throbber
Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 126-4 Filed 06/28/18 Page 1 of 3
`
`DECLARATION OF REBECCA CARSON
`I, Rebecca Carson, declare as follows:
`1.
`I am a member in good standing of the State Bar of California and a partner at
`Irell & Manella LLP, counsel of record in this action for Defendant Juniper Networks, Inc.
`(“Juniper”). I have personal knowledge of the facts set forth in this declaration, and I could and
`would testify competently thereto if called upon to do so.
`2.
`Documents produced by bearing Bates stamp FINJAN-JN 045244 through 045291
`consist solely of Finjan press releases and screen captures of Finjan’s website.
`3.
`Finjan’s Infringement Contentions related to claim 10 of the ‘494 Patent do not
`allege that the “database manager” element is met under the doctrine of equivalents.
`4.
`Juniper’s response to Finjan’s interrogatory no. 10 stated that Finjan’s
`Infringement Contentions were “indecipherable, unintelligible, and unduly vague and
`ambiguous.” During the course of Juniper’s in-person and telephonic conferring with Finjan on
`the issue, Juniper sent counsel for Finjan an email on May 22, 2018 stating that “Finjan’s
`infringement contentions are replete with conclusory statements untethered to the actual claim
`limitations and in general devoid of the requisite specificity. Juniper cannot explain how
`unidentified software components operate in a manner different than how Finjan alleges when
`Finjan does not even identify the specific accused software components in the first place.”
`Juniper offered to supplement its non-infringement contentions once Finjan had supplemented its
`Infringement Contentions, but Finjan never supplemented its Infringement Contentions.
`5.
`Based on the sales information that Juniper has produced in this matter, the total
`revenue of Sky ATP from November 24, 2015 through Jan. 29, 2017 was
`.
`6.
`Attached hereto as Exhibit 1 is a true and correct copy of U.S. Patent No.
`8,677,494 (“the ‘494 Patent”) asserted by Plaintiff Finjan, Inc. (“Finjan”) in this matter and
`produced by Finjan as FINJAN-JN 003821.
`7.
`Attached hereto as Exhibit 2 is a true and correct copy of select excerpts of the
`transcript of the deposition of John Garland, Finjan’s Rule 30(b)(6) witness on the following
`topic: “All facts and circumstances regarding any efforts taken to comply with the marking and
`
`10537010
`
`- 1 -
`
`DECLARATION OF REBECCA CARSON ISO
`JUNIPER’S OPP. TO
`MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
`(Case No. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA)
`
`REDACTED VERSION OF DOCUMENT SOUGHT TO BE SEALED
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 126-4 Filed 06/28/18 Page 2 of 3
`
`notice provisions of 35 U.S.C. § 287 with respect to the Asserted Patents, including any efforts
`by Finjan to ensure compliance by its licensees with said marking provisions.”
`8.
`Attached hereto as Exhibit 3 is a true and correct copy of select excerpts of the
`transcript of the deposition of Juniper engineer Yuly Tenorio.
`9.
`Attached hereto as Exhibit 4 is a true and correct copy of select excerpts of the
`transcript of the deposition of Dr. Eric Cole, the expert upon which Finjan relies for its Motion
`for Summary Judgment regarding claim 10 of the ‘494 Patent (Dkt. No. 98, the “Motion”).
`10.
`Attached hereto as Exhibit 5 is a true and correct copy of “Dynamic Detection
`And Classification Of Computer Viruses Using General Behaviour Patterns” by Morton
`Swimmer et al., published in 1995 by the Virus Bulletin Conference (“Swimmer.”)
`11.
`Attached hereto as Exhibit 6 is a true and correct copy of select excerpts of
`Webster’s New World Dictionary of Computer Terms (6th ed., 1997).
`12.
`Attached hereto as Exhibit 7 is a true and correct copy of select excerpts of the
`directory argon\src\adapters\greyduckling\constants\pe_constants.py from the Juniper Source
`Code, bearing print numbering (and referenced by Finjan in its Motion as) pages 90-92.
`13.
`Attached hereto as Exhibit 8 is a true and correct copy of select excerpts of
`Plaintiff Finjan, Inc.’s Objections And Responses To Defendant Juniper Networks, Inc.’s First
`Set Of Requests For Admission (Nos. 1-76).
`14.
`Attached hereto as Exhibit 9 is a true and correct copy of select excerpts of
`Plaintiff Finjan, Inc.’s Objections And Responses To Defendant Juniper Networks, Inc.s’ First
`Set Of Interrogatories (Nos. 1-10).
`15.
`Attached hereto as Exhibit 10 is a true and correct copy of select excerpts of
`Plaintiff Finjan, Inc.’s First Supplemental Objections And Responses To Defendant Juniper
`Networks, Inc.’s First Set Of Interrogatories (Nos. 3, 4, 6, 7).
`16.
`Attached hereto as Exhibit 11 is a true and correct copy of select portions of
`Amazon’s website for its S3 object storage service, available at https://aws.amazon.com/s3/.
`17.
`Attached hereto as Exhibit 12 is a true and correct copy of select excerpts of
`Finjan’s Patent Owner’s Response (Paper 27) in Symantec Corp. v. Finjan, Inc., IPR2015-01892.
`
`10537010
`
`
`- 2 -
`
`DECLARATION OF REBECCA CARSON ISO
`JUNIPER’S OPP. TO
`MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
`(Case No. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA)
`
`REDACTED VERSION OF DOCUMENT SOUGHT TO BE SEALED
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-05659-WHA Document 126-4 Filed 06/28/18 Page 3 of 3
`
`18.
`Attached hereto as Exhibit 13 is a true and correct copy of select portions of the
`Amazon DynamoDB Developer Guide, available at
`https://docs.aws.amazon.com/amazondynamodb/latest/developerguide/dynamodb-dg.pdf.
`19.
`Attached hereto as Exhibit 14 is a true and correct copy of select portions of
`Finjan’s Infringement Contentions related to the ‘494 Patent (and claim 10 in particular) against
`Websense, produced by Finjan as FINJAN-JN 191524.
`20.
`Exhibit 15 is intentionally left blank.
`21.
`Attached hereto as Exhibit 16 is a true and correct copy of select excerpts of
`Amazon’s “Frequently Asked Questions About Amazon DynamoDB,” available at
`https://aws.amazon.com/dynamodb/faqs/.
`22.
`Attached hereto as Exhibit 17 is a true and correct copy of select excerpts of the
`paper “Scanners of the Year 2000: Heuristics” by Dmitry Gryaznov, published in the
`Proceedings Of The Fifth International Virus Bulleting Conference in September 1995.
`23.
`Attached hereto as Exhibit 18 is a true and correct copy of select excerpts of the
`book SQL For Dummies (1995).
`24.
`Attached hereto as Exhibit 19 is a true and correct copy of select excerpts of the
`November 1991 issue of Virus Bulletin.
`//
`
`Executed this 28th day of June, 2018, at Newport Beach, California. I declare under penalty
`of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct.
`/s/ Rebecca Carson
`Rebecca Carson
`
`10537010
`
`
`- 3 -
`
`DECLARATION OF REBECCA CARSON ISO
`JUNIPER’S OPP. TO
`MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
`(Case No. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA)
`
`REDACTED VERSION OF DOCUMENT SOUGHT TO BE SEALED
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket