense; Sanctions. A party or attorney
`responsible for issuing and serving a subpoena must take reasonable steps
`to avoid imposing undue burden or expense on a person subject to the
`subpoena. The court for the district where compliance is required must
`enforce this duty and impose an appropriate sanction—which may include
`lost earnings and reasonable attorney’s fees—on a party or attorney who
`fails to comply.
`
`(2) Command to Produce Materials or Permit Inspection.
`(A) Appearance Not Required. A person commanded to produce
`documents, electronically stored information, or tangible things, or to
`permit the inspection of premises, need not appear in person at the place of
`production or inspection unless also commanded to appear for a deposition,
`hearing, or trial.
`(B) Objections. A person commanded to produce documents or tangible
`things or to permit inspection may serve on the party or attorney designated
`in the subpoena a written objection to inspecting, copying, testing, or
`sampling any or all of the materials or to inspecting the premises—or to
`producing electronically stored information in the form or forms requested.
`The objection must be served before the earlier of the time specified for
`compliance or 14 days after the subpoena is served. If an objection is made,
`the following rules apply:
`(i) At any time, on notice to the commanded person, the serving party
`may move the court for the district where compliance is required for an
`order compelling production or inspection.
`(ii) These acts may be required only as directed in the order, and the
`order must protect a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer from
`significant expense resulting from compliance.
`
`(3) Quashing or Modifying a Subpoena.
`(A) When Required. On timely motion, the court for the district where
`compliance is required must quash or modify a subpoena that:
`(i) fails to allow a reasonable time to comply;
`(ii) requires a person to comply beyond the geographical limits
`specified in Rule 45(c);
`(iii) requires disclosure of privileged or other protected matter, if no
`exception or waiver applies; or
`(iv) subjects a person to undue burden.
`(B) When Permitted. To protect a person subject to or affected by a
`subpoena, the court for the district where compliance is required may, on
`motion, quash or modify the subpoena if it requires:
`(i) disclosing a trade secret or other confidential research,
`development, or commercial information; or
`
`(e) Duties in Responding to a Subpoena.
`
`(1) Producing Documents or Electronically Stored Information. These
`procedures apply to producing documents or electronically stored
`information:
`(A) Documents. A person responding to a subpoena to produce documents
`must produce them as they are kept in the ordinary course of business or
`must organize and label them to correspond to the categories in the demand.
`(B) Form for Producing Electronically Stored Information Not Specified.
`If a subpoena does not specify a form for producing electronically stored
`information, the person responding must produce it in a form or forms in
`which it is ordinarily maintained or in a reasonably usable form or forms.
`(C) Electronically Stored Information Produced in Only One Form. The
`person responding need not produce the same electronically stored
`information in more than one form.
`(D) Inaccessible Electronically Stored Information. The person
`responding need not provide discovery of electronically stored information
`from sources that the person identifies as not reasonably accessible because
`of undue burden or cost. On motion to compel discovery or for a protective
`order, the person responding must show that the information is not
`reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost. If that showing is
`made, the court may nonetheless order discovery from such sources if the
`requesting party shows good cause, considering the limitations of Rule
`26(b)(2)(C). The court may specify conditions for the discovery.
`
`(2) Claiming Privilege or Protection.
`(A) Information Withheld. A person withholding subpoenaed information
`under a claim that it is privileged or subject to protection as trial-preparation
`material must:
`(i) expressly make the claim; and
`(ii) describe the nature of the withheld documents, communications, or
`tangible things in a manner that, without revealing information itself
`privileged or protected, will enable the parties to assess the claim.
`(B) Information Produced. If information produced in response to a
`subpoena is subject to a claim of privilege or of protection as
`trial-preparation material, the person making the claim may notify any party
`that received the information of the claim and the basis for it. After being
`notified, a party must promptly return, sequester, or destroy the specified
`information and any copies it has; must not use or disclose the information
`until the claim is resolved; must take reasonable steps to retrieve the
`information if the party disclosed it before being notified; and may promptly
`present the information under seal to the court for the district where
`compliance is required for a determination of the claim. The person who
`produced the information must preserve the information until the claim is
`resolved.
`
`(g) Contempt.
`The court for the district where compliance is required—and also, after a
`motion is transferred, the issuing court—may hold in contempt a person
`who, having been served, fails without adequate excuse to obey the
`subpoena or an order related to it.
`
`For access to subpoena materials, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(a) Committee Note (2013).
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 484-7 Filed 05/22/19 Page 4 of 9
`
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT A
`
`DEFINITIONS
`
`Unless the context indicates otherwise, for purposes of these discovery requests the
`
`following words and phrases shall have the meanings given:
`
`1.
`
`“Communication” shall mean any contact between two or more persons and
`
`shall include without limitation: written contact by such means as any document or any form
`
`of electronic or mechanical method of correspondence including without limitation e-mail,
`
`internet posting, text messaging, instant messaging, chat messaging, or voicemail message.
`
`2.
`
`“Concerning,” “relating,” or “related” shall be construed broadly, and shall
`
`mean mentioning, discussing, referring to, pertaining to, reflecting, or consulting.
`
`3.
`
`“Document” shall be construed to the broadest possible meaning pursuant to
`
`the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and refers to all writings, tangible things, and property,
`
`of any kind, which is in your possession, custody, or control or to which you have had, or
`
`can obtain access. Where a copy of a document contains comments, markings or notations
`
`not found on prior or subsequent versions, such copy and prior or subsequent versions are
`
`considered separate documents.
`
`4.
`
`“Finjan” refers to Plaintiff Finjan, Inc., including all past or present divisions,
`
`departments, parents, subsidiaries, affiliates, partnerships, joint ventures, predecessors or
`
`successors thereof, and all past and present officers, directors, employees, agents,
`
`representatives, consultants, managers, partners, or attorneys thereof.
`
`5.
`
`6.
`
`“Juniper” refers to Defendant Juniper Networks, Inc.
`
`“Patent” refers to any United States, international, or foreign classes or types
`
`of patents, utility models, design patents, applications (including provisional applications),
`
`10671939
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 484-7 Filed 05/22/19 Page 5 of 9
`
`
`
`certificates of invention, reissues, divisionals, continuations, continuations-in-part,
`
`extensions, renewals, reexaminations and foreign counterparts thereof. The defined term
`
`Patent includes all stated categories of intellectual property regardless of whether those
`
`rights are presently expired or were ever adjudged invalid.
`
`7.
`
`“Patents-in-Suit” refers to all of the patents at issue in the present litigation,
`
`which are U.S. Patent No. 8,677,494 (“the ’494 Patent”), U.S. Patent No. 6,154,844 (“the
`
`‘844 Patent”), U.S. Patent No. 6,804,780 (“the ‘780 Patent”), U.S. Patent No. 7,418,731
`
`(“the ‘731 Patent”), U.S. Patent No. 7,647,633 (“the ‘633 Patent”), and U.S. Patent No.
`
`8,141,154 (“the ‘154 Patent”).
`
`8.
`
`“You” or “Your” refers to Dawn-Marie Bey.
`
`INSTRUCTIONS
`
`1.
`
`You are required to produce all Documents responsive to these requests that
`
`are in your possession, custody, or control, including all those within the possession,
`
`custody, or control of your agents, representatives, and licensees and all those that can be
`
`obtained through reasonably diligent efforts.
`
`2.
`
`If any specific request cannot be complied with in full, you shall comply to
`
`the extent possible and explain why full compliance is not possible.
`
`3.
`
`Documents shall be produced in text-searchable image files (i.e., either PDF
`
`or TIFF format). The only Documents that may be produced in native format are files not
`
`easily converted to image format, such as Excel or media files. When scanning hard-copy
`
`Documents, you shall undertake reasonable efforts to ensure that distinct Documents are not
`
`merged into a single record and single Documents are not split into multiple records.
`
`4.
`
`The Documents produced should be organized and labeled to correspond to
`
`the categories in these requests. Alternatively, if Documents are produced as they are kept in
`
`10671939
`
`
`- 2 -
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 484-7 Filed 05/22/19 Page 6 of 9
`
`
`
`the usual course of business, you should provide Documents sufficient to show that the
`
`Documents produced have been produced as they are kept in the usual course of business.
`
`Documents attached to one another shall not be separated.
`
`5.
`
`If you withhold any Document or portion of a Document (including
`
`metadata) on the grounds that it is privileged, you must provide the following information in
`
`writing, at the time specified for production, with respect to each such Document:
`
`a. The nature of the privilege claimed;
`
`b. The facts relied upon for the basis of claiming privilege;
`
`c. The subject matter of the Communication or Document;
`
`d. The date of the Communication or Document;
`
`e. The name, organization, and position, if any, of each author, sender,
`
`signatory, and recipient of the Communication or Document;
`
`f. The name of the current or last known custodian of the Communication or
`
`Document;
`
`g. The steps taken to ensure the confidentiality of the Communication or
`
`Document, including affirmation that no unauthorized persons have received
`
`the Communication;
`
`6.
`
`If requested Document are known to be destroyed, lost, or otherwise missing,
`
`please provide sufficient information to identify the document or class of Documents and
`
`state the details concerning the loss of such document. For each lost, destroyed or otherwise
`
`missing document or class of documents, state (i) the manner of disposal (i.e., loss,
`
`destruction or other means); (ii) the date of disposal; (iii) the reason for disposal; (iv) the
`
`person authorizing disposal; (v) the person disposing of the document; (vi) the name and
`
`address of the most recent custodian of the document.
`
`10671939
`
`
`- 3 -
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 484-7 Filed 05/22/19 Page 7 of 9
`
`
`
`DOCUMENT REQUESTS
`
`REQUEST NO. 1:
`All retention letters, engagement agreements, and other consulting agreements
`between You and Finjan.
`REQUEST NO. 2:
`
`All invoices related to the Patents-in-Suit.
`REQUEST NO. 3:
`All petitions to accept unintentionally delayed claim of priority filed by you or
`bearing Your signature that were submitted to or filed with the USPTO.
`REQUEST NO. 4:
`All prior art that You considered during the prosecution of any of the Patents-in-Suit
`or any patents in the same family as the Patents-in-Suit.
`REQUEST NO. 5:
`All Documents related to the conception of any of the Patents-in-Suit.
`REQUEST NO. 6:
`All Documents related to the reduction to practice of any of the Patents-in-Suit.
`REQUEST NO. 7:
`All notes that You took related to the Patents-in-Suit.
`REQUEST NO. 8:
`All Communications with Shlomo Touboul.
`REQUEST NO. 9:
`All Communications with Yigal Edery.
`REQUEST NO. 10:
`All Communications with David Kroll.
`REQUEST NO. 11:
`All Communications with Nimrod Vered.
`
`10671939
`
`
`- 4 -
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 484-7 Filed 05/22/19 Page 8 of 9
`
`
`
`REQUEST NO. 12:
`All Communications with Marc Sockol.
`REQUEST NO. 13:
`All Communications with Marc Berger.
`REQUEST NO. 14:
`All Communications with Aaron Wininger.
`REQUEST NO. 15:
`All Communications with Eitan Law Group.
`REQUEST NO. 16:
`All Communications with Vladimir Sherman.
`REQUEST NO. 17:
`All Communications with Eppa Hite.
`REQUEST NO. 18:
`All Communications with Andrew Tiajoloff.
`REQUEST NO. 19:
`All Communications with Glenn Von Tersch.
`REQUEST NO. 20:
`All Communications with Michael Oblon.
`REQUEST NO. 21:
`All Communications with Eric Sophir.
`REQUEST NO. 22:
`All Communications with Daryl Josephson.
`REQUEST NO. 23:
`All Communications with Finjan.
`REQUEST NO. 24:
`All Communications related to Finjan, specifically including Communications
`related to SurfinGate.
`
`10671939
`
`
`- 5 -
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 484-7 Filed 05/22/19 Page 9 of 9
`
`
`
`REQUEST NO. 25:
`All Documents related to SurfinGate.
`REQUEST NO. 26:
`All Documents related to the Patents-in-Suit.
`REQUEST NO. 27:
`All Documents related to Finjan.
`
`
`10671939
`
`
`- 6 -
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket