throbber
Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 360-4 Filed 01/24/19 Page 1 of 2
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit 3
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 360-4 Filed 01/24/19 Page 2 of 2
`
`From:
`Sent:
`To:
`Cc:
`
`Subject:
`
`Kastens, Kris <KKastens@KRAMERLEVIN.com>
`Friday, March 30, 2018 10:05 AM
`Glucoft, Josh
`~Andre, Paul; ~Kobialka, Lisa; ~Hannah, James; Kagan, Jonathan; Carson, Rebecca;
`Wang, Kevin; Holland, Eileen; ~Manes, Austin; Curran, Casey; ~Manes, Austin; ~Lee,
`Michael
`RE: Meet and Confer
`
`Josh,
`We are available Tuesday afternoon to meet and confer. We suggest 3PM. You can reach me on my office line.
`
`
`To make sure there is no confusion, Finjan will meet and confer on the following topics:
`•
`Juniper’s failure to produce any confidential technical documents in the case, as outlined in my March 26 email.
`•
`Juniper’s failure to provide all relevant source code, and other issues with the source code I outlined in my
`March 26 email.
`Juniper’s refusal to produce material related to ATP Appliance or Spotlight Secure.
`Juniper’s request to deviate from the Court’s Order and to delay claim construction.
`
`•
`•
`
`
`
`Regarding Finjan’s production of materials confidential to third parties, as you are aware, we have been contacting
`multiple third parties daily. We have CCed you on those emails for Juniper. We will also start CCing Casey Curran as
`well, as from her recent correspondence she does not seem to be aware of the status of these negotiations.
`
`Contrary to our previous discussions, Juniper finally has agreed to the following narrowing of its document requests that
`impact third party confidential information as follows:
`
`
`Juniper is not seeking the following at this time: the Other Defendants’ discovery responses or any information or
`documentation produced by the Other Defendants in response to an interrogatory, RFP, or RFA; or deposition
`transcripts of employees of the Other Defendants. At this time, confidential infringement contentions and other
`documents that bear source code of the Other Defendants may be redacted to the extent that they contain
`information designated as “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE.”
`
`
`
`We will inform those parties impacted by the narrowing of your requests. Based on past experience, we anticipate that
`even this is likely to draw objections from those third parties because of the breadth of Juniper’s requests. Finjan
`requests a succinct list of material that Juniper is requesting. Let us know if you can provide such a list that we can
`provide to impacted third parties. Furthermore, we would like to note that we do not see how any of this material will
`be relevant to the “shootout.” As envisioned by the Court, this procedure will focus on infringement by Juniper, which
`will be based on Juniper’s products and the patents.
`
`
`Sincerely,
`Kris
`
`
`
`
`Kris Kastens
`Associate
`
`
`Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
`
`1
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket