throbber
Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 408-5 Filed 03/28/19 Page 1 of 9
`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 408-5 Filed 03/28/19 Page 1 of 9
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT C
`EXHIBIT C
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 408-5 Filed 03/28/19 Page 2 of 9
`
`
`
`PAUL ANDRE (State Bar No. 196585)
`pandre@kramerlevin.com
`LISA KOBIALKA (State Bar No. 191404)
`lkobialka@kramerlevin.com
`JAMES HANNAH (State Bar No. 237978)
`jhannah@kramerlevin.com
`KRISTOPHER KASTENS (State Bar No. 254797)
`kkastens@kramerlevin.com
`KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS & FRANKEL LLP
`990 Marsh Road
`Menlo Park, CA 94025
`Telephone: (650) 752-1700
`Facsimile: (650) 752-1800
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`FINJAN, INC.
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`SAN FRANCICO DIVISION
`
`FINJAN, INC., a Delaware Corporation,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`
`JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC., a Delaware
`Corporation,
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No.: 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`
`PLAINTIFF FINJAN, INC.’S FIRST SET
`OF REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF
`DOCUMENTS TO DEFENDANT
`JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC. (NOS. 1-60)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`FINJAN’S FIRST SET OF REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION
`OF DOCUMENTS TO JUNIPER NETWORKS (NOS. 1–60)
`
`CASE NO. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 408-5 Filed 03/28/19 Page 3 of 9
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`Plaintiff Finjan, Inc. (“Finjan”), by counsel, and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
`
`33, hereby requests that Defendant Juniper Networks Inc. (“Juniper”) produce the following
`
`documents for inspection and copying within thirty (30) days of the date of service of these requests at
`
`the offices of Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, 990 Marsh Road in Menlo Park, California
`
`94025, in accordance with the following Definitions and Instructions. These requests impose a
`
`continuing duty upon Juniper to supplement promptly in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil
`
`Procedure 26(e) and the Local Rules of the Northern District of California as Juniper becomes aware
`
`of, generates, or acquires additional knowledge or information responsive to these requests.
`
`DEFINITIONS
`
`1.
`
`The terms “You,” “Your,” and “Defendant” shall mean Juniper Networks Inc., Your
`
`present and former directors, officers, employees, parent organization(s), subsidiary organization(s),
`
`predecessors in interest, successors in interest, divisions, servants, agents, attorneys, consultants,
`
`partners, associates, investigators, representatives, accountants, financial advisors, distributors and any
`
`other person acting on Your behalf, pursuant to Your authority or subject to Your control, including
`
`any and all joint ventures or other legal entities of any type whatsoever in which You own or owned
`
`any interest, receive or received any payments, and/or participated or now participate in any manner.
`
`2.
`
`The term “Finjan” shall mean Finjan, its present and former directors, officers,
`
`employees, parent organization(s), subsidiary organization(s), predecessors in interest, successors in
`
`interest, divisions, servants, agents, attorneys, consultants, partners, associates, investigators,
`
`representatives, accountants, financial advisors, distributors and any other person acting on its behalf,
`
`pursuant to its authority or subject to its control.
`
`3.
`
`The term “third party” shall mean any person or entity other than Finjan or Defendant.
`
`4.
`case, filed on September 29, 2017, and any subsequently filed amended complaints. See Dkt. No. 1.
`
`The term “Complaint” shall refer to Finjan’s Complaint for Patent Infringement in this
`
`5.
`
`The term “Asserted Patents” shall mean U.S. Patent Nos.: 6,154,844 (“the ‘844
`
`Patent”); 6,804,780 (“the ‘780 Patent”), 7,613,926 (“the ‘926 Patent”); 7,613,633 (“the ‘633 Patent”);
`
`8,141,154 (“the ‘154 Patent”), and 8,677,494 (“the ‘494 Patent”), collectively.
`
`1
`FINJAN’S FIRST SET OF REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION
`OF DOCUMENTS TO JUNIPER NETWORKS (NOS. 1–60)
`
`CASE NO. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 408-5 Filed 03/28/19 Page 4 of 9
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`6.
`
`The term “Accused Instrumentalities” shall include the following Juniper products and
`
`services: Defendant’s SRX Gateways including the: SRX110; SRX220; SRX300; SRX550; SRX1400;
`
`SRX1500; SRX3400; SRX3600; SRX4000; SRX5400; SRX5600; and SRX5800 gateway appliances,
`
`as well as the vSRX Virtual Firewall and cSRX Container Firewall (collectively, “SRX Gateways”) as
`
`described in the Complaint, including but not limited to at Exhibit 9 and paragraphs 43-52;
`
`Defendant’s Sky Advanced Threat Protection or “Sky ATP” and Advanced Threat Protection
`
`Appliance, as described in the Complaint, including but not limited to at Exhibit 10 and paragraphs 43-
`
`52; Defendant’s Junos Space Security Director, as described in the Complaint, including but not
`
`limited to at Exhibit 16 and paragraphs 43-52; and Defendant’s Contrail, as described in the
`
`Complaint, including but not limited to at Exhibit 17 and paragraphs 43-52. The term “Accused
`
`Instrumentalities” shall also include any and all previous or currently contemplated versions, revisions,
`
`releases, or continuations of said Juniper products and services, and all additional products accused of
`
`infringement by Finjan in this action in infringement contentions or similar pleadings.
`
`7.
`
`The term “person” or “entity” shall refer to any individual, corporation, proprietorship,
`
`association, joint venture, company, partnership, or other business or legal entity, including
`
`governmental bodies and agencies. The masculine includes the feminine and vice versa; the singular
`
`includes the plural and vice versa.
`
`8.
`
`The term “document(s)” shall have the broadest meaning ascribed to it by Federal Rule
`
`of Civil Procedure 34 and Federal Rule of Evidence 1001, and shall include within its meaning any and
`
`all papers, videotapes or video recordings, photographs, films, recordings, memoranda, books, records,
`
`accounts, letters, telegrams, correspondence, notes of meetings, notes of conversations, notes of
`
`telephone calls, inter-office memoranda or written communications of any nature, recordings of
`
`conversations either in writing or by means of any mechanical or electrical recording device, notes,
`
`papers, reports, analyses, invoices, canceled checks or check stubs, receipts, minutes of meetings, time
`
`sheets, diaries, desk calendars, ledgers, schedules, licenses, financial statements, telephone bills, logs,
`
`and any differing versions of the foregoing whether denominated formal, informal, or otherwise, as
`
`well as copies of the foregoing which differ in any way, including handwritten notations or other
`
`2
`FINJAN’S FIRST SET OF REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION
`OF DOCUMENTS TO JUNIPER NETWORKS (NOS. 1–60)
`
`CASE NO. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 408-5 Filed 03/28/19 Page 5 of 9
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`written or printed matter of any nature, from the original. The foregoing specifically includes the
`
`information stored in any form, including electronic form, on a computer or in a computer database or
`
`otherwise, including electronic mail. Moreover, the term “document” shall also include all “technical
`
`documents,” such as source code, specifications, schematics, flow charts, artwork, drawings, pictures,
`
`pictorial representations, formulas, troubleshooting guides, service bulletins, technical bulletins,
`
`production specification sheets, white papers, operator manuals, operation manuals, and instruction
`
`manuals.
`
`9.
`
`The term “communication” shall mean, including its usual and customary meaning, any
`
`transmission, conveyance or exchange of a word, statement, fact, thing, idea, document, instruction,
`
`information, demand, or question by any medium, whether by written, oral, or other means, including,
`
`but not limited to, electronic communications and electronic mail.
`
`10.
`
`11.
`
`The term “thing” shall mean any tangible object, other than a document.
`
`The terms “relate to,” “reflecting,” “relating to,” “concerning,” or any variations
`
`thereof, shall mean relating to, referring to, concerning, mentioning, reflecting, regarding, pertaining
`
`to, evidencing, involving, describing, discussing, commenting on, embodying, responding to,
`
`supporting, contradicting, or constituting (in whole or in part), or are between (as in the context of
`
`communications), as the context makes appropriate.
`
`12.
`
`13.
`
`The term “including” shall mean including but not by way of limitation.
`
`The words “and” and “or” shall be construed conjunctively or disjunctively in a manner
`
`making the request inclusive rather than exclusive.
`
`14.
`
`15.
`
`The term “any” shall mean “any and all” and the term “all” shall mean “any and all.”
`
`The singular of any word or phrase shall include the plural of such word or phrase, and
`
`the plural of any word or phrase shall include the singular of such word or phrase.
`
`INSTRUCTIONS
`
`1.
`
`In answering the following requests, please furnish all available information including
`
`information in the possession, custody, or control of any of Defendant’s attorneys, directors, officers,
`
`agents, employees, representatives, associates, investigators, divisions, affiliates, partnerships, parents,
`
`3
`FINJAN’S FIRST SET OF REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION
`OF DOCUMENTS TO JUNIPER NETWORKS (NOS. 1–60)
`
`CASE NO. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 408-5 Filed 03/28/19 Page 6 of 9
`
`
`
`REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 33:
`
`Documents, communications, or things sufficient to show the process by which You detect new
`
`malware or security threats or update the Accused Instrumentalities.
`
`REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 34:
`
`Documents, communications, or things sufficient to show the location where the Accused
`
`Instrumentalities are developed, tested, manufactured, distributed, sold, updated and imported.
`
`REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 35:
`
`Documents, communications, or things sufficient to show the operation, functionality, design,
`
`development, testing, manufacturing, distribution, sale, updating and import of SRX Gateways (as
`
`described in Finjan’s Complaint, including at Exhibit 9).
`
`REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 36:
`
`Documents, communications, or things sufficient to show the operation, functionality, design,
`
`development, testing, manufacturing, distribution, sale, updating and import of Sky Advanced Threat
`
`Protection (as described in Finjan’s Complaint, including at Exhibit 10).
`
`REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 37:
`
`Documents, communications, or things sufficient to show the operation, functionality, design,
`
`development, testing, manufacturing, distribution, sale, updating and import of the malware inspection
`
`pipeline in Sky Advanced Threat Protection (as described in Finjan’s Complaint, including at Exhibit
`
`10).
`
`REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 38:
`
`Documents, communications, or things sufficient to show the operation, functionality, design,
`
`development, testing, manufacturing, distribution, sale, updating and import of dynamic analysis
`
`performed by the Sky Advanced Threat Protection (as described in Finjan’s Complaint, including at
`
`Exhibit 10).
`
`10
`FINJAN’S FIRST SET OF REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION
`OF DOCUMENTS TO JUNIPER NETWORKS (NOS. 1–60)
`
`CASE NO. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 408-5 Filed 03/28/19 Page 7 of 9
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 39:
`
`Documents, communications, or things sufficient to show the operation, functionality, design,
`
`development, testing, manufacturing, distribution, sale, updating and import of static analysis performed
`
`by the Sky Advanced Threat Protection (as described in Finjan’s Complaint, including at Exhibit 10).
`
`REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 40:
`
`Documents, communications, or things sufficient to show the operation, functionality, design,
`
`development, testing, manufacturing, distribution, sale, updating and import of the cache in the malware
`
`inspection pipeline of the Sky Advanced Threat Protection (as described in Finjan’s Complaint,
`
`including at Exhibit 10).
`
`REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 41:
`
`Documents, communications, or things sufficient to show the operation, functionality, design,
`
`development, testing, manufacturing, distribution, sale, updating and import of Junos Space Security
`
`Director (as described in Finjan’s Complaint, including at Exhibit 16).
`
`REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 42:
`
`Documents, communications, or things sufficient to show to the operation, functionality,
`
`design, development, testing, manufacturing, distribution, sale, updating and import of Contrail (as
`
`described in Finjan’s Complaint, including at Exhibit 17).
`
`REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 43:
`
`Documents, communications, or things sufficient to show Your organizational structure with
`
`respect to research, development, engineering, manufacture, assembly, testing, marketing, distribution,
`
`sale, licensing, updating and importation of each of the Accused Instrumentalities, including
`
`organizational charts.
`
`REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 44:
`
`All documents, communications, or things relating to the instant litigation.
`
`REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 45:
`
`All documents, communications, or things on which You intend to rely in support of or
`
`opposition to any claim or defense in this litigation.
`
`11
`FINJAN’S FIRST SET OF REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION
`OF DOCUMENTS TO JUNIPER NETWORKS (NOS. 1–60)
`
`CASE NO. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 408-5 Filed 03/28/19 Page 8 of 9
`
`
`
`REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 60:
`
`Documents, communications, or things sufficient to show any of Your business plans within
`
`the past six (6) years.
`
`
`
`
`Dated: February 23, 2018
`
`
`By: /s/ Kristopher Kastens
`
`
`Paul J. Andre (State Bar. No. 196585)
`Lisa Kobialka (State Bar No. 191404)
`James Hannah (State Bar No. 237978)
`Kristopher Kastens (State Bar No. 254797)
`KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS
`& FRANKEL LLP
`990 Marsh Road
`Menlo Park, CA 94025
`Telephone: (650) 752-1700
`Facsimile: (650) 752-1800
`pandre@kramerlevin.com
`lkobialka@kramerlevin.com
`jhannah@kramerlevin.com
`kkastens@kramerlevin.com
`
`
`
`
`
`14
`FINJAN’S FIRST SET OF REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION
`OF DOCUMENTS TO JUNIPER NETWORKS (NOS. 1–60)
`
`CASE NO. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 408-5 Filed 03/28/19 Page 9 of 9
`
`
`
`PROOF OF SERVICE
`
`I, Steven D. Dennison, am employed in the Menlo Park, California office of Kramer Levin
`
`Naftalis & Frankel LLP. I am over the age of 18 and not a party to the within action. My business
`
`address is 990 Marsh Road, Menlo Park, California 94025. I am readily familiar with the firm’s
`
`practice of collecting and processing of mail for mailing with the U.S. Postal Service and overnight
`
`delivery services.
`
`On February 23, 2018, I caused the following document(s) to be served:
`
`PLAINTIFF FINJAN, INC.’S FIRST SET OF REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF
`DOCUMENTS TO DEFENDANT JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC. (NOS. 1-60)
`
`
`by electronic mail, addressed as follows:
`
`
`Joshua Popik Glucoft
`Irell & Manella LLP
`1800 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 900
`Los Angeles, CA 90067
`jglucoft@irell.com
`
`
`Rebecca Lyn Carson
`Nima Hefazi
`Irell & Manella LLP
`840 Newport Center Dr., Suite 400
`Newport Beach, CA 92660
`rclifford@irell.com
`nhefazi@irell.com
`
`
`
`
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on February
`
`23, 2018, in Menlo Park, California.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`__________________________
` Steven D. Dennison
`
`
`
`15
`FINJAN’S FIRST SET OF REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION
`OF DOCUMENTS TO JUNIPER NETWORKS (NOS. 1–60)
`
`CASE NO. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket