throbber
Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 432-23 Filed 04/11/19 Page 1 of 4
`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 432-23 Filed 04/11/19 Page 1 of 4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT 22
`EXHIBIT 22
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 432-23 Filed 04/11/19 Page 2 of 4
`
` Pages 1 - 10
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`Before The Honorable William H. Alsup, Judge
`
`)
`FINJAN, INC.,
` )
` Plaintiff, )
` )
` VS. ) NO. CV 17-05659-WHA
` )
`JUNIPER NETWORK, INC.,
`)
` )
` Defendant.
`)
` )
`
` San Francisco, California
` Wednesday, July 18, 2018
`
`
`TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS
`
`
`APPEARANCES:
`
`For Plaintiff:
` KRAMER, LEVIN, NAFTALIS & FRANKEL LLP
` 990 Marsh Road
` Menlo Park, CA 94025
` BY: KRISTOPHER B. KASTENS, ESQUIRE
`
`
`For Defendant:
` IRELL & MANELLA LLP
` 840 Newport Center Drive - Suite 400
` Newport Beach, CA 92660
` BY: REBECCA L. CARSON, ESQUIRE
`
` IRELLA & MANELLA LLP
` 1800 Avenue of the Stars - Suite 900
` Los Angeles, CA 90024
` BY: CASEY M. CURRAN, ESQUIRE
`
`
`Reported By: Pamela A. Batalo, CSR No. 3593, RMR, FCRR
` Official Reporter
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 432-23 Filed 04/11/19 Page 3 of 4
`
` 8
`
`say you won.
`
`MS. CURRAN: Thank you, Your Honor.
`
`THE COURT: But I want to explain why you win, and
`
`that is that this document was used to refresh the memory of
`
`the witness. He said so in the deposition.
`
`Now, it's true that immediately before that, he said that
`
`his -- he had a "bright" -- I think that was the word he
`
`used -- "memory of the conversation." But that was a clever
`
`answer because yes, after you read the document, you surely
`
`would have a bright memory. That's the way I read the
`
`testimony. He didn't say, "I had a bright memory before I read
`
`the document." He said he had a bright memory and that was
`
`after he read the document. So that's number one.
`
`Now, then, number two, he was woodsheded, in my view.
`
`There was a break in the testimony, and counsel took him
`
`outside in the hallway, and he came back and said later that it
`
`didn't refresh his memory. Well, I practiced for 25 years.
`
`I've been in this job 20 years. I know exactly what happened.
`
`Counsel got out there and told him to fix his testimony.
`
`That's the way I view it. And I give very little weight to
`
`that after-the-break testimony to try to take back and fix up
`
`what actually was said. So I have been around the block and
`
`I'm not going to fall for it. So that's number one.
`
`Number two, though, is a completely different point.
`
`Ninety nine percent of this document has been produced and the
`
` 1
`
` 2
`
` 3
`
` 4
`
` 5
`
` 6
`
` 7
`
` 8
`
` 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 432-23 Filed 04/11/19 Page 4 of 4
`
` 9
`
`plaintiffs want to use it for their purposes, but they want to
`
`selectively withhold parts of what is -- you can't do that.
`
`Under the Rule of Completeness, the whole thing is going to be
`
`an open book, not just the 99 percent that plaintiffs want
`
`everyone to see. So that's crazy. You can't do that.
`
`So this whole document is going to be produced. I might
`
`get into whether or not -- I'm assuming for the sake of
`
`argument that it was privileged to begin with and I'm not
`
`ruling on the lateness of the log. That's a fair point, but I
`
`don't know whether you did the same thing. Maybe you got a
`
`late log yourself. So I don't want to go down that path
`
`without knowing a lot more than I know now. But it's
`
`sufficient for me to make the ruling based on the points that I
`
`have laid out.
`
`So you've got to produce the document. End of story.
`
`I'll give you until next Monday at noon to produce the
`
`document. All right.
`
`Anything more today?
`
`MS. CURRAN: I believe there's a pending motion to
`
`amend the Complaint. Finjan would like to add a patent to the
`
`case.
`
`THE COURT: Yeah. I've got to think about what to do
`
`on that. And we're going to get an order out this week telling
`
`you what the answer is on that. Okay?
`
`MR. KASTENS: Your Honor, if I could just --
`
` 1
`
` 2
`
` 3
`
` 4
`
` 5
`
` 6
`
` 7
`
` 8
`
` 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket