throbber
Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 435-8 Filed 04/12/19 Page 1 of 2
`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 435-8 Filed 04/12/19 Page 1 of 2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT 5
`EXHIBIT 5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 435-8 Filed 04/12/19 Page 2 of 2
`
`Holland, Eileen
`From:
`Sent:
`To:
`
`Cc:
`
`Subject:
`
`Glucoft, Josh
`Monday, November 5, 2018 5:19 PM
`~Kastens, Kristopher; ~Andre, Paul; ~Caire, Yuridia; ~Hannah, James; ~Hedvat,
`Shannon; ~Kastens, Kristopher; ~Kobialka, Lisa; ~Lee, Hannah; ~Lee, Michael; ~Manes,
`Austin; ~Martinez, Cristina; ~Nguyen, Stephanie
`Kagan, Jonathan; Carson, Rebecca; Curran, Casey; Song, Sharon; Wang, Kevin;
`#Juniper/Finjan [Int]
`Depositions
`
`Kris,
`
` write to memorialize our call today.
`
` I
`
`
`Juniper does not at this time intend to call Mr. Marcellin or Mr. Kuznetsov at the December 10 trial, and I understand that
`Finjan does not at this time intend to call Mr. Touboul at the December 10 trial. Accordingly, we would agree to postpone
`the depositions of Mr. Marcellin, Mr. Kuznetsov, and Mr. Touboul until after the December 10 trial; please confirm.
`
`We can accept the proposed November 16 date for Mr. Kroll’s deposition at Kramer Levin. Mr. Coonan’s deposition that
`same day will take place at Juniper’s headquarters in Sunnyvale rather than at your offices, per your request. Please
`confirm Mr. Bushong’s deposition for November 15 at Juniper's headquarters by the end of tomorrow. As I mentioned,
`Mr. Bushong does not have any other availability in November due to pre-scheduled holiday and work commitments.
`
`As we agreed on our call, the parties will exchange summaries of hours/fees billed by the experts on the following
`schedule:
`•
`•
`•
`
`Bims: before his deposition
`Arst/Rubin: Nov 7 at noon
`Cole: Nov 12 at noon
`
`
`Please provide a date certain for Dr. Orso’s production, as Finjan has agreed. Relatedly, we do not believe that the expert
`engagement letters for this matter are properly considered work product; Finjan itself subpoenaed this information from
`Dr. Rubin and Dr. Ugone, and the case law is clear that this information is discoverable. We urge Finjan to reconsider its
`position. If you do not confirm that Finjan will produce its retention letters with its experts by end of day tomorrow,
`Juniper will raise this issue with the Court.
`
`Lastly, you agreed to defer until after the December 10 trial the deposition on the first 30(b)(6) topic ("Any efforts by
`Juniper to incorporate or use any technologies provided by Joe Security LLC….”). We will be designating Ms. Gupta for
`the third topic (“Development and research costs associated with each of the Accused Products”). As I noted on our call
`with regard to the second topic, Juniper does not track “[t]he total number of threats, malware, files detected, classified,
`analyzed or received by each of the Accused Products.” But if Finjan nevertheless wishes to pursue a deposition on this
`topic before the December trial, please let us know.
`
`Thanks,
`Josh
`
`
`____________________________________________________________________
`Joshua P. Glucoft | Irell & Manella LLP | 310.203.7189 | www.irell.com
`
`
`1
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket