throbber
Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 350-3 Filed 01/10/19 Page 1 of 14
`
`Exhibit 3
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 350-3 Filed 01/10/19 Page 2 of 14
`
`Juniper’s ATP Appliance
`6,804,780
`The statements and documents cited below are based on information available to Finjan, Inc. at the time this chart
`was created. Finjan reserves its right to supplement this chart as additional information becomes known to it.
`
`For purposes of this chart, “ATP Appliance” includes at least the following models that are used individually, or in
`combination and identified in Exhibit A. Based on public information, ATP Appliances all operate identically with
`respect to the identified claims and only vary based on software specifications and/or deployment options. ATP
`Appliances perform the infringing procedures on their own or as a distributed system in combination with Juniper
`Sky Advanced Threat Prevention (“Sky ATP”)1, as will be described in greater detail herein. Based on public
`information, ATP Appliances all operate identically with respect to the identified claims and only vary based on
`software specifications and/or deployment options.
`
`As identified and described element by element below, the one or more of the ATP Appliance specifically listed
`above infringe at least claims 1and 9 of the ’780 Patent.
`
`Claim 1
`1a. A computer-based method
`for generating a
`Downloadable ID to identify
`a Downloadable, comprising:
`
`ATP Appliance meet the recited claim language because it provides a computer-
`based method for generating a Downloadable ID to identify a Downloadable.
`
`As used herein, and throughout these contentions, Downloadable is “an executable
`application program, which is downloaded from a source computer and run on the
`destination computer.”
`
`ATP Appliance meet the recited claim language because ATP Appliance
`generates a Downloadable ID by creating malware attack profiles which include a
`hash to identify a Downloadable, such as malware. The analysis includes
`scanning the Downloadables which include references to software components
`required to be executed by the Downloadable (e.g., suspicious web page content
`containing HTML, PDFs, JavaScript, drive-by downloads, obfuscated code, or
`other blended web malware).
`
`ATP Appliance obtains a Downloadable then generates a Downloadable ID (e.g.,
`a SHA-256 or a MD5 hash) to identify a Downloadable and to determine whether
`it is malicious and to return a risk score or verdict.
`
`
`1 “Sky ATP” includes all components and services described in Exhibit A.
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 350-3 Filed 01/10/19 Page 3 of 14
`
`Vandelay-ThreatAssessment-2015 (emphasis added) (showing fetching an
`component and creating a Downloadable ID for that dropped file).
`
`
`
`
`1b. obtaining a Downloadable
`that includes one or more
`references to software
`components required to be
`executed by the
`Downloadable;
`
`
`
`Cyphort DataSheet (showing MD5, SHA1, and SHA256 hashes).
`
`ATP Appliance meets the recited claim language because it obtains a
`Downloadable that includes one or more references to software components
`required to be executed by the Downloadable.
`
`ATP Appliance meets the recited claim language because ATP Appliance obtains
`suspicious traffic flows for analysis through an application program interface, and
`the content in these traffic flows include Downloadables such as web page and/or
`email attachments. These Downloadables include references to software
`components required to be executed by the Downloadable (e.g. suspicious web
`page content containing HTML, PDFs, JavaScript, drive-by downloads,
`obfuscated code, or other blended web malware).
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 350-3 Filed 01/10/19 Page 4 of 14
`
`Downloadables that includes one or more references to software components
`required to be executed by the Downloadable include a web page that includes
`references to JavaScript, visual basic script, ActiveX, injected iframes; and a PDF
`that includes references to JavaScript, swf files or other executables. Typically,
`Juniper characterizes them as drive-by-downloads or droppers as such
`Downloadables are usually programmed to take advantage of a browser,
`application, or OS that is out of date and has a security flaw. The initial
`downloaded code is often small enough that it wouldn’t be noticed, since its job is
`often simply to contact another computer where it can pull down the rest of the
`code on to the computer. In particular, such software components are usually
`programmed to be downloaded and run in the background in a manner that is
`invisible to the user and without the user taking any conscious actions as just the
`act of viewing a web-page that harbors this malicious code is typically enough for
`the download and execution to occur.
`
`ATP Appliance obtains and scans Downloadables that may include malware
`embedded in images, JavaScript, text and Flash files. As shown below, ATP
`appliance obtains and conducts analysis on Downloadables such as Executable
`files (e.g., “.bin, .com, .dat, .exe, .msi, .msm, .mst”), PDF files, Java (e.g., “.class,
`.ear, .jar, .war”), MS Office file types, Flash and Silverlight applications, Script
`files, and installer files through an application program interface.
`
`The ATP Appliance performs behavioral analysis such as potential dropper
`infection for Downloadables. Potential dropper infections are references to
`software components required to be executed by the Downloadable. As shown
`below, the ATP appliance uses behavior inspection and dynamic detection to find
`dropper files and to perform hashing functions on them.
`
`
`Cyphort Datasheet
`
`As shown below, ATP Appliance will obtain Downloadables, as well as
`components required to execute the Downloadables.
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 350-3 Filed 01/10/19 Page 5 of 14
`
`Redimadrid_Journadas-Sky ATP Enhancements.pdf at page 14.
`
`
`Cyphort WP Security 2.0
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Cyphort WP Drive by Downloads (describing how the ATP appliances captures
`dropper files and perofrms “static analysis, behavior analysis and reputaiton
`analysis to identify if it is a malware.”).
`
`ATP Appliance meet the recited claim language because it fetches at least one
`software component identified by the one or more references.
`
`
`1c. fetching at least one
`software component
`identified by the one or more
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 350-3 Filed 01/10/19 Page 6 of 14
`
`references; and
`
`ATP Appliance meet the recited claim language because ATP Appliance perform
`analysis on malware containing multiple software components and capture traffic
`containing malware for analysis, including suspicious web page content
`containing HTML, scripts, applets, ActiveX and drive-by downloads. As part of
`this analysis, ATP Appliance includes components which fetch the software
`components identified in references in the Downloadable such as potential
`dropper infections, dropped files, multiple infected files, and object streams
`within PDF’s.
`
`The ATP Appliance performs behavioral analysis such as potential dropper
`infection for Downloadables. Potential dropper infections are references to
`software components required to be executed by the Downloadable. As shown
`below, the ATP Appliance uses behavior inspection and dynamic detection to find
`dropper files and to perform hashing functions on them.
`
`
`
`Vandelay-ThreatAssessment-2015 (emphasis added) (showing fetching an
`component and creating a Downloadable ID for that dropped file).
`
`
`5
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 350-3 Filed 01/10/19 Page 7 of 14
`
`
`
`Cyphort DataSheet (showing MD5, SHA1, and SHA256 hashes).
`
`To the extent Juniper argues that ATP Appliances do not literally satisfy this
`element, Juniper meets this element under the doctrine of equivalents. ATP
`Appliances perform the same function as this claim element because they receive
`downloaded content, such as HTML or JavaScript, that have referenced
`components that are also downloaded by ATP Appliances, and create an identity
`for downloaded content. This is the same function as this element because this an
`identification of a downloaded content, including referenced components that are
`downloaded. ATP Appliances perform this function in the same way as this claim
`element because they download components that are used to create an identity for
`downloaded content such as HTML or JavaScript. ATP Appliances perform this
`element the same way because the identity created can be used to identify
`downloaded content that reference multiple components that are used by the
`downloaded content. ATP Appliances achieve the same result as this claim
`element because they have components that result in the creation of an
`identification in downloaded content, such as HTML or JavaScript, and
`downloads multiple components referenced. This is the same result as this claim
`element because ATP Appliances use this identity to identify the downloaded
`content and its referenced components for security decisions.
`
`ATP Appliance meet the recited claim language because they perform a hashing
`function on the Downloadable and the fetched software components to generate a
`Downloadable ID.
`
`ATP Appliance meet the recited claim language because ATP Appliance include
`components which create a dynamically generated signature and/or a malware
`attack profile for the Downloadable by performing a hashing function using
`SHA256, MD5, and/or SHA-1 on Downloadables (e.g., HTML, JavaScript,
`and/or email) together with other web-based files/executables fetched (e.g.,
`potential dropper infections, multiple infected files, and object streams within
`PDF’s).
`
`The ATP Appliance performs MD5, SHA-1, and SHA256 hashes on
`Downloadables.
`
`6
`
`1d. performing a hashing
`function on the Downloadable
`and the fetched software
`components to generate a
`Downloadable ID.
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 350-3 Filed 01/10/19 Page 8 of 14
`
`
`Vandelay-ThreatAssessment-2015 (emphasis added) (showing fetching an
`component and creating a hash value for that dropped file).
`
`
`Claim 9
`
`9a. A system for generating a
`Downloadable ID to identify
`a Downloadable, comprising:
`
`Cyphort DataSheet (showing MD5, SHA1, and SHA256 hashes).
`
`
`
`
`
`ATP Appliance meets the recited claim language they provide a system for
`generating a Downloadable ID to identify a Downloadable.
`
`ATP Appliance meet the recited claim language because ATP Appliance is a
`system which generates a Downloadable ID by creating malware attack profiles
`which include a hash to identify a Downloadable such as malware. The analysis
`includes scanning the Downloadables which include references to software
`
`7
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 350-3 Filed 01/10/19 Page 9 of 14
`
`components required to be executed by the Downloadable (e.g., suspicious web
`page content containing HTML, PDFs, JavaScript, drive-by downloads,
`obfuscated code, or other blended web malware).
`
`ATP Appliance is a system which obtains a Downloadable then generates a
`profile that includes generating a Downloadable ID (e.g., the SHA-256 hash) to
`identify a Downloadable and to determine whether it is malicious and to return a
`risk score or verdict.
`
`
`
`
`Vandelay-ThreatAssessment-2015 (emphasis added) (showing fetching an
`component and creating a Downloadable ID for that dropped file).
`
`
`Cyphort DataSheet (showing MD5, SHA1, and SHA256 hashes).
`
`
`
`
`8
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 350-3 Filed 01/10/19 Page 10 of 14
`
`9b. a communications engine
`for obtaining a Downloadable
`that includes one or more
`references to software
`components required to be
`executed by the
`Downloadable; and
`
`ATP Appliance meets the recited claim language because they provide a
`communications engine for obtaining a Downloadable that includes one or more
`references to software components required to be executed by the Downloadable.
`
`ATP Appliance meet the recited claim language because ATP Appliance is a
`system which includes a communications engine (e.g., network interface and
`corresponding proxy software) which obtains suspicious traffic flows for analysis
`that include Downloadables such as web page content and/or email attachments.
`These Downloadables include references to software components required to be
`executed by the Downloadable (e.g., suspicious web page content containing
`HTML, PDFs, JavaScript, drive-by downloads, obfuscated code, or other blended
`web malware).
`
`Downloadables that includes one or more references to software components
`required to be executed by the Downloadable include a web page that includes
`references to JavaScript, visual basic script, ActiveX, injected iframes; and a PDF
`that includes references to JavaScript, swf files or other executables. Typically,
`Juniper characterizes them as drive-by-downloads or droppers as such
`Downloadables are usually programmed to take advantage of a browser,
`application, or OS that is out of date and has a security flaw. The initial
`downloaded code is often small enough that it wouldn’t be noticed, since its job is
`often simply to contact another computer where it can pull down the rest of the
`code on to the computer. In particular, such software components are usually
`programmed to be downloaded and run in the background in a manner that is
`invisible to the user - and without the user taking any conscious actions as just the
`act of viewing a web-page that harbors this malicious code is typically enough for
`the download and execution to occur.
`
`ATP Appliance includes a communications engine (e.g., network interface and
`corresponding proxy software) to obtain Downloadables for scanning. ATP
`appliance scans Downloadables that may include malware embedded in images,
`JavaScript, text and Flash files. As shown below, ATP Appliance obtains and
`conducts analysis on Downloadables such as Executable files (e.g., “.bin, .com,
`.dat, .exe, .msi, .msm, .mst”), PDF files, Java (e.g., “.class, .ear, .jar, .war”), MS
`Office file types, Flash and Silverlight applications, Script files, and installer files
`through an application program interface.
`
`The ATP Appliance performs behavioral analysis such as potential dropper
`infection for Downloadables. Potential dropper infections are references to
`software components required to be executed by the Downloadable. As shown
`below, the ATP Appliance uses behavior inspection and dynamic detection to find
`dropper files and to perform hashing functions on them.
`
`9
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 350-3 Filed 01/10/19 Page 11 of 14
`
`
`
`
`
`Cyphort Datasheet
`
`As shown below, ATP Appliance will obtain Downloadables, as well as
`components required to execute the Downloadables.
`
`Redimadrid_Journadas-Sky ATP Enhancements.pdf at page 14.
`
`
`Cyphort WP Security 2.0
`
`
`10
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 350-3 Filed 01/10/19 Page 12 of 14
`
`9c. an ID generator coupled to
`the communications engine
`that fetches at least one
`software component
`identified by the one or more
`references, and for
`performing a hashing function
`on the Downloadable and the
`fetched software components
`to generate a Downloadable
`ID.
`
`
`Cyphort WP Drive by Downloads (describing how the ATP appliances captures
`dropper files and perofrms “static analysis, behavior analysis and reputaiton
`analysis to identify if it is a malware.”).
`
`ATP Appliance meets the recited claim language because they provide an ID
`generator coupled to the communications engine that fetches at least one software
`component identified by the one or more references, and for performing a hashing
`function on the Downloadable and the fetched software components to generate a
`Downloadable ID.
`
`ATP Appliance meet the recited claim language because ATP Appliance is a
`system that includes an ID generator (e.g., software coupled to the
`communications engine) that performs multi-protocol capture of HTML,
`JavaScript, files and EXEs and then performs a hash of the Downloadable and
`fetched software components. ATP Appliance create a dynamically generated
`signature and/or a malware attack profile for the Downloadable by performing a
`hashing function using SHA-256, MD5, and/or SHA-1 on Downloadables (e.g.,
`HTML, JavaScript and other web-based files/executables), thereby performing a
`hashing function on the Downloadable together with the fetched software
`components to generate a Downloadable ID.
`
`ATP Appliance obtains a Downloadable then generates a profile that includes
`generating a Downloadable ID (e.g., the SHA-256 hash) to identify a
`Downloadable. As shown below, the profile is then stored in Juniper’s cloud for
`further identification of Downloadables, including whether it is malicious and to
`create a risk score.
`
`The ATP Appliance performs behavioral analysis such as potential dropper
`infection for Downloadables. Potential dropper infections are references to
`software components required to be executed by the Downloadable. As shown
`below, the ATP Appliance uses behavior inspection and dynamic detection to find
`dropper files and to perform hashing functions on them. The ID generator is the
`software running on a system that generates the hash value of the component and
`the dropped file.
`
`11
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 350-3 Filed 01/10/19 Page 13 of 14
`
`
`Vandelay-ThreatAssessment-2015 (emphasis added) (showing fetching an
`component and creating a Downloadable ID for that dropped file).
`
`
`Cyphort DataSheet (showing MD5, SHA1, and SHA256 hashes).
`
`As shown below, ATP Appliance will obtain Downloadables, as well as
`components required to execute the Downloadables.
`
`
`
`12
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 350-3 Filed 01/10/19 Page 14 of 14
`
`Redimadrid_Journadas-Sky ATP Enhancements.pdf at page 14.
`
`To the extent Juniper argues that ATP Appliances do not literally satisfy this
`element, Juniper meets this element under the doctrine of equivalents. ATP
`Appliances perform the same function as this claim element because they receive
`downloaded content, such as HTML or JavaScript, that have referenced
`components that are also downloaded by ATP Appliances, and create an identity
`for downloaded content. This is the same function as this element because this an
`identification of a downloaded content, including referenced components that are
`downloaded. ATP Appliances perform this function in the same way as this claim
`element because they download components that are used to create an identity for
`downloaded content such as HTML or JavaScript. ATP Appliances perform this
`element the same way because the identity created can be used to identify
`downloaded content that reference multiple components that are used by the
`downloaded content. ATP Appliances achieve the same result as this claim
`element because they have components that result in the creation of an
`identification in downloaded content, such as HTML or JavaScript, and
`downloads multiple components referenced. This is the same result as this claim
`element because ATP Appliances use this identity to identify the downloaded
`content and its referenced components for security decisions.
`
`
`
`
`13
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket