throbber
NDA No /' “(41
`Reviewer: BeLinda A. Ha es Ph.D.
`
`
`
`2.6.5 PHARMACOKINETICS TABULATED SUMMARY
`
`Absorption:
`
`Pharmacokinetics parameters of lacosamide following oral administration to mice.
`
`AUCMmulvgmll]
`Farrah
`
`0.5“
`
`‘ 015“
`0.5“
`0.5"
`
`.
`
`140
`i3
`229
`
`U!
`(D
`‘13.-
`"U
`0m
`93..
`g.
`(p
`o
`'8
`<
`
`,
`
`‘
`
`31(4)
`
`15.0
`40.7
`hdinidmldmormedimsfi'an 2prrcfilesm m.
`n--f1'rst mpljrgtine
`Dm sauces: Tabla;£65 313. -— 1344?.04; T1hl*"'"- 53C, 7 BTTZI05;Ta1:J.e 2.6.33'
`42..32] ”131212.420 Agrpam.)14232.2 '- 13123.00.Appa:\.d3{10-5.
`4.23.411." B124I03.£;>puflix 11-5.
`'
`
`APPEARS THIS WAY
`0N ORIGINAL
`
`109
`
`0.5"
`0.5”
`
`10
`
`.5“
`
`16 .0
`17 .7
`16 .8
`20 .0
`32.6
`26 .9
`41 .6
`2'9 .0
`29.9
`33 .9
`29 .3
`
`13.3
`16.9
`14.0
`20.4
`16.6
`24.”?
`29.5
`2'16
`290
`3‘10
`30.4
`39.9
`30.1
`46.3
`36.6
`
`

`

`
`
`Reviewer: BeLinda A. Ha es PhD. NDA No.
`
`Pharmacokinetics parameters of lacosamide following oral administration to rats.
`
`
`27.5
`05"
`3.5“
`169
`22.2
`3.5"
`3.5"
`139
`13.9
`3.5“
`0.5“
`130
`34.4
`35“
`1
`299
`46.6
`1
`1
`333
`29.3
`0.5“
`n.5“
`323
`1
`25.3
`262
`26.4
`235
`33.7
`296
`22.0
`142
`36.n
`172
`5?.3
`514
`-
`512
`-
`635
`30.7
`33.9
`62.4
`59.6
`
`1?.6
`
`15.2
`
`213
`21.3
`
`57.9
`495
`32 I?
`38.2
`4'." .0
`
`1 year
`-as
`6116111115
`1 year
`2 years
`1 day
`31:16:31.5
`691mm
`111a]
`311mm
`MW
`1year
`2 -ars
`
`180
`
`-
`
`300
`
`
`
` _2
`
`
`
`
`
`216
`218
`l
`40.3
`342
`111337
`1
`403
`340
`1
`5'11
`33.6
`3 months
`
`17611125 mmed'nns trmems m= 2m 3 pofflesyorphmuckmticpmemswu‘e calmhtgdwirhmem
`phmncmemnfimu.
`n -fiIV;t9mplirgtine
`Dan smrces: 423.25. 148—231 Himacfihefiz wahmicnmpurt; 4232.6. _- 32217903. 2‘1)qu 10-5;
`4.23.4.1} -— 3295403. @1391de 11-5.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`w
`(D
`'59--
`'8
`U,
`2_
`0'
`6
`
`o0 a
`
`b i
`(4)
`
`193
`232
`429
`3:1
`342
`311
`313
`339
`152
`229
`659
`-
`
`'
`
`1
`
`1 1l
`
`3.5“
`
`.5“
`
`3
`l
`1
`
`1 2
`
`.
`
`5
`
`35'
`4
`2
`2
`2
`1
`1
`2
`U 5"
`
`APPEARS THIS WAY
`0N ORIGINAL
`
`110
`
`

`

`
`
` Reviewer: BeLinda A. Ha es Ph.D. NDA N0. M 5(4)
`
`Pharmacokinetics parameters of lacosamide following oral administration to adult
`dogs.
`
`Cm“ [plg'mL]
`blah
`Fen‘mh
`
`]
`
`In
`
`5
`
`
`
` Dose Dm-adion
`
`
`Tmm [ll]
`fiUChn DrudmL]
`Farrah
`blah
`Farrah
`luah
`
`1.5 '
`1
`1
`1
`1.3
`1.5
`
`1.3
`0.5
`
`0.5 [D.25"-1)
`1 (0.5-1)
`0.80151)
`0.3 (0.51)
`
`1(051)
`03(05-1)
`
`
`31.6
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1E]
`
`12
`
`12
`- 1'11
`16
`(1)111)
`24
`
`25
`
`
`
`Sda
`
`13.5116
`
`Eda
`
`15.7118
`
`
`
`—
`61.81143
`-
`11-1
`
`79.5
`33.1
`0.8 (0.2552)
`1 (0.52)
`59.4
`55 2
`1 (0.52)
`1 (0.25-1)
`
`
`
`3 (1-4)
`1 (0.5-2)
`10?
`32.7
`
`
`
`85.2
`
`
`68.6
`95.6
`
`
`129
`134
`
`133
`166
`
`
`124
`142
`Values are means it SDJtn=2. 4 cr 5) magic: T,.u|;1nedim1}1mgen.AU'C,_.v1-as mma amt one dose
`immal.
`n - firs. samplingtime
`held:twine(11111‘1yl:1211101111511p"ml
`Dmsomces: Tabla 25.5.31. — 5654.02; 4.2.3.110. 98825 "mmcoltib‘sti: mhaximrepurt;
`42 32.1]. 9%61 Tmicdximfia: enhmimrepm; 4.2.3.1111 .— 1.96.00. 21912-131111}: 10-5.
`
`
`
`
`
`A303amassed1,539
`
`0.5 (0.25“- 1)
`1 (0.52)
`0.5 (0.50 5)
`
`
`
`0.6 (025'- 1)
`1 (0.51)
`1.5 (0.52)
`
`
`
`
`461
`
`43.4
`49 .0
`
`105"—
`
`-
`
`43.51101
`
`-
`
`-
`
`—
`
`,
`“‘43
`
`111
`
`

`

`
`
` Reviewer: BeLinda A. Ha es Ph.D. NDA N0.
`
`—————
`
`bM}
`
`Comparative pharmacokinetic data and systemic exposure to lacosamide following
`intravenous administration of lacosamide to dogs and human volunteers.
`
`Paramehr [unit]
`
`
`
`
`
`A0103elqgssodI398
`
`Male
`
`Dog
`intavemus
`
`(b 0115)
`
`Cram [llgfmIJ
`
`Tau-z [h]
`
`AUCO-hl’ lh'lla’le
`
`[Why]
`
`4
`8 (NOEL)
`
`Female
`
`16
`4
`
`
`
`8 (NOEL)'-
`
`.
`
`Male
`
`Dan 11er are after repeated mucus bobs injectim althe mi cf a Nahydog mun em d: SD.n=-I per
`sexlorr afiu' single 10-minute imam-anon; Mimmhgflhywmgma}: volunteers memiSDm=5to 6).
`11- human abodgmighofmhgnas assumedISLL mm 133, 330mgpar suitjectjl.
`Dun sauces: 4.2.3.2.14‘ 93793. Eiarmucobhmj: mhmmmpm; 53 3.15.5Pfi34‘Tnhle 14.2.1.
`
`APPEARS THIS WAY
`0N ORIGINAL
`
`112
`
`

`

`
`
`NDA No. 'Reviewer: BeLinda A. Ha es Ph.D. hm)
`
`
`
`
`
`Comparative pharmacokinetic data following repeated oral administration of
`lacosamide to mice, rats, dogs and human VOIunteers.
`Parameter of lacosamifle [unit]
`
`Cray-ax [llg’nll‘]
`
`T Max M AIt‘ltrhn mltfl’mL]
`
`
`
`10 (HOAEL) 25
`
`Female
`
`5
`
`
`
`
`
`Adooelqgssod4333
`
`b‘fl)
`'1
`,
`
`133
`133
`so
`
`a] (NOAEL)
`133
`180
`
`33
`90 (NOAEL)
`12:0
`
`Male,
`
`Few 33
`90 (NOAEL)
`1m
`5
`
`Male
`
`Male
`
`ID25(NOAEL)
`119 :t 18.3
`3 (1 -6)
`12.6 :I: 2.2
`3.625Day 15 (High)
`126:1: 1'14
`1(1- 2)
`145i1.7
`Day16[day)
`Chilflcapsule)
`Dnmnegmmdm afmrrepemdcnlndnifistmfimatme enrich 3-mocrthmmlfi'ndjmflnldfin16-mmflimt
`(medians IFZJ. 13mmuhrbg¢ned1mn=21 and 115-duyhmm1rhlSP588 means i: SD n=12. Tmmedim
`flange 3). hmmnbodymigmod'm kgwxs again edtflx mflmgpu' subject/thy”),
`AUG”, ninth mome.mmddog.mdAUCp.mhmmm giant“
`mummy-1.23.2.2. ~13123m.2Ҥpmdix105.4.2.3.2.fi h .mmll Appendix 1115;41:3211
`. BIQSIOJJEtpmdm w-S;5.3.3.1.4.SP583.Sectim9.4.
`
`APPEARS THIS WAY
`
`0N ORIGINAL
`
`113
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`A603elQlSSOd1999
`
`
`
`
`
`
`NDA No.Reviewer: BeLinda A. Ha es Ph.D. ‘5‘
`
`
`
`n14):
`
`Metabolism:
`
`Metabolism: Interspecies comparison of maximum observed concentration of
`
`plasma metabolites.
`’
`R.
`
`(ml
`
`an].
`
`oral
`
`u‘al
`
`(mil
`

`
`oral
`
`hiravawus hummus
`
`2-85mm—
`m-“————_—
`
`m
`
`-m-—————_—
`
`mmm -———— -—_
`EE--__———mlfi-lfil
`—-——————_—
`
`———_—m————
`——_—m—————
`E_--_——_——_
`Ina-m
`me
`.mq —— .m «m
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`—--—————— 1462
`
`Major metabolites in plasma following single oral administration of [14C]-
`lacosamide to mice, rats and dogs.
`Reimfiml
`
`hhzchnum % ofradinactirityinchmm‘bgrmn
`
`Dog
`Rat
`Mom
`Male
`Female Male Farah Male
`Female
`13.?
`2'10
`2.45
`2.40
`-
`-
`
`
`
`Mediumpolar fi'action
`S PM 1281 '1 (13-1012)
`S PM 8912 (M5)
`Unknown
`
`18 - 24
`26
`2‘15
`29
`
`-
`BLQ
`6.85
`4.98
`
`-
`2.2?
`8.98
`8.41
`
`-
`4.34
`
`—
`
`13.9
`5.40
`BLQ
`-
`
`15.2
`1‘33
`BLQ
`—
`
`.
`
`-
`
`36.2
`33.4
`17 .1
`15.4
`22.0
`1'? .2
`3D
`S PM 12839 (Ml)
`88.3
`88.6
`118.1
`62.2
`75.?
`7'00
`35‘
`Lacosamide
`Dampemdm afiershgh mlmifistmtim [ 'Cl-hzosnmifie mill] tlniceHD mislead 10mgkg£dngst
`Phannsmplesm cbtaimdatfimfolwmgtinespost dose: lmdfilwu's mussel-1» mail-$110.11: (1111.3. dog:
`Mminms. 0.5. 1.2. 4. 8.12. 34 and-18 (dog).
`BLQ =belmrthe mtocrqlmmajMMdanmm. - = magma
`
`114
`
`

`

`Reviewer: BeLinda A. Ha es Ph.D. NDA NO. ,—
`
`mm
`
`Major metabolites in urine following single oral administration of [14C]-lacosamide
`to mice, rats and dogs.
`
`% ofadminktm'ed 11.0512
`
`10183210173312
`
`2 .76
`
`3.23
`3.20
`0.835
`
`111151.12 Femah MahD Female
`
`0.449
`2.84
`1.15
`10.5
`3.41
`5.97
`5.36
`
`BLQ
`2 .40
`1 .75
`826
`457
`5.44
`
`77.9
`
`Urdrruwn
`Unkruwn
`Unkrnwn “
`
`M4 [GkUA arm)
`3 PM 12814 (p—MB)
`Sulfate of‘M2
`
`3 PM 12817 (13-1112)
`S PM 6912 (M5)
`M6
`
`S PM 12339 (Ml)
`Lacosamjde
`Tubal
`
`BLQ
`BLQ
`31.8
`8.0
`79.4
`
`Dampesmmdare after shgle a'alafln'njsuafion [ 'C]-1ax:osamidz a120 (1111:2140 1:111st 10mghgtdog5).
`ndinI-IF'L C-MSIMS
`Pooledurhe samples [U-241mrsjmre imastigamdby
`a — Irmsfigafimwifil ["C] lacosamiie labelzdeiharatfltm cubmyli: cr anhe hmzylix carbmamm sugestflae
`fazm atim cf a deshem'yhmim clarinet-12.14.61. 347 J.
`b - When employmgthe HPL C m emodxmidmms madfocrlnmmm fi'cm u-hl SP6 Dine 6- and Baum
`peaks co-ehxedas cmpeak ataretmimttne of 1.6111111111501211. 1003)
`BLD =be1m/thelimim'm1mtificmml'fllfi- 0.63%0cf1he don't-=mdmmd
`
`32.5
`6.13
`
`
`
`
`
`Adooe\qissod1,839
`
`Excretion:
`
`Mice: Excretion of radioactivity following single administration of
`[14
`C]- lacosamide.
`
`
` Route of
`$2628
`
`Pmmge 01'an dose
`[11311;] alnnn'nirat'xm
`
`Urine
`Feces
`Carcass
`T otal
`
`
`M0115 a
`
`
`
`1.81:0.2
`83.1 d: 7.1 4.5: 2.0
`90114.8
`
`
`
`
`17t0.2
`80.9 :1: 2.5 5.3:1: 23
`88.7 :1: 3.0
`oral [s irgle)
`
`
`Era-Mm dmmdwu' lmhou's. Vines aremeams iSD 1:11: 31. Um includes cagewash [34.3%:
`113%11111 ales 111111239345: 13D%i'1f€ma1esj. Tctalinchdes ndjoacLiriiyincage debris.
`Data sauce: Tabb 21551325.. 6997-16
`
`Female
`
`oral (s irgle)
`
`115
`
`

`

`
`
`Reviewer: BeLinda A. Ha es PhD. NDA N0,
`
`_——.
`
`' ”
`
`M43
`
`Rat: Excretion of radioactivity following single administration of
`[14C]—lacosamide.
`
`Species
`
`Rat
`
`Puma-dag: ofadnfilfistemfl dose
`Rnuteof
`[11%] almm'nirafion Urine
`Feces
`Camass
`T otal
`
`oralfisingle)
`iv (single)
`
`81.8 1 2.9 16.3 1 3.1
`78.1 1 7.2 17.6 1 6.7
`
`1.6 1 0.2
`1.8 1 0.5
`
`ora1(single)
`
`81.11 1.5 8.01 0.5
`
`39 1 0.3
`
`99.7 11.1
`98.0 1 5.0
`
`929 11.2
`
`
`
`Rat
`
`91510.7
`3.7109
`798110 8014.7
`oralfiepeat)
`90.7112
`3310.5
`82812.8 4.5120
`0131(5th
`94512.0
`3510.6
`83011.5 8010.9
`oral(single)
`40
`Male
`94010.9
`3910.6
`86012.6 4.1112
`oral(single)
`40
`Female
`Ekcmbnwas detem'mdwer ’32 cr lfihmrs. Values are means 15D 61:3). Tl'ne mlnies cage mshifljm.
`T0131 'ncludgs miioncmriy in cage debris («D .17.) and ”n Eiqximd air (<0 57.).
`Dan sauces: Table 2.65.1313.le2; Table 2.65.13C. 699747; Table 2155.131). 0699.023
`
`Dogs: Excretion of radioactivity following single administration of
`[14C]-lacosamide.
`
`
`
`
`
`Adogeaqissod1963
`
`Route of
`
`Percentage ofallmfin'mtelul dose
`
`Wm'mmm‘im Urine
`
`Feces
`
`Tohl
`
`oral(si1gle)
`
`85417.4
`
`7.2167
`
`92.6135
`
`iv(singlej
`
`75.91116
`
`7.1166
`
`83.01113 ora1(si.ng1e)
`
`10
`10
`
`ora1(sirng1e)
`ivfsingle)
`
`.
`ivfisingh]
`10
`Emmfimw dammdorm 72 cr lfihmrs. ‘ihlms are mums *SD tn= BJOImedians $1152). 11m imhdes
`cng'mm (< 11%).
`a - Total imhdesndjmmm cage debris (<0 3%;
`Dan sauces: Table 2.65.1351. F232;Tab12 2.65.1317. 699748
`
`Human: Excretion of radioactivity following single administration of
`[14C]—lacosamide.
`
`
`
`backs
`
`
`may: ofaflmin'xtetul dose
`Route of
`Dose
`5m:
`[mg]
`admin'xtm'lian
`Urine
`Feces
`To131
`oral (single)
`94.19 1 3.09
`0.38 1 0.17
`94.57 1 3.12
`iv (1-hour, single)
`96.82 1 2.62
`0.30 1 0.07
`97.13 1 2.65
`Eccmjmm mmdmr 168110115 hlmlfliymalehmmmbjem folhwiig s'ngla onladm'nisumonou:
`mar lhourirmnmms izfiJsiomoflmmg["C]-1acomfia.lfah25 aremenns 1 SD tn: 5 per gulp}.
`Dan QUIIce: 53.1.1.1. 39519. Tabh 13.0. Tame 13.10
`
`
`
`
`
`2.6.6 TOXICOLOGY
`
`2.6.6.1 Overall toxicology summary
`
`General toxicology:
`
`116
`
`

`

`Reviewer: BeLinda A. Hayes, Ph.D.
`
`NDA No. ‘6‘“
`
`Wei
`
`In support of the chronic indication, the systemic toxicity of lacosamide was studied in
`mice, rats, dogs and rabbits. The key repeat—dose toxicology studies to support the
`chronic indication were conducted in mice up to 13 weeks, in rats up to 6 months and up
`to 12 months in dogs.
`
`In a 13-week repeat dose mouse study, CD—1 mice were administered lacosamide by oral
`gavage at doses of 30, 60, 120 and 180 mg/kg/day. Dose levels were based on the
`findings of the 2-week dose~range finding study _ “=- l3122/00)L Clinical signs of
`toxicity included ataxia, abdominal position and reduced motility at 120 and 180
`mg/kg/day. Ataxia was observed in all animals on the first day of dosing and was
`observed on most days of the study. Reduced motility was not observed until day 16 of
`the study and was observed in all animals until termination of the study. Two deaths
`occurred in the high dose group (180 mg/kg). There were no microscopic findings in this
`study. The NOAEL was 60 mg/kg/day based on clinical signs not considered to be
`significant safety issues. This NOAEL was associated with a mean AUC(0_24) of 97.0
`ng.h/mL in males and Cmax of 29.04 ug/mL (males) and 27.62 ug/mL (females).
`
`NA)
`
`In the 13-week repeat dose rat study, Sprague-Dawley rat were administered lacosamide
`by oral gavage at doses of 30, 100 and 300 mg/kg/day. Dose levels were based on the
`findings of the l—month dose-range finding study ; \1108-005). In the dose—range
`finding study, female rats were orally administered lacosamide at dosages of 0, 100, 200
`and 300 mg/kg to determine the MTD. At the highest dose (300 mg/kg/day), two
`treatment-related deaths occurred in week 1. At 200 mg/kg/day and higher, clinical signs
`of toxicity included muscle flaccidity, decreased motor activity, impaired righting reflex,
`splayed limbs, ataxia and head bobbing. In addition to these clinical signs, loss of
`righting reflex, bradypnea and excessive salivation were observed at 300 mg/kg/day.
`Based on these clinical signs, the NOAEL was 100 mg/kg and the MTD was established
`at S 200 mg/kg/day. In the 13—week study, treatment-related clinical signs included
`ataxia, hypoactivity, prostration and convulsions (female only). Five deaths, which were
`attributed to lacosamide, occurred in the female high dose group. Treatment—related
`increases in mean liver-to-body weight were noted in both males and females at all dose
`levels. The increase in liver weight in the high dose female group was attributed to the
`observed increase in alanine aminotransferase and alkaline phosphatase. Changes in
`urine chemistry indicate that lacosamide has a diuretic-like effect. Significant increases
`in urine volume were observed in both male and females starting at the lowest dose (30
`mg/kg/day). Based on clinical signs, not considered to be safety issues, 100 mg/kg/day
`(mean Cmax of 906 ng/mL and mean AUC 'of 14,252 ng.h/mL) was established as the
`NOAEL in this study.
`
`A 6-month oral toxicity study was conducted in rats that closed the animals once daily
`with 0 (vehicle), 30, 90 and 180 mg/kg/day. The top dose was selected based on a dose-
`range finding study (StudyReport N2 1108—005) that was conducted in rats that observed
`minimal toxicity at 100 mg/kg/day. In the 6-month study, clinical signs of toxicity
`included excessive salivation, reduced motility, increased muscle tone, abdominal or
`lateral position and apathy in the high-dose group (180 mg/kg/day). These clinical signs
`
`117
`
`M4)
`
`

`

`Reviewer: BeLinda A. Hayes, Ph.D.
`
`1
`
`' NDA No. F‘“
`
`11(4)
`
`had a rapid onset, starting 15 to 20 minutes after dosing, and lasting for a few hours
`(reduced motility) or up to 24 hours (salivation). The observed reduced motility and
`apathy peaked within the range of Tmax for lacosamide. Three deaths occurred in the
`study; one female in the control group, one female in the low dose group and one male in
`the high dose group. The Sponsor concluded that the death of the male was treatment-
`related. However, no macroscopic changes 'were identified. A marginal but dose-related
`(90 to 180 mg/kg/day) reduction in body weight was observed in the male rats. At the
`end of the dosing period (day 182), relative to control, a 7% reduction in body weight
`was noted1n the males1n the high dose group Serum cholesterol levels were
`significantly increased by 41% and 25%1n females at 180 mg/kg/day1n weeks 13 and 26,
`respectively. Although not statistically significant, compared to the control, serum
`cholesterol levels were increased by 29% and 20% at weeks 13 and 26, respectively, in
`males at 180 mg/kg/day. Increased ALT levels were noted in the rats at 180 mg/kg/day.
`At week 13, ALT levels in females were significantly increased by 43%. ALT levels
`Were increased by 30% (not statistically significant) at week 13 in females in the high
`dose group. Also at 180 mg/kg/day, the relative liver weight and liver-to-brain weight
`was significantly increased by 13.3% and 14.8%, respectively, compared to the control.
`No macroscopic or histopathological changes in the liver of females in the high dose
`group were observed. The increased ALT activities and increased liver weights were
`reversible; within the 4-week recovery period, the ALT levels and liver weights were
`within normal range. Urinalysis results suggest that lacosamide can produce a diuretic-
`like effect. At 180 mg/kg/day, the urine volume was increased by 12% and 84% in males
`and females, respectively. Also the high dosed female, drinking water consumption was
`transiently increased up to 21% compared controls in week 6. Specific gravity was
`minimally, but statistically significantly, decreased in females at .90 and 180 mg/kg/day.
`The NOAEL was 90 mg/kg/day based on clinical signs not considered to be significant
`safety issues. This NOAEL was associated with a mean AUC(0_24) of 325.8 h.ug/mL and
`Cmax of 27.45 ug/mL.
`
`A 12-month oral toxicity study was conducted in dogs that dosed animals once daily with
`0, 5, 10, 20 (first 5 weeks) and 25 mg/kg. The high dose was adjusted from 20 to 25
`mg/kg/day in week 6 because 20 mg/kg/day only produced mild systemic toxicity. No
`deaths occurred during the study. Consistent with the observed clinical signs in rodents,
`lacosamide produced evidence of CNS and gastrointestinal toxicity in dogs. At 20
`mg/kg/day, vomiting, tonic-clonic convulsions, sedation, ataxia, abdominal and/or lateral
`position, were observed among a few dogs on some isolated days. At 25 mg/kg/day,
`these clinical signs were observed in more dogs and were more pronounced and occurred
`more frequently. Also new clinical signs, i.e. reduced motility, tremor, salivation,
`increased defecation and vocalization, emerged. Onset of the clinical signs was generally
`at Cmax between 5 and 60 minutes after dosing and lasted for up to 2 hours; increased
`salivation was noted for 24 hours. EKG data were obtained on test days 1 and 3, and at
`the end of weeks 13, 26, 39 and 52. Blood pressure data was obtained before and 2.5
`hours after dosing at the end of weeks 13, 26, 39 and 52. Cardiac effects were minimal
`following oral administration of lacosamide. In females, a dose-dependent decrease in
`peripheral arterial systolic blood pressure was noted on test day 1. Statistically
`significant decrease in peripheral arterial blood pressure was observed at 10 mg/kg/day
`
`118
`
`

`

`Reviewer: BeLinda A. Hayes, Ph.D.
`
`NDA No
`
`‘—‘
`
`to
`
`(30% decrease) and 20 mg/kg/day (35% decrease). During week 13, a 37% decrease in
`peripheral arterial blood pressure was observed compared to control. No further
`lacosamide-related effects was observed after week 13. In males, there was no
`lacosamide-related effect on blood pressure up to 25 mg/kg. Single statistically
`significant changes appeared to be inconsistent in direction (increase / decrease), not
`dose-related and/or were observed prior to dosing. Lacosamide did not induce significant
`ECG changes. No treatment-related changes were observed in QRS interval, PQ interval,
`P-segment and QT electrocardiographic complexes in either male or females. A
`statistically significant increase of the QTc (as calculated by Fridericia) value for high
`dose females was caused by relatively low QTc values of the controls and considered to
`be within the normal range. The NOAEL was 10 mg/kg/day based on the lack of
`toxicological findings and on the increased heart rate not being statistically significant
`and is monitorable. This corresponds to AUC values of 71.0 and 54.6 hug/mL in males
`and females respectively, after repeated daily dosing for 12 months. Cmax values at this
`dose were 15.52 and 13.15 ug/mL in males and females, respectively.
`
`Genetic toxicology:
`
`The Sponsor conducted five genetic toxicology studies to evaluate the genotoxicity
`and/or mutagenicity of lacosamide. Three of the five studies were in vitro studies and the
`remaining 2 studies were in vivo Dr. Edward Fisher reviewed these studies, specific
`details can be found in the NDA (NDA N9 22-253) review prepared by Dr. Fisher.
`
`Carcinogenicity:
`
`To evaluate the carcinogenic potential of lacosamide, the Sponsor conducted a 2-year
`carcinogenicity bioassays were in mice and rats. Drs. Edward Fisher and Terry Peters
`reviewed these studies. Specific details of these studies can be found in NDA 22-253
`review from Drs. Fisher and Peters.
`
`Reproductive toxicology:
`
`The Sponsor conducted a standard battery of reproductive toxicology studies. Dr.
`Edward Fisher reviewed these studies. Specific details of these studies can be found in
`NDA 22-253 review from Dr. Fishers
`
`2.6.6.2 Single—dose toxicity
`Single-dose toxicology studies were conducted in mice and rats.
`
`Study title: Acute Toxicity Study of SPM 927 by Oral Administration to CD-l Mice.
`
`Key study findings: A single dose of SPM 927 (31.6, 100, 316, and 464 mg/kg) was
`administered via gavage to mice. The mice were observed for 14 days following dosing.
`The following key findings were obtained:
`
`119
`
`

`

`Reviewer: BeLinda A. Hayes, Ph.D.
`
`NDA No.
`
`~=-‘
`
`M4?
`
`1. All animals in the high-dose group (464 mg/kg) died within 20 minutes to 2
`hours after oral administration of lacosamide.
`
`U.)
`
`2. Reduced motility, mortality, ataxia, tremor, mydriasis, dysponea, increased
`muscle tone and abdominal position were the primary treatment-related
`clinical signs.
`. No treatment-related macroscopic changes were noted.
`4. No treatment-related histological changes were observed in the liver or
`kidney.
`'
`5. Based on clinical signs, NOEL is 31.6 mg/kg.
`
`12(4)
`
`Study N2:
`
`Report No. ‘ {3121/00
`
`M4)
`
`4.23.1.1
`
`~ N
`
`—
`
`Volume #, and page #:
`Conducting laboratory and location:
`
`Date of study initiation:
`GLP compliance:
`QA report:
`Drug, lot #, and % purity:
`
`April 18, 2000
`Yes
`yes ( x ) no ( )
`SPM 927, Batch N2 KK 02457, 99.67%
`
`Methods
`Doses: 31.6, 100, 316, and 464 mg/kgbmy
`Species/strain: Mice;
`-— CD®
`Number/seX/group or time point (main study): 3/sex/group
`Route, formulation, volume, and infusion rate: Oral gavage, Solution, 20 mL/kg
`Satellite groups used for toxicokinetics or recovery: None
`Age: Males: 24 days; Females: 25 days
`Weight: Males: 25-26 g; females: 20—25 g
`Sampling times: N/A
`Unique study design or methodology (if any): None
`
`Observations and times:
`
`Mortality: Mortality was examined once daily.
`Clinical signs: Clinical signs were observed before and immediately, 5, 15, 30, and 60
`minutes and 3, 6, and 24 hours after dosing. All surviving animals were observed for 14
`days. During this 2-week period, the animals were observed once daily for changes in
`skin and fur, eyes and mucus membranes, respiratory and circulatory function, autonomic
`and central nervous system and somatomotor activity and behavioral pattern.
`Body weights: Body weight was recorded pre—dosing, and than weekly until end of
`study.
`Food consumption: Not monitored
`Ophthalmoscopy: Not performed
`&: Not performed
`Hematology: Not performed
`Clinical chemistry: Not performed
`
`120
`
`

`

`Reviewer: BeLinda A. Hayes, Ph.D.
`
`NDA No. 7.6.;
`
`MA}
`
`Urinalysis: Not performed
`Gross pathology: Surviving animals were euthanized under ether anesthesia.
`Macroscopic evaluation was performed.
`Organ weights: Relative organ weight of liver and kidney was calculated.
`Histopathology: Liver and kidney were fixed in 7% buffered formalin and stained with
`haematoxylin—eosin stain prior to being examined microscopically.
`
`Results
`
`Mortality: Treatment-related deaths were observed. All subjects in the high-dose group
`(464 mg/kg) died within 20 minutes and 2 hours after dosing. The Sponsor reported that '
`prior to their death; the animals were comatose and displayed an abdominal position (not
`described). LD50 for lacosamide at 24 hours and 14 days posting dosing was 383 mg/kg
`for both males and females.
`
`Clinical signs: Treatment-related clinical signs were dose—dependent. No treatment-
`related clinical signs were observed in the low-dose group (31.6 mg/kg). As indicated in
`the table 1 below, reduced motility, ataxia, tremor, tonic convulsions, abdominal position,
`mydriasis, dysponea, and increased muscle tone were the primary treatment-related
`clinical signs. These primary treatment-related clinical signs had a rapid onset of action;
`occurring within 5 to 15 minutes after dosing. These clinical signs were observed for up
`to 6 hours.
`
`Table 1
`
`
`
`Dose (mg/kg) ‘
`>
`'
`n E 3/sex/_rou .
`)—|O. O
`
`_'131.6— .
`316
`.
`
`
`
`
`5 Wm —_-———-_
`mum-mu“
`—-_-_-—_—n-_
`_mnn
`”Emma-_—
`”nunn——
`_nm-m
`_nnm
`—-—_———n-_
`human-nu“
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Body weights: No treatment-related effects on body weight were noted.
`
`Gross pathology: At necropsy, all animals were observed for identifying macroscopic
`lesions. No treatment-related macroscopic changes were identified.
`
`Organ weights: No treatment-related effects on relative liver and kidney weight were
`observed in any groups.
`'
`
`121
`
`

`

`Reviewer: BeLinda A. Hayes, Ph.D.
`
`NDA No.
`
`__._,_
`
`33(4)
`
`Histopathology: Histological examination of the liver and kidney did not reveal any
`treatment-related changes
`
`Study title: Acute Toxicity Study of SPM 927 by Single Oral Administration to CD
`Rats.
`
`Key study findings: A single dose of lacosamide (31.6, 100, 316, and 464 mg/kg) was
`administered via gavage to rats. The rats were observed for 14 days following dosing.
`The following key findings were obtained:
`
`1. All animals in the high-dose group (464 mg/kg) died within 3 hours after oral
`administration of lacosamide.
`
`2. Reduced motility, mortality, ataxia, dyspnea, reduced muscle tone and lateral
`position were the primary treatment-related clinical signs.
`3. No treatment-related macroscopic changes were noted.
`4. Based on clinical signs, NOEL is 31.6 mg/kg.
`
`Study N2:
`
`Report No.
`
`-—=~ ‘ 17964/04
`
`31(4)
`
`Volume #, and page #2
`
`I
`
`4.2.3.1.3
`
`Conducting laboratory and location:
`
`/
`
`/
`
`/
`
`Date of study initiation:
`GLP compliance:
`QA report:
`Drug, lot #, and % purity:
`
`Methods
`
`June 18, 2004
`Yes
`yes ( x ) no ( )
`SPM 927, Batch N9 WE 11837 (537.1008,
`2»:
`99.6%
`
`Doses: 31.6, 100, 316, and 464 mg/kg
`Species/strain: Rat/CD®
`Number/sex/group or time point (main study): 3/sex/group
`Route, formulation, volume, and infusion rate: Oral gavage, Solution, 20 mL/kg
`Satellite groups used for toxicokinetics or recovery: None
`Age: Males: 48 days; Females: 55 days
`Weight: Males: 207-230 g; Females: 177—202 g
`Sampling times: N/A
`Unique study design or methodology (if any): None
`
`Observations and times:
`
`Mortaligg: Mortality was examined once daily.
`Clinical signs: Clinical signs were observed before and immediately, 5, 15, 30, and 60
`minutes and 3, 6, and 24 hours after dosing. All surviving animals were observed for 14
`
`122
`
`N4)
`
`‘
`
`M4)
`
`

`

`31(4)
`
`Reviewer: BeLinda A. Hayes, Ph.D.
`
`NDA No.
`
`‘4:
`
`days. During this 2-week period, the animals were observed once daily for changes in
`skin and fur, eyes and mucus membranes, respiratory and circulatory function, autonomic
`and central nervous system and somatomotor activity and behavioral pattern.
`Body weights: Body weight was recorded pre—dosing, and then weekly until end of
`study.
`_
`Food consumption: Not monitored '
`Ophthalmoscopy: Not performed
`
`EKG: Not performed
`Hematology: Not performed
`Clinical chemistry: Not performed
`Urinalysis: Not performed
`Gross pathology: Surviving animals were euthanized under ether anesthesia.
`Macroscopic evaluation was performed.
`Organ weights: Not performed
`Histopathology: Not performed
`
`Results
`
`Mortalifl: No treatment-related deaths were observed in the 31.6 and 100 mg/kg groups.
`Treatment—related deaths were observed in the 316 and 464 mg/kg groups. One male and
`one female died in the 316 mg/kg group. All subjects in the high-dose group (464
`mg/kg) died within 3 hours after dosing. The Sponsor reported that prior to their death;
`the animals were comatose and displayed an abdominal position (not described). LD50
`for lacosamide at 24 hours and 14 days posting dosing was 383 mg/kg for both males and
`females.
`
`Clinical signs: Treatment-related clinical signs were dose-dependent. No treatment-
`related clinical signs were observed in the low-dose group (31.6 mg/kg). As indicated in
`the table 2 below, reduced motility, ataxia, reduced muscle tone, clonic convulsions,
`lateral position, and dyspnea were the primary treatment-related clinical signs. These
`primary treatment-related clinical signs had a rapid onset of action; occurring within 5 to
`15 minutes after dosing. These clinical signs were observed for up to 6 hours.
`
`The Sponsor noted that reduced motility, ataxia, and dyspnea as slight to moderate.
`Reduced muscle tone ranged form slight to severe.
`
`Body weights: No treatment-related effects on body weight were noted.
`
`Gross pathology: At necropsy, all animals were observed for identifying macroscopic
`lesions. No treatment-related macroscopic changes were identified.
`
`Table 2.
`
`
`
`123
`
`

`

`
`
` Reviewer: BeLinda A. Ha es PhD. NDA No.
`
`”7"
`
`3(4)
`
`
`
`Reduced Motili
`
`Ataxia
`
`Clonic convulsion
`Lateral Position
`
`Mortality
`
`Reduced Muscle Tone
`
`Study title: Acute Toxicity Study of SPM 927 by Single Intravenous Administration to
`CD—l Mice.
`
`Key study findings: A single dose of lacosamide (10, 31.6, 100, and 316 mg/kg) was
`administered intravenous to mice. The mice were observed for 14 days following dosing.
`The following key findings were obtained:
`
`1. All animals in the high—dose group (316 mg/kg) died within 15 hours after
`oral administration of lacosamide.
`
`2. Reduced motility, death, ataxia, dyspnea, reduced muscle tone, tremor, clonic
`convulsions, abdominal position and lateral position were the primary
`treatment-related clinical signs.
`3. No treatment-related macroscopic changes were noted.
`4. Based on clinical signs, NOEL is 10 mg/kg.
`
`Study N2:
`
`Report No. Q 17963/04
`
`M4)
`
`Volume #, and page #:
`
`Conducting laboratory and location:
`
`4.23.1.2
`
`/! / /
`
`/
`
`b“)
`
`'
`
`Date of study initiation:
`‘ GLP compliance:
`QA report:
`Drug, lot #, and % purity:
`
`June 18, 2004
`Yes
`yes ( x ) no ( )
`SPM 927, Batch N9 WE 11837 (537.1008,
`/— , 99.6%
`
`Methods
`
`b“)
`
`Doses: 10, 31.6, 100, and 316 mg/kg
`Species/strain: CD—l Mice Rat ’“ .CD1®
`Number/sex/group or time point (main study): 3/sex/group
`Route, formulation, volume, and infusion rate: Intravenous, Solution, 20 mL/kg, 15 sec infusion ratr
`Satellite groups used for toxicokinetics or recovery: None
`Age: Males: 32 days; Females: 33 days
`Weight. Males. 20-23 g, Females. 17—20 g
`Sampling times: N/A
`Unique study design or methodology (if any): None
`
`‘
`
`APPEfigQS 7mg Willi
`0“ OMGWM‘
`
`124
`
`

`

`Reviewer: BeLinda A. Hayes, Ph.D.
`
`NDA No
`
`4—“
`
`M4)
`
`Observations and times:
`
`Mortalifl: Mortality was examined once daily.
`Clinical signs: Clinical signs were observed before and immediately, 5, 15, 30, and 60
`minutes and 3, 6, and 24 hours after dosing. All surviving animals were observed for 14
`days. During this 2-week period, the animals were observed once daily for changes in
`skin and fur, eyes and mucus membranes, respiratory and circulatory function, autonomic
`and central nervous system and somatomotor activity and behavioral pattern.
`Body weights: Body weight was recorded pre—dosing, and then weekly until end of
`study.
`Food consumption: Not monitored
`Ophthalmoscopy: Not performed
`Egg: Not performed
`Hematology: Not performed
`Clinical chemistry: Not performed
`Urinalysis: Not performed
`Gross pathology: Surviving animals were euthanized under ether anesthesia.
`Macroscopic evaluation was performed.
`Organ weights: Not performed
`Histopathology: Not performed
`
`Results
`
`Mortality: Treatment-related deaths were observed. All subjects in the high-dose group
`(316 mg/kg) died within 15 minutes after dosing. LD50 for lacosamide at 24 hours and 14
`days posting dosing was 178 mg/kg for both males and females.
`
`Clinical signs: Treatment-related clinical signs were dose-dependent. No treatment-
`related clinical signs were observed in the low-dose group (10 mg/kg). As indicated in
`the table 3 below, reduced motility, ataxia, reduced muscle tone, clonic convulsions,
`lateral position, abdominal position and dyspnea were the primary treatment-related
`clinical signs. These primary treatment-related clinical signs had a rapid onset of action;
`occurring within 0 to 5 minutes after dosing. These clinical signs were observed for up to
`6 hours.
`
`Body weights: N0 treatment-related effects on body weight were noted.
`
`Gross pathology: At necropsy, all animals were observed for identifying macroscopic
`lesions. No treatment-related macroscopic changes were identified.
`
`
`
`
`Reduced Motili:ty_
`
`Dose (mg/kg)
`n = 3/sex/_rou 0
`
`125
`
`

`

`
`
`NDA N0.Reviewer: BeLinda A. Ha es Ph.D. “=“'
`
`
`
`
`
`31(4)
`
`0
`
`0
`
`3
`
`3
`
`
`
`Ataxia
`Tremor
`Clonic cOnvulsion
`Lateral Position
`Abdominal Position
`D snea
`Reduced Muscle Tone
`
`Mortality
`
`
`
`Study title: Acute IV Study of ADD 234037 in Rats.
`
`Key study findings: A single dose of lacosamide (25, 50, and 100 mg/kg) was
`administered intravenously to rats. The rats were observed for 14 days following dosing.
`The following key findings were obtained:
`
`1. No mortality occurred following the intravenous administration of
`lacosamide.
`
`2. Treatment-related clinical signs included labored breathing, reduced righting
`ability, limb weakness, ataxia, limb splay and flattened posture.
`3. Macroscopic changes were noted in the kidney and stomach of some animals
`in the 50 mg/kg and 100 mg/kg treatment groups.
`4. Based on clinical signs, NOEL is 25 mg/kg.
`
`Study N2:
`
`Report No. 18566-0-800
`
`Volume #, and page #:
`Conducting laboratory and location:
`
`42.3.15
`-——-———~
`
`”(4)
`
`Date of study initiation:
`GLP compliance:
`QA report:
`Drug, lot #, and % purity:
`
`May 6, 1997
`' Yes
`yes ( x ) no ( )
`ADD 234037, Lot N2 PEH-A-170, % purity
`not stated
`
`.
`
`Methods
`
`Doses: 25, 50, and 100 mg/kg
`Species/strain: Rat/Sprague Dawley®SD®
`Number/sex/group or time point (main study): 5/males/group (l & 2);
`'2/sex/group (3)
`Route, formulation, volume, and infusion rate: Intravenous, Solution, 1.7, 3.3,
`and 6.7 mL/kg to achieve the desired dose of 25, 50, and 100 mg/kg, respectively,
`2 mL/minute
`
`Satellite groups used for toxicokinetics or recovery: None
`Age: approximately 8—weeks
`Weight: 225 to 264 g
`Sampling times: N/A
`
`126
`
`

`

`Reviewer: BeLinda A. Hayes, Ph.D.
`
`‘ NDA No /
`
`M4)
`
`Unique study design or methodology (if any): None
`
`Observations and t

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket