throbber
Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 358-3 Filed 01/24/19 Page 1 of 7
`

`

`

`

`

`

`
`Exhibit 3
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 358-3 Filed 01/24/19 Page 2 of 7
`
`Case Clip(s) Detailed Report
`Wednesday, December 12, 2018, 7:46:00 AM
`
`Finjan v. Juniper
`
`Coonan, Scott (Vol. 01) - 11/16/2018
`1 CLIP (RUNNING 00:15:12.743)
`
`Plaintiff's Deposition Designations for Scott Coonan - with Juniper's Counters and Finjan's Counters
`(11-16-18)
`
`43 SEGMENTS (RUNNING 00:15:12.743)
`SC1116-CC
`1. PAGE 7:03 TO 7:15 (RUNNING 00:00:24.427)
` 03 SCOTT JAMES COONAN,
` 04 the witness herein, having been first duly sworn, was
` 05 examined and testified as follows:
` 06 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Please proceed, Counsel.
` 07 EXAMINATION
` 08 BY MR. LEE:
` 09 Q Please state your full name.
` 10 A Scott James Coonan.
` 11 Q And where do you work?
` 12 A At Juniper Networks in Sunnyvale, California.
` 13 Q What is your position?
` 14 A I am the senior director of IP litigation and
` 15 strategy.
`2. PAGE 7:16 TO 7:22 (RUNNING 00:00:30.506)
` 16 Q What are your responsibilities?
` 17 A Besides the ones that are self-evident from
` 18 the title? I largely -- I manage all IP litigation and
` 19 some non-IP litigation, principally. I also support the
` 20 commercial function in negotiating various terms of
` 21 equipment sales to our customers. Those are my
` 22 principal responsibilities.
`3. PAGE 25:23 TO 26:01 (RUNNING 00:00:12.610)
` 23 Q Have you heard the SRX series?
` 24 A I'm familiar with the -- the product, yes.
` 25 Q Does Juniper's SRX products use anything from
` 00026:01 NetScreen?
`4. PAGE 26:03 TO 26:03 (RUNNING 00:00:01.981)
` 03 A I don't know.
`5. PAGE 26:08 TO 26:10 (RUNNING 00:00:06.368)
` 08 Did you previously say that there are some
` 09 Juniper firewall products that use technology from
` 10 NetScreen?
`6. PAGE 26:12 TO 26:20 (RUNNING 00:00:29.933)
` 12 A I said I wasn't comfortable saying whether a
` 13 particular product used NetScreen technology or did not.
` 14 What I then said in a subsequent question was that I was
` 15 fairly certain that when the transaction took place
` 16 between NetScreen and Juniper, that NetScreen had
` 17 firewall and VPN products.
` 18 Q Can you be more specific in what the names of
` 19 these products are?
` 20 A No.
`7. PAGE 26:21 TO 26:22 (RUNNING 00:00:04.660)
` 21 Q Can you name any of Juniper's firewall or VPN
`
`CONFIDENTIAL
`
`page 1
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 358-3 Filed 01/24/19 Page 3 of 7
`
`Case Clip(s) Detailed Report
`Wednesday, December 12, 2018, 7:46:00 AM
`
`Finjan v. Juniper
`
` 22 products?
`8. PAGE 26:24 TO 27:04 (RUNNING 00:00:18.811)
` 24 A SRX is a firewall product. I don't know how
` 25 much of it, if any, was derived from the NetScreen
` 00027:01 products.
` 02 Q When was this transaction made?
` 03 A I believe it was somewhere around April of
` 04 2004.
`9. PAGE 29:01 TO 29:04 (RUNNING 00:00:09.228)
` 00029:01 Q You mentioned that Juniper acquired NetScreen
` 02 to get into the security business?
` 03 A Yes.
` 04 Q Can you elaborate what do you mean by that?
`10. PAGE 29:06 TO 29:17 (RUNNING 00:01:00.515)
` 06 A Well, Juniper -- Juniper was founded as an
` 07 alternative to Cisco in the networking space. And when
` 08 it was initially founded, we only sold routers. As we
` 09 grew up and became more of a real company and not just a
` 10 startup, people felt like we needed to have a more --
` 11 this is the way the story has been told to me -- a
` 12 broader offering. And we were not in the security
` 13 business at the time, and that was a logical next step
` 14 because, you know, in addition to building network --
` 15 the network, it's logical to want to make the network
` 16 safe from intrusion. So that was a -- a logical next
` 17 step for us to offer a security set of products.
`11. PAGE 127:01 TO 127:04 (RUNNING 00:00:24.090)
` 00127:01 Q You've been handed an exhibit marked as
` 02 Exhibit 7. Exhibit 7 is -- has the heading of
` 03 "Transcript." It's Bates labeled
` 04 JNPR-FNJN_29011_00960575 to 0591.
`12. PAGE 128:06 TO 128:17 (RUNNING 00:00:40.577)
` 06 Q Do you have Exhibit 7 in front of you?
` 07 A Yes.
` 08 Q Do you have any understanding of what is
` 09 Exhibit 7?
` 10 A I do.
` 11 Q And what is Exhibit 7?
` 12 A This is a transcribed version of -- of the
` 13 phone call that I had with Mr. Garland in November --
` 14 November 2015 time frame.
` 15 Q Is the call with Mr. Garland on November 24th,
` 16 2015?
` 17 A That sounds about right.
`13. PAGE 130:20 TO 130:23 (RUNNING 00:00:18.391)
` 20 Q Did you create the audio file?
` 21 A Yes.
` 22 Q How did you create this audio file?
` 23 A Using the voice memo feature on my iPhone.
`14. PAGE 130:24 TO 131:02 (RUNNING 00:00:09.796)
` 24 Q During your November 24th, 2015, call with
` 25 Mr. Garland, did you ever inform him that you were
` 00131:01 recording the call?
` 02 A I did not.
`
`CONFIDENTIAL
`
`page 2
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 358-3 Filed 01/24/19 Page 4 of 7
`
`Case Clip(s) Detailed Report
`Wednesday, December 12, 2018, 7:46:00 AM
`
`Finjan v. Juniper
`
`15. PAGE 131:05 TO 131:14 (RUNNING 00:00:46.594)
` 05 Q Can you provide any reason why you didn't
` 06 inform him that you were recording the call?
` 07 A The reason I decided to record the call was to
` 08 protect myself because I had become aware that -- that
` 09 certain mischaracterizations of events during the
` 10 negotiations had taken place, and I wanted to make sure
` 11 that didn't happen again, and I wanted to make sure that
` 12 the truth was going to be told accurately. To advise
` 13 him of the recording would have, you know, eviscerated
` 14 that protection, would have made it meaningless.
`16. PAGE 133:14 TO 133:15 (RUNNING 00:00:10.254)
` 14 Q So during your November 24th call with
` 15 Mr. Garland, Sky ATP was never discussed?
`17. PAGE 133:16 TO 133:21 (RUNNING 00:00:20.523)
` 16 A Correct.
` 17 Q But SRX was discussed?
` 18 A We mentioned SRX on a few occasions, yes.
` 19 Q Did you and Mr. Garland discuss any other
` 20 Juniper products other than Juniper's SRX product during
` 21 your November 24th call?
`18. PAGE 133:23 TO 133:24 (RUNNING 00:00:04.315)
` 23 A My recollection is -- can I take a moment to
` 24 look through this?
`19. PAGE 133:25 TO 134:01 (RUNNING 00:00:05.020)
` 25 Q Sure. Are you looking for something in
` 00134:01 particular?
`20. PAGE 134:02 TO 134:03 (RUNNING 00:00:10.593)
` 02 A So at the bottom of 577, he's talking about
` 03 next-generation firewalls, UTM, your antivirus, your --
`21. PAGE 134:04 TO 134:05 (RUNNING 00:00:13.442)
` 04 with filtering. So modules that, when we think of
` 05 modules, we think of SRX as a module-based product.
`22. PAGE 134:06 TO 134:09 (RUNNING 00:00:19.062)
` 06 So in my view, there was nothing that was
` 07 either expressly mentioning Sky ATP, nor by implication,
` 08 in my view, mentioning Sky ATP or things that would
` 09 implicate Sky ATP.
`23. PAGE 141:18 TO 141:19 (RUNNING 00:00:08.230)
` 18 Q And why did you not inform him that you were
` 19 recording the call?
`24. PAGE 141:21 TO 142:03 (RUNNING 00:00:34.078)
` 21 A Well, I was comfortable that what I was doing
` 22 was legal. I was located in North Carolina, which is a
` 23 one-party consent state. I had ascertained
` 24 Mr. Garland's location earlier as being on the East
` 25 Coast. It's a -- that's the majority approach. And
` 00142:01 since I was comfortable that I was doing something
` 02 legal, I didn't feel that it was necessary to disclose
` 03 it.
`
`CONFIDENTIAL
`
`page 3
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 358-3 Filed 01/24/19 Page 5 of 7
`
`Case Clip(s) Detailed Report
`Wednesday, December 12, 2018, 7:46:00 AM
`
`Finjan v. Juniper
`
`25. PAGE 145:01 TO 145:22 (RUNNING 00:01:24.615)
` 00145:01 Q What is it about this particular call with
` 02 Mr. Garland on November 24th, 2015, that you decided
` 03 that it needed to be recorded?
` 04 A Well, maybe I -- I've led a charmed life, but
` 05 it's not often that you are dealing with a party that
` 06 you know in advance going into a particular conversation
` 07 that that person is probably not going to be entirely
` 08 truthful. I had that insight. I couldn't ignore that.
` 09 I couldn't take that away as a fact that operated in the
` 10 background of this case.
` 11 Since we were going to be talking about a very
` 12 important topic, something Juniper takes very seriously,
` 13 but that could ultimately, you know, result in the
` 14 payment of, you know, large sums of money, I felt like
` 15 the facts needed to be accurate and that I needed to be
` 16 able to rely on those facts. And so I chose to -- to
` 17 record it because I had that information ahead of time.
` 18 And I think I would, you know -- was just looking out
` 19 for the situation where, you know, there was no
` 20 recording, and I said that he said one thing, and he
` 21 said that he said another, and then I would know that I
` 22 was right, but I'd have no way of proving it.
`26. PAGE 147:11 TO 147:14 (RUNNING 00:00:13.871)
` 11 Q So you recorded the call between you and
` 12 Mr. Garland on November 24th, 2015, because he was
` 13 untruthful about saying that you reneged on the offer
` 14 for the PAN litigation?
`27. PAGE 147:16 TO 147:23 (RUNNING 00:00:19.938)
` 16 Q Is that correct?
` 17 A That's the -- that's the main reason.
` 18 Q Any other reason?
` 19 A The -- the fact that there were two different
` 20 instances involving, you know, fairly senior people at
` 21 the same company getting the same fact -- taking the
` 22 same fact and twisting it in a different way, both of
` 23 them incorrect.
`28. PAGE 155:15 TO 156:06 (RUNNING 00:01:01.134)
` 15 Q You said that you started recording this after
` 16 you and Mr. Garland already started speaking, correct?
` 17 A Yes.
` 18 Q Why did you decide to -- to -- to start
` 19 recording partway into your conversation with
` 20 Mr. Garland?
` 21 A It wasn't a -- it wasn't a conscious decision
` 22 to start it late. I was doing a lot of things. I was
` 23 in my -- in my home office. I was juggling -- I can't
` 24 recall whether I was on two phones or one phone. I had
` 25 my notepad. I had, you know, a pen, and I was trying to
` 00156:01 just start the call and be on time for the call. So
` 02 just a lot of things going on. I might have -- we
` 03 might -- I can't recall whether I sent him or he sent me
` 04 one of those bridges where you have dial-in
` 05 instructions. And so after that kind of settled down,
` 06 then I got around to pressing record.
`29. PAGE 156:07 TO 156:11 (RUNNING 00:00:06.339)
` 07 Q You mentioned that you were in your home
` 08 office?
` 09 A Yes.
` 10 Q Where is your home office located?
`
`CONFIDENTIAL
`
`page 4
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 358-3 Filed 01/24/19 Page 6 of 7
`
`Case Clip(s) Detailed Report
`Wednesday, December 12, 2018, 7:46:00 AM
`
`Finjan v. Juniper
`
` 11 A It's in Raleigh, North Carolina.
`30. PAGE 166:15 TO 166:15 (RUNNING 00:00:03.951)
` 15 Q Can you go to the Bates ending in 580. Can
`31. PAGE 166:16 TO 167:03 (RUNNING 00:00:52.595)
` 16 you go to time code 11:21. Do you see where Mr. Garland
` 17 says that it reads on your advance malware modules?
` 18 A Right.
` 19 Q Do you have any understanding of what are your
` 20 advanced malware modules?
` 21 A No. I'm not familiar with a product called
` 22 the advanced malware module. There's -- I mean,
` 23 "advanced" probably just means some sort of marketing
` 24 lingo. "Malware" is really stuff that's in a -- that
` 25 can get into the network that's bad that everyone wants
` 00167:01 to eliminate. And then "module" suggests some sort of
` 02 more of a -- in my view, more of like a hardware
` 03 solution. But we did have, I think when it comes to Sky
`32. PAGE 167:04 TO 167:04 (RUNNING 00:00:14.315)
` 04 ATP, that is -- I think it does deal with advanced
`33. PAGE 167:05 TO 167:06 (RUNNING 00:00:10.347)
` 05 malware solutions, but it's -- it's a cloud-based
` 06 solution, not a module.
`34. PAGE 167:07 TO 167:09 (RUNNING 00:00:09.923)
` 07 Q When Mr. Garland is saying, "It reads on your
` 08 advanced malware module," is he referring to the '494
` 09 patent?
`35. PAGE 167:10 TO 167:10 (RUNNING 00:00:02.127)
` 10 A It appears to, yes.
`36. PAGE 167:11 TO 167:12 (RUNNING 00:00:10.785)
` 11 Q That's Exhibit 3, right, the '494 patent?
` 12 A Yes.
`37. PAGE 167:13 TO 168:02 (RUNNING 00:00:45.078)
` 13 Q Have you ever heard of Sky ATP referred to as
` 14 advanced malware?
` 15 A No.
` 16 Q Have you -- is it your understanding -- do you
` 17 have any understanding of what "modules" means?
` 18 A I -- I mean, before this case started, I
` 19 didn't have any knowledge of -- of this field of
` 20 technology.
` 21 Q Have you ever heard of Sky ATP referred to as
` 22 having advanced malware modules?
` 23 A Not -- not a module, no, 'cause it's a
` 24 cloud-based solution.
` 25 Q You said that Sky ATP does have some kind of
` 00168:01 technology related to advanced malware?
` 02 A Right.
`38. PAGE 168:03 TO 168:09 (RUNNING 00:00:34.686)
` 03 Q Can you be more specific?
` 04 A Well, it's a security product. So its goal is
` 05 to scrub whatever it's connected to for bad stuff. And
` 06 it's provided by -- it's provided in the cloud. In
` 07 other words, Juniper probably contracts with someone
`
`CONFIDENTIAL
`
`page 5
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 358-3 Filed 01/24/19 Page 7 of 7
`
`Case Clip(s) Detailed Report
`Wednesday, December 12, 2018, 7:46:00 AM
`
`Finjan v. Juniper
`
` 08 else who is actually providing a service outside of a
` 09 Juniper box.
`39. PAGE 169:20 TO 169:24 (RUNNING 00:00:12.415)
` 20 Q Do you have any understanding of how Sky ATP
` 21 works?
` 22 A I do not.
` 23 Q Do you have any understanding of how SRX
` 24 works?
`40. PAGE 170:01 TO 170:02 (RUNNING 00:00:06.241)
` 00170:01 A I just know it's a firewall. I don't know
` 02 much beyond that. I'm not a technical guy anymore.
`41. PAGE 170:03 TO 170:10 (RUNNING 00:00:31.223)
` 03 Q Is it your understanding that when Mr. Garland
` 04 says "advanced malware modules," that it's referring to
` 05 something in SRX?
` 06 A The terminology, especially the word "module,"
` 07 combined with his earlier statement -- I'd have to look
` 08 and see where it is -- that's referring to SRX as being
` 09 a product they were particularly interested in, those
` 10 caused me to -- to draw that conclusion.
`42. PAGE 170:19 TO 170:24 (RUNNING 00:00:17.345)
` 19 Q Do you have any understanding of which Juniper
` 20 products Mr. Garland is referring to when he says
` 21 "advanced malware modules"?
` 22 A As I said, I really focus mostly on SRX
` 23 because of his earlier reference to SRX and then use of
` 24 the word module.
`43. PAGE 170:25 TO 171:02 (RUNNING 00:00:11.811)
` 25 Q Have you heard of Sky ATP referred to as any
` 00171:01 other name other than Sky ATP?
` 02 A I don't know if I have.
`
`TOTAL: 1 CLIP FROM 1 DEPOSITION (RUNNING 00:15:12.743)
`
`CONFIDENTIAL
`
`page 6
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket