throbber
Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 364-1 Filed 01/31/19 Page 1 of 4
`
`
`
`PAUL J. ANDRE (State Bar No. 196585)
`pandre@kramerlevin.com
`LISA KOBIALKA (State Bar No. 191404)
`lkobialka@kramerlevin.com
`JAMES HANNAH (State Bar No. 237978)
`jhannah@kramerlevin.com
`KRISTOPHER KASTENS (State Bar No. 254797)
`kkastens@kramerlevin.com
`KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS & FRANKEL LLP
`990 Marsh Road
`Menlo Park, CA 94025
`Telephone: (650) 752-1700
`Facsimile: (650) 752-1800
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`FINJAN, INC.
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
`
`FINJAN, INC., a Delaware Corporation,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`
`JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC., a Delaware
`Corporation,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`Case No.: 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`DECLARATION OF AUSTIN MANES IN
`SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF FINJAN, INC.’S
`ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE
`DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`MANES DECL. IN SUPPORT OF FINJAN’S
`ADMIN. MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
`
`CASE NO.: 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 364-1 Filed 01/31/19 Page 2 of 4
`
`
`
`I, Austin Manes, declare:
`1.
`2.
`
`I have personal knowledge of the facts stated herein.
`
`I am an attorney at Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, counsel of record for Finjan,
`
`Inc. (“Finjan”). I make this declaration in support of Plaintiff Finjan, Inc.’s Reply in Support of its
`
`Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 50(b); Motion for New
`
`Trial under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59; and Motion for Certification for Immediate Appeal in the Alternative,
`
`pursuant to Civil Local Rules 79-5(d)-(e).
`3.
`
`I have reviewed the following documents and confirmed that they contain information
`
`designated as “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” or “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes
`
`Only – Source Code” by Juniper pursuant to the stipulated protective order in this litigation.
`
`
`
`Identification of Documents to be Sealed
`
`Entity that Designated the
`Information to be
`Confidential
`
`Juniper
`
`Juniper
`
`Plaintiff Finjan, Inc.’s Reply in Support of its Renewed
`Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law Pursuant to Fed. R.
`Civ. P. 50(b); Motion for New Trial under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59;
`and Motion for Certification for Immediate Appeal in the
`Alternative, at the following page:line numbers: 4:22-24; 5:3-
`4; and 6:17-18.
`
`
`Exhibits 2 and 5-7 to the Kastens Declaration filed in support
`of Plaintiff Finjan, Inc.’s Reply in Support of its Renewed
`Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law Pursuant to Fed. R.
`Civ. P. 50(b); Motion for New Trial under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59;
`and Motion for Certification for Immediate Appeal in the
`Alternative
`4.
`This Administrative Motion to File Documents Under Seal should be granted because
`
`good cause and compelling reasons exist to seal the documents identified above. Finjan seeks to seal
`
`only those documents and portions of documents that Juniper identified as containing confidential
`
`information pursuant to the Protective Order.
`5.
`
`Finjan seeks to seal Plaintiff Finjan, Inc.’s Reply in Support of its Renewed Motion for
`
`Judgement as a Matter of Law Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 50(b); Motion for New Trial under Fed. R.
`
`MANES DECL. IN SUPPORT OF FINJAN’S
`ADMIN. MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
`
`1
`
`CASE NO.: 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 364-1 Filed 01/31/19 Page 3 of 4
`
`
`
`Civ. P. 59; and Motion for Certification for Immediate Appeal in the Alternative at the following
`
`page:line numbers: 4:22-24; 5:3-4; and 6:17-18, and Exhibits 2 and 5-7 to the Kastens Declaration filed
`
`in support of the same, because these portions contain descriptions or quotes from Juniper’s technical
`
`documents or source code, or Juniper’s financial and sales information, the public disclosure of which
`
`Juniper claims could harm its business.
`6.
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that
`
`each of the above statements is true and corrected. Executed on January 31, 2019, in Menlo Park,
`
`California.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By: /s/ Austin Manes
`Austin Manes
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`MANES DECL. IN SUPPORT OF FINJAN’S
`ADMIN. MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
`
`2
`
`CASE NO.: 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 364-1 Filed 01/31/19 Page 4 of 4
`
`
`
`ATTESTATION
`
`Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i), the filer attests that concurrence in the filing of this
`
`document has been obtained from the signatories above.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Lisa Kolbialka
`Lisa Kobialka
`
`
`
`MANES DECL. IN SUPPORT OF FINJAN’S
`ADMIN. MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
`
`3
`
`CASE NO.: 3:17-cv-05659-WHA
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket