Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 469-5 Filed 05/13/19 Page 1 of 42
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE
`REDACTED VERSION OF DOCUMENT SOUGHT TO BE SEALED
`DECLARATION OF DR. MICHAEL MITZENMACHER
`I, Michael Mitzenmacher, hereby declare that:
`1.
`
`I have been asked by Plaintiff Finjan, Inc. to submit a supplemental expert declaration
`
`on whether Juniper, Inc.’s SRX Gateways, Sky ATP and ATP Appliance products infringe claim 1 of
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,141,154 (the “’154 Patent”) when the Court’s construction of “content processor” is
`
`applied from the claim construction order. Dkt. No. 369-1. I relied on the documents cited herein,
`
`including the Court’s Order on Second Round of Early Motions for Summary Judgment and Motion to
`
`Strike and Order to Show Cause, the ’154 Patent, the file history of the ’154 Patent, the source code,
`
`the deposition transcripts of Juniper’s employees (including the transcripts of Tenorio, Manthena,
`
`Nagarajan, Manocha, and Khurram Islah), the trial transcript for this case, exhibits thereto, Finjan’s
`
`Infringement Contentions, and Juniper’s Discovery Responses. I have reviewed the opinions that I
`
`provided in my previous declaration for the Second Round of Early Motions for Summary Judgment
`
`and found that Juniper’s accused products still infringe Claim 1 of the ‘154 Patent under the Court’s
`
`construction of “content processor” as a “a processor that processes modified content.”
`I.
`
`EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS
`2.
`
`I received a Ph.D degree in Computer Science from the University of California at
`
`Berkeley in 1996. I am currently employed as a Professor of Computer Science at Harvard University.
`
`I have published over 200 research papers in computer science conferences and journals, many of
`
`which have explored computer securities and computer networks, such as algorithms and data
`
`structures for communication networks and data transmission. I regularly serve on program
`
`committees for conferences in networking, algorithms, and communication, including SIGCOMM,
`
`NSDI, and CoNEXT. I have also taught graduate courses relating to computer networking.
`3.
`
`My rate of compensation for my work in this case is $750 per hour plus any direct
`
`expenses incurred. My compensation is based solely on the amount of time that I devote to activity
`
`related to this case and is in no way affected by any opinions that I render. I receive no other
`
`compensation from work on this action. My compensation is not dependent on the outcome of this case.
`II.
`
`Counsel for Finjan has informed me of the following legal standards that I have used as
`
`LEGAL STANDARDS
`4.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`1
`MITZENMACHER DECL. IN SUPPORT OF FINJAN’S MSJ
`
`CASE NO. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 469-5 Filed 05/13/19 Page 2 of 42
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE
`REDACTED VERSION OF DOCUMENT SOUGHT TO BE SEALED
`a framework in forming my opinions contained herein.
`5.
`
`I have been informed that claim construction is a legal issue for the Court to decide. I
`
`understand that the Court had construed “content processor” as “a processor that processes modified
`
`content.”
`6.
`
`I have been informed that infringement is determined on a claim by claim basis. A
`
`product may infringe a claim either literally or under the doctrine of equivalents.
`7.
`
`I have been further informed that literal infringement is found if an accused product,
`
`system or method meets each and every element of a single claim. Direct infringement is found if a
`
`party, or its agents, makes, uses, sells, or offers for sale a product or system that contains all elements
`
`of a claimed system or performs all of the steps of a claimed method. I have been informed that a party
`
`can be found to use the patented system even if that party does not exercise physical or direct control
`
`over every element of the system. I have been informed that for elements that are not subject to the
`
`physical or direct control of the party, that party is still deemed to be using that component or part of
`
`the patented system where the party (i) puts the component into service – that is, the party causes it to
`
`work for its intended purpose and (ii) receives the benefit of that purpose. I have been informed that
`
`direct infringement can be found in a multinational system claim where elements of such system are
`
`located in multiple countries, when the place where control of the accused system is exercised and
`
`where beneficial use of the system is obtained are both within the United States.
`8.
`
`I have been informed that infringement under the doctrine of equivalents is found if an
`
`accused product, system or process contains parts or steps that are identical or equivalent to each and
`
`every element of a single claim. A part or step is equivalent if a person of ordinary skill in the art
`
`(“POSITA”) would conclude that, at the time of infringement, the differences between the product or
`
`method step and the claim element were not substantial. One common test to determine if the difference
`
`between a component or method step and a claim element is not substantial is to determine whether the
`
`component or step performs substantially the same function, in substantially the same way, to achieve
`
`substantially the same result.
`9.
`
`Based on review of the Asserted Patents and consideration of the abovementioned
`
`factors, it is my opinion that a person of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention of the
`
`2
`MITZENMACHER DECL. IN SUPPORT OF FINJAN’S MSJ
`
`CASE NO. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 469-5 Filed 05/13/19 Page 3 of 42
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE
`REDACTED VERSION OF DOCUMENT SOUGHT TO BE SEALED
`Asserted Patents would be someone with a bachelor’s degree in computer science or related field, and
`
`either (1) two or more years of industry experience and/or (2) an advanced degree in computer science
`
`or related field. I understand that claim 1 of the ’154 Patent claims a priority date of December 12,
`
`2005. But if the ’154 Patent is found to have another priority date it would not materially affect my
`
`analysis.
`III.
`
`SUMMARY OF DECLARATION
`10.
`
`I have been asked by counsel for Finjan to consider if Juniper infringes claim 1 of the
`
`‘154 Patent. I have assumed that claim 1 of the ’154 Patent is valid and enforceable. I have not
`
`considered damages related issues associated with this infringement.
`11.
`12.
`
`The language of claim 1 is set forth in the ’154 Patent at 17:31-44.
`
`I have been asked by counsel for Finjan to consider the following infringement scenarios
`
`with respect to claim 1 of the ’154 Patent: (1) SRX Gateways (“SRX”) by themselves, (2) Sky ATP by
`
`itself, (3) ATP Appliance by itself. My opinion on the current product features is based on the
`
`information available, including source code, release notes, Juniper’s documents, and deposition
`
`testimonies of Juniper’s employees. I have also considered the Court’s Order on Claim 1 of the ‘154
`
`Patent and applied the Court’s construction is reaching my conclusion.
`IV. OVERVIEW OF THE ’154 PATENT
`13.
`The ’154 Patent describes protecting a computer system from dynamically generated
`
`malicious content. See ’154 Patent, Abstract. Many types of documents (such as PDF, Office, HTML)
`
`allow for generating content dynamically. As one example, a document may be modified so that it is
`
`embedded with a JavaScript (“JS”) script, which is able to call a link from which to download a file. As
`
`another example, an iFrame (which is another HTML document embedded into the main HTML page)
`
`inserts external content into the main HTML page, and thereby allows for dynamically generated
`
`malicious content. As a further example, an email or a document may be modified to include an HTTP
`
`link to a site. The HTTP link by default is associated with an HTTP function (such as an HTTP GET
`
`request), which allows a computer to automatically communicate with the site hosted by the HTTP link
`
`upon the activation of the HTTP link.
`14.
`
`The ability to dynamically generate content allows malicious code to evade detection
`
`3
`MITZENMACHER DECL. IN SUPPORT OF FINJAN’S MSJ
`
`CASE NO. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 469-5 Filed 05/13/19 Page 4 of 42
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE
`REDACTED VERSION OF DOCUMENT SOUGHT TO BE SEALED
`through obfuscation. Obfuscation is a mechanism which allows malicious code to be encoded or
`
`reformatted in a string that it appears to be benign, but the encoded or reformatted string is later decoded
`
`or reformatted to generate the malicious code for execution. See ‘154 Patent at 3:31-64 (describing how
`
`dynamically generated content would result in malicious code being inserted). Obfuscation is one way
`
`in which activation of a seemingly benign link may result in malicious code being injected into a
`
`document or causing a malware to be downloaded. Dynamically generated malicious content typically
`
`comes in the form of a multi-stage attack such as a drive-by Download, or through a link on a webpage
`
`or email. Dkt. No. 369-16, FINJAN-JN 045339 at 41 (describing the mechanism of a drive-by
`Download attack); Ex. 7,1 FINJAN-JN 045326 at 29-30 (describing different ways ransomware infects a
`computing system). The dynamically generated malicious code cannot be detected by conventional
`
`reactive content inspection or gateway level analysis because the malicious code is not present in the
`
`content before runtime, which is when the malicious code is generated. ’154 Patent at 3:65-4:8. Claim
`
`1 of the ’154 Patent describes the use of a content processor to process content which includes a call to a
`
`first function and the call has an input. See id., Claim 1. The ’154 Patent also recites sending the input to
`
`a security computer for inspection. See id. Claim 1 also recites invoking a second function with the
`
`input only if a security computer indicates that it is safe to invoke the second function. Id. By utilizing
`
`“behavioral analysis technologies,” Claim 1 of the ’154 Patent allows a security system to detect “day-
`
`zero” threats which escape the detections by traditional security technologies.
`V.
`
`OVERVIEW OF THE ACCUSED PRODUCTS
`A.
`15.
`
`SRX Gateways
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 All “Ex.” citations are to the Declaration of Kristopher Kastens (“Kastens Decl.”) filed herewith.
`4
`MITZENMACHER DECL. IN SUPPORT OF FINJAN’S MSJ
`
`CASE NO. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 469-5 Filed 05/13/19 Page 5 of 42
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE
`REDACTED VERSION OF DOCUMENT SOUGHT TO BE SEALED
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`5
`MITZENMACHER DECL. IN SUPPORT OF FINJAN’S MSJ
`
`CASE NO. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 469-5 Filed 05/13/19 Page 6 of 42
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE
`REDACTED VERSION OF DOCUMENT SOUGHT TO BE SEALED
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`6
`MITZENMACHER DECL. IN SUPPORT OF FINJAN’S MSJ
`
`CASE NO. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 469-5 Filed 05/13/19 Page 7 of 42
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE
`REDACTED VERSION OF DOCUMENT SOUGHT TO BE SEALED
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`7
`MITZENMACHER DECL. IN SUPPORT OF FINJAN’S MSJ
`
`CASE NO. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 469-5 Filed 05/13/19 Page 8 of 42
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE
`REDACTED VERSION OF DOCUMENT SOUGHT TO BE SEALED
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`8
`MITZENMACHER DECL. IN SUPPORT OF FINJAN’S MSJ
`
`CASE NO. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 469-5 Filed 05/13/19 Page 9 of 42
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE
`REDACTED VERSION OF DOCUMENT SOUGHT TO BE SEALED
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`.
`
`26.
`
` The ATP Appliance will determine whether content is safe or malicious based on its
`
`processing.
`VI. ANALYSIS OF CLAIM 1 OF THE ’154 PATENT
`A.
`Overview of Juniper’s Infringement
`27.
`
`Juniper sells, builds, and tests SRX, Sky ATP, and ATP appliance in the United States.
`
`Juniper infringes Claim 1 of the ’154 Patent because SRX, Sky ATP, and ATP appliance each meets
`
`every element of the claim.
`28.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`9
`MITZENMACHER DECL. IN SUPPORT OF FINJAN’S MSJ
`
`CASE NO. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 469-5 Filed 05/13/19 Page 10 of 42
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE
`REDACTED VERSION OF DOCUMENT SOUGHT TO BE SEALED
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`10
`MITZENMACHER DECL. IN SUPPORT OF FINJAN’S MSJ
`
`CASE NO. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 469-5 Filed 05/13/19 Page 11 of 42
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE
`REDACTED VERSION OF DOCUMENT SOUGHT TO BE SEALED
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`11
`MITZENMACHER DECL. IN SUPPORT OF FINJAN’S MSJ
`
`CASE NO. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 469-5 Filed 05/13/19 Page 12 of 42
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE
`REDACTED VERSION OF DOCUMENT SOUGHT TO BE SEALED
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Preamble of Claim 1 of the ’154 Patent
`
`.
`
`The preamble of claim 1 of the ’154 Patent recites “[a] system for protecting a computer
`
`B.
`31.
`
`from dynamically generated malicious content, comprising:”. While I understand that a preamble is not
`
`typically limiting, it is my opinion that the preamble of claim 1 is met by SRX, Sky ATP, and ATP
`
`Appliance. I incorporate by reference my summary of the products for this section.
`32.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`12
`MITZENMACHER DECL. IN SUPPORT OF FINJAN’S MSJ
`
`CASE NO. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 469-5 Filed 05/13/19 Page 13 of 42
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE
`REDACTED VERSION OF DOCUMENT SOUGHT TO BE SEALED
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`13
`MITZENMACHER DECL. IN SUPPORT OF FINJAN’S MSJ
`
`CASE NO. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 469-5 Filed 05/13/19 Page 14 of 42
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE
`REDACTED VERSION OF DOCUMENT SOUGHT TO BE SEALED
`
`
`
`35.
`
`Element 1(a) of the ’154 Patent
`
`1.
`The Accused Products include “a content processor (i) for processing content received
`
`over a network, the content including a call to a first function, and the call including an input, and (ii)
`
`for invoking a second function with the input, only if a security computer indicates that such invocation
`
`is safe.” It is my opinion that SRX, Sky ATP, and ATP Appliance each includes a content processor
`
`which performs the claimed functions. I incorporate by reference my summary of the products for this
`
`section.
`
`36.
`
`a)
`
`SRX by Itself Infringes Element 1(a) of the ’154 Patent.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`14
`MITZENMACHER DECL. IN SUPPORT OF FINJAN’S MSJ
`
`CASE NO. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 469-5 Filed 05/13/19 Page 15 of 42
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE
`REDACTED VERSION OF DOCUMENT SOUGHT TO BE SEALED
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`15
`MITZENMACHER DECL. IN SUPPORT OF FINJAN’S MSJ
`
`CASE NO. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 469-5 Filed 05/13/19 Page 16 of 42
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE
`REDACTED VERSION OF DOCUMENT SOUGHT TO BE SEALED
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`16
`MITZENMACHER DECL. IN SUPPORT OF FINJAN’S MSJ
`
`CASE NO. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 469-5 Filed 05/13/19 Page 17 of 42
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE
`REDACTED VERSION OF DOCUMENT SOUGHT TO BE SEALED
`
`40.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`17
`MITZENMACHER DECL. IN SUPPORT OF FINJAN’S MSJ
`
`CASE NO. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 469-5 Filed 05/13/19 Page 18 of 42
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE
`REDACTED VERSION OF DOCUMENT SOUGHT TO BE SEALED
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`18
`MITZENMACHER DECL. IN SUPPORT OF FINJAN’S MSJ
`
`CASE NO. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 469-5 Filed 05/13/19 Page 19 of 42
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE
`REDACTED VERSION OF DOCUMENT SOUGHT TO BE SEALED
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`19
`MITZENMACHER DECL. IN SUPPORT OF FINJAN’S MSJ
`
`CASE NO. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 469-5 Filed 05/13/19 Page 20 of 42
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE
`REDACTED VERSION OF DOCUMENT SOUGHT TO BE SEALED
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`50.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`20
`MITZENMACHER DECL. IN SUPPORT OF FINJAN’S MSJ
`
`CASE NO. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 469-5 Filed 05/13/19 Page 21 of 42
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE
`REDACTED VERSION OF DOCUMENT SOUGHT TO BE SEALED
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`21
`MITZENMACHER DECL. IN SUPPORT OF FINJAN’S MSJ
`
`CASE NO. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 469-5 Filed 05/13/19 Page 22 of 42
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE
`REDACTED VERSION OF DOCUMENT SOUGHT TO BE SEALED
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`22
`MITZENMACHER DECL. IN SUPPORT OF FINJAN’S MSJ
`
`CASE NO. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 469-5 Filed 05/13/19 Page 23 of 42
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE
`REDACTED VERSION OF DOCUMENT SOUGHT TO BE SEALED
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`23
`MITZENMACHER DECL. IN SUPPORT OF FINJAN’S MSJ
`
`CASE NO. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 469-5 Filed 05/13/19 Page 24 of 42
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE
`REDACTED VERSION OF DOCUMENT SOUGHT TO BE SEALED
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`24
`MITZENMACHER DECL. IN SUPPORT OF FINJAN’S MSJ
`
`CASE NO. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 469-5 Filed 05/13/19 Page 25 of 42
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE
`REDACTED VERSION OF DOCUMENT SOUGHT TO BE SEALED
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`25
`MITZENMACHER DECL. IN SUPPORT OF FINJAN’S MSJ
`
`CASE NO. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 469-5 Filed 05/13/19 Page 26 of 42
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE
`REDACTED VERSION OF DOCUMENT SOUGHT TO BE SEALED
`
`66.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`26
`MITZENMACHER DECL. IN SUPPORT OF FINJAN’S MSJ
`
`CASE NO. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 469-5 Filed 05/13/19 Page 27 of 42
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE
`REDACTED VERSION OF DOCUMENT SOUGHT TO BE SEALED
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`27
`MITZENMACHER DECL. IN SUPPORT OF FINJAN’S MSJ
`
`CASE NO. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 469-5 Filed 05/13/19 Page 28 of 42
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE
`REDACTED VERSION OF DOCUMENT SOUGHT TO BE SEALED
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`28
`MITZENMACHER DECL. IN SUPPORT OF FINJAN’S MSJ
`
`CASE NO. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 469-5 Filed 05/13/19 Page 29 of 42
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE
`REDACTED VERSION OF DOCUMENT SOUGHT TO BE SEALED
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Element 1(b) of the ’154 Patent
`
`2.
`The Accused Products include “a transmitter for transmitting the input to the security
`
`77.
`
`computer for inspection, when the first function is invoked; and.” It is my opinion that SRX, Sky ATP,
`
`and ATP Appliance each includes a transmitter which performs the claimed functions. I incorporate by
`
`reference my summary of the products for this section.
`
`29
`MITZENMACHER DECL. IN SUPPORT OF FINJAN’S MSJ
`
`CASE NO. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 469-5 Filed 05/13/19 Page 30 of 42
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE
`REDACTED VERSION OF DOCUMENT SOUGHT TO BE SEALED
`a)
`SRX By Itself Infringes Element 1(b) of the ’154 Patent
`
`78.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`30
`MITZENMACHER DECL. IN SUPPORT OF FINJAN’S MSJ
`
`CASE NO. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 469-5 Filed 05/13/19 Page 31 of 42
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE
`REDACTED VERSION OF DOCUMENT SOUGHT TO BE SEALED
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`31
`MITZENMACHER DECL. IN SUPPORT OF FINJAN’S MSJ
`
`CASE NO. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 469-5 Filed 05/13/19 Page 32 of 42
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE
`REDACTED VERSION OF DOCUMENT SOUGHT TO BE SEALED
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`32
`MITZENMACHER DECL. IN SUPPORT OF FINJAN’S MSJ
`
`CASE NO. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`.
`
`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 469-5 Filed 05/13/19 Page 33 of 42
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE
`REDACTED VERSION OF DOCUMENT SOUGHT TO BE SEALED
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`88.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`33
`MITZENMACHER DECL. IN SUPPORT OF FINJAN’S MSJ
`
`CASE NO. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 469-5 Filed 05/13/19 Page 34 of 42
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE
`REDACTED VERSION OF DOCUMENT SOUGHT TO BE SEALED
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`34
`MITZENMACHER DECL. IN SUPPORT OF FINJAN’S MSJ
`
`CASE NO. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 469-5 Filed 05/13/19 Page 35 of 42
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE
`REDACTED VERSION OF DOCUMENT SOUGHT TO BE SEALED
`c)
`ATP Appliance By Itself Infringes Element 1(b) of the ’154 Patent
`
`
`92.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`35
`MITZENMACHER DECL. IN SUPPORT OF FINJAN’S MSJ
`
`CASE NO. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 469-5 Filed 05/13/19 Page 36 of 42
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE
`REDACTED VERSION OF DOCUMENT SOUGHT TO BE SEALED
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`36
`MITZENMACHER DECL. IN SUPPORT OF FINJAN’S MSJ
`
`CASE NO. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 469-5 Filed 05/13/19 Page 37 of 42
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE
`REDACTED VERSION OF DOCUMENT SOUGHT TO BE SEALED
`
`\
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`.
`
`3.
`Element 1(c) of the ’154 Patent
`98. The Accused Products include “a receiver for receiving an indicator from the security
`
`computer whether it is safe to invoke the second function with the input.” It is my opinion that SRX,
`
`Sky ATP, and ATP Appliance each includes a receiver which performs the claimed functions. I
`
`incorporate by reference my summary of the products for this section.
`
`a)
`
`SRX By Itself Infringes Element 1(c) of the ’154 Patent
`
`99.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`37
`MITZENMACHER DECL. IN SUPPORT OF FINJAN’S MSJ
`
`CASE NO. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 469-5 Filed 05/13/19 Page 38 of 42
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE
`REDACTED VERSION OF DOCUMENT SOUGHT TO BE SEALED
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`38
`MITZENMACHER DECL. IN SUPPORT OF FINJAN’S MSJ
`
`CASE NO. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 469-5 Filed 05/13/19 Page 39 of 42
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE
`REDACTED VERSION OF DOCUMENT SOUGHT TO BE SEALED
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`39
`MITZENMACHER DECL. IN SUPPORT OF FINJAN’S MSJ
`
`CASE NO. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 469-5 Filed 05/13/19 Page 40 of 42
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE
`REDACTED VERSION OF DOCUMENT SOUGHT TO BE SEALED
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`40
`MITZENMACHER DECL. IN SUPPORT OF FINJAN’S MSJ
`
`CASE NO. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 469-5 Filed 05/13/19 Page 41 of 42
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE
`REDACTED VERSION OF DOCUMENT SOUGHT TO BE SEALED
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`41
`MITZENMACHER DECL. IN SUPPORT OF FINJAN’S MSJ
`
`CASE NO. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 469-5 Filed 05/13/19 Page 42 of 42
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE
`REDACTED VERSION OF DOCUMENT SOUGHT TO BE SEALED
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`.
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the foregoing is true
`
`and correct. Executed on May 12, 2019 in Lexington, Massachusetts.
`
`Dr. Michael Mitzenmacher
`
`
`
`In accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this
`
`document has been obtained from any other signatory to this document.
`
`/s/ Kristopher Kastens
`Kristopher Kastens
`
`
`
`42
`MITZENMACHER DECL. IN SUPPORT OF FINJAN’S MSJ
`
`CASE NO. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`