`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 432-23 Filed 04/11/19 Page 1 of 4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT 22
`EXHIBIT 22
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 432-23 Filed 04/11/19 Page 2 of 4
`
` Pages 1 - 10
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`Before The Honorable William H. Alsup, Judge
`
`)
`FINJAN, INC.,
` )
` Plaintiff, )
` )
` VS. ) NO. CV 17-05659-WHA
` )
`JUNIPER NETWORK, INC.,
`)
` )
` Defendant.
`)
` )
`
` San Francisco, California
` Wednesday, July 18, 2018
`
`
`TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS
`
`
`APPEARANCES:
`
`For Plaintiff:
` KRAMER, LEVIN, NAFTALIS & FRANKEL LLP
` 990 Marsh Road
` Menlo Park, CA 94025
` BY: KRISTOPHER B. KASTENS, ESQUIRE
`
`
`For Defendant:
` IRELL & MANELLA LLP
` 840 Newport Center Drive - Suite 400
` Newport Beach, CA 92660
` BY: REBECCA L. CARSON, ESQUIRE
`
` IRELLA & MANELLA LLP
` 1800 Avenue of the Stars - Suite 900
` Los Angeles, CA 90024
` BY: CASEY M. CURRAN, ESQUIRE
`
`
`Reported By: Pamela A. Batalo, CSR No. 3593, RMR, FCRR
` Official Reporter
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 432-23 Filed 04/11/19 Page 3 of 4
`
` 8
`
`say you won.
`
`MS. CURRAN: Thank you, Your Honor.
`
`THE COURT: But I want to explain why you win, and
`
`that is that this document was used to refresh the memory of
`
`the witness. He said so in the deposition.
`
`Now, it's true that immediately before that, he said that
`
`his -- he had a "bright" -- I think that was the word he
`
`used -- "memory of the conversation." But that was a clever
`
`answer because yes, after you read the document, you surely
`
`would have a bright memory. That's the way I read the
`
`testimony. He didn't say, "I had a bright memory before I read
`
`the document." He said he had a bright memory and that was
`
`after he read the document. So that's number one.
`
`Now, then, number two, he was woodsheded, in my view.
`
`There was a break in the testimony, and counsel took him
`
`outside in the hallway, and he came back and said later that it
`
`didn't refresh his memory. Well, I practiced for 25 years.
`
`I've been in this job 20 years. I know exactly what happened.
`
`Counsel got out there and told him to fix his testimony.
`
`That's the way I view it. And I give very little weight to
`
`that after-the-break testimony to try to take back and fix up
`
`what actually was said. So I have been around the block and
`
`I'm not going to fall for it. So that's number one.
`
`Number two, though, is a completely different point.
`
`Ninety nine percent of this document has been produced and the
`
` 1
`
` 2
`
` 3
`
` 4
`
` 5
`
` 6
`
` 7
`
` 8
`
` 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`
`
`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 432-23 Filed 04/11/19 Page 4 of 4
`
` 9
`
`plaintiffs want to use it for their purposes, but they want to
`
`selectively withhold parts of what is -- you can't do that.
`
`Under the Rule of Completeness, the whole thing is going to be
`
`an open book, not just the 99 percent that plaintiffs want
`
`everyone to see. So that's crazy. You can't do that.
`
`So this whole document is going to be produced. I might
`
`get into whether or not -- I'm assuming for the sake of
`
`argument that it was privileged to begin with and I'm not
`
`ruling on the lateness of the log. That's a fair point, but I
`
`don't know whether you did the same thing. Maybe you got a
`
`late log yourself. So I don't want to go down that path
`
`without knowing a lot more than I know now. But it's
`
`sufficient for me to make the ruling based on the points that I
`
`have laid out.
`
`So you've got to produce the document. End of story.
`
`I'll give you until next Monday at noon to produce the
`
`document. All right.
`
`Anything more today?
`
`MS. CURRAN: I believe there's a pending motion to
`
`amend the Complaint. Finjan would like to add a patent to the
`
`case.
`
`THE COURT: Yeah. I've got to think about what to do
`
`on that. And we're going to get an order out this week telling
`
`you what the answer is on that. Okay?
`
`MR. KASTENS: Your Honor, if I could just --
`
` 1
`
` 2
`
` 3
`
` 4
`
` 5
`
` 6
`
` 7
`
` 8
`
` 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`